Printer Friendly

Therapeutic Potential of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Domain Inhibitors for Synovial Sarcoma Cells.

Author(s): Yuki Kotani [1]; Yoshinori Imura [1]; Sho Nakai [1]; Ryota Chijimatsu [2]; Haruna Takami [1]; Akitomo Inoue [1]; Hirokazu Mae [1]; Satoshi Takenaka [3]; Hidetatsu Outani (corresponding author) [1,*]; Seiji Okada [1]

1. Introduction

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare, aggressively progressing malignant soft-tissue tumor found in adolescents and young adults and is characterized by the fusion gene SS18-SSX arising from a t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) translocation [1,2]. Furthermore, compared with other soft-tissue tumors, SS has minimal genetic mutations apart from the fusion gene [3]. The fusion oncoprotein SS18-SSX replaces SS18, a subunit of the BAF complex, and epigenetically and globally alters gene expression by modulating the BAF complex localization [4,5]. These indicate that SS has the capability to orchestrate the oncogenic program solely through the fusion gene SS18-SSX. Based on the assessment of resection margins and distant metastases, the primary treatment for SS is surgical resection followed by radiotherapy or chemotherapy [6]. Existing chemotherapy options like doxorubicin and ifosfamide are commonly employed; however, their efficacy is limited, and options available for advanced stages of the disease are scarce. Despite multimodal therapy implementation, disease-specific survival at 10 years is approximately 60% [7]. Therefore, the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for SS is highly anticipated.

Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) proteins, represented by BRD4, play crucial roles in initiating transcription and promoting transcriptional RNA elongation. BRD4 identifies and binds to acetylated histones, promoting transcription initiation by recruiting RNA polymerase II (RNA-polII) to the promoter regions of genes. Additionally, BRD4 interacts with positive transcription elongation factor b (p-TEFb) to enhance transcriptional RNA elongation by releasing RNA-polII, which is dormant in the promoter-proximal regions, for active transcription [8,9]. BET inhibitors competitively inhibit these functions by binding to acetylated histones. Three distinct classes regulate histone acetylation: “writers” represented by histone acetyltransferase, “erasers” represented by histone deacetylase (HDAC), and “readers” represented by BET [10]. Several studies on SS have focused on HDAC inhibitors targeting “writers” [11,12,13]. Recently, BET inhibitors targeting “readers” have attracted much attention, and several studies have explored BET inhibitors as potential anticancer agents. These inhibitors have been reported to inhibit BRD4 binding in super-enhancer regions, which play a pivotal role in the recruitment of RNA-polII to promoter regions, thereby diminishing the expression of MYC and other oncogenic genes [14]. This leads to the induction of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis across various tumor cells [15,16,17,18]. However, reports on the anticancer activity of BET inhibitors against SS are absent.

Herein, we investigate the antitumor effects of BET inhibitors on SS as a potential new agent for treating SS using (+)-JQ1 and ABBV-075.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Our laboratory established the human cell lines Aska-SS (SS; CVCL_6C43), Yamato-SS (SS; CVCL_6C44), and Asra-EPS (epithelioid sarcoma; CVCL_W949). The SS cell lines, HS-SY-II (CVCL_8719) and SYO-1 (CVCL_7146), were graciously provided by Dr. Toguchida (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) and Dr. Ozaki (Okayama University, Okayama, Japan), respectively. The clear cell sarcoma cell lines, MP-CCS-SY (CVCL_0J33) and KAS, were graciously provided by Dr. Moritake (Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan) and Dr. Nakamura (Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan). The epithelioid sarcoma cell line, NEPS (CVCL_IS66), was graciously provided by Dr. Kawashima (Niigata University, Niigata, Japan). We purchased the SU-CCS1 (clear cell sarcoma; CVCL_B470), VAESBJ (epithelioid sarcoma; CVCL_1785), EW-8 (Ewing sarcoma; V618), HT-1080 (fibrosarcoma; CVCL_0317), and SW872 (liposarcoma; CVCL_1730) cell lines from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). We obtained normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) from Kurabo (Osaka, Japan). The accession numbers listed with each cell line are registered in the cell line database Cellosaurus (https://www.cellosaurus.org/index.html, accessed on 26 July 2022). All cell lines were cultured under standard conditions at 37 °C with 5% CO[sub.2] and 100% humidity in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Nacalai Tesque, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% antibiotics (penicillin 100 IU/mL, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All cell lines underwent authentication through morphological examination, genotyping by PCR, and analysis of growth characteristics. Prior to experimentation, these cell lines were confirmed to be negative for Mycoplasma contamination through the use of TaKaRa PCR Mycoplasma Detection Set (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan).

2.2. Compounds

ABBV-075 was obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). The compound was solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma–Aldrich) before its addition to the cell cultures for subsequent examination, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. WST-8 Cell Proliferation Assay

The SS cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 10[sup.3] cells/well in triplicates and incubated with the compound or vehicle control for 48 h. The cell proliferation rate was determined using the Cell Count Reagent SF (Nacalai Tesque). Absorbance at 450 and 690 nm (reference wavelengths) was recorded using a microplate reader, and the relative cell proliferation rate was calculated.

2.4. Flow Cytometry

The SS cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 3–12 × 10[sup.5] cells/well and cultured for 24 h. Subsequently, the compound or vehicle control was administered. After 24 h of treatment at the designated concentration, the cells were harvested and stained with a propidium iodide (PI) solution (25 µg/mL PI, 0.03% NP-40, 0.02 mg/mL RNase A, and 0.1% sodium citrate) for 30 min at 20–23 °C. Cell-cycle analysis was performed using a BD FACSVerse flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and BD FACSuite (Becton Dickinson), following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.5. Western Blotting

SS cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 10[sup.5] cells/well and incubated with the compound or vehicle control at the designated concentrations for 24 h. For lysate preparation, the SS cells were initially washed with phosphate-buffered saline and subsequently lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with a 1% protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein concentrations were determined using bicinchoninic acid (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Equivalent protein amounts were separated using 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan). Membranes were incubated in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with Tween 20 (TBS-T) containing 5% skimmed milk at 20–23 °C and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) diluted in Can Get Signal Solution 1 (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) at 4 °C overnight. They were subsequently incubated with secondary antibodies diluted in Can Get Signal Solution 2 (Toyobo) at 20–23 °C for 1 h. After washing with TBS-T, images were obtained using a ChemiDOC touch system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo). Gene expression analysis was performed using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo). The expression levels of target genes were normalized to those of GAPDH. The relative expression was determined using the 2-??Ct method. Supplementary Table S1 lists the PCR primers (forward and reverse) used in this study.

2.7. Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) Transfection

SS cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 10[sup.5] cells/well and cultured for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were reverse transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For this procedure, 20 nmol/L of siRNAs targeting SS18-SSX1 were used for Aska-SS, Yamato-SS, and HS-SY-II, and SS18-SSX2 for SYO-1 (Supplementary Table S1). A non-targeting negative control siRNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was also included.

2.8. Total RNA Sequencing (RNA-seq)

Total RNA was isolated from the four SS cell lines treated with ABBV-075 or the vehicle control for 24 h using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and the NEBNext UltraTMII Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs). The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system in paired-end 2 × 150 bp cycle mode, in accordance with the standard protocol.

2.9. Analyzing the Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

We determined the DEGs following compound administration using iDEP (https://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/idep/, accessed on 30 April 2023) [19]. The adjusted p-value was set at <0.05, and the log2 (fold change (FC)) was set at >1. Supplementary Table S2 shows the DEG data.

2.10. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Analysis

KEGG pathway analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery v6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 14 May 2023) [20,21]. Analyses were conducted with the species set as Homo sapiens, the identifier set as the official gene symbol, the gene list set as the list type, and the remaining parameters set to the default values. The results of the KEGG pathway analysis were annotated using the KEGG pathway. Supplementary Table S3 presents the KEGG pathway analysis data.

2.11. Subcutaneous Xenograft Assays

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine. Five-week-old male BALB/c nu/nu mice (SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were used in this study. A subcutaneous injection of 1 × 10[sup.7] SYO-1 cells was administered to the right side of the back of individual mice for subcutaneous xenograft assays. Tumor dimensions were measured at 3 d intervals using a caliper, and tumor volume was calculated using the following formula: Volume = Length × Width × Width/2. Treatment intervention commenced when all tumors became palpable. Before treatment, the mice were randomly allocated to vehicle control and ABBV-075 groups. ABBV-075 was administered once daily at a dose of 1 mg/kg via oral gavage. The vehicle control group received an equivalent volume of saline via oral gavage once daily. The xenograft tumor volume and mouse body weight were measured at 3 d intervals. Mice were continually monitored for marked adverse effects, and all tumors were excised and weighed at the end of the treatment phase.

2.12. Histology

The tumors were fixed in a 10% formalin-neutral buffer solution (Wako, Osaka, Japan) and subsequently embedded in paraffin using a Tissue-Tek VIP 6 AI (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan). Paraffin-embedded tumors were sectioned at a 3.5 µm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).

2.13. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Paraffin-embedded tumor sections were hydrated by passing through xylene and graded ethanol solutions. Antigen retrieval was facilitated by incubation in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95 °C for 30 min, followed by inactivation of endogenous peroxidase activity using 3% hydrogen peroxide. The sections were then treated with Blocking One Histo (Nacalai Tesque) for 20 min to prevent non-specific binding. Subsequently, the sections were primarily incubated with a 1:200 dilution of Ki-67 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) for 60 min. Secondary incubation was performed using N-Histofine Simple Stain MAX PO (MULTI) (Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) for 60 min. The immunoreactivity was visualized using Simple Stain DAB (Nichirei Biosciences), and contrast was enhanced with hematoxylin staining. All IHC analyses were performed using an Aperio CS2 (Leica, Wetzler, Germany), and the staining intensities were compared at ×200 magnification.

2.14. Statistical Analysis

All data are shown as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Statistical differences were assessed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Significance was set at p-values < 0.05, and the figure legends indicate precise p values.

3. Results

3.1. BET Inhibitors Exhibit Antitumor Effects for SS In Vitro

We conducted a cell viability assay using four SS cell lines and a NHDF cell line to examine the antiproliferative effects of BET inhibitors on SS. (+)-JQ1 caused a dose-dependent reduction in the number of viable cells in all four SS cell lines (Figure 1A). SS cells demonstrated greater sensitivity to (+)-JQ1 than to NHDF, with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 0.04–0.45 µM and 20.1 µM, respectively (Table 1). Additionally, ABBV-075 caused a dose-dependent reduction in the number of viable cells in all four SS cell lines (Figure 1B). SS cells demonstrated greater sensitivity to ABBV-075 than to NHDF, with IC50 values of 0.7–67 nM and 2140 nM, respectively (Table 2). Over the course of 96 h, ABBV-075 exhibited dose- and time-dependent reductions in all four SS cell lines compared to the vehicle control (Figure 1C). In all four SS cell lines following ABBV-075 treatment, cleaved caspase-3 was detected (Figure 1D, Supplementary File S1). We conducted cell viability assays using nine cell lines derived from five different sarcomas to discern variations in susceptibility among various soft-tissue sarcomas (Figure 1E–G). Notably, all nine cell lines exhibited reduced sensitivity compared to the SS cell lines (Table 2). These findings revealed that ABBV-075 induced apoptosis and inhibited SS cell proliferation in vitro.

3.2. ABBV-075 Delays SS Growth In Vivo

Additionally, we evaluated the antitumor effects of ABBV-075 on SS cells in vivo. Daily ABBV-075 administration significantly reduced tumor volume in the xenograft model compared to the vehicle control (Figure 2A). Histological examination using HE staining revealed that the tumors in the vehicle control group exhibited high cellular density, whereas those in the ABBV-075-treated group exhibited substantial internal necrosis and low cellular density (Figure 2B). Immunohistochemical staining of tumors using a Ki-67 antibody revealed a higher density of cells positive for Ki-67 in the vehicle control-treated group than in the ABBV-075-treated group (Figure 2C,D). These findings reveal that ABBV-075 slows the cell cycle and inhibits SS tumor growth in vivo.

3.3. ABBV-075 Inhibits Cell-Cycle Checkpoints and Causes G1 Arrest

Cell-cycle analysis revealed that ABBV-075 treatment increased the cell proportion in the G0/G1 phase across all four SS cell lines, accompanied by an increase in the G1 fraction in two SS cell lines (Figure 3A). We investigated the mechanisms underlying G1 arrest by examining the expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins. MYC expression decreased, whereas p21 expression increased in a dose-dependent manner in all four cell lines. Furthermore, CDK4 and CDK6 expression, involved in directly advancing the cell cycle from G1 to S phase, decreased. Additionally, the increase in p21 expression was independent of p53 expression (Figure 3B, Supplementary File S1). Similarly, mRNA expression analysis revealed elevated CDKN1A levels and decreased CDK4 and CDK6 levels in all four cell lines (Supplementary Figure S1). These results indicate that ABBV-075 downregulates MYC and causes G1 arrest by inhibiting the cell-cycle checkpoint between the G1 and S phases.

3.4. ABBV-075 Targets the BCL2 Family Protein to Induce Apoptosis

We investigated the mechanism of the antitumor effect by employing RNA-seq to compile complete expression profiles from four SS cell lines treated with the vehicle control or ABBV-075. The mean gene counts of the four cell lines in the vehicle control and ABBV-075 groups were compared, and genes with a fold change >2 were defined as genes with variable expression. The numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes were 1970 and 2224, respectively (Figure 4A). KEGG pathway analysis was performed to identify the pathways regulated by ABBV-075 in SS. KEGG pathway analysis for all 4194 genes revealed that the p53 signaling pathway and apoptosis were the pathways that were regulated by ABBV-075 and were related to antitumor effects (Figure 4B). The BCL2 family is involved in p53 signaling and apoptosis pathways, and a heatmap of the BCL2 family was generated using gene count data from RNA-seq (Figure 4C). We also conducted Western blotting and qRT-PCR to explore the changes in expression levels of BCL2 family members following ABBV-075 treatment and their correlation with susceptibility to ABBV-075. The anti-apoptotic protein BCLxL was downregulated, whereas the pro-apoptotic proteins BIM and PUMA were upregulated by ABBV-075 (Figure 4D, Supplementary File S1). ABBV-075 treatment reduced the mRNA expression of the anti-apoptotic factor BCLxL while concurrently enhancing the mRNA expression of the pro-apoptotic factors BIM and PUMA (Figure 4E). The mRNA expression of BCLxL in each cell line was compared with that of BCL2, which revealed a pronounced increase in BCLxL expression in Aska-SS and SYO-1 (Supplementary Figure S2). Subsequently, the ratios of the anti-apoptotic factor to the pro-apoptotic factors were calculated, which revealed a significant alteration in the BCLxL:BIM ratio across all four cell lines (Table 3). Among the four cell lines, Aska-SS and SYO-1 exhibited greater susceptibility to ABBV-075 (IC 50 < 10 nM) than Yamato-SS and HS-SY-II (IC 50 > 10 nM) (Table 2). The pro-apoptotic shift in the BCLxL:BIM ratio was greater in the susceptible Aska-SS and SYO-1 strains (Table 4).

