Area, 2017, 49.4, 503–509, doi: 10.1111/area.12339
Demonic geographies
Dragos Simandan
Geography Department, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
L2S 3A1
Email:
[email protected]
Revised manuscript received 3 December 2016
Demonic geography is an approach to practising human geography that operates from the premise that
there are no such immaterial entities as ‘souls’, ‘spirits’, ‘minds’, integrated stable ‘selves’ or conscious
‘free will’. This paper elaborates the theoretical framework of demonic geography by spelling out how
it is different from non-representational theory and by articulating it within recent developments in
experimental psychology, neuroscience and the philosophy of mind. Counterintuitively, the paper
shows that the deflationary, materialistic ontology of human nature espoused by demonic geography
need not lead to meaninglessness, unhappiness or the collapse of moral behaviour. Instead, subscribing
to demonic geography opens up new ways to find meaning, to pursue happiness and to live the
good life.
Key words: happiness, meaning, conscious free will, material turn, embodiment, human geography
Space . . . is no longer a by-product of something deeper
or a convenient prosthetic or a concrete assay but,
rather, pre-treated as it increasingly may be and made
up of fragments as it undoubtedly is, it is the very stuff of
life itself. And if we can get that sense of space right it
might feel like something that is both caring and in need
of care (Thrift 2006, 145; emphasis added)
The demonic comes from the Greek, and it refers to the
dynamic of life – your demon is the dynamic of life. In
our tradition we are so against the dynamic of life that
we’ve turned it into a devil. Demon has negative
meaning in our tradition. This is fantastic. (Campbell
1989, 90–1)
Introduction
This paper critically engages with current research in
psychology, neuroscience and the philosophy of mind
to show how these disciplines are developing a novel
understanding of what it means to be human and of the
sources of happiness: it is an understanding that discards
the illusions of conscious free will, of souls and of an
integrated coherent self. Since large segments of human
geography are in the business of improving the lot of
humans, and since the success of this noble enterprise
hinges on an accurate understanding of what it means
to be human and of the major wellsprings of human
happiness, it follows that we should take seriously the
new picture of the human that emerges in these
neglected research areas and work through its
implications for geographical practices. To this end,
the paper begins to chart the possible contours of
a demonic geography, that is, of a humble, yet
courageous, geography that hopes to break free from the
past by tracing the spatiality of life without recourse to
comfortable but obsolete illusions about our condition or
about ways to better it. Demonic geography is an
approach to human geography that uses recent scientific
evidence to abandon folk psychology assumptions about
human nature. Specifically, demonic geography discards
extravagant, immaterial, transcendental, theistic notions
such as ‘soul’, ‘spirit’, ‘mind’ and ‘conscious free will’
and replaces them with a fully materialistic, causal and
mechanistic understanding of human nature and of
brain processes. Demonic geography shares with nonrepresentational theory the attention given to embodiment
and materiality, but is different from it in significant ways.
Non-representational theory was developed as a response
against the excessive focus on representations that
pervaded the new cultural geography of the 1980s and
the 1990s (Thrift 1996). Among other things, it attempted
to downplay the importance of representations and to
highlight instead the explanatory power of practices and
The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).
504
Demonic geographies
performances. Unlike non-representational theory,
demonic geography acknowledges that representations
should be recognised as central to understanding human
nature. Demonic geography as developed in this paper
is not a response against excessive attention to
representations, but a response against the entrenchment
and pervasiveness of immaterial, mentalistic ontologies of
the human carried by a family of counterproductive and
antiquated concepts that include ‘souls’, ‘minds’, ‘spirits’,
‘conscious free will’ and the idea of a stable coherent
integrated self.
Non-representational theory does not offer a strong,
explicit disavowal1 of such notions, not because it relies
on them, but because from its very beginning it has
been crafted as a response to an entirely different
matter, that of the excessive focus on representations
(Anderson and Harrison 2010; Vannini 2015). The reason
demonic geography refuses to discount representations is
two-fold. First, the totality of available scientific evidence
from cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and the field
of judgment and decision-making shows that various
types of representations (concepts, beliefs, attitudes,
mental models, narratives and scripts, images) are
fundamental variables in the explanation of why, what
and how humans decide, feel and act (Komer and
Eliasmith 2016; Simandan 2016). Second, demonic
geography provides an account of representations that is
fully materialistic, causal and mechanistic: representations
are (ever-evolving) populations of neurons and their
inhibitory or excitatory synaptic connections (Thagard 2014).
Practising demonic geography may often feel like
going through hell. It is initially upsetting to entertain the
thought that there is no immaterial, eternal ‘me’, that there
is no driver in the driver’s seat and that discarding beliefs
in souls entails abandoning hopes for finding one’s ‘soul
mate’. The cultural prevalence of extravagant beliefs in
‘souls’, ‘minds’, ‘conscious free will’ and ‘spirits’ means
that attempts to uproot them will likely be met with many
layers of resistance because many of our other beliefs are
built on this questionable foundation (Shiah 2016). If,
however, one persists in this therapeutic process of
unlearning, one may find demonic geography a liberating
experience, an experience that refreshes one’s life and
that reveals new ways to pursue meaning, purpose and
happiness.
In the remainder of this paper, I develop the evidencedriven theoretical framework of demonic geography by
engaging with recent work in psychology, neuroscience
and the philosophy of mind. Specifically, the next section
disentangles the three-way relationship between hedonism,
virtue and meaning-making, and its impact on happiness.
This opening move will then provide the groundwork for
questioning, in the second section, who the bearer of
happiness is, if neuroscientists and philosophers of mind2
Area 2017 49.4, 503–509 doi: 10.1111/area.12339
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
are correct in telling us that we all are bodies without souls
(i.e. that the mind/body dualism is untenable, see Trautteur
2009; Huang and Bargh 2014; Thagard and Wood 2015;
Wegner and Gray 2016; Komer and Eliasmith 2016;
Caruso 2017). Finally, the conclusion will show how a
demonic geography that exploits the fact that humans are
at the same time a part of their environments and apart
from them, can offer alternative ways to pursue meaning,
happiness and the good life.
Hedonism, virtue and meaning-making
Martin Seligman (2002 2008; for empirical support, see
Vella-Brodrick et al. 2009; for limitations, cf. Disabato
et al. 2016) has produced an evidence-based argument for
the need to discriminate the vague conceptual space of
‘happiness’ into three distinct understandings. Each of these
understandings derives from particular assumptions held
about how to become happy. Thus, the first assumption
equates happiness with the sum of pleasures one
experiences in one’s life. This hedonistic perspective
proposes that in order to be happy one has to minimise the
amount of pain and maximise the amount of pleasure
(Bentham 1993). Hedonism, however, has been criticised
by humanist scholars for reducing the human being to an
animal in search of sensual pleasure (Paulson et al. 2016).
Whereas a long string of pleasurable indulgences does not
necessarily lead to an overall feeling of happiness with
one’s life (Baumeister et al. 2013), recent experimental
evidence suggests that being in a good mood is causally
related to increased feelings that one’s life is meaningful
(King et al. 2016). The various doubts about the
effectiveness and morality of the hedonistic approach
have ushered in a renewed interest for the other two
understandings.
One of them is the eudaimonic understanding of
happiness (Ryff 2013), launched in the writings of
Aristotle (cf. Kraut 2015, for an overview), who argued
that eudaimonia (the good life) emerges from the
exercise of strengths and virtues and the contemplation
of the good, the true and the beautiful. In psychology,
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (2014) has collected multiple
types of empirical evidence that support Aristotle’s
original insights and prompt their further development in
an unexpected direction. He introduces the concept of
flow, in order to capture the quality of affect that
characterises one’s total absorption in a task as one
exercises one’s virtues. Individuals engaged in the kinds
of activities they like the most forget the passage of time
as they become completely immersed in their work or
hobby. They do not feel happy in the strict sense of the
term; instead, happiness is felt afterwards, as they
recollect the intense and passionate struggle of dealing
with
the
challenges
raised
by
their
work
Demonic geographies
(Csikszentmihalyi 2014). The two conditions necessary
for flow to emerge are the focus on something that is
truly interesting for the individual and the existence of a
level of challenge that is neither too high nor too low
(see, for example, the case of video games in Shaw and
Wharf 2009). That ideal level of challenge pulls the
individual beyond herself (onto place) and stretches her
abilities in such a way that the work receives her
undivided attention. A climber beautifully describes how
happiness appears when one’s psychology and
physiology merge onto the surrounding geography:
You could get so immersed in the rock, the moves, the
proper position of the body, that you’d lose
consciousness of your identity and melt into the rock
and the others you’re climbing with . . . you are not quite
sure whether you are moving or the rock is . . . You are
climbing yourself as much as the rock . . . If you’re
flowing with something, it’s totally still . . . Lack of selfawareness is totally self-aware to me. (Csikszentmihalyi
1993, 185; emphasis added)
The advantages of flow are three-fold (Csikszentmihalyi
2014): it is the best way to escape boredom (Anderson
2004), it generates a feeling of accomplishment and
happiness in its wake, and it is the type of mental state
that maximises one’s work productivity. More recently,
the Hungarian-born psychologist has expanded his
reflections on flow and proposed the concept ‘vital
engagement’ as a complement to it. Vital engagement
(Csikszentmihalyi 2014) refers to the general positive
effects on one’s life resulting from having found one’s
vocation. Individuals who are passionate about a given
topic or cause derive meaning from working on it and
organise their lives around it. Often, they found their
spouse and friends in circumstances related to their
passion and this further provides a sense of integration
and unity to their lives.
The third understanding of happiness, going beyond
both the pleasurable life (hedonism) and the good life
(eudaimonia), is that of a meaningful life (Seligman
2002; McAdams and Guo 2015; Pyszczynski et al.
2015). Philosophers, psychologists and geographers
agree that it is in the nature of humans to make sense of
things and to extract meaning from dwelling in place
(Pierce et al. 2011; Simandan 2011a 2011b 2011c
2013a 2013b; Malpas 2015; Jones 2015). Those
individuals who feel that they have a mission in life and
who see themselves as a part of something larger than
themselves tend to rate their satisfaction with life very
high (Haidt 2006; Bering 2006 2010). Ever since the
earlier writings of the Frankfurt School (for an overview,
see Nealon and Irr 2012), humanist intellectuals have
deplored the ‘mass society’ and the alienation brought
505
by it in the lives of millions of people. The relative
decline of religious commitments combined with the
erosion of traditional communities has deprived many
individuals of a sense of belonging and has led to the
proliferation of ‘infrasecular geographies’ (della Dora
2016; see also Bartolini et al. 2016; Sutherland 2017). In
Erich Fromm’s terminology (cf. McLaughlin 1998),
people in the 20th century gained negative freedom
(freedom from the pressure of entrenched cultural
norms), without winning positive freedom (freedom to
do something meaningful and fulfilling with their newly
acquired liberty). This explanatory framework, although
not as powerful as it used to be in the 1960s and the
1970s, still makes it possible to account for the apparent
paradox that the frequency of depression and suicide in
advanced capitalist societies has increased despite the
parallel increase in material wealth (Layard 2010;
Hidaka 2012; O’Donnell and Oswald 2015; Balayannis
and Cook 2016). More recent research on meaning
(Wegner and Gray 2016; King et al. 2016) has
unravelled the fact that individuals derive meaning from
a plurality of mundane engagements, and not from some
singular grandiose answer about the meaning of life. Of
specific interest for social and cultural geographers is the
observation that different spaces of engagement provide
complementary sources of meaning and that people
have highly specific profiles of their spaces of
engagement (Chater and Loewenstein 2016; Martela and
Steger 2016). Thus, a worker in a steel factory might
find meaning from his family space (fathering children
and feeling part of the wheel of life) and from his
political space (being a vociferous trade unionist and a
member of a political party), whereas a painter would
derive the meaning of her life from the singlemindedness with which she engages the spaces of the
canvass.
