fix handling of .op in lowering
#44770
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simeonschaub
added
backport 1.6
22 tasks
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of `jlfrontend.scm` commented out. Turned out we didn't handle `.op` correctly in neither `check-dotop` nor in `deparse`. This meant we just got `error: malformed expression` instead of an actually useful error message.
simeonschaub
force-pushed
the
sds/fix_dotlower
branch
from
0d77031
to
4a136b0
Compare
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2022
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of `jlfrontend.scm` commented out. Turned out we didn't handle `.op` correctly in neither `check-dotop` nor in `deparse`. This meant we just got `error: malformed expression` instead of an actually useful error message. (cherry picked from commit 9112135)
67 tasks
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2022
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of `jlfrontend.scm` commented out. Turned out we didn't handle `.op` correctly in neither `check-dotop` nor in `deparse`. This meant we just got `error: malformed expression` instead of an actually useful error message. (cherry picked from commit 9112135)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2022
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of `jlfrontend.scm` commented out. Turned out we didn't handle `.op` correctly in neither `check-dotop` nor in `deparse`. This meant we just got `error: malformed expression` instead of an actually useful error message. (cherry picked from commit 9112135)
45 tasks
KristofferC
removed
backport 1.8
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of `jlfrontend.scm` commented out. Turned out we didn't handle `.op` correctly in neither `check-dotop` nor in `deparse`. This meant we just got `error: malformed expression` instead of an actually useful error message. (cherry picked from commit 9112135)
staticfloat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2022
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of `jlfrontend.scm` commented out. Turned out we didn't handle `.op` correctly in neither `check-dotop` nor in `deparse`. This meant we just got `error: malformed expression` instead of an actually useful error message. (cherry picked from commit 9112135)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discovered while running the syntax tests with lines 25-28 of
jlfrontend.scmcommented out. Turned out we didn't handle.opcorrectly in neither
check-dotopnor indeparse. This meant we justgot
error: malformed expressioninstead of an actually useful errormessage.