3.5. SS18-SSX Affects SS Susceptibility to ABBV-075

Several epigenome-modulating agents affect fusion gene expression in sarcoma cells [12,22,23]. We investigated the effects of ABBV-075 on SS18-SSX. We formulated an siRNA targeting SS18-SSX and silenced the fusion gene to explore the influence of SS18-SSX expression on the susceptibility to ABBV-075 (Figure 5A). We calculated the relative proliferation of SS cells treated with 10 nM ABBV-075 for the si_Control and si_SS18-SSX groups, with 0 µM ABBV-075 as the baseline. In the si_Control group, the relative proliferation was 0.32, 0.69, 0.13, and 0.80 for Aska-SS, Yamato-SS, HS-SY-II, and SYO-1, respectively. Conversely, in the si_SS18-SSX group, the relative proliferation was 0.80, 0.80, 0.80, and 0.55 for Aska-SS, Yamato-SS, HS-SY-II, and SYO-1, respectively. A significant reduction in susceptibility upon silencing of SS18-SSX was observed across three cell lines, Aska-SS, Yamato-SS, and SYO-1 (Figure 5B). We investigated the gene expression controlled by SS18-SSX using the Genome Expression Omnibus (GEO) database provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (GSE108028) to identify the pathway controlled by SS18-SSX and related to susceptibility to BET inhibitors in SS [4]. We compared the mean gene counts of the three cell lines in the sh_Control and sh_SS18-SSX groups and defined genes with a fold change >4 as genes with variable expression. The numbers of upregulated genes and downregulated genes were 1039 and 462, respectively (Figure 5C). Subsequently, when genes whose expression was downregulated by SS18-SSX silencing were sorted from those with significant differences in expression levels, BCL2 was identified as the most significant factor (Supplementary Table S4). The heatmap generated from the RNA-seq gene count data exhibited minimal variation in the expression levels of other members of the BCL2 family (Figure 5D). SS18-SSX silencing decreased BCL2 protein expression (Figure 5E, Supplementary File S1). These findings indicate that susceptibility to ABBV-075 was influenced by SS18-SSX expression and that the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, modulated by BCL2, whose expression was upregulated by SS18-SSX, could potentially impact susceptibility.

4. Discussion

The efficacy of chemotherapy for SS is limited [7,24,25], and the development of further effective therapies is desired. The role of the SS18-SSX fusion gene in SS is progressively becoming clear, with emerging evidence suggesting that the fusion gene modifies BAF complex localization, thereby exerting an influence on epigenetic processes [4,5]. Agents that directly modify the BAF complex are unavailable, except for the BRD9 inhibitor [26]. Inhibitors targeting EZH2, a subunit of the polycomb complex that coordinates chromatin remodeling in conjunction with the BAF complex, are available [27]; however, they have not been clinically effective in SS [28]. Therefore, we investigated other epigenome-modifying agents for treating SS. Although sporadic reports of HDAC and DNMT inhibitors as agents capable of epigenetic regulation are available [11,12,29], investigations into BET inhibitors for SS are lacking. BRD4, a representative BET family protein, orchestrates transcriptional activation by recruiting the transcription elongation factor P-TEFb to the transcription start site through interaction with histone–lysine acetylation via its bromodomain [30]. Furthermore, BRD4 engages with the RNA polymerase II complex and participates in transcriptional elongation [31]. Although (+)-JQ1, the first BET inhibitor, was introduced in 2010 and has been extensively employed in studies on BET inhibitors, it is not currently undergoing human clinical trials because of its short half-life [14]. (+)-JQ1 inhibits BRD4 binding at the super-enhancer region of MYC, leading to the downregulation of MYC expression and modulation of downstream gene expression [32]. I-BET 151 induced G1 phase cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis for mixed lineage leukemia (MLL), achieved by reducing the binding of BRD4 to the promoter regions of MYC, BCL2, and CDK6 [33]. ABBV-075 is an orally bioavailable pan-BETi with a core of pyrrolopyridone that exhibits exceptional potency against BRD2, BRD4, and BRDT, with inhibition constants (Ki) of 1, 1.6, and 2.2 nmol/L, respectively. ABBV-075 induces G1 cell-cycle arrest and activates the intrinsic apoptotic pathway by downregulating BCLxL in hematologic tumor cell lines [18]. Additionally, ABBV-075 downregulates MYC, CDK6, and BCLxL expression, upregulates p21 and BIM expression, and induces apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells [16]. Regarding soft-tissue sarcomas, several studies have demonstrated antitumor activity of BET inhibitors using Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and clear cell sarcoma cells through mechanisms similar to those of hematological tumor cells [17,22,23].

In SS, SS18-SSX contributes to CCND1 expression and stabilization; consequently, the activated CCND1/CDK4/CDK6 axis is considered a promising therapeutic target [34,35]. Additionally, fusion gene-dependent BCL2 overexpression and its contribution to tumorigenesis have been reported, and BCL2-related anti-apoptotic pathways are also considered a potential therapeutic target for SS [12,36,37,38].

Herein, MYC, CDK4, and CDK6 downregulation and p21 upregulation were observed following ABBV-075 treatment, which is consistent with previous reports. Furthermore, we confirmed the downregulation of the anti-apoptotic factor BCLxL and the upregulation of the pro-apoptotic factors BIM and PUMA following ABBV-075 treatment. A BET inhibitor would be a promising treatment for SS because ABBV-075 inhibits both pathways activated in SS. Although we demonstrated that SS18-SSX silencing reduced the susceptibility of ABBV-075 and that the BCL2-related apoptotic pathway is a potential pathway affecting susceptibility, BCLxL is possibly more critical than BCL2 in ABBV-075 treatment for SS. These results are consistent with a previous report that the antitumor effect of BCL2 inhibitors was poor despite BCL2 overexpression in SS, whereas BCLxL inhibitors exhibited nanomolar efficacy [38]. The possibility that BCL2 may not be as important in maintaining the cellular health of SS cells and that BCLxL may be more easily poisoned than BCL2 has been discussed, and the BCL2 family, rather than BCL2 alone, is considered a viable therapeutic target [38]. Moreover, a previous report on SS documented apoptosis induction by downregulating BCLxL, rather than BCL2, among the factors governing the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [39]. In the present study, the mRNA expression of BCLxL was substantially higher than that of BCL2 in Aska-SS and SYO-1, which are both susceptible to ABBV-075. The findings of this study also indicate that BCLxL expression could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting the therapeutic effectiveness of ABBV-075.

ABBV-075 completed a phase 1 clinical trial in 2019 and its safety and pharmacokinetics were investigated [40]. ABBV-075 exhibited anti-leukemic efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory AML, and its effectiveness was further potentiated when combined with the BCL2 selective inhibitor, venetoclax [41]. Clinical trials on SS, where ABBV-075 induces G1 phase cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, as in AML, are eagerly anticipated.

5. Conclusions

The BET inhibitor used in this study exhibited antitumor activity against SS cell lines by suppressing cell-cycle modulators and inducing apoptosis by regulating the BCL2 family proteins. Given that BCL2 is controlled by SS18-SSX and that SS18-SSX affects ABBV-075 susceptibility, BET inhibitors appear to be promising therapeutic agents for SS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.K., H.O. and S.O.; resources, Y.K., H.T., A.I., H.M. and S.T.; methodology, Y.K., Y.I., H.O., R.C., S.N. and S.O.; formal analysis, Y.K., R.C. and H.M.; data curation, Y.K., H.T. and A.I.; validation, Y.I., H.M., H.T. and S.N.; investigation, Y.K., H.O., A.I. and S.T.; supervision, H.O. and S.O.; writing?original draft, Y.K., H.O. and S.O.; writing?review and editing, Y.I., S.N. and S.T.; project administration, Y.I., H.O. and S.O.; funding acquisition, Y.K., Y.I., H.O. and S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Animal studies were approved on 5 April 2021 (approval number: 03-000-002) by the Institutional Review Board of Osaka University Animal Experiments Committee. Animal care followed institutional guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this research are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Acknowledgments

We thank Junya Toghchida and Toshifumi Ozaki for supplying the human SS cell lines, HS-SY-II and SYO-1, Hiroshi Moritake and Takuro Nakamura for supplying the human clear cell sarcoma cell lines, MP-CCS-SY and KAS, and Hiroyuki Kawashima for supplying the human epithelioid sarcoma cell line NEPS. We are grateful to Yukiko Eguchi for technical support.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers16061125/s1, Figure S1: The mRNA expression of the cell-cycle regulators, CCND1, CDK4, CDK6, and CDKN1A, of the four synovial sarcoma cell lines treated with 0 µM and 1 µM ABBV-075 examined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Figure S2: The mRNA expression of BCLxL compared with BCL2 in four synovial sarcoma cell lines examined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Table S1: List of resources; Table S2: Differentially expressed gene analysis of RNA sequencing; Table S3: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis; Table S4: Downregulated genes by silencing SS18-SSX; File S1: Original images of Western blotting.

References

1. P.H. Wright; F.H. Sim; E.H. Soule; W.F. Taylor Synovial Sarcoma., 1982, 64,pp. 112-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198264010-00016.

2. A. Kawai; J. Woodruff; J.H. Healey; M.F. Brennan; C.R. Antonescu; M. Ladanyi SYT-SSX gene fusion as a determinant of morphology and prognosis in synovial sarcoma., 1998, 338,pp. 153-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380303. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9428816.

3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Comprehensive and Integrated Genomic Characterization of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas., 2017, 171,pp. 950-965.e28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.014. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100075.

4. M.J. McBride; J.L. Pulice; H.C. Beird; D.R. Ingram; A.R. D’Avino; J.F. Shern; G.W. Charville; J.L. Hornick; R.T. Nakayama; E.M. Garcia-Rivera et al. The SS18-SSX fusion oncoprotein hijacks BAF complex targeting and function to drive synovial sarcoma., 2018, 33,pp. 1128-1141.e7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.002. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861296.

5. A. Banito; X. Li; A.N. Laporte; J.-S. Roe; F. Sanchez-Vega; C.-H. Huang; A.R. Dancsok; K. Hatzi; C.-C. Chen; D.F. Tschaharganeh et al. The SS18-SSX oncoprotein hijacks KDM2B-PRC1.1 to drive synovial sarcoma., 2018, 33,pp. 527-541.e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.018. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29502955.

6. A.M. Gazendam; S. Popovic; S. Munir; N. Parasu; D. Wilson; M. Ghert Synovial Sarcoma: A clinical review., 2021, 28,pp. 1909-1920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28030177. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069748.

7. H. Outani; T. Nakamura; H. Murata; J. Stevenson; M. Parry; J. Gregory; R. Tillman; L. Jeys; A. Abudu Localized synovial sarcoma: A single institutional study of 191 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years for survivors., 2019, 119,pp. 850-855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25417. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786036.

8. C. Dhalluin; J.E. Carlson; L. Zeng; C. He; A.K. Aggarwal; M.-M. Zhou Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain., 1999, 399,pp. 491-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/20974.

9. B. Donati; E. Lorenzini; A. Ciarrocchi BRD4 and cancer: Going beyond transcriptional regulation., 2018, 17,p. 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0915-9.

10. R.L. Bennett; J.D. Licht Targeting epigenetics in cancer., 2018, 58,pp. 187-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010716-105106.

11. T. Ito; M. Ouchida; Y. Morimoto; A. Yoshida; Y. Jitsumori; T. Ozaki; H. Sonobe; H. Inoue; K. Shimizu Significant growth suppression of synovial sarcomas by the histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 in vitro and in vivo., 2005, 224,pp. 311-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.030.

12. A.N. Laporte; N.M. Poulin; J.J. Barrott; X.Q. Wang; A. Lorzadeh; R. Vander Werff; K.B. Jones; T.M. Underhill; T.O. Nielsen Death by HDAC Inhibition in Synovial Sarcoma Cells., 2017, 16,pp. 2656-2667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0397.

13. C. Lanzi; E. Favini; L. Dal Bo; M. Tortoreto; N. Arrighetti; N. Zaffaroni; G. Cassinelli Upregulation of ERK-EGR1-Heparanase Axis by HDAC inhibitors provides targets for rational therapeutic intervention in synovial sarcoma., 2021, 40,p. 381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02150-y.

14. P. Filippakopoulos; J. Qi; S. Picaud; Y. Shen; W.B. Smith; O. Fedorov; E.M. Morse; T. Keates; T.T. Hickman; I. Felletar et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains., 2010, 468,pp. 1067-1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09504.

15. T. Shorstova; W.D. Foulkes; M. Witcher Achieving clinical success with BET inhibitors as anti-cancer agents., 2021, 124,pp. 1478-1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01321-0.

16. W. Fiskus; T. Cai; C.D. DiNardo; S.M. Kornblau; G. Borthakur; T.M. Kadia; N. Pemmaraju; P. Bose; L. Masarova; K. Rajapakshe et al. Superior efficacy of cotreatment with BET protein inhibitor and BCL2 or MCL1 inhibitor against AML blast progenitor cells., 2019, 9,p. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-018-0165-5. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647404.

17. I. Marchesi; M. Fais; F.P. Fiorentino; V. Bordoni; L. Sanna; S. Zoroddu; L. Bagella Bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 provides novel insights and perspectives in rhabdomyosarcoma treatment., 2022, 23, 3581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073581. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408939.

18. M.H. Bui; X. Lin; D.H. Albert; L. Li; L.T. Lam; E.J. Faivre; S.E. Warder; X. Huang; D. Wilcox; C.K. Donawho et al. Preclinical characterization of bet family bromodomain inhibitor ABBV-075 suggests combination therapeutic strategies., 2017, 77,pp. 2976-2989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1793.

19. S.X. Ge; E.W. Son; R. Yao iDEP: An integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data., 2018, 19, 534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2486-6. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567491.

20. D.W. Huang; B.T. Sherman; R.A. Lempicki Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources., 2009, 4,pp. 44-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19131956.

21. B.T. Sherman; M. Hao; J. Qiu; X. Jiao; M.W. Baseler; H.C. Lane; T. Imamichi; W. Chang DAVID: A Web Server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 Update)., 2022, 50,pp. W216-W221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac194. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35325185.

22. C. Jacques; F. Lamoureux; M. Baud’huin; L. Rodriguez Calleja; T. Quillard; J. Amiaud; F. Tirode; F. Rédini; J.E. Bradner; D. Heymann et al. Targeting the epigenetic readers in ewing sarcoma inhibits the oncogenic transcription factor ews/Fli1., 2016, 7,pp. 24125-24140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8214. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006472.

23. H. Mae; H. Outani; Y. Imura; R. Chijimatsu; A. Inoue; Y. Kotani; N. Yasuda; S. Nakai; T. Nakai; S. Takenaka et al. Targeting the clear cell sarcoma oncogenic driver fusion gene EWSR1::ATF1 by HDAC inhibition., 2023, 3,pp. 1152-1165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0518. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405123.

24. A. Le Cesne; M. Ouali; M.G. Leahy; A. Santoro; H.J. Hoekstra; P. Hohenberger; F. Van Coevorden; P. Rutkowski; R. Van Hoesel; J. Verweij et al. Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: Pooled analysis of two STBSG-EORTC phase III clinical trials., 2014, 25,pp. 2425-2432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu460. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25294887.

25. A. Italiano; N. Penel; Y.-M. Robin; B. Bui; A. Le Cesne; S. Piperno-Neumann; M. Tubiana-Hulin; E. Bompas; C. Chevreau; N. Isambert et al. Neo/adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve outcome in resected primary synovial sarcoma: A study of the French sarcoma group., 2009, 20,pp. 425-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn678. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19088169.

26. G.L. Brien; D. Remillard; J. Shi; M.L. Hemming; J. Chabon; K. Wynne; E.T. Dillon; G. Cagney; G. Van Mierlo; M.P. Baltissen et al. Targeted degradation of BRD9 reverses oncogenic gene expression in synovial sarcoma., 2018, 7,p. e41305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41305.

27. J.K. Shen; G.M. Cote; Y. Gao; E. Choy; H.J. Mankin; F.J. Hornicek; Z. Duan Targeting EZH2-mediated methylation of H3K27 inhibits proliferation and migration of synovial sarcoma in vitro., 2016, 6,p. 25239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25239.

28. P. Schoffski; M. Agulnik; S. Stacchiotti; L.E. Davis; V.M. Villalobos; A. Italiano; S. George; G.M. Cote; S. Blakemore; A. Clawson et al. Phase 2 multicenter study of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in adults with synovial sarcoma (NCT02601950)., 2017, 35,p. 11057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.11057.

29. K. Numoto; A. Yoshida; S. Sugihara; T. Kunisada; Y. Morimoto; Y. Yoneda; Y. Fujita; K. Nishida; M. Ouchida; T. Ozaki Frequent methylation of RASSF1A in synovial sarcoma and the anti-tumor effects of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine against synovial sarcoma cell lines., 2010, 136,pp. 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0632-2.

30. Z. Yang; J.H.N. Yik; R. Chen; N. He; M.K. Jang; K. Ozato; Q. Zhou Recruitment of P-TEFb for stimulation of transcriptional elongation by the bromodomain protein Brd4., 2005, 19,pp. 535-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.029. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16109377.

31. B.N. Devaiah; B.A. Lewis; N. Cherman; M.C. Hewitt; B.K. Albrecht; P.G. Robey; K. Ozato; R.J. Sims; D.S. Singer BRD4 is an atypical kinase that phosphorylates Serine2 of the rna polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain., 2012, 109,pp. 6927-6932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120422109.

32. J. Lovén; H.A. Hoke; C.Y. Lin; A. Lau; D.A. Orlando; C.R. Vakoc; J.E. Bradner; T.I. Lee; R.A. Young Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers., 2013, 153,pp. 320-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.036.

33. M.A. Dawson; R.K. Prinjha; A. Dittmann; G. Giotopoulos; M. Bantscheff; W.-I. Chan; S.C. Robson; C. Chung; C. Hopf; M.M. Savitski et al. Inhibition of BET recruitment to chromatin as an effective treatment for MLL-fusion leukaemia., 2011, 478,pp. 529-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10509.

34. Y. Xie; B. Skytting; G. Nilsson; A. Gasbarri; K. Haslam; A. Bartolazzi; B. Brodin; N. Mandahl; O. Larsson SYT-SSX is critical for cyclin D1 expression in synovial sarcoma cells: A gain of function of the t(X;18)(P11.2;Q11.2) translocation., 2002, 62,pp. 3861-3867.

35. M. Vlenterie; M.H.S. Hillebrandt-Roeffen; E.W.M. Schaars; U.E. Flucke; E.D.G. Fleuren; A.C. Navis; W.P.J. Leenders; Y.M.H. Versleijen-Jonkers; W.T.A. van der Graaf Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in synovial sarcoma: Palbociclib as a potential treatment for synovial sarcoma patients., 2016, 23,pp. 2745-2752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5341-x.

36. N. Hirakawa; T. Naka; I. Yamamoto; T. Fukuda; M. Tsuneyoshi Overexpression of Bcl-2 protein in synovial sarcoma: A comparative study of other soft tissue spindle cell sarcomas and an additional analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization., 1996, 27,pp. 1060-1065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(96)90284-1.

37. C. Peng; W. Guo; Y. Yang; H. Zhao Downregulation of SS18-SSX1 expression by small interfering RNA inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in human synovial sarcoma cell line HS-SY-II in vitro., 2008, 17,pp. 392-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328305a11b. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18714179.

38. J.J. Barrott; J.-F. Zhu; K. Smith-Fry; A.M. Susko; D. Nollner; L.D. Burrell; A. Pozner; M.R. Capecchi; J.T. Yap; L.A. Cannon-Albright et al. The influential role of BCL2 family members in synovial sarcomagenesis., 2017, 15,pp. 1733-1740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0315. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851813.

39. C.-L. Peng; W. Guo; T. Ji; T. Ren; Y. Yang; D.-S. Li; H.-Y. Qu; X. Li; S. Tang; T.-Q. Yan et al. Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in human synovial sarcoma cells via inhibiting the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway., 2009, 8,pp. 1729-1736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.8.18.9208. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19633425.

40. S.A. Piha-Paul; J.C. Sachdev; M. Barve; P. LoRusso; R. Szmulewitz; S.P. Patel; P.N. Lara; X. Chen; B. Hu; K.J. Freise et al. First-in-human study of Mivebresib (ABBV-075), an oral pan-inhibitor of bromodomain and extra terminal proteins, in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors., 2019, 25,pp. 6309-6319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0578.