Bodies without souls
Really interesting questions begin to appear when one
starts to factor in the affect-laden discursive construction
€ and
of meaning and its ‘haunting’ quality (Wenno
Holmgren-Troy 2008; Okon-Singer et al. 2015; Simpson
2016; Wegner and Gray 2016). We use perception,
language and emotion to extract a pattern from the
spaces within which our lives unfold. There can be no
meaning without a pattern (Chater and Loewenstein
2016). The way the human brain works is such that any
new information must be made to make sense by
matching the pre-existing patterns in the brain (Thagard
and Wood 2015). The process of matching continuously
changes the brain and who we are. Given three
consecutive events x, y and z, and the state of the brain
just before moment x labelled B, a human being will
Area 2017 49.4, 503–509 doi: 10.1111/area.12339
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
506
Demonic geographies
engage event y with the state of the brain B + x, and
event z with the state of the brain B + x + y (Komer and
Eliasmith 2016). In a very fundamental sense, humans
are always in the making, and what we are going to do
next is a function of the interaction of our previous brain
state with that which has just happened (Thagard 2014).
The brain is a silent self-organising structure that
systematically feeds the awareness of any living being
with the illusion of conscious free will and the illusion
of an integrated self (Wegner 2002; Bering 2006 2010;
Trautteur 2009; Huang and Bargh 2014; Churchland
2015; Thagard and Wood 2015; Bear and Bloom 2016;
Wegner and Gray 2016). One may say ‘I am trying to
make sense of x’, but the neuroscientific evidence
makes it clear that there is no such thing as ‘I’. That is to
say that there is no mind independent of the brain and
there is no homunculus or driver in one’s brain to
coordinate what the brain does. The brain works in such
a way that it fools the living being with the fantasy of a
‘soul’ (i.e. disembodied, ethereal mind), of some
Platonic entity separate from the flesh. Brain researcher
and philosopher of mind Susan Blackmore vividly
describes her long and frustrating struggle with these
recalcitrant illusions:
I long ago concluded that free will must be an illusion,
and so over the years I have practised not believing in it.
Eventually, with long practice, it becomes perfectly
obvious that all the actions of this body are the
consequences of prior events acting on a complex
system; then the feeling of making free conscious
decisions simply melts away . . . What could a self be?
The essence of consciousness is subjectivity, and
subjective experience seems always to imply someone
who is having the experience; in other words, a self. But
what sort of a thing could be the experiencer of
experiences? And – even worse – what could such an
experiencer correspond to in the brain? . . . I long ago
concluded that there is no substantial or persistent self to
be found in experience, let alone in the brain. I have
become quite uncertain as to whether there really is
anything it is like to be me. Yet, unlike the illusion of
free will, I have not (yet?) found that all sense of an
experiencing self disappears. Although it does often
depart, leaving only multiple experiences without
anyone having them, the sense of ‘me’ tends to pop
easily back into existence. (2006, 8–9)
It is not ethereal selves or souls who make meaning, but
our brains. This disenchanted anti-humanist view of
meaning-making opens up new possibilities for
understanding space, distance, place and the geography
of becoming (Ash and Simpson 2016; May and
Thrift 2001; Simandan 2002 2010a 2012 2016; Wright
Area 2017 49.4, 503–509 doi: 10.1111/area.12339
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
et al. 2016). We are not carried by our bodies in this
world; we are nothing more but our bodies. In line
with the centrality of ideas of embodiment in nonrepresentational theory and feminist geography
(Anderson and Harrison 2010; Colls 2012; Longhurst
and Johnston 2014; McKittrick 2006; Vannini 2015), this
recasting of the human condition in the light of
neuroscientific research might help us redefine our
participation in the world. Each of us is a process that
defies thermodynamic death by sucking good quality
energy (food, oxygen) from our surroundings and using
that energy to create a structure (our bodies) that is at
once highly differentiated and highly integrated
(Heylighen 2008). And when we die, that structure
quickly (cremation) or slowly (putrefaction in the grave)
is dissipated back onto the very surroundings which
made possible its existence (see also Romanillos 2015).
But this view is not depressing at all, for it contains an
answer to the aforementioned lamentations of the
Frankfurt School. The answer lies in us having a dual
nature. The body-without-a-soul model of the human
being makes it apparent that we are at the very same
time a part of our environment and apart from it. Put
differently, in order to be apart, we must be a part,
because our ‘apartness’ exists only in so far as we are
able to suck energy from what is around us (Heylighen
2008; Peacock 1999). If meaning is essential for
happiness (King et al. 2016), and feeling a part of
something larger than oneself is essential to meaning
(Haidt 2006; Bering 2010), then an awareness of the
geographical post-phenomenology of the self-less human
sketched in the above comments might help re-enchant
the lives of those who have lost their faith (Ash and
Simpson 2016; see also Churchland 2015 and Caruso
2017, for a related discussion of ‘neuroexistentialism’).
Oftentimes, we tend to think of geography as some
grand project aimed at solving humanity’s big problems
(e.g. Sheppard 2015), but this stance might obliterate the
more modest, yet more palpable, achievements that this
discipline could produce for the happiness of the
specific individuals who hide below the grandiosity of
the label ‘humanity’ (Simandan 2011a 2011b 2011c;
Olson 2016). Consider this old African story:
One day the animals called a contest to measure their
strength. Animal after animal displayed their strengths.
Monkey leapt high and swung from tree to tree. All of
the animals applauded his strength. Then Elephant
leaned against the same tree and uprooted it, raising it
high above his head. The animals agreed Elephant was
stronger than Monkey. Man said, ‘I am stronger still’, but
the animals laughed – how could Man be stronger than
Elephant? Man was angry at their laughter and produced
a gun. The animals ran away from Man forever. Man did
Demonic geographies
not know the difference between strength and death.
And to this day, they fear his ignorance. (Simmons 2001,
179–80)
Doing geography can be a therapeutic process and we
should become open to this possibility whenever we
write and teach (Bondi 2005; Mullings et al. 2016; Philo
and Parr 2003; Simandan 2013a 2013b; Wright et al.
2016). I use this African story in my teaching because,
unlike recent environmental data, it goes straight to the
heart of my students. Instead of subtly accusing them of
environmental irresponsibility, the story helps them
discover the fundamental tension we have to live with:
to be apart (i.e. to exist), we have to be a part of our
surroundings, and we have to suck the energy of those
surroundings, while making sure that they are kept alive
(Hovorka 2017; Peacock 1999; Singer 2015; Wilson
2017). Demonic geography’s attending to this tension
articulates well with conceptual developments that try to
make sense of life in the Anthropocene, such as Paul
Adams’ (2016) inspired account of place as an ‘enviroorganism’ and Derek McCormack’s (2017) postphenomenological elaboration of the concept of
circumstance. When all is said and done, it might be the
art of wisely managing this tension that geography is
supposed to offer.
Conclusion
In this paper, I began to tentatively trace the contours of
a demonic geography, that is, of a materialistic,
deflationary geography that lives the fact that ‘space . . . is
the very stuff of life itself’ (Thrift 2006, 145). To be sure,
demonic geography is humble. Its humility ensues from
its admission that it is written by, and writes about,
bodies without souls. It presumes that there is no such
thing as conscious free will (while acknowledging its
powerful illusion) and no ethereal things such as souls or
minds. From the perspective of conventional social
scientists and legal scholars, it might look like a demonic
discipline indeed, but this time with ‘demonic’ as a
synonym for ‘diabolical’ or ‘nefarious’. However, I think
demonic geography only seems diabolical. The fact that
it discards the illusions of an integrated self and of
conscious free will does not mean that it discards the
respect it pays to life itself or the fascination it has with
the human condition. Japanese samurai warriors used to
say that one has to learn to die before going into a battle.
Geography and the social sciences might have to learn to
die if they are to win their battles for a better world.
Letting the convergent developments from psychology,
neuroscience and the philosophy of mind sink into our
brains may amount to letting some of our most
entrenched illusions die. If we are in the business of
507
improving the lot of humans, we could start modestly, by
learning the new picture of the human that emerges in
these academic disciplines (Huang and Bargh 2014;
Thagard and Wood 2015; Wegner and Gray 2016). This
is no easy task, because we are not babies any more. We
have already learned stuff about human nature, but the
problem is that it might have been the wrong stuff
(Churchland 2015; Bear and Bloom 2016; Caruso 2017).
And unlearning is slow, frustrating and uncertain, like
trying to get rid of old tenants (Clark 2009). Nevertheless,
engaged as we may become in the act of unlearning, we
could come full circle and realise that humans – these
bodies without souls – want to be happy (Baumeister
2016; Shiah 2016). At the level of the individual, we
could, perhaps unwisely, opt to let the matter of
subjective well-being to psychologists and neuroscientists,
despite the fact that the body is an accepted scalar level
of analysis in contemporary geography (Johnston and
Longhurst 2016; Olson 2016; Simandan 2010b). But, as
social geographers remind us (Smith et al. 2009), above
that basic scalar level, the quest for collective well-being
clearly becomes part of our responsibility.
Notes
1 Although familiar with the deflationary metaphysics of mind
and personhood inspired by recent advances in the cognitive
sciences, Nigel Thrift prefers to ‘hold to a sense of personal
authorship . . . because how things seem is often more
important than what they are’ (2008, 13). His account seems
evasive and uncommitted, in that it avoids both the stronger
statement ‘I believe in conscious free will’ and its equally
strong opposite ‘I don’t believe in conscious free will’
2 For a review of arguments that claim that empirical research
in psychology and neuroscience remains compatible with
beliefs in conscious free will, see Walter (2014) and Shepherd
(2015). For an argument that the belief in conscious free will
is empirically unsupported, but nonetheless evolutionarily
adaptive, see Smithdeal (2016).
Acknowledgements
This research has been funded through Insight Grant # 4352013-0161, provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council of Canada.
References
Adams P C 2016 Placing the Anthropocene: a day in the life of
an enviro-organism Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers 41 54–65
Anderson B 2004 Time-stilled space-slowed: how boredom
matters Geoforum 35 739–54
Anderson B and Harrison P eds 2010 Taking-place: nonrepresentational theories and human geography Ashgate,
London
Area 2017 49.4, 503–509 doi: 10.1111/area.12339
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
508
Demonic geographies
Ash J and Simpson P 2016 Geography and postphenomenology Progress in Human Geography 40 48–66
Balayannis A and Cook B R 2016 Suicide at a distance: the
paradox of knowing self-destruction Progress in Human
Geography 40 530–45
Bartolini N, Chris R, MacKian S and Pile S 2016 The place of
spirit: modernity and the geographies of spirituality Progress
in Human Geography (Early View)
Baumeister R F 2016 Toward a general theory of motivation:
problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture
Motivation and Emotion 40 1–10
Baumeister R F, Vohs K D, Aaker J L and Garbinsky E N 2013
Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful
life The Journal of Positive Psychology 8 505–16
Bear A and Bloom P 2016 A simple task uncovers a postdictive
illusion of choice Psychological Science 27 914–22
Bentham J 1993 The collected works of Jeremy Bentham:
official aptitude maximized; expense minimized Schofield P
ed Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bering J 2006 The folk psychology of souls Behavioral & Brain
Sciences 29 453–98
Bering J 2010 Under God’s skin: the hidden psychology of souls,
destiny and the meaning of life W W Norton, New York NY
Blackmore S ed 2006 Conversations on consciousness Oxford
University Press, New York NY
Bondi L 2005 Making connections and thinking through
emotions:
between
geography
and
psychotherapy
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 433–48
Campbell J 1989 The business of the gods . . . in conversation
with Fraser Boa Windrose Films, Caledon East
Caruso G D 2017 Preface and introduction: neuroexistentialism:
third-wave existentialism in Caruso G D and Flanagan O eds
Neuroexistentialism: meaning, morals, and purpose in the age
of neuroscience Oxford University Press, New York NY 1–42
Chater N and Loewenstein G 2016 The under-appreciated drive
for sense-making Journal of Economic Behavior &
Organization 126 137–54
Churchland P S 2015 The neurobiological platform for moral
values Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76 97–110
Clark R E 2009 Resistance to change: unconscious knowledge
and the challenge of unlearning in Berliner D C and
Kupermintz H eds Fostering change in institutions,
environments and people. A festschrift in honor of Gavriel
Salomon Routledge, London 75–94
Colls R 2012 Feminism, bodily difference and non-representational
geographies Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
37 430–45 doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00477.x
Csikszentmihalyi M 1993 The evolving self. A psychology for
the third millennium. HarperCollins, New York NY
Csikszentmihalyi M 2014 Flow and the foundations of positive
psychology: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
Springer, Dordrecht
della Dora V 2016 Infrasecular geographies: making, unmaking
and remaking sacred space Progress in Human Geography
(Early View)
Disabato D J, Goodman F R, Kashdan T B, Short J L and Jarden A
2016 Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination
of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being Psychological Assessment
28 471–82
Area 2017 49.4, 503–509 doi: 10.1111/area.12339
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
Haidt J 2006 The happiness hypothesis: finding modern truth in
ancient wisdom Basic Books, New York NY
Heylighen F 2008 Complexity and self-organization in Bates M
J and Maack M N eds Encyclopedia of library and
information sciences Taylor & Francis, London 1215–24
Hidaka B H 2012 Depression as a disease of modernity:
explanations for increasing prevalence Journal of Affective
Disorders 140 205–14
Hovorka A J 2017 Animal geographies I: globalizing and
decolonizing Progress in Human Geography 41 382–94
Huang J Y and Bargh J A 2014 The selfish goal: autonomously
operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of
human judgment and behavior Behavioral and Brain Sciences
37 121–35
Johnston L and Longhurst R 2016 Trans(itional) geographies:
bodies, binaries, places and spaces in Brown G and Browne
K eds The Routledge research companion to geographies of
sex and sexualities chap 6 Routledge, London 45–54
Jones O 2015 ‘Not promising a landfall . . .’: an
autotopographical account of loss of place, memory and
landscape Environmental Humanities 6 1–27
King L A, Heintzelman S J and Ward S J 2016 Beyond the
search for meaning: a contemporary science of the
experience of meaning in life Current Directions in
Psychological Science 25 211–16
Komer B and Eliasmith C 2016 A unified theoretical approach
for biological cognition and learning Current Opinion in
Behavioral Sciences 11 14–20
Kraut R 2015 Aristotle on well-being in Fletcher G ed The
Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being Routledge,
London 20–8
Layard R 2010 Measuring subjective well-being. How should
human happiness and life-satisfaction be assessed? Science
327 534–5
Longhurst R and Johnston L 2014 Bodies, gender, place
and culture: 21 years on Gender, Place & Culture 21 267–
78
Malpas J ed 2015 The intelligence of place: topographies and
poetics Bloomsbury, New York NY
Martela F and Steger M F 2016 The three meanings of meaning
in life: distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance
The Journal of Positive Psychology 11 531–45
May J and Thrift N 2001 Introduction in May J and Thrift N
eds Timespace: geographies of temporality Routledge, London
1–37
McAdams D P and Guo J 2015 Narrating the generative life
Psychological Science 26 475–83
McCormack D P 2017 The circumstances of postphenomenological life worlds Transactions of the Institute of
British Geographers 42 2–13
McKittrick K 2006 Demonic grounds: black women and the
cartographies of struggle University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis
McLaughlin N 1998 How to become a forgotten intellectual:
intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm
Sociological Forum 13 215–46
Mullings B, Peake L and Parizeau K 2016 Cultivating an ethic
of wellness in geography The Canadian Geographer/Le
G
eographe canadien 60 161–7
Demonic geographies
Nealon J T and Irr C eds 2012 Rethinking the Frankfurt School:
alternative legacies of cultural critique SUNY Press, Albany
O’Donnell G and Oswald A J 2015 National well-being policy
and a weighted approach to human feelings Ecological
Economics 120 59–70
Okon-Singer H, Pessoa L and Shackman A J eds 2015 The
neurobiology of emotion–cognition interactions Frontiers
Media, Lausanne
Olson E 2016 Geography and ethics II: emotions and morality
Progress in Human Geography 40 830–8
Paulson S, Azzarelli K K, McMahon D M and Schwartz B 2016
A new science of happiness: the paradox of pleasure Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences 1384(2016) 12–31
Peacock K A 1999 Staying out of the lifeboat? Ecosystem Health
5 91–103
Philo C and Parr H 2003 Introducing psychoanalytic
geographies Social & Cultural Geography 4 283–93
Pierce J, Martin D G and Murphy J T 2011 Relational placemaking: the networked politics of place Transactions of the
Institute of British Geographers NS 36 54–70
Pyszczynski T, Solomon S and Greenberg J 2015 Chapter one –
thirty years of terror management theory: from genesis to
revelation Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 52 1–
70
Romanillos J L 2015 Mortal questions. Geographies on the
other side of life Progress in Human Geography 39 560–79
Ryff C D 2013 Psychological well-being revisited: advances in
the science and practice of eudaimonia Psychotherapy and
Psychosomatics 83 10–28
Seligman M 2002 Authentic happiness Free Press, New York NY
Seligman M 2008 Positive health Applied Psychology: An
International Review 57 3–18
Shaw I G R and Warf B 2009 Worlds of affect: virtual
geographies of video games Environment and Planning A 41
1332–43
Shepherd J 2015 Scientific challenges to free will and moral
responsibility Philosophy Compass 10 197–207
Sheppard E 2015 Thinking geographically: globalizing
capitalism and beyond Annals of the Association of American
Geographers 105 1113–34
Shiah Y J 2016 From self to nonself: the nonself theory Frontiers
in Psychology 7 124
Simandan D 2002 On what it takes to be a good geographer
Area 34 284–93
Simandan D 2010a Beware of contingency Environment and
planning D: Society and Space 28 388–96
Simandan D 2010b On how much one can take: relocating
exploitation and exclusion within the broader framework of
allostatic load theory Health & Place 16 1291–3
Simandan D 2011a Kinds of environments – a framework for
reflecting on the possible contours of a better world The
Canadian Geographer/Le Geographe canadien 55 383–6
Simandan D 2011b On time, place and happiness New
Zealand Geographer 67 6–15
Simandan D 2011c The wise stance in human geography
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 188–92
509
Simandan D 2012 Options for moving beyond the canonical
model of regional path dependence International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research 36 172–8
Simandan D 2013a Introduction: learning as a geographical
process The Professional Geographer 65 363–8
Simandan D 2013b Learning wisdom through geographical
dislocations The Professional Geographer 65 390–5
Simandan D 2016 Proximity, subjectivity, and space: rethinking
distance in human geography Geoforum 75 249–52
Simmons A 2001 The story factor Basic Books, New York NY
Simpson P 2016 Spaces of affect in Adams P C, Craine J and
Dittmer J eds The Ashgate research companion to media
geography Ashgate, Farnham 329–45
Singer P 2015 Writings on an ethical life Open Road Media,
Newburyport
Smith S J, Pain R, Marston S and Jones J P eds 2009 The SAGE
handbook of social geographies Sage, London
Smithdeal M 2016 Belief in free will as an adaptive,
ungrounded belief Philosophical Psychology 29 1241–52
Sutherland C 2017 Theography. Subject, theology, and praxis in
geographies of religion Progress in Human Geography 41 321–37
Thagard P 2014 The self as a system of multilevel interacting
mechanisms Philosophical Psychology 27 145–63
Thagard P and Wood J V 2015 Eighty phenomena about the
self: representation, evaluation, regulation, and change
Frontiers in Psychology 6 1–15
Thrift N 1996 Spatial formations Sage, London
Thrift N 2006 Space Theory, Culture & Society 23 139–46
Thrift N2008 Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect
Routledge, London
Trautteur G 2009 The illusion of free will and its acceptance in
Leidlmair K ed After cognitivism: a reassessment of cognitive
science and philosophy Springer, Amsterdam 191–203
Vannini P ed 2015 Non-representational methodologies: reenvisioning research Routledge, London
Vella-Brodrick D A, Park N and Peterson C 2009 Three ways
to be happy: pleasure, engagement, and meaning – findings
from Australian and US samples Social Indicators Research 90
165–79
Walter S 2014 Willusionism, epiphenomenalism, and the
feeling of conscious will Synthese 191 2215–38
Wegner D 2002 The illusion of conscious will MIT Press,
Cambridge MA
Wegner D and Gray K 2016 The mind club: who thinks, what
feels, and why it matters Viking, New York NY
€ E and Holmgren-Troy M 2008 Introduction: space,
Wenno
€ E eds
haunting and discourse in Holmgren-Troy M and Wenno
Space, haunting, discourse Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle
1–12
Wilson H F 2017 On geography and encounter: bodies, borders,
and difference Progress in Human Geography 41 451–71
Wright S, Suchet-Pearson S, Lloyd K, Burarrwanga L,
Ganambarr R, Ganambarr-Stubbs M, Ganambarr B,
Maymuru D and Sweeney J 2016 Co-becoming Bawaka.
Towards a relational understanding of place/space Progress in
Human Geography 40 455–75
Area 2017 49.4, 503–509 doi: 10.1111/area.12339
© 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)