-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rocm-related: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 & various fixes/changes #206421
Conversation
da7aa3e
to
d3e0bd7
Compare
Manually updated |
d3e0bd7
to
8238978
Compare
8238978
to
bf22ad7
Compare
That's a mass rebuild. I wonder if it's |
e9044ed
to
151089a
Compare
151089a
to
b99924f
Compare
license = licenses.mit; | ||
maintainers = with maintainers; [ lovesegfault ] ++ teams.rocm.members; | ||
platforms = platforms.linux; | ||
broken = finalAttrs.version != stdenv.cc.version; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if broken is actual correct here but I don't really have a better suggestion right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The other option I found was including (llvmPackages_rocm) clang in the derivation, but since we already manually change the stdenv it feels like a needless point of redirection.
rocminfo: standardize rocm-thunk: standardize rocm-opencl-icd: standardize rocclr: standardize rocm-device-libs: standardize rocm-comgr: standardize rocm-opencl-runtime: standardize rocm-runtime: standardize clang-ocl: standardize composable_kernel: standardize hipcub: standardize hipsparse: standardize miopengemm: standardize rccl: standardize rocfft: standardize rocprim: standardize rocsparse: standardize rocmlir: standardize rocrand: standardize tensile: standardize rocm-cmake: standardize rocm-smi: standardize miopen: standardize
rocblas: standardize and fix test/benchmarks rocthrust: standardize and fix test/benchmarks rocwmma: standardize and fix tests/benchmarks
hip-common: init at 5.4.0 hipcc: init at 5.4.1
clang-ocl: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 hipsparse: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 composable_kernel: unstable-2022-12-08 → unstable-2022-12-15 llvmPackages_rocm.llvm: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 miopen: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 miopengemm: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rccl: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocalution: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 hipcub: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocclr: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocfft: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-cmake: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-comgr: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-device-libs: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 hip: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocblas: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-runtime: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-opencl-runtime: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-thunk: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocprim: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocm-smi: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocminfo: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocsolver: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocrand: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocthrust: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocprofiler: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocwmma: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 roctracer: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 rocsparse: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1 tensile: 5.4.0 → 5.4.1
82f5a37
to
8de2395
Compare
Fixed release-notes merge conflict. |
Result of 1 package failed to build:
51 packages built:
|
Result of 52 packages built:
|
Forgot to add it to the list, but |
Description of changes
Tracking: #197885
This fixes a lot of issues, particularly the toolchain issue we were having.
Things done
sandbox = true
set innix.conf
? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh
to update generated release notes