Riqiang, 2011 - Google Patents

Global Missile Defense Cooperation and China

Riqiang, 2011

View PDF
Document ID
18139437837947573123
Author
Riqiang W
Publication year
Publication venue
Asian Perspective

External Links

Snippet

US-Russia ballistic missile defense (BMD) cooperation can improve strategic stability between both countries, but this cooperation would pose a potential threat to China's strategic security, especially if it is a closed and deep cooperation. The United States and …
Continue reading at muse.jhu.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/04Plate construction composed of more than one layer
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/20Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
    • F42B12/22Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/02Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/20Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
    • F41G7/22Homing guidance systems
    • F41G7/224Deceiving or protecting means
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F41H13/0043Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/36Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling; for transmitting information
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming means; Laying means
    • F41G3/04Aiming means; Laying means for dispersing fire from a battery; for controlling spread of shots; for coordinating fire from spaced weapons
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G9/00Systems for controlling missiles or projectiles, not provided for elsewhere

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rinehart et al. Ballistic missile defense in the Asia-Pacific region: cooperation and opposition
Karako et al. Missile defense 2020: Next steps for defending the Homeland
Cambone The United States and theatre missile defence in North‐East Asia
Forss et al. The development of Russian military policy and Finland
Burns The missile defense systems of George W. Bush: a critical assessment
DeBlois The advent of space weapons
Wilner et al. Iran and the Gulf military balance
Sugden Speed Kills: Analyzing the deployment of conventional ballistic missiles
Riqiang Global Missile Defense Cooperation and China
Brauch Star Wars and European Defence: Implications for Europe: Perception and Assessments
Michishita Japan’s response to nuclear North Korea
Kunertova New Hypersonic Weapons: Same but Different
Mowthorpe US Military space policy 1945–92
Sankaran Missile defense against Iran without threatening Russia
Cordesman Gulf and Iran's Capability for Asymmetric Warfare
Vick et al. Air Base Defense
Czajkowski Ballistic missile defence–technology, effectiveness and organization–key issues
Neuneck The US missile defense systems, Europe and Russia
Gormley The Path to Deep Nuclear Reductions. Dealing with American Conventional Superiority
Jaspal Ballistic missile defence: implications for India-Pakistan strategic environment
Panda Missile defense strategy, policies, and programs in review of the Defense Authorization Request for fiscal year 2022 and the Future Years Defense Program
Lodal An arms control agenda
Murat-Bors Modern assumptions of the American ballistic missile defence system against the background of historical concepts and programmes
Soesanto US missile defense in the age of everything: From BMDS to IAMD
Fetter Hypersonic Glide Vehicles: Evaluating inadvertent escalation risks