Trevor graduated at about the same time the acquisition closed, so in the course of 4 days he went from impecunious grad student to millionaire PhD.
In 1998, I had made an effort to do the whole "once a day, learn a random new word from the dictionary". I did that for exactly one day. The one word I learned was "impecunious." Up until now, I've never, ever, seen or heard that word used.
So in 1998, independent, near simultaneous events (Viaweb being acquired, and me learning a single word) were set in motion that would culminate 14 years later in me reading for the first time an actual legitimate use of that word, resulting in a very self-satisfied grin. Consider my day made.
When studying vocab, some words stick out as words you'll never see, and because of that you may fixate on that single word. For me it's eleemosynary. Still haven't seen it used. Once.
It's in the first sentence of Tom Jones, Axiak. I thought you knew that.
An author ought to consider himself not as a gentleman who gives a private or eleemosynary treat, but rather as one who keeps a public ordinary at which all persons are welcome for their money.
YCNews is sort of a public ordinary if you stretch things a bit.
For me it's gregarious (which I see used occasionally but not super often). It was used as an example for learning vocab by imagining a scene. In this one you imagined a guy "Greg Arious" who is the life of the party dancing around with a lampshade over his head.
I'm interested in rtm's pseudonym: John McArtyem, specifically the 'Artyem' part. This is actually a Russian name (I know because it's also my name). I wonder why rtm chose it. Maybe because attempting to pronounce 'rtm' can lead to 'Artyem'? Sounds like the rest of the pseudonym could have been influenced by John McCarthy.
Don't use software that generates your pages dynamically... Currently, all search engine crawlers ignore dynamically generated pages...[1]
Alas, I am too young to remember fascinating parts of Internet history like this one.
But I do remember the hesitancy to use personal names on the public Internet. If we could tell our 1998 selves about the modern "personal branding" craze our old selves would never believe it.
> If we could tell our 1998 selves about the modern "personal branding" craze our old selves would never believe it.
I think this is a fascinating comment. I was using my real name on the Internet in 1998, and now I mainly stick to pseudonyms. Occasionally I Google up what I was talking about on usenet 10+ years ago when I was a geeky teenager and cringe. Let's hope Google never puts together a comprehensive IRC log the way they were able to with usenet.
Very nicely done, PG. I'm amazed at how ahead of its time Viaweb was... 3 years before IE6! I agree with the other comments here that it's quite good even by today's standards. To withstand the test of time (14 years!) of web design/technologies is seriously impressive.
I do wish the test drive worked though. It'd be great to be able to really test it out in its original form!
PG, if you don't mind me asking a couple of questions (or point me to the answers if they are already available elsewhere)... how many man hours do you think went into the project (MVP and maintenance)? And how did you come to start developing it? Was it an original idea at the time or were you aware of other online store builders and decided you could do a better job? When did it all start?
"The public should always be wondering how
it is possible to give so much for the money."
— Henry Ford
I also find it fascinating how so many YC companies have a very similar footprint of pricing, features, and basic pages right there on the homepage. It sounds obvious that, yeah, you should be telling your potential customers what your prices are, but this is not always shown so readily.
If a company makes it hard to get their prices, they probably are too high for you - because you're not the target market. They're likely targeting large businesses that expect to negotiate and get some kind of discount. It works out well for everyone because that software probably wasn't something you were going to use anyway.
Not stating price allows you to get in the ring with a customer and then later convince them of the value of what you are selling. But depending on the actual service or deal there could be slimey reasons no question about it.
"makes it hard for me to get (and compare) their prices, they are too high"
Agree and have found that to be true in general as well. And any solicitation that doesn't mention price is usually to be able to convince you of the value of which you would initially reject off the top as "to expensive". The other reason is to get you to commit to something and therefore be less likely to pull out of a transaction.
Along those lines (hidden pricing) it is a good idea to not assume everyone knows why a service is free and why a user isn't being charged for it.
On the other end of the bell curve of course is a price that is advertised and seems to cheap. This normally means there is something hidden or extra that you will encounter.
From the press release about Trevor Blackwell's graduation (linked in this article):
In addition to his work in randomness, Dr. Blackwell has also developed pioneering techniques for rapid mass deletion of potentially critical information. His original work on /usr directories at Harvard has successfully been applied to IP addresses, and also, with the assistance of his wife Laurie, to human hair (see illustration).
"It's not a Flowbie!" said Dr. Blackwell. "They're the very same kind of clippers that actual barbers use."
I salute your use of inside jokes as press releases. And I identify with it. In fact, it reminds me of a press release my company launched about a year ago, in which we promise "mondo shirtage": https://www.prlog.org/11203938-new-shirt-website-promises-mon...
It's just hard for us to take press releases seriously.
The homepage is timeless and quite good even by today's standards. It gets across very clearly what you can do, what the product is, pricing and why you should use. It contains "awards" giving the visitor confidence in using the service.
"So you can build a store and start taking orders in minutes."
yeah, i was thinking the same thing... includes the one sentence headline, some social proof (1000 users :), press icons, though seems to lack the big call to action button that we all use today.
I'm impressed (though not particularly surprised) at how well the Viaweb home page has aged. It's a good example of an observation from pg's "Taste for Makers" (https://www.paulgraham.com/taste.html):
Good design is timeless.
Indeed. Well done.
N.B. The press release for tlb's graduation propagates one of the John Harvard Statue's famous Three Lies: Harvard was founded in 1636 and not, as reported on the statue and in the release, in 1638. Minor error, or sly joke? We may never know for sure.
It was very popular. Fully automated. We needed a bank of 6 fax modems to keep up. Most of the merchants had existing paper catalog businesses and most of those orders arrived by fax, so it was easiest for them to handle it the same way. They needed a paper copy anyway to walk around the warehouse with.
> His office was nicknamed the Hot Tub on account of the heat they generated. Most days his stack of window air conditioners could keep up.
I ran the servers for a whole company like that, everyday thinking that's totally unprofessional but it is effective.
After we went to our own raised floor cold room, I still never felt it was that much more reliable. Cleaner, more polished yes. But 80% of the effect for 20% of cost is usually a good deal.
Fitting out your server room from the local hardware store felt like a successful hack.
Viamall as a whole is currently getting over 9.9 million page views per month. That corresponds to over 72 million "hits", or http requests.
Once upon a time these were the currency of the internet :)
Of course now, even page views is seen as archaic and a little cough exaggeratory. I remember campaigning at my place-of-work (in early 2000) to have this term banished in favour of unique visitors.
In June of 1998 I was working at IBM, and wondering if I should buy myself some Apple stock since it was only about $25/share. I didn't, and I kick myself now.
I remember the web in 1998. It stunk. And every TV commercial said "visit us at blah.com, or America Online keyword 'blah'".
It's funny, I actually like the design of the site. It holds up well to the test of time. A lot of newer sites could learn from this. Aside from the 640x480 site design it's perfectly modern.
As they say, Simplicity is the height of sophistication.
Doubtful. A small store was $100/mo and probably made up the bulk. Wouldn't be surprising if some of those 1050 weren't paying for whatever reasons. Still, they clearly built a good business.
From the standpoint of someone using those search engines, it's a lot easier now to find things. And there are more things to find. I don't remember the likes of Altavista and Ask Jeeves with much fondness.
My first client project was through an internship for a small firm that leant me out to a company called OpenMarket, in 1997 - located in Cambridge. Was this Viawebs only competitor? Were they competitors at all?
In 1998, I had made an effort to do the whole "once a day, learn a random new word from the dictionary". I did that for exactly one day. The one word I learned was "impecunious." Up until now, I've never, ever, seen or heard that word used.
So in 1998, independent, near simultaneous events (Viaweb being acquired, and me learning a single word) were set in motion that would culminate 14 years later in me reading for the first time an actual legitimate use of that word, resulting in a very self-satisfied grin. Consider my day made.
It means "poor" btw.