Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sros2: 0.9.0-1 in 'foxy/distribution.yaml' [bloom] #24745

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2020

Conversation

mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Member

Increasing version of package(s) in repository sros2 to 0.9.0-1:

sros2

* Use matching validity dates for cert and permissions (#205 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/205>)
* permission signing should use permissions_ca (#204 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/204>)
* Rename keystore root env from ROS_SECURITY_ROOT_DIRECTORY to ROS_SECURITY_KEYSTORE (#200 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/200>)
* API cleanup
  * remove function leftover from old generation strategy (#207 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/207>)
  * remove distribute_key completely (#197 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/197>)
  * api: reorganize policy generation API (#196 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/196>)
  * api: reorganize artifact generation API (#195 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/195>)
  * api: reorganize key API (#192 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/192>)
  * api: reorganize permission API (#191 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/191>)
  * api: reorganize policy API (#190 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/190>)
  * api: reorganize keystore API (#188 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/188>)
* Security enclaves:
  * Use security contexts (#177 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/177>)
  * security-context -> enclave (#198 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/198>)
  * Update generate_policy verb for enclaves (#203 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/203>)
  * reenable test_generate_policy_no_policy_file (#206 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/206>)
* [ci] Add GitHub actions for linting and source-build CI (#178 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/178>)
* [test] use test_msgs instead of std message packages (#181 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/181>)
* [test] more verbose test_flake8 error messages (same as ros2/launch_ros#135 <https://github.com/ros2/launch_ros/issues/135>)
* [bookkeeping] Update maintainer to point to ros-security mailing list + fix package.xml (#179 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/179>)
* Symlink CA certs instead of copy (#176 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/176>)
* update from ros2cli API:
  * pass argv in add_arguments to add_subparsers_on_demand (#175 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/175>)
  * switch to not deprecated API (#174 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/174>)
  * Use ros2cli.node.NodeStrategy consistently. (#173 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/173>)
* Contributors: Dirk Thomas, Ivan Santiago Paunovic, Kyle Fazzari, Michel Hidalgo, Mikael Arguedas, Ruffin

sros2_cmake

* Rename keystore root env from ROS_SECURITY_ROOT_DIRECTORY to ROS_SECURITY_KEYSTORE (#200 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/200>)
* Security enclaves:
  * security-context -> enclave (#198 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/198>)
  * Update sros2_cmake to use security contexts (#177 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/177>)
* Update maintainer to point to ros-security mailing list + fix package.xml (#179 <https://github.com/ros2/sros2/issues/179>)
* Contributors: Ivan Santiago Paunovic, Mikael Arguedas, Ruffin

@jacobperron jacobperron merged commit 3df5605 into ros:master May 6, 2020
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas deleted the bloom-sros2-0 branch May 6, 2020 17:48
@kyrofa
Copy link
Contributor

kyrofa commented May 6, 2020

Thanks @mikaelarguedas!

@ruffsl
Copy link
Contributor

ruffsl commented May 8, 2020

@mikaelarguedas , does this need a re-release given ros2/sros2#209 ?

@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Member Author

Yes a new release is needed:+1: #24809

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants