-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug]: Fails to install any application: Could not unmount revokefs-fuse filesystem #5104
Comments
UPDATENote that THIS IS NOT NECESSARILY the cause or the solution to the OP's issue, it just so happens that our similar issue (on surface), was solved on my end. Scouring through the issues list, this problem could have varying causes from something wrong with As stated in my issue below, my flatpak version is I then checked the versions of the earlier 3 packages i mentioned, and found that the Checking the To fix this issue on my end, I simply had to ensure Old IssueI am only now just having this error when running I saw that this issue may also be present in one of the unstable version of SteamOS 3 on Steam Decks, as detailed in this Steam Community Bug Report on April 27 2023: Flatpak applications unable to be installed or updated on Main. This issue seems to also be related and has been closed, but the solution seems to have been to upgrade to a particular Flatpak Flatpak version
What Linux distribution are you using?
Linux distribution version
What architecture are you using?
Additional Information
Result of updating all pending apps using
|
Also experienced the same issue, SteamOS 3 main channel. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
No, what you quoted there is not the same error at all. It looks like an unrelated bug in the app itself. |
flatpak will have been running the first If this is a common failure mode, then the way to resolve it would be for flatpak to detect the path to a known-good |
Perhaps. FUSE 3's version of If this is a common failure mode, then the way to resolve it would be for flatpak to either use |
@rstanuwijaya: There is not enough information in your comment to diagnose whether your situation is the same as @notseanray, or the same as @irfanhakim-as, or something different. What is the output of |
@irfanhakim-as I saw this problem happens on SteamOS 3.5.5 stable version and I need to delete the .local/podman folder and i want to reinstall it from scratch (curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/89luca89/distrobox/main/uninstall | sh -s -- --prefix ~/.local) But, when I tried to create new container I got this: Image archlinux:latest not found. |
I had the same issue and have podman/distrobox installed, moving |
For me this was caused by a different version of libfuse I installed via homebrew. Running |
The hard-coding is not appropriate. According to libfuse 3.0.0 release notes: "The fusermount and mount.fuse binaries have been renamed to fusermount3 and mount.fuse3 to allow co-installation of libfuse 2.x and 3.x". Some distributions seem to install a symlink, but this is not upstream's default behavior. In addition, fusermount might be provided from non-distro sources. So a build-time option takes precedence over auto-detection logic. Fixes flatpak#5104 Fixes flatpak#5694
The hard-coding is not appropriate. According to libfuse 3.0.0 release notes: "The fusermount and mount.fuse binaries have been renamed to fusermount3 and mount.fuse3 to allow co-installation of libfuse 2.x and 3.x". Some distributions seem to install a symlink, but this is not upstream's default behavior. In addition, fusermount might be provided from non-distro sources. So a build-time option takes precedence over auto-detection logic. Fixes flatpak#5104 Fixes flatpak#5694
The hard-coding is not appropriate. According to libfuse 3.0.0 release notes: "The fusermount and mount.fuse binaries have been renamed to fusermount3 and mount.fuse3 to allow co-installation of libfuse 2.x and 3.x". Some distributions seem to install a symlink, but this is not upstream's default behavior. In addition, fusermount might be provided from non-distro sources. So a build-time option takes precedence over auto-detection logic. Fixes flatpak#5104 Fixes flatpak#5694
The hard-coding is not appropriate. According to libfuse 3.0.0 release notes: "The fusermount and mount.fuse binaries have been renamed to fusermount3 and mount.fuse3 to allow co-installation of libfuse 2.x and 3.x". Some distributions seem to install a symlink, but this is not upstream's default behavior. In addition, fusermount might be provided from non-distro sources. So a build-time option takes precedence over auto-detection logic. Fixes #5104 Fixes #5694
The hard-coding is not appropriate. According to libfuse 3.0.0 release notes: "The fusermount and mount.fuse binaries have been renamed to fusermount3 and mount.fuse3 to allow co-installation of libfuse 2.x and 3.x". Some distributions seem to install a symlink, but this is not upstream's default behavior. In addition, fusermount might be provided from non-distro sources. So a build-time option takes precedence over auto-detection logic. Fixes flatpak#5104 Fixes flatpak#5694
Checklist
Flatpak version
1.12.2
What Linux distribution are you using?
Gentoo Linux
Linux distribution version
5.18.1-gentoo-r2 #3
What architecture are you using?
x86_64
How to reproduce
flatpak install flathub com.usebottles.bottles
flatpak install flathub org.gnome.Platform/x86_64/42
Expected Behavior
Installs bottles or the desired application
Actual Behavior
Starts to download dependencies but after each dependency is downloaded this warning is put in the terminal.
After all dependencies are installed this error occurs and it fails.
This is the case for every package I attempt to install.
Additional Information
output of
stat /usr/bin/fusermount
I am curious if having both of these installed causes the issue
fusermount --version
fusermount3 --version
uname -a
I looked through previous issues but could not find anyone with a similar problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: