mavlink: add initial mavlink OPEN_DRONE_ID_SYSTEM stream #20563
Conversation
| msg.category_eu = MAV_ODID_CATEGORY_EU_UNDECLARED; | ||
| msg.class_eu = MAV_ODID_CLASS_EU_UNDECLARED; | ||
| msg.operator_altitude_geo = home_position.alt; | ||
| msg.timestamp = home_position.timestamp; // TODO: 32 bit Unix Timestamp in seconds since 00:00:00 01/01/2019. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this timestamp needs improvement. I did try home_position.timestamp/1000000 - 1546300800, but that didn't work. For the rest, both system and location messages are received by the RemoteID transmitter and broadcast.
ToDo is: a) fix the timestamp b) stream the live operator position. @ryanjAA do you have ideas/preference how to stream the live position?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@BluemarkInnovations we spoke about this on the dev call. It makes most sense to plug a gps into your computer (or use one internal if on a tablet) and stream from QGC back up. It may or may not take a QGC change but it can already read NMEA and live position if you have gps.
That seems like the best path and then as @dagar said, if we have rtk and related in use we can start to benefit system wide from that data.
Let me know your thoughts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
st sense to plug a gps into your computer (or use one internal if on a tablet) and stream from QGC back up. It may or may not take a QGC change but it can already read NMEA and live position if you have gps.
@ryanjAA I do know that there are customers using ArduPilot and a Herelink running QGC. In that product there is RemoteID functionality already. Not sure if that is part of QGC or something Hex implemented. So it seems to me a good approach. And if the RemoteID functionality is already be part of QGC, only a few steps are needed to get a dynamic location in the RemoteID signal.
dagar
force-pushed
the
pr-mavlink_OPEN_DRONE_ID_SYSTEM
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7658aad
to
de943d7
Compare
dagar
force-pushed
the
pr-mavlink_OPEN_DRONE_ID_SYSTEM
branch
from
de943d7
to
a5efaca
Compare
|
I did a final check, the time information is correct now.
|
@ryanjAA @BluemarkInnovations