-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rejectVersionIf { } now considers all versions as stable #629
Comments
Oh yeah, we need to support number-less versions. Care to add some failing tests in a PR? I'd pick it up from here and fix it the way it should. |
Fixed on main, just launched the publication of a new snapshot in case you want to try it before one of use make a new release. |
thederputy
pushed a commit
to thederputy/refreshVersions
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2022
Since last changes in the Version class, versions like 1.7.20-RC and 1.7.20-Beta would be marked as stable instead of respectively ReleaseCandidate and Beta because the logic expected a number in all cases. The number is now optional for all pre-versions, except milestones. To prevent future recurrence of such regression, this commit also adds tests that assert the expected stability level of many known versions from various libraries. Fixes Splitties#629
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
🐛 Describe the bug
In refreshVersions 0.50.2, all versions are described as stable
Versions like 1.7.20-RC and 1.7.20-Beta are considered stable.
rendering
refreshVersions.rejectVersionIf { .. }
useless✅ Expected behavior
Like before
💣 Steps to reproduce
Checkout jmfayard/kotlin-playground@0e07f63
📱 Tech info
https://scans.gradle.com/s/dteblugtek5ec#infrastructure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: