Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ot3): handle multiple responses for a tip action request #12083

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2023

Conversation

Laura-Danielle
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

The tip action request will actually send back two move responses (one for each "gear/tip" motor). We should properly handle this move and make sure the move times out if it doesn't receive a response from both motors.

The tip action request will actually send back two move responses (one for each "gear/tip" motor).
We should properly handle this move and make sure the move times out if it doesn't receive a
response from both motors.
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle requested a review from a team January 30, 2023 22:52
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2023 22:52
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #12083 (dda4dd9) into edge (6824b7c) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge   #12083   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.99%   73.99%           
=======================================
  Files        2195     2195           
  Lines       60789    60796    +7     
  Branches     6442     6442           
=======================================
+ Hits        44978    44987    +9     
+ Misses      14294    14292    -2     
  Partials     1517     1517           
Flag Coverage Δ
hardware 57.18% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
notify-server 89.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ons_hardware/hardware_control/move_group_runner.py 90.00% <100.00%> (+1.33%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice

@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle merged commit 2cd7948 into edge Jan 31, 2023
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle deleted the support_multiple_move_responses branch January 31, 2023 14:56
y3rsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2023
* edge: (116 commits)
  feat(system-server): add sqlite database and barebones HTTP server (#12085)
  feat(ot3): add enableOT3FirmwareUpdates feature flag to gate firmware update functionality. (#12102)
  feat(app): add bare bones hardware section to protocol details (#12099)
  feat(app): Support failed calibrations in the calibration wizard (#12092)
  refactor(docs): clean up Versioning page (#12084)
  refactor(robot-server): Make run and protocol limits configurable at launch (#12094)
  feat(app): add robotServerVersion to display the current robot software version (#12096)
  fix(hardware): do not track tip motor positions (#12093)
  feat(engine): allow calibrateGripper command to save calibration data (#12046)
  feat(app, api-client, react-api-client): delete POC TLC calibration data from overflow menu (#12075)
  fix(api): actually update OT3 instrument calibration offset in cache instrument (#12089)
  fix(robot-server): correct the data returned from instruments endpoint (#12067)
  feat(api): add thermocycler plate lift to hardware controller (#12068)
  fix(app): reference moduleId from result not params (#12077)
  feat(app): create ODD protocol setup page (#12071)
  refactor(api): Deprecate presses and increment args when using PAPI pick_up_tip (#12079)
  fix(ot3): handle multiple responses for a tip action request (#12083)
  refactor(api): touch tip implementation for PAPIv2 engine core (#12053)
  refactor(app): Remove ssid parameter from OnDeviceRouteParams (#11930)
  fix(api): fix broken test in the api hardware controller (#12080)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants