Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copy edits #20

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 14, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
Change “discussions between” to “discussions among”
“discussions between” isn’t strictly wrong, but when writing about
discussions involving more than two parties, it’s common practice to use
“discusions among” the parties — and using “discussions between” when
writing about discussions involving just two parties. See the examples
at https://textranch.com/667108/discussion-between/or/discussion-among/

There are exceptions of course — but looking through those examples will
show that general practice is “between” for two-party discussions, and
“among” for more-than-two-parties discussions.
  • Loading branch information
sideshowbarker committed May 14, 2022
commit 90a215311ee4f99313b2989c39a5221250727821
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion main.jsx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ function Home() {
This community group aims to provide a space for JS runtimes to
collaborate on API interoperability. We focus on documenting and
improving interoperability of web platform APIs across runtimes
(especially non-Browser ones). This is done through discussions between
(especially non-Browser ones). This is done through discussions among
runtimes, proposals for new and existing web APIs in existing
specification venues (WHATWG, W3C), and documentation of existing
runtime behaviours.{" "}
Expand Down