Cants are fascinating. I hadn't realized until reading this article the connection to Morrissey's "Piccadilly Palare" (which indeed is the intent), which makes so much more sense now upon reflection.
Here in Turkey, we have "lubunca" which is more or less the same with this language, except it is still living. Entire Turkish grammar applies but there is lots and lots of new words to keep the talk obscure.
Here's that short film in Polari with line-by-line translations and a discussion of the etymology of the slang used. Scroll down to see the script, some of the dialog is clickable with annotations.
> Another group of activists called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence created a Polari Bible, running a Polari wordlist through a computer program on an English version of the Bible.
> “And the rib, which the Duchess Gloria had lelled from homie, made she a palone, and brought her unto the homie.” Translation: “And the rib which God had taken from man was made into a woman and brought to the man.”
I'm interested how a language is judged to be distinctly different such that it can be called a separate language and not a dialect or variant. If the language heavily borrows sentence structure and filler words from English, is it a separate language or merely a variant or dialect?
To the extent that there's a rule to go by, it's that in general dialects are mutually intelligible and languages are not, and video of this speech is not comprehensible at all to me (a native English speaker), so that arguably pushes it into "language."
But of course there really isn't a rule, though. In practice what gets called a language vs. a dialect is mostly political. Swedish, Danish, and Norwegian are at least somewhat mutually intelligible, and Moldovan and Romanian are essentially the same language but for a border in between, as are Bosnian, Serbian, Croatian, and Montenegrin. By contrast, Mandarin and Cantonese aren't mutually intelligible at all but are supposedly both "Chinese dialects," and ditto for the various colloquial flavors of Arabic. The saying among linguists is "a language is a dialect with an army and a navy."
It's a political distinction, and linguists generally try not to make that distinction, using words like "tongue" (for the language/dialect) or "speech community" (for the people who speak it). cf. the way that Serbian/Croatian, or Danish/Swedish, are considered different languages, while the much more distinct Arabic and Chinese spoken tongues are considered dialects. (Note - Tunisian is considered a separate "language" in Tunisia, purely because of the way Tunisians view it. It's not actually any more distinct from other Arabics than, say, Iraqi or Moroccan.)
Or the way that Dutch is considered a separate language, while the very similar tongues that exist in Germany on a continuum between Standard German and Dutch are considered German (or Frisian, or Dutch) dialects.
> It developed from an earlier form of language called Parlyaree which had roots in Italian and rudimentary forms of language used for communication by sailors around the Mediterranean.
> Polari itself had Parlyaree as a base, but once in Britain was supplemented with a wealth of slang terminology from different sources, including Cockney Rhyming Slang, backslang (pronouncing a word as if it was spelt backwards), French, Yiddish and American airforce slang.
So perhaps its a dialect of Italian which borrows heavily from English? Or?
Russian "Fenya" is a living example of something similar (applicable to the criminal/thief subculture), with bits and pieces of it having migrated into everyday speech, like the word "garbage" for cops. There's a Polish, Romani and Yiddish layer in it too, which should make it an amazing subject for linguistic research, but I'm not sure if anyone is seriously studying it...
This is regional slang rather than dialect, but in the UK — specifically England, mostly northern England — "the filth" means "the police" (collective noun — you wouldn't refer to an individual cop as a filth).
I'm now wondering if this is parallel evolution to "Fenya" or some sort of cross-fertilization.
Convergent evolution due to similar environmental pressures, I presume :)
Garbage is a collective noun in Russian and can't have a plural, but in thief jargon it's used as a singular noun for one cop (the garbage is on my tail), and, hilariously enough, in a plural for multiple cops ("garbages were whistling all night in the park", it's from a song).
I think the amount of Yiddish borrowings points to a certain region on the Black Sea coast (we all know where it points, as they would say in the city where it points).
But the roots of it go much deeper into the middle ages, and there is an older layer that is less recognizable to the uninitiated.
The gulag definitely helped it spread, as did the chanson style singers in the 90s.
Because we are so used to seeing articles broken up by ads and other intrusive media that we go from the last word of one paragraph to the first of the next and skip the interruption?
According to a table in the Wikipedia, for instance cottage, a standard English dictionary word, denotes a "public lavatory used for sexual encounters" and handbag stands for "money".
Do you really think that Queen is not using Scaramouche to mean the Commedia del Arte clown and fandango to mean the dance? If I see a sentence with cottage and handbag used like that, I don't think I'd be confused.
Of course they knew, Britain has a long history of camp in the theater. They maybe didn't know the words' meaning but they knew the gay subtext and overtones.
Their Polari bible translation has "unto the homie" == "to the man", so Polari for "man" is "homie"! I think the modern slang homie comes from "homeboy", so that'd be convergent etymology?
Interesting. I'd (naïvely) guess Polari homie would come from the French homme, so it would be convergent (as opposed to some shared etymological root).
I believe at the time in the UK not just homosexuality (cf. Alan Turing) but also depictions of it were illegal, so this was a way to have gay characters without the BBC directors or censors realising.
Depicting gay characters wasn't illegal, but it would have caused an almighty shitstorm in the tabloid press.
In the 60s and 70s, British comedy and light entertainment was rife with "confirmed bachelors" with a flamboyant manner - John Inman, Kenneth Williams, Frankie Howerd, Larry Grayson etc. A metropolitan audience would see them as obviously gay, but there was a level of plausible deniability, aided by straight camp and drag performers like Dick Emery and Stanley Baxter.
Articles like this remind me of how far we have come in a relatively short time. From a world where gay people had to invent a secret language to afford them some sense of security in a harsh world, to a world where gay people have significantly more rights is a wonderful development. Good job to everyone who fought to make this change a reality...
"to a world where gay people have significantly more rights is a wonderful development"
You are being too optimistic. Gays have more rights in some (mostly western) countries, it's not even close to the whole world. Meanwhile in Chechnya https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_concentration_camps_in_Che... and I'm not even talking about some Islamic countries where gay people are being killed on the spot.
This was an extreme, but all subcultures have their own hermetic languages. Local slangs and expressions that get popularized inside of a group, almost meaningless to any outsider.
Indeed, and imagine how quickly we could regress under the wrong regime (see Iran, Iraq and Somalia for examples), a generation or two is all it could take.
Recently a man in UK was jailed because he repeatedly raped his daughter. She had told him she was lesbian, and he reportedly wanted to rape it out of her.
People in UK still face higher rates of violent crime; there's still discrimination at work; there's only very recently been legal parity; there are increased rates of death by suicide.
> This week a father was jailed for 21 years for sexual offences including the long-term sexual abuse of his two daughters. The abuse of his younger daughter began when she confided in him that she might be a lesbian. It is reported that the father decided to rape his daughter to “prove” that sex with men was “better”.
> For those of us who work with asylum-seeking women, this story of the rape of a lesbian or bisexual woman is all too familiar. “Corrective rape”, as it is chillingly known, is a common experience for women in countries where homosexuality is illegal or culturally disapproved of.
> No wonder such women seek asylum in the UK, a country which in some ways flies the gay flag with pride, allowing same-sex marriage and protecting LGBT people with laws prohibiting discrimination. However, rather than being protected and given sanctuary when they arrive in the UK, so many of these women end up locked up indefinitely in Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre in Bedfordshire
"A world", for some restricted local definitions of "world". Even in countries which ostensibly recognize the equality of same-sex couples and the rights of those couples, violence, variable access to justice and a variety of other issues still remain.
Or maybe it shows how little progress we've made. In other words, we're deluding ourselves with an illusion of progress.
What does it mean when Obama flipped his view (evolved) in 2012? And, every serious 2008 POTUS candidate was against gay marriage.
So today we have broad support for gay marriage. Great -- certainly good news for my mainstream gay friends and cowoerkers (and by extension, for me).
But is that real progress? Or have we simply said something like, "your lifestyle is fine, as long as it looks a lot like our established mainstream lifestyle."
We pat ourselves on the back for accepting gays. How many coworkers do you have with facial tattoos? How many cross dressing coworkers? How many coworkers who are proud and open about being swingers, or nudists?
The church's objections to homosexuality are an opinion that they have the right to have-- the state's criminalization of it, however, is the violation of rights which is a crime.
Homophobia is just stupid, government action is the real crime.
There's a further distinction between male-sexed individuals who enjoy crossdressing and those who identify as female and dress accordingly. Only the latter group is trans (and is so independent of what they wear)
Apologies to any nuance of language I've missed here, as I'm sure this could be nitpicked to death.
While both acknowledge that gender is fluid personal interpretation of identity, to drag (female impersonation, but there are women who drag as men), gender identity is a joke to be made fun of and celebrate, but being transgender takes gender identity seriously.
They can be expressed by the same people (see Peppermint who won 2015's RuPaul Drag Race, she is a transgendered woman who competes in drag competitions), but they can just as often be in conflict.
Mostly. In not all cases and for not all people, and I'm probably wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piccadilly_Palare
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cant_(language)