-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvement of Viterbi algorithm used in tagger.cljc #28
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ALL TESTS PASS
Thank you very much ! 👍 |
Just playing around :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Viterbi algorithm implementation in
tagger.cljc
uses the values of the observations, instead of their index, to store the newly calculated probabilities:E.g., if the sentence is
, then
cur-observation
will take the valuesje
,mange
,une
,pomme
. This is fine, as long as each observation appears only once in the sentence.However, consider the following example:
. In this sentence, "montre", appears both as a noun (the first occurrence), as well as a verb (the second occurrence). The current implementation would tag it either as verb, or as noun, but it obviously cannot tag both.
The following test case reproduces the issue:
(is (= ["P" "P" "V" "P" "N"] (viterbi sample-model ["Je" "Te" "Montre" "Ma" "Montre"])))
(See
tagger_test.cljc
forsample-model
.)The proposed change basically consists of using the index of each observation, instead of the observation itself, to address
T1
.