Your support matters. Contribute today to ensure every voter has access to unbiased information.

Milan Smith

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Milan Smith
Image of Milan Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Tenure

2006 - Present

Years in position

18

Education

Bachelor's

Brigham Young University, 1966

Law

University of Chicago Law School, 1969

Personal
Birthplace
Pendleton, Ore.


Milan Dale Smith, Jr. is a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. He joined the court in 2006 after being nominated by President George W. Bush.

Early life and education

Born in Pendleton, Oregon, Smith graduated from Brigham Young University with his bachelor's degree in 1966, and from the University of Chicago Law School with his J.D. in 1969.[1]

Professional career

  • 1987-1991: Vice chairman, California Fair Employment and Housing Commission
  • 1983-2006: President and general counsel, Los Angeles Building Authority
  • 1969-2006: Private practice, Los Angeles, Calif.

Judicial career

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Milan D. Smith, Jr.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 91 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: February 14, 2006
ApprovedAABA Rating: Substantial Majority Well Qualified, Minority Qualified
Questionnaire:
ApprovedAHearing: April 25, 2006
Hearing Transcript: Hearing Transcript
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: May 4, 2006 
ApprovedAConfirmed: May 16, 2006
ApprovedAVote: 93-0

Smith was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit by President George W. Bush on February 14, 2006, to a seat vacated by Wallace Tashima. The American Bar Association rated Smith Substantial Majority Well Qualified, Minority Qualified for the nomination.[2] Hearings on Smith's nomination were held before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on April 25, 2006, and his nomination was reported by U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) on May 4, 2006. Smith was confirmed on a recorded 93-0 vote of the U.S. Senate on May 16, 2006, and he received his commission on May 18, 2006.[1][3]

Noteworthy cases

Medi-Cal case: California's attempt to cut doctors' fees illegal (2009)

See also: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al., v. David Maxwell-Jolly, Director of the Dept. of Health Care Services, State of California, 2:08-cv-03315-CAS-MAS)

Judge Smith wrote the majority opinion in a lawsuit involving the withholding of retroactive reimbursement payments to providers of Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal is California's Medicaid program.[4] Judge Smith, along with judges Stephen Reinhardt and William Fletcher, ruled unanimously to uphold an injunction against cuts in the reimbursement payments to providers. The panel ruled that California's budget crisis did not justify the 10% reduction in payments to providers.[4]

The court's ruling held that California could not withhold $1.1 billion dollars in reimbursements to doctors, dentists, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers. The lawsuit came in response to a bill passed by the California Legislature in 2008 and was filed by healthcare providers suing the Department of Health Care Services after the law took effect on July 1, 2008.[4]

Judge Christina Snyder ruled against the fee reductions on August 18, 2008, but also ruled that the California Constitution shielded the state from having to make retroactive payments for the period spanning the effective date of the cuts.[5]

On appeal, the panel stated that driving away providers from the already-shrinking group, while allowing the system to keep taking state-funded patients, endangers their ability to get treatment.[4] As a result of the Ninth Circuit's ruling, the State of California was required to pay providers $55.8 million dollars in retroactive reimbursements that were withheld weeks before Judge Snyder granted the original injunction. An official for the California Department of Finance told The Los Angeles Times that the ruling would not affect the $26.3-billion state budget deficit because the state hadn't counted on the 10% savings from the Medi-Cal reimbursement changes.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
2006-Present
Succeeded by
-