fix unreliable jldoctest
#46021
Merged
fix unreliable jldoctest
#46021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fredrikekre
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2022
|
Thank you @t-bltg! |
|
I'm merging this now because doctest is green. |
ffucci
pushed a commit
to ffucci/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2022
pcjentsch
pushed a commit
to pcjentsch/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix unreliable
jldoctestintroduced in #45306.As shown e.g. in the
doctestjob https://buildkite.com/julialang/julia-master/builds/13830#0181f7c7-9994-4f84-a690-9cdb86480cbc.Specifically, the incriminated number change will keep changing on addition / removal of any
jldoctests in the source docstrings: e.g. it changed after merging #45137.