USRE32612E - Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging - Google Patents

Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE32612E
USRE32612E US06/855,284 US85528486A USRE32612E US RE32612 E USRE32612 E US RE32612E US 85528486 A US85528486 A US 85528486A US RE32612 E USRE32612 E US RE32612E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
tungsten
sub
pct
tungstate
melt
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US06/855,284
Inventor
John M. Gomes
Andrea E. Raddatz
Elizabeth G. Baglin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
US Department of the Interior
Original Assignee
US Department of the Interior
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by US Department of the Interior filed Critical US Department of the Interior
Priority to US06/855,284 priority Critical patent/USRE32612E/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE32612E publication Critical patent/USRE32612E/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B32/00Carbon; Compounds thereof
    • C01B32/90Carbides
    • C01B32/914Carbides of single elements
    • C01B32/949Tungsten or molybdenum carbides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/80Compositional purity

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process for preparation of tungsten monocarbide (WC) from oxygen compounds of tungsten.
  • Tungsten possesses a high melting point and is useful in its elemental form, particularly as an alloy for high-temperature applications. Tungsten is also useful in the form of tungsten monocarbide for use in abrasives and cutting instruments. As the demand for increased availability of such materials has advanced, so has the necessity for improved techniques for their production and recovery.
  • Tungsten was usually recovered either from wolframite, (Fe,Mn)WO 4 , or scheelite, CaWO 4 , by various pyrometallurgical and extraction procedures. The carbide final product would then be obtained by reacting the purified metal with carbon in another sequence of reactions.
  • tungsten powder is mixed with 6.2-6.9% carbon. This amount of carbon is 2-10% in excess of the stoichiometric amount in WC (6.13%) and is required to decrease the oxygen content.
  • the mixture is usually blended in a rotary blender containing steel or tungsten carbide balls. Typically one-half of the tungsten powder will be added to all of the carbon, blended for several hours, and this is followed by the addition of the remaining tungsten powder and additional several hours of blending. Careful blending procedures are required, particularly in the case of coarse tungsten powder, because of great disparity in density of the constituents and the size effects of the particles.
  • the tungsten-carbon mixture is next put into graphite boats and passed continuously through a tube furnace.
  • the furnace may be either gas fired or electrically heated, but must be maintained in the temperature range of 1,400° to 1,600° C.
  • Hydrogen is usually introduced into the discharge end of the tube and is burned off at the charging end.
  • the time per furnace cycle is 4 to 5 hours.
  • the major disadvantage of this process is the requirement for high purity tungsten powder as the feed material for synthesis of the carbide.
  • the complete process for preparing monocarbide from ore concentrates includes the following steps: (1) pressure digestion to decompose the ore, (2) solution purification, (3) solvent extraction, (4) ammonium hydroxide stripping, (5) ammonium paratungstate crystallization, (6) formation of tungsten metal by hydrogen reduction, and (7) carbide synthesis.
  • Aluminothermic reduction is also used to produce WC from ore concentrates.
  • This process consists of blending the concentrates, aluminum, calcium carbide and other reagents in a tear-down carbon lined refractory furnace.
  • a thermite reaction is started and the whole mass becomes molten, thereby producing a slag and an iron-manganese alloy containing WC crystals.
  • the furnace is cooled in about 10-14 days and the slag and menstruum separated. The menstruum is then crushed and leached to yield a coarse WC product.
  • the coarse WC crystals next are ground in a WC rod or ball mill and yield a commercial WC product.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,482,941 to Palm discloses another method for recovering tungsten in the form of tungsten carbide from scheelite by heating ore with silica and carbon. This process is said to reduce the amount of ditungsten carbide which is commonly formed when tungsten carbide is prepared at elevated temperatures.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,496 to Brandstatter discloses an additional process for the recovery of metal ores utilizing a solid state reduction and carburization reaction.
  • the disclosed process utilizes physical separation techniques, such as gravity separation employing water elutriation. The separation is based upon the different physical properties of metal carbides and various gangue oxide constituents of ores at elevated temperatures.
  • preparation of tungsten monocarbide from oxygen compounds of the metal may be efficiently and economically accomplished by subjecting a melt of an alkali metal halide and the tungsten compound to sparging with a hydrocarbon gas.
  • the process of the invention has been found to be particularly applicable to preparation of tungsten monocarbide from tungstic oxide or tungstates such as sodium tungstate and ammonium paratungstate.
  • the preferred alkali metal halide will generally be sodium chloride since it is usually most readily available and economical.
  • the alkali metal halide may also consist of fluorides or bromides of sodium, potassium, or lithium.
  • mixed metal compounds such as NaAlF or KAlF may also be used.
  • Proportions of the alkali metal halide and the tungsten compound are not critical, provided the amount of halide is sufficient for ready formation of a homogenous melt for treatment with the hydrocarbon gas.
  • the percent of tungsten (in percent WO 3 by weight) will generally range from about 5 to 30.
  • Formation of the melt is accomplished by simply heating an admixture of halide and tungsten compound to a temperature and for a time sufficient to form a melt of sufficient fluidity for sparging with the hydrocarbon gas. A temperature of about 900° to 1100° C. and a time of about 3 to 8 hours is usually sufficient.
  • Formation of the melt, as well as the sparging, may be carried out in a crucible of any conventional refractory material such as graphite, or ceramics such as alumina, magnesia, zircon or silicon carbide.
  • refractory metal alloys such as Inconel, are particularly effective in the process of the invention.
  • the preferred hydrocarbon gas will generally be methane, or natural gas. However, other hydrocarbons, such as ethane, acetylene, propane or butane may also be used. In addition, mixtures of the hydrocarbon gas, or gases, with H 2 or CO may be used. Furthermore, other reductants such as powdered charcoal, coke breeze or calcium carbide may be added to the sodium chloride melt to facilitate reduction during the sparging process. It has also been found that addition of small amounts of alkali borates, carbonates, fluorides or hydroxides to the melt may assist in reduction and crystal growth.
  • Sparging is by conventional means using sparging tubes of any suitably inert material such as graphite, alumina or Inconel.
  • a temperature of about 900° to 1100° C. and a methane flow rate of about 4 to 12 liters per minute per liter of melt for a period of about 3 to 8 hours is usually sufficient to give substantially complete conversion of tungsten to WC.
  • a vacuum or inert atmosphere may also be beneficial in the sparging process.
  • the WC product has a density greater than the melt, and forms a separate phase.
  • the phases are readily separated by decanting the tungsten-depleted phase from the melt, after which the WC-rich composition is cooled and water leached to remove adhering salt from the WC product.
  • the WC product may then be further purified by leaching with dilute HCl solution, followed by dilute caustic solution, and water washing, and is then dried.
  • the dried WC product may be further purified by treatment for removal of any free carbon by a conventional heavy liquid treatment, resulting in gravity separation of the carbon from the heavier WC. Diiodomethane has been found very effective for this purpose, although other heavy liquids such as acetylene tetrabromide may be used.
  • the free carbon can also be removed by floation or gravity methods.
  • the process of the invention has been found to be particularly effective in preparation of WC from concentrates of tungsten ores such as scheelite or wolframite.
  • a sodium tungsten-sodium chloride compostion is initially prepared by means of the process of U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,097, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • a melt comprising the ore concentrate, sodium chloride and sodium silicate is held at elevated temperature for a time sufficient to form separate halide and silicate phases.
  • Sodium tungstate is formed by the reaction (in the case of wolframite)
  • the charge was melted for 2 hours at 1,075° C. in a silicon carbide crucible. Molten charge was removed from the furnace and the two molten phases were decanted into separate slag pots. The upper halide phase was fluid and easily separated from the lower silicate phase which was very viscous.
  • the halide phase containing 92 pct of the WO 3 in the wolframite was treated by methane gas sparging.
  • a 600-gram charge of the halide phase was melted in a 3" I.D. ⁇ 7" high graphite crucible at 1,100° C.
  • a graphite tube with four 1/16" holes at the bottom was used as a gas sparger. Methane was passed through the tube for 6 hours at a rate of 4 liters/min STP. The gas was turned off, the sparging tube removed and the remaining molten salt in the crucible was decanted into a slag pot. The cooled crucible was then water leached and scraped to recover the WC product. The WC product was leached in dilute HCl and NaOH solutions, and free carbon removed by heavy liquid treatment.
  • the molten phases were decanted into separate slag pots.
  • the halide phase containing 96 pct of the WO 3 from the scheelite was treated by natural gas sparging.
  • the natural gas contained, in pct: methane, 93.63; carbon dioxide, 0.70; nitrogen, 0.47; ethane, 3.58; propane, 1.02; other hydrocarbons, 0.60.
  • a 600-gram charge was melted at 1,100° C. in a 3" I.D. ⁇ 7" high graphite crucible.
  • a 1/4" O.D. ⁇ 1/8" I.D. Alundum tube was used for gas sparging the melt. Natural gas was passed through the melt for 6 hours at a rate of 4 liters/min STP. The tube was removed and the remaining molten salt in the crucible was decanted into a slag pot.
  • the WC was recovered from the cooled crucible by water leaching and scraping. The WC product was leached in dilute HCl and NaOH solutions, and treated for free carbon removal in heavy liquids.
  • a 1/4" Inconel pipe was the sparging tube.
  • the melt was heated to 1,070° C. and methane sparged for 4 hours at a gas flow rate of 5 liters per minute STP.
  • the WC was recovered by decanting off the unreacted melt, cooling the crucible and water leaching and scraping.
  • the WC product was leached in dilute HCl and NaOH solutions, water washed and dried.
  • the Inconel crucible was used a total of 5 times with similar results.
  • a major advantage of using the Inconel crucible was that free carbon was not detected in the WC product, thus eliminating a free carbon cleaning step.
  • the charge was melted in an alumina ceramic crucible 23/4" I.D. ⁇ 6" high, at 1,100° C. Methane gas was passed through the melt for 6 hours at a flow rate of 4 liters/min STP.
  • WC was also prepared in NaCl-Na 2 WO 4 melts containing 50 pct WO 3 .
  • the WC yield was about 50 pct.
  • the charge was melted in a 3" I.D. ⁇ 7" high graphite crucible at 1,100° C. Methane gas was passed through a 1/4" alumina tube into the melt for 6 hours at a flow rate of 4 liters/min STP. Ammonia gas was given off during heating of the APT prior to melting.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