41. G. Borthakur; O. Odenike; I. Aldoss; D.A. Rizzieri; T. Prebet; C. Chen; R. Popovic; D.A. Modi; R.H. Joshi; J.E. Wolff et al. A phase 1 study of the pan-bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor Mivebresib (ABBV-075) alone or in combination with venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia., 2021, 127,pp. 2943-2953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33590. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934351.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1: Antitumor effects of the bromodomain and extra-terminal domain protein (BET) inhibitors in vitro. (A) Relative cell proliferation measured using WST-8 assay of four synovial sarcoma (SS) cell lines and NHDF incubated with the different (+)-JQ1 concentrations for 48 h. (B) Relative cell proliferation measured using WST-8 assay of four SS cell lines and NHDF incubated with the different ABBV-075 concentrations for 48 h. (C) Relative cell proliferation measured using WST-8 assay of four SS cell lines incubated in the presence of ABBV-075 (0, 10, 100, 1000 (nM)) from 24 to 96 h. (D) Apoptosis marker expression of four SS cell lines treated with ABBV-075 via Western blotting. Relative cell proliferation measured using WST-8 assay of three clear cell sarcoma cell lines (E), three epithelioid sarcoma cell lines (F), and cell lines of Ewing sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and liposarcoma (G). Data in (A–C,E–G) are means ± standard deviations. **, p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Figure 2: Antitumor effects of ABBV-075 in vivo. (A) Vehicle-treated tumors (above) and tumors treated with a 1 mg/kg concentration of ABBV-075 (below). (B) Mean tumor volume after treatment with the vehicle control and ABBV-075 (n = 6 mice in each group). (C) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the excised tumor with the vehicle control and ABBV-075 at the end of the treatment phase. Ki-67 staining of the excised tumor with the vehicle control and ABBV-075 at the end of the treatment phase was performed using immunohistochemistry (D) and estimated as a percentage of positive cells (E). Data in (B,D) are means ± standard deviations. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Figure 3: ABBV-075 induces G1 phase cell-cycle arrest. (A) Cell-cycle analysis of four SS cell lines treated with 0, 10, 100, and 1000 nM ABBV-075 was performed using flow cytometry. (B) Analysis of expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins of four SS cell lines treated with 0, 10, 100, and 1000 nM ABBV-075 using Western blotting. [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Figure 4: ABBV-075 targets BCL2 family. (A) A volcano plot of differentially expressed genes following ABBV-075 treatment compared with the vehicle control using mean gene counts of four synovial sarcoma (SS) cell lines. (B) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis reveals the top 10 pathways regulated by ABBV-075 in the order of the fold enrichment score. (C) Heatmap of the BCL2 family expression based on gene count data obtained using RNA sequencing. (D) Expression of the BCL2 family proteins of four SS cell lines treated with 0, 10, 100, and 1000 nM of ABBV-075 analyzed by Western blotting. (E) mRNA expression of the BCL2 family of four SS cell lines treated with 0 µM and 1 µM ABBV-075 examined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Data in (E) are means ± standard deviations. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Figure 5: SS18-SSX regulates BCL2, modulating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. (A) The silencing efficiency of SS18-SSX using small interfering RNA was evaluated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (B) SS18-SSX silencing reduces the susceptibility of SS cell lines to 10 nM ABBV-075 measured using the WST-8 assay. (C) A volcano plot of differentially expressed genes following SS18-SSX silencing compared with the control using mean gene counts of four synovial sarcoma (SS) cell lines. (D) Heatmap of the BCL2 family expression based on gene count data obtained using RNA sequencing. (E) Expression of BCL2 family proteins of four SS cell lines by silencing SS18-SSX compared with the control conducted using Western blotting. Data in (A,B) are means ± standard deviations. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Table 1: IC50s of JQ1 for 4 synovial sarcoma cell lines and 1 human normal cell line.
Cell LinesIC 50 (µM)


Synovial sarcoma


Aska-SS


0.19


Yamato-SS


0.45


HS-SY-II


0.27


SYO-1


0.04


Human dermal fibroblasts


NHDF


20.1


Table 2: IC50s of ABBV-075 for 14 cell lines from 6 human sarcomas and 1 human normal cell line.
Cell LinesIC 50 (µM)


Synovial sarcoma


Aska-SS


0.0048


Yamato-SS


0.030


HS-SY-II


0.067


SYO-1


0.0007


Clear cell sarcoma


KAS


19.2


MP-CCS-SY


0.67


SU-CCS1


14.2


Epithelioid sarcoma


Asra-EPS


0.77


NEPS


2.28


VA-ES-BJ


15.8


Ewing sarcoma


EW8


14.5


Fibrosarcoma


HT-1080


17.9


Liposarcoma


SW872


0.11


Human dermal fibroblasts


NHDF


2.14


Table 3: Ratio of the anti-apoptotic factor to the pro-apoptotic factor.
RatioSYO-1p-ValueAska-SSp-ValueYamato-SSp-ValueHS-SY-IIp-Value
VehicleABBV-075VehicleABBV-075VehicleABBV-075VehicleABBV-075


BCLxL/BIM


15.36


0.20


0.001


13.82


0.32


0.002


9.79


1.92


2.02 × 10[sup.-4]


6.02


1.00


7.07 × 10[sup.-6]


BCLxL/PUMA


602.8


20.05


0.002


1029.4


45.80


ns


710.3


66.41


0.01


375.7


96.89


ns


Table 4: Pro-apoptotic shift in the BCLxL:BIM ratio.
SYO-1Aska-SSYamato-SSHS-SY-II


IC 50 to ABBV-075


0.7 nM


4.8 nM


30 nM


67 nM


rate of change


76.8


43.19


5.10


6.02


Author Affiliation(s):

[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, [email protected] (S.N.); [email protected] (S.O.)

[2] Center for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; [email protected]

[3] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 540-0008, Japan

Author Note(s):

[*] Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+81-6-6879-3552

DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061125
COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2024 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Kotani, Yuki; Imura, Yoshinori; Nakai, Sho; Chijimatsu, Ryota; Takami, Haruna; Inoue, Akitomo; Mae,
Publication:Cancers
Geographic Code:9JAPA
Date:Mar 1, 2024
Words:6933
Previous Article:Impact of Bisphosphonate Therapy on Oral Health in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases: A Comprehensive Study.
Next Article:Pinpointing Functionally Relevant miRNAs in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Pathogenesis.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2024 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |