Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate ds.lazy() since Dataset is lazy already #33812

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

jianoaix
Copy link
Contributor

Why are these changes needed?

#31639

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Copy link
Collaborator

@zhe-thoughts zhe-thoughts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved for merging into master pending the nits

@@ -4131,6 +4131,10 @@ def get_internal_block_refs(self) -> List[ObjectRef[Block]]:
self._synchronize_progress_bar()
return blocks

@Deprecated(
message="Dataset is lazy by default, so this conversion call is no longer "
"needed and this API will be removed in future release"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nits (grammar):

  • "Datasets is lazy ..."
  • "in a future release"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done (the Dataset here is referring to this class not the library we provide, so incline to keep it as Dataset).

@c21 c21 added the tests-ok The tagger certifies test failures are unrelated and assumes personal liability. label Mar 29, 2023
@zhe-thoughts
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, feel free to merge

@ericl ericl merged commit dc0cee4 into ray-project:master Mar 29, 2023
joncarter1 pushed a commit to joncarter1/ray that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2023
elliottower pushed a commit to elliottower/ray that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2023
ProjectsByJackHe pushed a commit to ProjectsByJackHe/ray that referenced this pull request May 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tests-ok The tagger certifies test failures are unrelated and assumes personal liability.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants