Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement & test TRICE_TRANSFER_ORDER_IS_NOT_MCU_ENDIAN #417

Open
rokath opened this issue May 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Implement & test TRICE_TRANSFER_ORDER_IS_NOT_MCU_ENDIAN #417

rokath opened this issue May 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed quality improve code quality wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@rokath
Copy link
Owner

rokath commented May 14, 2023

  • big endian MCUs are already supported.
  • It is unclear, how RTT8 & RTT32 work well between machines of different endiannes.
    • without and with package framing
  • compiler agostic and efficient byte swapping macros (optional assembler?) are of interest.
  • Actually there seems to be no need for that.
  • Increases code amount and target execution time
  • One advantage: big endian reception could get tested automatically.
@rokath rokath added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed quality improve code quality labels May 14, 2023
@rokath rokath self-assigned this May 14, 2023
@rokath rokath added the wontfix This will not be worked on label May 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed quality improve code quality wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant