Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Not really? The original title is careful to say "citing court order", not "per court order" etc.

If anything, I think your title is more editorialized, since Google is clearly doing this for legal reasons, not exactly "voluntarily".




"citing court order" to me as a non-legal person indicates that it is one they received. I hope you don't expect this non-legal forum's headlines to be parsed like legal text? How does "citing" indicate it is not an order Google received?

I merely gave my opinion as a non-legal casual news reader. To me at lest this new headline conveyed what happened more clearly before I delved into the article.


"citing a court order against ISPs" would be sufficient, I think.


As a non-native speaker, the difference between "citing" and "per" would have me confused. The HN title is much more explicit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: