Your support matters. Contribute today to ensure every voter has access to unbiased information.

Kim McLane Wardlaw

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Kim McLane Wardlaw
Image of Kim McLane Wardlaw
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Tenure

1998 - Present

Years in position

26

Prior offices
United States District Court for the Central District of California

Education

Bachelor's

University of California, Los Angeles, 1976

Law

University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, 1979

Personal
Birthplace
San Francisco, Calif.


Kim McLane Wardlaw is a federal judge for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. She joined the court in 1998 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton. Prior to her service on the Ninth Circuit, she was a district judge for the United States District Court for the Central District of California.[1]

Early life and education

Born in San Francisco, California, Wardlaw graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, with her bachelor's degree in 1976 and her J.D. in 1979.[1]

Professional career

Judicial career

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Kim McLane Wardlaw
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 185 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: January 27, 1998
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Qualified
Questionnaire:
ApprovedAHearing: June 18, 1998
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: July 16, 1998 
ApprovedAConfirmed: July 31, 1998
ApprovedAVote: Voice vote

Wardlaw was nominated to serve on the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit by President Bill Clinton on January 27, 1998, to a seat vacated by Judge Clifford Wallace. The American Bar Association rated Wardlaw Unanimously Qualified for the nomination.[2] Hearings on Wardlaw's nomination were held before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on June 18, 1998, and her nomination was reported by U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) on July 16, 1998. Wardlaw was confirmed on a voice vote of the United States Senate on July 31, 1998, and she received her commission on August 3, 1998.[1][3]

Central District of California

Wardlaw was nominated to the United States District Court for the Central District of California by President Bill Clinton on August 10, 1995, to a seat vacated by David Kenyon. The American Bar Association rated Wardlaw Majority Qualified, Minority Not Qualified for the nomination.[4] Hearings on Wardlaw's nomination were held before the Senate Judiciary Committee on October 24, 1995, and her nomination was reported by Senator Hatch (R-Utah) on November 9, 1995. Wardlaw was confirmed on a voice vote of the U.S. Senate on December 22, 1995, and she received her commission on December 26, 1995. Wardlaw resigned from the district court on August 3, 1998, upon her elevation to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. She was succeeded in this position by Judge Percy Anderson.[1][5][6]

Noteworthy cases

Ninth Circuit panel rules immigrant detainees must receive bond hearings

See also: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Rodriguez et al. v. Robbins et al., Nos. 13-56706; 13-56755)

On October 28, 2015, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the government was required to provide bond hearings for non-citizen alien detainees every six months.

Writing for the panel, Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw held that immigration judges were required to consider "the length of a non-citizen's past and likely future detention and, relatedly, the likelihood of eventual removal from the United States", requirements that a lower court did not impose on immigration judges. Further, the court stated that for the very same reasons immigration judges "must consider the length of past detention, we hold that the government must provide periodic bond hearings every six months so that noncitizens may challenge their continued detention as 'the period of ... confinement grows.'" These bond proceedings were required every six months even if the detainee did not request such a hearing.[7]

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in this case during its October 2016 term and restored the case to its calendar for the October 2017 term.

For more: see Jennings v. Rodriguez

See also

External links


Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
1998-Present
Succeeded by
-
Preceded by
-
United States District Court for the Central District of California
1995-1998
Succeeded by
-