Tungsten monocarbide is prepared by sparging a molten composition comprising an alkali metal halide and an oxygen compound of tungsten with a gas comprising a gaseous hydrocarbon, particularly methane.

Description

This application is a continuation-in-part of pending application Ser. No. 544,299, filed Oct. 21, 1983 .Iadd.now abandoned.Iaddend..
This invention relates to a process for preparation of tungsten monocarbide (WC) from oxygen compounds of tungsten.
Recent technological advances have resulted in an ever increasing demand for materials that are capable of delivering constant chemical and physical performances under a variety of extreme operating conditions. For example, the development of supersonic aircraft and rockets is based upon the availability of such materials.
One material of relatively recent importance is tungsten. Tungsten possesses a high melting point and is useful in its elemental form, particularly as an alloy for high-temperature applications. Tungsten is also useful in the form of tungsten monocarbide for use in abrasives and cutting instruments. As the demand for increased availability of such materials has advanced, so has the necessity for improved techniques for their production and recovery.
In the past, recovery of tungsten from its ores was an expensive and relatively complex process involving both physical and chemical separation procedures. Tungsten was usually recovered either from wolframite, (Fe,Mn)WO4, or scheelite, CaWO4, by various pyrometallurgical and extraction procedures. The carbide final product would then be obtained by reacting the purified metal with carbon in another sequence of reactions.
The predominant commercial process for the preparation of tungsten carbide from wolframite or scheelite concentrates requires many steps because the preparation of high purity tungsten powder is necessary before synthesis of tungsten carbide.
In the commercial production of tungsten monocarbide by direct synthesis, tungsten powder is mixed with 6.2-6.9% carbon. This amount of carbon is 2-10% in excess of the stoichiometric amount in WC (6.13%) and is required to decrease the oxygen content. The mixture is usually blended in a rotary blender containing steel or tungsten carbide balls. Typically one-half of the tungsten powder will be added to all of the carbon, blended for several hours, and this is followed by the addition of the remaining tungsten powder and additional several hours of blending. Careful blending procedures are required, particularly in the case of coarse tungsten powder, because of great disparity in density of the constituents and the size effects of the particles. The tungsten-carbon mixture is next put into graphite boats and passed continuously through a tube furnace. The furnace may be either gas fired or electrically heated, but must be maintained in the temperature range of 1,400° to 1,600° C. Hydrogen is usually introduced into the discharge end of the tube and is burned off at the charging end. The time per furnace cycle is 4 to 5 hours.
The major disadvantage of this process is the requirement for high purity tungsten powder as the feed material for synthesis of the carbide. The complete process for preparing monocarbide from ore concentrates includes the following steps: (1) pressure digestion to decompose the ore, (2) solution purification, (3) solvent extraction, (4) ammonium hydroxide stripping, (5) ammonium paratungstate crystallization, (6) formation of tungsten metal by hydrogen reduction, and (7) carbide synthesis.
Aluminothermic reduction is also used to produce WC from ore concentrates. This process consists of blending the concentrates, aluminum, calcium carbide and other reagents in a tear-down carbon lined refractory furnace. A thermite reaction is started and the whole mass becomes molten, thereby producing a slag and an iron-manganese alloy containing WC crystals. The furnace is cooled in about 10-14 days and the slag and menstruum separated. The menstruum is then crushed and leached to yield a coarse WC product. The coarse WC crystals next are ground in a WC rod or ball mill and yield a commercial WC product.
This technique, however, is also disadvantageous in that it requires a large amount of energy for size reduction and leaching the menstruum, and also for the size reduction of the recovered WC crystals. Additionally, the carbide thus formed is not suitable for preparing many cemented carbide products.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,482,941 to Palm discloses another method for recovering tungsten in the form of tungsten carbide from scheelite by heating ore with silica and carbon. This process is said to reduce the amount of ditungsten carbide which is commonly formed when tungsten carbide is prepared at elevated temperatures.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,496 to Brandstatter discloses an additional process for the recovery of metal ores utilizing a solid state reduction and carburization reaction. The disclosed process utilizes physical separation techniques, such as gravity separation employing water elutriation. The separation is based upon the different physical properties of metal carbides and various gangue oxide constituents of ores at elevated temperatures.
It has now been found, according to the present invention, that preparation of tungsten monocarbide from oxygen compounds of the metal may be efficiently and economically accomplished by subjecting a melt of an alkali metal halide and the tungsten compound to sparging with a hydrocarbon gas. The process of the invention has been found to be particularly applicable to preparation of tungsten monocarbide from tungstic oxide or tungstates such as sodium tungstate and ammonium paratungstate.
The preferred alkali metal halide will generally be sodium chloride since it is usually most readily available and economical. However, the alkali metal halide may also consist of fluorides or bromides of sodium, potassium, or lithium. In addition, mixed metal compounds such as NaAlF or KAlF may also be used.
Proportions of the alkali metal halide and the tungsten compound are not critical, provided the amount of halide is sufficient for ready formation of a homogenous melt for treatment with the hydrocarbon gas. The percent of tungsten (in percent WO3 by weight) will generally range from about 5 to 30. Formation of the melt is accomplished by simply heating an admixture of halide and tungsten compound to a temperature and for a time sufficient to form a melt of sufficient fluidity for sparging with the hydrocarbon gas. A temperature of about 900° to 1100° C. and a time of about 3 to 8 hours is usually sufficient.
Formation of the melt, as well as the sparging, may be carried out in a crucible of any conventional refractory material such as graphite, or ceramics such as alumina, magnesia, zircon or silicon carbide. However, it has been found that refractory metal alloys, such as Inconel, are particularly effective in the process of the invention.
The preferred hydrocarbon gas will generally be methane, or natural gas. However, other hydrocarbons, such as ethane, acetylene, propane or butane may also be used. In addition, mixtures of the hydrocarbon gas, or gases, with H2 or CO may be used. Furthermore, other reductants such as powdered charcoal, coke breeze or calcium carbide may be added to the sodium chloride melt to facilitate reduction during the sparging process. It has also been found that addition of small amounts of alkali borates, carbonates, fluorides or hydroxides to the melt may assist in reduction and crystal growth.
Sparging is by conventional means using sparging tubes of any suitably inert material such as graphite, alumina or Inconel. A temperature of about 900° to 1100° C. and a methane flow rate of about 4 to 12 liters per minute per liter of melt for a period of about 3 to 8 hours is usually sufficient to give substantially complete conversion of tungsten to WC. A vacuum or inert atmosphere may also be beneficial in the sparging process.
The WC product has a density greater than the melt, and forms a separate phase. The phases are readily separated by decanting the tungsten-depleted phase from the melt, after which the WC-rich composition is cooled and water leached to remove adhering salt from the WC product. The WC product may then be further purified by leaching with dilute HCl solution, followed by dilute caustic solution, and water washing, and is then dried. The dried WC product may be further purified by treatment for removal of any free carbon by a conventional heavy liquid treatment, resulting in gravity separation of the carbon from the heavier WC. Diiodomethane has been found very effective for this purpose, although other heavy liquids such as acetylene tetrabromide may be used. The free carbon can also be removed by floation or gravity methods.
The process of the invention has been found to be particularly effective in preparation of WC from concentrates of tungsten ores such as scheelite or wolframite. A sodium tungsten-sodium chloride compostion is initially prepared by means of the process of U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,097, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In this process a melt comprising the ore concentrate, sodium chloride and sodium silicate is held at elevated temperature for a time sufficient to form separate halide and silicate phases. Sodium tungstate is formed by the reaction (in the case of wolframite)
2(Fe,Mn)WO.sub.4 +3Na.sub.2 SiO.sub.3 →2Na.sub.2 WO.sub.4 +Na.sub.2 (Fe,Mn).sub.2 Si.sub.3 O.sub.9
and concentrates in the halide phase, with gangue materials concentrating in the silicate phase. The phases are separated, and the resulting NaCl-Na2 WO4 composition is then treated according to the process of the present invention for formation of WC.
The invention will be more specifically illustrated by the following examples.
EXAMPLE 1
Feed material-Colorado wolframite concentrate
______________________________________                                    
Analysis, pct                                                             
WO.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 MnO                                             
69.1 9.1 13.5                                                             
High temperature phase separation                                         
       Charge  grams                                                      
______________________________________                                    
       Wolframite                                                         
               484                                                        
       NaCl    704                                                        
       Na.sub.2 SiC.sub.3                                                 
               291                                                        
               1,479                                                      
______________________________________                                    
The charge was melted for 2 hours at 1,075° C. in a silicon carbide crucible. Molten charge was removed from the furnace and the two molten phases were decanted into separate slag pots. The upper halide phase was fluid and easily separated from the lower silicate phase which was very viscous.
______________________________________                                    
Analysis of the phases, pct                                               
         Wt. g WO.sub.3   FeO    MnO                                      
______________________________________                                    
Halide     980     31.4       0.05 0.17                                   
Silicate   440     4.5        9.3  13.4                                   
           1,420                                                          
______________________________________                                    
The halide phase containing 92 pct of the WO3 in the wolframite was treated by methane gas sparging.
Gas Sparging of the Halide Phase
A 600-gram charge of the halide phase was melted in a 3" I.D.×7" high graphite crucible at 1,100° C. A graphite tube with four 1/16" holes at the bottom was used as a gas sparger. Methane was passed through the tube for 6 hours at a rate of 4 liters/min STP. The gas was turned off, the sparging tube removed and the remaining molten salt in the crucible was decanted into a slag pot. The cooled crucible was then water leached and scraped to recover the WC product. The WC product was leached in dilute HCl and NaOH solutions, and free carbon removed by heavy liquid treatment.
______________________________________                                    
Results                                                                   
______________________________________                                    
        WC recovered = 128 g                                              
        W recovered as WC, pct = 81                                       
        Final melt, g = 310                                               
        Final melt, pct WO.sub.3 = 10                                     
        Final melt, g WO.sub.3 = 31                                       
        X-ray diffraction                                                 
        Major WC, trace C                                                 
        No W.sub.2 C detected                                             
Spectrographic analysis of WC product, pct                                
Al   Cu     Fe     Mg   Mn   Mo    Si   Sn   Ti   V                       
______________________________________                                    
0.005                                                                     
     0.007  0.10   0.005                                                  
                        0.05 <.001 0.07 0.009                             
                                             0.01 0.006                   
Other impurities below detection limits.                                  
Carbon and oxygen analysis, pct                                           
C = 6.19                                                                  
O = 0.34                                                                  
Specs for Commercial WC                                                   
Max. pct                                                                  
       Free carbon                                                        
                0.10                                                      
       Fe       0.15                                                      
       Mo       0.10                                                      
Stoichiometric carbon content of WC = 6.13 pct.                           
______________________________________                                    
EXAMPLE 2
______________________________________                                    
Feed material - California scheelite concentrate                          
Analysis, pct                                                             
WO.sub.3 CaO Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3                                             
69.3 18.1 2.6                                                             
High Temperature phase separation                                         
       Charge grams                                                       
______________________________________                                    
       Scheelite                                                          
              432                                                         
       NaCl   420                                                         
       NaF    201                                                         
       Al.sub.2 O.sub.3                                                   
               72                                                         
       Al.sub.2 SiO.sub.3                                                 
              366                                                         
              1,491                                                       
______________________________________                                    
The phase separation was made with the same procedure as that of Example 1.
The molten phases were decanted into separate slag pots.
______________________________________                                    
Analysis of the phases, pct                                               
       Wt. g        WO.sub.3                                              
                           CaO                                            
______________________________________                                    
Halide   909            31.5   0.22                                       
Silicate 515            2.0    14.5                                       
         1,424                                                            
______________________________________                                    
Gas Sparging of Halide Phase
The halide phase containing 96 pct of the WO3 from the scheelite was treated by natural gas sparging. The natural gas contained, in pct: methane, 93.63; carbon dioxide, 0.70; nitrogen, 0.47; ethane, 3.58; propane, 1.02; other hydrocarbons, 0.60.
A 600-gram charge was melted at 1,100° C. in a 3" I.D.×7" high graphite crucible. A 1/4" O.D.×1/8" I.D. Alundum tube was used for gas sparging the melt. Natural gas was passed through the melt for 6 hours at a rate of 4 liters/min STP. The tube was removed and the remaining molten salt in the crucible was decanted into a slag pot. The WC was recovered from the cooled crucible by water leaching and scraping. The WC product was leached in dilute HCl and NaOH solutions, and treated for free carbon removal in heavy liquids.
______________________________________                                    
Results                                                                   
______________________________________                                    
        WC recovered = 120 g                                              
        W recovered as WC, pct = 75                                       
        Final melt, g = 360                                               
        Final melt, pct WO.sub.3 = 9.5                                    
        Final melt, g WO.sub.3 = 34.0                                     
        x-ray Diffraction of WC product                                   
        Major WC                                                          
Spectrographic analysis of WC product, pct                                
Al   Cu     Fe     Mg   Mn   Mo   Si   Sn   Ti   V                        
______________________________________                                    
0.005                                                                     
     0.007  0.1    0.005                                                  
                        0.05 0.001                                        
                                  0.05 0.003                              
                                            0.005                         
                                                 <.006                    
Other impurities below detection limits.                                  
Carbon and oxygen analysis, pct                                           
C = 6.31                                                                  
O = 0.32                                                                  
______________________________________                                    
EXAMPLE 3 Gas Sparging of Halide Phase Prepared from Wolframite in a Metal Alloy Crucible
A 1,600 gram charge of halide phase prepared according to the procedure of Example 1, and containing 25 wt pct WO3, was melted in an Inconel 600 crucible 3" I.D.×12" high. A 1/4" Inconel pipe was the sparging tube. The melt was heated to 1,070° C. and methane sparged for 4 hours at a gas flow rate of 5 liters per minute STP. The WC was recovered by decanting off the unreacted melt, cooling the crucible and water leaching and scraping. The WC product was leached in dilute HCl and NaOH solutions, water washed and dried.
______________________________________                                    
Results                                                                   
______________________________________                                    
        WC recovered = 181.5 g                                            
        W recovered as WC, pct = 54                                       
        Final melt, g = 992                                               
        Final melt, pct WO.sub.3 = 15.5                                   
        Final melt, g WO.sub.3 = 153.8                                    
        X-Ray Diffraction                                                 
        Major WC                                                          
Spectrographic analysis of WC product, pct                                
Al   Ca     Cr     Cu   Fe   Mg   Mn   Mo   Na   Ni  Si                   
______________________________________                                    
.005 <.01   0.1    .002 .04  .001 .001 .05  .04  .02 .02                  
Other impurities below detection limits.                                  
Carbon and oxygen analysis, pct                                           
C = 6.19                                                                  
O = 0.07                                                                  
______________________________________                                    
The Inconel crucible was used a total of 5 times with similar results. A major advantage of using the Inconel crucible was that free carbon was not detected in the WC product, thus eliminating a free carbon cleaning step.
EXAMPLE 4
______________________________________                                    
WC from Na.sub.2 WO.sub.4                                                 
       Charge grams                                                       
______________________________________                                    
       NaCl   440                                                         
       Na.sub.2 WO.sub.4                                                  
              160                                                         
              600                                                         
______________________________________                                    
Procedure
The charge was melted in an alumina ceramic crucible 23/4" I.D.×6" high, at 1,100° C. Methane gas was passed through the melt for 6 hours at a flow rate of 4 liters/min STP.
______________________________________                                    
Results                                                                   
______________________________________                                    
        WC recovered = 92 g                                               
        W recovered as WC, pct = 86                                       
        Final melt, g = 260                                               
        Final melt, pct WO.sub.3 = 6.2                                    
        Final melt, g WO.sub.3 = 16                                       
Spectrographic analysis of WC product, pct                                
Al B   Cu     Fe     Mg Mn  Na  Pb   Si  Sn    TiZr                       
______________________________________                                    
0.05 0.004                                                                
       0.01   0.03   0.02 0.02                                            
                            0.4 <.01 0.1 <.002 0.01 0.1                   
______________________________________                                    
WC was also prepared in NaCl-Na2 WO4 melts containing 50 pct WO3. The WC yield was about 50 pct.
EXAMPLE 5
______________________________________                                    
WC from WO.sub.3                                                          
       Charge grams                                                       
______________________________________                                    
       NaCl   500                                                         
       WO.sub.3                                                           
              100                                                         
       Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3                                                  
               46                                                         
              646                                                         
Procedure:                                                                
Temperature, 1,100° C.                                             
Graphite crucible, 3" I.D. × 7" high                                
1/4" alumina sparging tube                                                
Methane gas sparged for 6 hours at                                        
a flow rate of 3 liters/min STP                                           
Results                                                                   
WC recovered = 68 g                                                       
W recovered as WC, pct = 80                                               
Final melt, g = 398                                                       
Final melt, pct WO.sub.3 = 5.0                                            
Final melt, g WO.sub.3 = 19.9                                             
______________________________________                                    
The analyses were similar to those obtained in Example 4.
EXAMPLE 6
______________________________________                                    
WC from ammonium paratungstate (89 pct WO.sub.3)                          
        Charge                                                            
              grams                                                       
______________________________________                                    
        NaCl  500                                                         
        APT   140                                                         
        NaOH   43                                                         
              683                                                         
______________________________________                                    
Procedure
The charge was melted in a 3" I.D.×7" high graphite crucible at 1,100° C. Methane gas was passed through a 1/4" alumina tube into the melt for 6 hours at a flow rate of 4 liters/min STP. Ammonia gas was given off during heating of the APT prior to melting.
______________________________________                                    
Results:                                                                  
______________________________________                                    
        WC recovered = 74 g                                               
        W recovered as WC, pct = 70                                       
        Final melt, g = 307                                               
        Final melt, pct WO.sub.3 = 7.5                                    
        Final melt, g WO.sub.3 = 23.0                                     
______________________________________                                    
The analyses were similar to those obtained in Example 4.

Claims (10)

We claim:
1. A process for preparation of tungsten monocarbide comprising:
(a) providing a molten composition comprising an alkali metal halide and an oxygen compound of tungsten;
(b) sparging said composition with a gas comprising a gaseous hydrocarbon which is selected from the group consisting of natural gas, methane, ethane, acetylene, propane, butane, mixtures thereof, and admixtures of these gases with H2 or CO, at a temperature of about 900° to 1100° C. for a sufficient time for the tungsten compound to be substantially converted to tungsten carbide; and
(c) decanting the molten halide from the tungsten carbide product.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the alkali metal halide is sodium chloride.
3. The process of claim 1 in which the oxygen compound of tungsten is tungstic oxide, an alkali metal tungstate, or ammonium tungstate.
4. The process of claim 3 in which the tungsten compound is sodium tungstate.
5. The process of claim 1 in which the gaseous hydrocarbon is methane or natural gas.
6. The process of claim 1 in which the tungsten carbide product is cooled and purified by water leaching.
7. The process of claim 1 in which the molten composition consists essentially of a mixture of sodium chloride and sodium tungstate.
8. The process of claim 7 in which the NaCl-Na2 WO4 mixture is prepared by forming a melt comprising a tungsten ore concentrate, sodium chloride and sodium silicate, whereby the tungsten concentrates in the sodium chloride phase.
9. The process of claim 8 in which the tungsten ore is scheelite or wolframite. .Iadd.
10. The process of claim 1, wherein a reductant is included in the molten composition. .Iaddend. .Iadd.11. The process of claim 10, wherein the reductant is selected from the group consisting of powdered charcoal, coke breeze and calcium carbide. .Iaddend.
US06/855,284 1983-10-21 1986-04-24 Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging Expired - Lifetime USRE32612E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/855,284 USRE32612E (en) 1983-10-21 1986-04-24 Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US54429983A 1983-10-21 1983-10-21
US06/855,284 USRE32612E (en) 1983-10-21 1986-04-24 Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US54429983A Continuation-In-Part 1983-10-21 1983-10-21
US06/574,499 Reissue US4489044A (en) 1983-10-21 1984-01-27 Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE32612E true USRE32612E (en) 1988-02-23

Family

ID=27067570

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/855,284 Expired - Lifetime USRE32612E (en) 1983-10-21 1986-04-24 Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USRE32612E (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1990008103A1 (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-07-26 Kennametal Inc. Process for producing tungsten monocarbide
US5096689A (en) * 1989-01-23 1992-03-17 Kennametal Inc. Process for producing tungsten monocarbide
US5882620A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-03-16 International Carbitech Industries, Inc. Pyrometallurgical process for forming tungsten carbide
US6749663B2 (en) * 2000-09-06 2004-06-15 H.C. Starck Gmbh Ultra-coarse, monocrystalline tungsten carbide and a process for the preparation thereof, and hardmetal produced therefrom

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3373097A (en) * 1965-02-16 1968-03-12 Interior Usa Method for separation of a metalcontaining halide phase from a gangue-containing silicate phase and electrolysis of halide phase to obtain the metal
US3482941A (en) * 1968-05-29 1969-12-09 Gen Electric Direct production of monotungsten carbide from ores
GB1190713A (en) * 1968-04-05 1970-05-06 Kennametal Inc Improvements in and relating to the production of Tungsten Monocarbide
US3692479A (en) * 1968-09-10 1972-09-19 Geoffrey W Meadows Preparation of binary borides,carbides and silicides
US3902917A (en) * 1970-06-04 1975-09-02 Bosch Gmbh Robert Process for the production of tungsten carbide catalyst adapted for use in fuel cells
US4190439A (en) * 1973-12-28 1980-02-26 Union Carbide Corporation Process for the preparation of fine grain metal carbide powders and sintered articles therefrom
US4256496A (en) * 1977-12-16 1981-03-17 Ontario Research Foundation Production of metal carbides in pure form

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3373097A (en) * 1965-02-16 1968-03-12 Interior Usa Method for separation of a metalcontaining halide phase from a gangue-containing silicate phase and electrolysis of halide phase to obtain the metal
GB1190713A (en) * 1968-04-05 1970-05-06 Kennametal Inc Improvements in and relating to the production of Tungsten Monocarbide
US3482941A (en) * 1968-05-29 1969-12-09 Gen Electric Direct production of monotungsten carbide from ores
US3692479A (en) * 1968-09-10 1972-09-19 Geoffrey W Meadows Preparation of binary borides,carbides and silicides
US3902917A (en) * 1970-06-04 1975-09-02 Bosch Gmbh Robert Process for the production of tungsten carbide catalyst adapted for use in fuel cells
US4190439A (en) * 1973-12-28 1980-02-26 Union Carbide Corporation Process for the preparation of fine grain metal carbide powders and sintered articles therefrom
US4256496A (en) * 1977-12-16 1981-03-17 Ontario Research Foundation Production of metal carbides in pure form

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1990008103A1 (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-07-26 Kennametal Inc. Process for producing tungsten monocarbide
US5096689A (en) * 1989-01-23 1992-03-17 Kennametal Inc. Process for producing tungsten monocarbide
US5882620A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-03-16 International Carbitech Industries, Inc. Pyrometallurgical process for forming tungsten carbide
US6749663B2 (en) * 2000-09-06 2004-06-15 H.C. Starck Gmbh Ultra-coarse, monocrystalline tungsten carbide and a process for the preparation thereof, and hardmetal produced therefrom

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5350416B2 (en) Method for producing tungsten carbide
CA1288572C (en) Macrocrystalline tungsten monocarbide powder and process for producing
US9433038B2 (en) Fusion process using an alkali metal metalate
EP3554998B1 (en) Process for the production of commercial grade silicon
US5096689A (en) Process for producing tungsten monocarbide
USRE32612E (en) Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging
US4489044A (en) Formation of tungsten monocarbide from a molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging
US3953579A (en) Methods of making reactive metal silicide
ES2941508T3 (en) Process for refining raw silicon melts by means of a particulate mediator
Gomes et al. Preparation of tungsten carbide by gas sparging tungstate melts
KR960012709B1 (en) Process for producing tungsten monocarbide
CA1078626A (en) Treatment of carbothermically produced aluminum
JPS61500222A (en) Method for producing tungsten monocarbide from molten tungstate-halide phase by gas sparging
Taylor et al. Formation of titanium carbide from ilmenite concentrates in a thermal plasma reactor
Jha Extractive metallurgy of molybdenum
Reuter et al. Direct reduction during the production of ferroniobium in an electric furnace
CN106115703A (en) The method of macrocrystalline tungsten carbide directly prepared by a kind of tungsten ore
CA2623200C (en) Pyrometallurgical process for treating metal-containing materials

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12