Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade yaml from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 #189

Conversation

hedera-eng-infrastructure

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade yaml from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1.

As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2024-03-06.
Release notes
Package name: yaml
  • 2.4.1 - 2024-03-06
    • cst: Do not drop trailing newline after line comment in block-map if followed by unindented block-seq value (#525)
    • Stringify flow collection comments in parent (#528)
    • Do not skip folding lines after the first in indented block scalars (#529)
  • 2.4.0 - 2024-02-25
    • Add a command-line tool (#523)
    • Use the lineWidth option for line breaking in flow collections (#522)
from yaml GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: yaml

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

  1 files  ±0   16 suites  ±0   1m 14s ⏱️ +3s
109 tests ±0  109 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
134 runs  ±0  134 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a999aeb. ± Comparison against base commit 9ee6b46.

Copy link
Contributor

E2E Test Results

65 tests  ±0   65 ✅ ±0   7m 4s ⏱️ + 1m 3s
 9 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a999aeb. ± Comparison against base commit 9ee6b46.

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-0.05% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (9ee6b46) 2594 1915 73.82%
Head commit (a999aeb) 2597 (+3) 1916 (+1) 73.78% (-0.05%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#189) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.54%. Comparing base (9ee6b46) to head (a999aeb).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #189      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.60%   73.54%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        3107     3107              
  Branches      484      553      +69     
==========================================
- Hits         2287     2285       -2     
- Misses        820      822       +2     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

@jeromy-cannon
Copy link
Contributor

duplicate #265

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants