Fix #93, Adds format check and static analysis workflows

[chillfig]

Checklist (Please check before submitting)

• I reviewed the Contributing Guide.
• I signed and emailed the appropriate Contributor License agreement to [email protected] and copied [email protected].

Describe the contribution
Fixes #93

Testing performed
Tested format check on fork: https://github.com/chillfig/CF/runs/5662467104?check_suite_focus=true

Tested static analysis on fork: https://github.com/chillfig/CF/runs/5662467266?check_suite_focus=true

Expected behavior changes
Passing workflow

System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 18.04

Additional context
The added format check workflow catches a format check error when it runs its "error on differences" step. Specifically, the workflow throws errors on the placement of "*" with pointer variables written in the fsw and unit test files. The format check would rather that "*" be on the left side of the whitespace than the right side.

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Justin Figueroa, ASRC Federal

[skliper]

What happened to the format check? It's OK that it fails, we can submit a merge to fix once the other merges are in.

[chillfig]

@skliper The format check failed on the "Error on differences" step from within the script. According to github actions, the process exited with error code 255 in this step after it identified failure in files primarily from the unit-test repo, but also a few from the fsw repo.

[astrogeco]

It might have to do with the clang-format version differences that Joe mentioned in #93

[astrogeco]

@chillfig looks like the second commit deleted the format check workflow