627 ljw mov parallel #628
627 ljw mov parallel #628
Conversation
|
@lee1043 Looks like some checks failed :-( |
|
@muryanto1 I think I have resolved all about flake8 related test failure, but the test is still failing and I don't have a clear idea, would you mind take a look? Thank you in advance. |
…attern by its own stdv
…attern by its own stdv
…or waiting model with many runs
|
All test passed on circle ci except for linux_pmp_py2, linux_pmp_py3 and macos_pmp_py2, macos_pmp_py3. Following the comment of @muryanto1 at #639 (comment) I think it is okay to be merged now. |
|
@lee1043 Why all the changes to diurnal on this branch? I'm not sure this is correct as we have been using the diurnal branch heavily in master. |
|
@gleckler1 that is weird because I haven't touched anything from diurnal. Hmm.. let me check. Thanks for pointing it out! |
|
@lee1043 when was the last time this was updated with master? Maybe diurnal was changed after that? |
|
@gleckler1 yes, the change in diurnal was after my latest update with master (using the rebase functionality). I have tried rebase again with the latest current one but the rebase process was struggling to me. |
|
I am migrating necessary changes to a new branch that generated based on the current master and opened another PR #643. @gleckler1 I will let you know when the new PR is ready for reviewing. |
Resolve #627