Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve openstack-exporter#135 #138

Merged

Conversation

shotgun-20
Copy link
Contributor

Ironic exporter now checks for API microversion. Also, baremetal resource_class metric is added. Release tarballs added to gitignore.

@shotgun-20 shotgun-20 force-pushed the feature/resource_class branch 2 times, most recently from ea6ad8d to 9bcb35a Compare November 6, 2020 08:38
VERSION Outdated
@@ -1 +1 @@
1.2.0
1.2.1
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no need to increase the version number, please revert this change.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, reverted it.

@niedbalski
Copy link
Member

@shotgun-20 hello, I am awaiting the tests to come back and please check the comment made on the VERSION file.

@shotgun-20
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done, no version change here anymore.

@niedbalski
Copy link
Member

LGTM @shotgun-20 ,i'll wait for tests and merge. Once again thank you for your contributions!

@niedbalski niedbalski added this to the 1.3.0 milestone Nov 6, 2020
@niedbalski niedbalski merged commit 1fede2f into openstack-exporter:master Nov 6, 2020
mzijdemans pushed a commit to mzijdemans/openstack-exporter that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2022
* ironic microversion workaround (openstack-exporter#135)

Co-authored-by: Mikhail Sharkov <[email protected]>

* add baremetal resource_class metric

Co-authored-by: Mikhail Sharkov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Niedbalski <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants