Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow developers to add custom search parameter to the engine. #1778

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 6, 2023

Conversation

aditya-07
Copy link
Collaborator

IMPORTANT: All PRs must be linked to an issue (except for extremely trivial and straightforward changes).

Fixes #1382

Description

  1. Allows app developers to add custom search parameter to the engine via FhirEngineConfiguration.
  2. Any CRUD operations on the resources after custom search parameter is added will result in reindexing of that particular resource.
  3. Engine doesn't reindex all old resources after custom search parameter is added to it. Its responsibility of the developers to reindex.

Alternative(s) considered
No

Type
Choose one: Feature

Screenshots (if applicable)

Checklist

  • I have read and acknowledged the Code of conduct.
  • I have read the Contributing page.
  • I have signed the Google Individual CLA, or I am covered by my company's Corporate CLA.
  • I have discussed my proposed solution with code owners in the linked issue(s) and we have agreed upon the general approach.
  • I have run ./gradlew spotlessApply and ./gradlew spotlessCheck to check my code follows the style guide of this project.
  • I have run ./gradlew check and ./gradlew connectedCheck to test my changes locally.
  • I have built and run the demo app(s) to verify my change fixes the issue and/or does not break the demo app(s).

@jingtang10
Copy link
Collaborator

@omarismail94 does this have any interaction with your change wrt fhir versions?

@jingtang10
Copy link
Collaborator

@joiskash hi kashyap - please take a look at this work which might be useful to your implementation.

@joiskash
Copy link
Collaborator

@joiskash hi kashyap - please take a look at this work which might be useful to your implementation.

Sure @jingtang10 ! Thanks !

cc: @nsabale7 @vbothe23

Copy link
Collaborator

@jingtang10 jingtang10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Aditya this is a really good PR 👍

@jingtang10 jingtang10 assigned aditya-07 and unassigned jingtang10 Feb 3, 2023
@jingtang10
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevenckngaa + @yigit + @omarismail94 in case you have any more comments.

@aditya-07 aditya-07 merged commit 5f17993 into google:master Feb 6, 2023
omarismail94 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
…h type reference (#2065)

* set the initial value using the initial expression extension for reference type

* Allow developers to add custom search parameter to the engine. (#1778)

* Added custom search paramter.

* Review changes : Injecting ResourceIndexer into ResourceDao

* Show submit button in review mode. (#1826)

* Show submit button in review mode

* Added tests

* Review comments: Updated the fragment result listener to check explicit result values

* Fix for removing old indexes when resource is updated (#1840)

* Fix for removing old indexes when resource is updated

* Added comments

* add datacapture config in demo app

* Fix dropdown initial selection for answerOptions of type Reference

Sometimes choiceColumn evaluated to similar 'display' text across many options, and the autocompletetextview text would get set to null

* Support expression evaluating to ResourceType for items of type Reference

* Update autocompleteTextView to check answerId

* Add AutoCompleteViewHolderFactory ui tests

* Fix failing tests for AutoCompleteViewHolderFactory

* Refactor MoreTypes.kt to remove duplications

Co-authored-by: Omar Ismail <[email protected]>

* Refactor evaluation of questionnaireItem initial value

* Fix AutoCompleteTextViewFactory espresso test failing in api 24

---------

Co-authored-by: omarismail <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: aditya-07 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Omar Ismail <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Complete
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Custom SearchParameter for local search to support offline use case
5 participants