Moore, 1980 - Google Patents

Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26 respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 2.05

Moore, 1980

View HTML
Document ID
11143359733279215412
Author
Moore R
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

The overall and blade-element performances of an axial-flow, transoniccompressor-inlet stage are presented herein. The stage is one of a series of single stages that were designed and tested to investigate the performance characteristics of low-aspect-ratio blading for the …
Continue reading at books.google.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F04—POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00—Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/40—Casings; Connections of working fluid
    • F04D29/52—Casings; Connections of working fluid for axial pumps
    • F04D29/54—Fluid-guiding means, e.g. diffusers
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F04—POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00—Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/40—Casings; Connections of working fluid
    • F04D29/42—Casings; Connections of working fluid for radial or helico-centrifugal pumps
    • F04D29/44—Fluid-guiding means, e.g. diffusers
    • F04D29/441—Fluid-guiding means, e.g. diffusers especially adapted for elastic fluid pumps
    • F04D29/444—Bladed diffusers
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/60—Efficient propulsion technologies
    • Y02T50/67—Relevant aircraft propulsion technologies
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F04—POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00—Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/26—Rotors specially for elastic fluids

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Moore Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26 respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 2.05
Reid Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively, and with design pressure ration of 1.82
Reid et al. Design and overall performance of four highly loaded, high speed inlet stages for an advanced high-pressure-ratio core compressor
Koch Experimental evaluation of outer case blowing or bleeding of single stage axial flow compressor, part 6 Final report
Skoch Experimental investigation of diffuser hub injection to improve centrifugal compressor stability
McLallin et al. Experimental performance and analysis of 15.04-centimeter-tip-diameter, radial-inflow turbine with work factor of 1.126 and thick blading
Klassen et al. Experimental performance of a 13.65-centimeter-tip-diameter tandem-bladed sweptback centrifugal compressor designed for a pressure ratio of 6
Urasek et al. Effect of casing treatment on performance of an inlet stage for a transonic multistage compressor
Lewis Jr et al. Overall and blade-element performance of a 1.20-pressure-ratio fan stage at design blade setting angle
Moore et al. Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.63 and 1.78, respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 1.82
Osborn et al. Performance of a single-stage transonic compressor with a blade-tip solidity of 1.5 and comparison with 1.3 and 1.7 solidity stages
Moore et al. Performance of a single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor stage with a blade tip solidity of 1.7
Osborn et al. Performance of a 1.15-pressure-ratio Axial-flow Fan Stage with a Blade Tip Solidity of 0.5
Lewis Jr et al. Performance of a 1.20 pressure ratio STOL fan stage at three rotor blade setting angles
Urasek et al. Performance of a single-stage transonic compressor with a blade-tip solidity of 1.3
Moore et al. Performance of transonic fan stage with weight flow per unit annulus area of 178 kilograms per second per square meter (6.5 (lb/sec)/(sq ft))
Moore et al. Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.63 and 1.77, respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 2.05
Moore et al. Aerodynamic performance of 1.38-pressure-ratio, variable-pitch fan stage
Sanger Effect of rotor meridional velocity ratio on response to inlet radial and circumferential distortion
Osborn et al. Aerodynamic performance of a 1.35-pressure-ratio axial-flow fan stage
Kovich et al. Performance of low-pressure-ratio low-tip-speed fan stage with blade tip solidity of 0.65
Kovich et al. Overall and blade-element performance of a transonic compressor stage with multiple-circular-arc blades at tip speed of 419 meters per second
Lewis Jr et al. Design and performance of a high-pressure-ratio, highly loaded axial-flow transonic compressor space
Moore et al. Aerodynamic performance of 0.4066-scale model to JT8D refan stage
Urasek et al. Performance of transonic fan stage with weight flow per unit annulus area of 208 kilograms per second per square meter (42.6 (lb/sec)/sq ft)