Add default template warning #2205
Conversation
* Reuse Client when checking urls and add timeout for requests
* Implement replace_re filter * Cargo fmt * add regex caching * cargo fmt * update docs, update unit test * rename replace_re -> regex_replace
Relative links in the entry content do not currently have a base URI, so
will be resolved relative to the feed URI:
Given an entry with the content:
<a href="some-resource.bin">
And URIS of:
* entry: https://example.org/blog/some-entry/
* feed: https://example.org/atom.xml
The link URI will end up as:
https://example.org/some-resource.bin
rather than the URI that ends up resolved in the rendered page:
https://example.org/blog/some-entry/some-resource.bin
The atom and RSS formats allow for an xml:base attribute (itself
specified in [1]) to provide a base URI of a subset of a document. This
change adds xml:base attributes to each entry, using the page permalink.
This gives us something equivalent to:
<entry>
<content xml:base="https://example.org/blog/some-entry/">
<![CDATA[
<a href="some-resource.bin">
]]>
</content>
</entry>
[1]: https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
| @@ -100,6 +100,16 @@ pub fn render_template( | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| pub fn is_default_template(name: &str, tera: &Tera, theme: &Option<String>) -> Result<bool> { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's not the right place to check. You essentially need to search for templates with that name in a theme or the templates directory Tera instances. Only if there are no overrides should the message be shown. Another way to do it would be to have a log Tera functions that does println so the template itself can warn
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You essentially need to search for templates with that name in a theme or the templates directory Tera instances. Only if there are no overrides should the message be shown.
Sorry, I thought I had accomplished this with this function which uses check_template_fallbacks. I will think on this but I am currently confused as to how to do this differently without repeating the logic in check_template_fallbacks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How do I do this without repeating logic in check_template_fallbacks?
8b1a413
to
67c2fe0
Compare
IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request adding a new feature without discussing it first.
The place to discuss new features is the forum: https://zola.discourse.group/
If you want to add a new feature, please open a thread there first in the feature requests section.
Sanity check:
Code changes
(Delete or ignore this section for documentation changes)
nextbranch?If the change is a new feature or adding to/changing an existing one:
Rewrite of #2200
This should be less ugly with way fewer lock acquisitions, and it actually works for
zola check.I have only done some simple manual tests so far.