US6369885B1 - Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver - Google Patents
Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6369885B1 US6369885B1 US09/072,841 US7284198A US6369885B1 US 6369885 B1 US6369885 B1 US 6369885B1 US 7284198 A US7284198 A US 7284198A US 6369885 B1 US6369885 B1 US 6369885B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- missile
- signal
- trajectory
- processor
- laser
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001429 visible spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
- F41G7/22—Homing guidance systems
- F41G7/224—Deceiving or protecting means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
- G01S7/495—Counter-measures or counter-counter-measures using electronic or electro-optical means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S3/00—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received
- G01S3/78—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
- G01S3/782—Systems for determining direction or deviation from predetermined direction
- G01S3/785—Systems for determining direction or deviation from predetermined direction using adjustment of orientation of directivity characteristics of a detector or detector system to give a desired condition of signal derived from that detector or detector system
- G01S3/786—Systems for determining direction or deviation from predetermined direction using adjustment of orientation of directivity characteristics of a detector or detector system to give a desired condition of signal derived from that detector or detector system the desired condition being maintained automatically
- G01S3/7864—T.V. type tracking systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
- G01S7/4802—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section
Definitions
- the present invention herein resides in the art of defense systems for diverting the trajectory of incoming missiles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system which provides simultaneous tracking and identification/classification functions with an infrared receiver having a focal plane array. Specifically, the present invention relates to a system which provides variable imaging rates to detect, jam and divert an incoming infrared missile.
- One possible configuration for introducing a closed-loop receiver into a directional countermeasure system is to use a high resolution tracking sensor side-by-side with an infrared detector assembly. Accordingly, an independent receive channel, which is a separate optical path, must be added to the detection system with a separate expensive cooled detector. The cost and size impact of such a configuration to the countermeasure system is prohibitive.
- Another approach is to incorporate an infrared detector assembly into the countermeasure system and split a portion of the received optical path for the high resolution tracking sensor.
- This approach causes at least a 50% receive loss for both the track sensor and the receiver, plus the cost for adding another cryogenically cooled detector.
- Another problem with this approach is that the apertures of the sensor and the receiver may not match which would require a larger overall assembly to accommodate both.
- Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a countermeasure system with a missile warning system that detects the presence of an object that may be considered a threat to a platform upon which the system is associated.
- Yet another aspect of the present invention is to provide a countermeasure processor, in communication with the warning system, which coordinates all of the functions and processing of the closed-loop system.
- Yet another aspect of the present invention is to provide a track processor which receives a trajectory signal representative of the missile path from the countermeasure processor based upon the communication received from the warning system to generate a trajectory pointer signal.
- Yet a further aspect of the present invention is to provide a pointer which positions itself based upon signals received from the countermeasure processor and the track processor.
- Still a further aspect of the present invention is to provide an infrared receiver positioned by the pointer, wherein the infrared receiver has an infrared focal plane array that functions simultaneously as a laser receiver and a high resolution track sensor or camera.
- Still a further aspect of the present invention is to provide a laser carried by the pointer, which is bore-sighted with the infrared receiver, which receives instructional signals and commands from the countermeasure processor, wherein a laser beam generated by the laser is initially directed toward the incoming missile threat and obtains operational characteristics therefrom which are received by the infrared receiver, which in turn are transmitted to the countermeasure processor which generates a jam code that is included with the laser beam impinging upon the incoming missile.
- Still an additional aspect of the present invention is to instruct the focal plane array to initiate variable imaging rates, in particular, a first imaging rate is employed to initially acquire and track the incoming threat, a faster second imaging rate is employed to provide a high resolution tracking of the incoming threat and an even faster third imaging rate is employed to obtain operational characteristics of the incoming missile.
- a missile tracking and deflection system for protecting a platform, comprising a missile warning system for detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning signal, a countermeasure processor for receiving the warning signal and generating a warning report, a track processor for receiving the warning report and generating a pointer trajectory signal, a pointer for receiving the pointer trajectory signal to position the pointer toward the missile, a receiver carried by the pointer to receive a passive signature of the missile and generate a trajectory characteristic signal received by the track processor for updating the pointer trajectory signal, and a laser carried by the pointer which directs a laser beam at the missile to generate an active signature received by the receiver which generates a missile characteristic signal received by the countermeasure processor to identify the missile and generate a jam code carried by the laser beam to divert the trajectory of the missile away from the platform, the receiver observing the passive and active signatures, and generating the trajectory characteristic signal and the missile characteristic signal simultaneously.
- a method for diverting the trajectory of a missile comprising the steps of detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning signal, analyzing characteristics of the warning signal with a countermeasure processor which generates a trajectory signal, processing the trajectory signal to generate a trajectory pointer signal, receiving the pointer signal in a receiver which has a single focal plane array that tracks the trajectory of the missile and detects operational characteristics of the missile, the receiver delivering a signal to the countermeasure processor which generates a jam code employed to divert the trajectory of the missile.
- an object tracking system comprising a receiver for observing the object, the receiver having a focal plane array for obtaining information about the object, and a processor in communication with the receiver, the processor imaging the focal plane array over at least two frame rates, wherein a first frame rate images a large portion of the focal plane array to observe the object, and a second frame rate, faster than the first frame rate, images a smaller portion of the focal plane array to track the object.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a platform and an incoming missile threat
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a closed-loop infrared countermeasure system according to the present invention
- FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an infrared receiver tracking and delivering a jam code to an incoming missile
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing operation of the infrared countermeasure system.
- a closed-loop infrared countermeasure system is designated generally by the numeral 10 .
- the system 10 is incorporated into a platform 12 such as a plane, ship, or ground-based installation.
- the system 10 is employed to detect the presence of an in-bound infrared missile 14 , determine the operating characteristics of the missile, and then divert the trajectory of the missile so that it turns away from the platform 12 .
- the system 10 may also be employed to track any moving object by observing any time varying frequency components thereof.
- an infrared-based system is disclosed, it will be appreciated that the aspects of the present invention are applicable to other frequency-observable phenomena.
- the system 10 includes a missile warning system 16 which may be carried by the platform 12 .
- the missile warning system 16 detects the presence of an object, which could be an incoming threat, by either an infrared camera, an ultraviolet camera, by sight, by radar, or any other device which can generate information about the possible location and trajectory of the object.
- the missile warning system 16 acquires passive information about the object and determines if the object is in fact a missile. Accordingly, the missile warning system 16 generates a hand-off signal 26 which is received by the system 10 .
- the missile warning system 16 is a low resolution system that looks at high spatial coverage areas for the primary purpose of detecting the presence of any type of threat, such as a missile or enemy aircraft.
- the hand-off signal 26 includes information such as amplitude, how long the threat has been tracked, speed, intensity, and angle range from the platform 12 .
- a countermeasure processor 30 which provides the necessary software, hardware, and memory for controlling and coordinating the various aspects of the system 10 , receives the hand-off signal 26 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 prioritizes the threat according to the information acquired and predetermined criteria.
- the countermeasure processor 30 is in communication with a host platform 32 via host signal 34 for the purpose of communicating with the command structure controlling operation of the platform 12 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 generates a trajectory signal 38 received by an infrared countermeasure track processor 40 .
- the track processor 40 initiates a tracking sequence for the potential in-bound missile 14 indicated by the hand-off signal 26 .
- the track processor 40 generates a trajectory pointer signal 42 which provides mechanical control functions to position selected components of the system 10 in the appropriate direction.
- a pointer 44 receives the pointer signal 42 and slews the components thereof to observe the angle and position of the in-bound missile 14 .
- the pointer 44 positions an infrared receiver 50 and an infrared laser 52 which are bore sighted.
- the infrared receiver 50 is a high frame rate, infrared focal plane array which integrally and simultaneously combines the functions of a high resolution track sensor or a camera 54 and a laser receiver 56 .
- the receiver 50 has an aperture of about 35-50 mm, although other aperture sizes could be used.
- the pointer 44 provides an optical path 57 for the infrared receiver 50 .
- the infrared receiver 50 generates a trajectory characteristic signal 58 that is received by the track processor 40 for updating the trajectory pointer signal 42 .
- the infrared receiver 50 provides a single focal plane array generally designated by the numeral 51 as best seen in FIG. 3 to function both as a passive viewing device and an active viewing device.
- the receiver 50 has a relatively large field of view, wherein the focal plane array 51 provides a full frame, 512 ⁇ 512 pixel display that generates an optical image that is converted into an electrical signal.
- other size focal plane arrays may be used.
- the receiver 50 functions as the tracking camera 54 by employing the focal plane array 51 to passively observe the trajectory of the missile. Since the receiver 50 employs a single focal plane array, the function of the camera 54 is inherently bore-sighted with the function of the laser receiver 56 . Accordingly, both the receiver 56 and the camera 54 functionally observe substantially the same scene.
- the laser receiver 56 functions to employ relatively smaller portions of the focal plane array to actively observe the trajectory of the missile.
- the infrared receiver 50 communicates with the countermeasure processor 30 via a missile characteristic signal 60 .
- an operational flow of the countermeasure processor system is designated generally by the numeral 100 .
- the tracking camera 54 observes a passive signature 62 , typically thermal emissions generated by the missile.
- Other possible passive signatures that may be viewed with a similar camera are light frequencies in the visible or near visible spectrum including ultraviolet light, or acoustic signals.
- a relatively low frame rate up to about 120 frames per second and preferably about 60 frames per second, is used by the track camera 54 to communicate information obtained from the passive signature 62 to the track processor 40 via the trajectory characteristic signal line 58 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 instructs the track processor 40 to position the pointer 44 so that the missile 14 is centered in the focal plane array 51 of the receiver 50 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 instructs the track processor 40 to increase the imaging rate to a frame rate of the focal plane array of the receiver 50 to between about 120 to about 1000 frames per second and preferably about 400 frames per second.
- the observation area of the focal plane array is reduced to a mid-size frame smaller than full frame or preferably to about 32 ⁇ 32 pixels centered about the missile 14 as it appears on the focal plane array 51 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 generates an initiation signal 64 which instructs the infrared laser 52 to “illuminate” the missile 14 .
- a laser beam 68 is generated by the laser 52 and directed at the missile 14 .
- an active signature 70 is reflected and received by the laser receiver 56 aspect of the receiver 50 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 then instructs the receiver 50 , at step 110 , to employ a frame rate of up to 50,000 frames per second and preferably about 32,000 frames per second over an even smaller sub-array frame size 90 of about 16 ⁇ 16 pixels.
- the ultra-fast imaging rate may be applied to a pixel array of 1 ⁇ 1 up to an array size employed for the prior imaging rate. It will be appreciated that these imaging rates are only limited by the operational characteristics of the receiver 50 .
- the image of the active signature 70 is processed at step 112 , in the manner described above to maintain the high resolution track on the missile 14 .
- the laser receiver 56 employs pixel detectors, such as photo diodes, which are digitally sampled and processed by the countermeasure processor 30 via the optical path 57 and the missile characteristic signal 60 .
- the processor 30 in turn performs a Fourier analysis of the amplitude modulation or time varying characteristics of the incoming signals 62 , 70 via the optical path 57 and/or the signal 60 to determine operational characteristics of the missile 14 .
- the processor 30 monitors the performance of the laser 52 via a signal line 73 .
- the infrared receiver 50 simultaneously generates corresponding updated signals for the trajectory characteristic signal 58 , which in turn updates the pointer trajectory signal 42 , and the missile characteristic signal line 60 .
- the countermeasure processor 30 analyzes the components of the active signature 70 and generates a jam code 74 , at step 114 , for inclusion with the laser beam 68 . Accordingly, the missile 14 is diverted from the actual platform and eventually self-destructs, as the jam code 74 is included with the laser beam 68 .
- a countermeasure effectiveness measurement is performed by the countermeasure processor 30 by simultaneously examining dynamic track and classification and identification information provided by the trajectory characteristic signal 58 and the signature 70 . As such, if the jam code 74 is found to be ineffective, the countermeasure processor 30 can immediately make adjustments thereto.
- the system 10 may also provide dispensers 76 which eject infrared expendable devices 78 that may also be used to divert the trajectory and/or path of the incoming missile 14 .
- the dispensers 76 are in communication with the host platform 32 so that it may be monitored thereby.
- the system 10 effectively analyzes a trajectory of an incoming missile and its operational characteristics and generates a jam code to divert the trajectory of the missile away from the platform.
- Previous approaches to closed-loop laser infrared countermeasure required the use of a separate laser receiver to collect interrogation signals from an infrared missile and a separate infrared focal plane array camera for high resolution tracking of the threat.
- the separate laser interrogation receiver has significant negative system impacts on the cost, size, weight, power efficiency, performance, reliability, and maintainability.
- Still yet another advantage of the present invention is that current open-loop systems may be converted to closed-loop systems with substantially improved performance in defending from missile attacks. Moreover, the present invention avoids adding additional operating equipment which would require the splitting of signals and reducing the strength thereof to the detriment of the host platform 32 . Another advantage of the present invention is that the same signal may be processed with a relatively smaller aperture than may be otherwise provided.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
A missile tracking and deflection system for protecting a platform includes a missile warning system for detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning signal. A countermeasure processor receives the warning signal and analyzes characteristics of the missile to prioritize a trajectory signal. A track processor receives the trajectory signal and generates a pointer signal. The system also includes a receiver, which is positioned by a pointer that receives the pointer signal, for receiving a passive and/or active signature of the missile to confirm the presence thereof. The countermeasure processor then directs a laser beam at the missile to determine its operational parameters and receives an active signature from the missile. The receiver delivers the passive and/or active signatures to the countermeasure processor and the track processor, wherein the track processor updates the pointer signal and the countermeasure processor generates a jam code delivered by the laser beam to divert the trajectory of the missile away from the platform.
Description
The present invention herein resides in the art of defense systems for diverting the trajectory of incoming missiles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system which provides simultaneous tracking and identification/classification functions with an infrared receiver having a focal plane array. Specifically, the present invention relates to a system which provides variable imaging rates to detect, jam and divert an incoming infrared missile.
To protect and defend military platforms, such as ships, aircraft, and ground-based installations, it is known to provide countermeasure systems that detect incoming threats such as enemy aircraft or missiles. Known systems detect incoming threats, such as infrared missiles, and then deploy defensive countermeasures in an attempt to destroy or divert the threat. These systems are referred to as open-loop systems since no immediate determination as to the type of threat or effectiveness of the countermeasure is readily available. Due to the inefficiency of the open-loop systems, closed-loop systems have been developed.
There are known performance benefits to using a directional, laser-based, closed-loop infrared countermeasure system to defeat infrared missiles. In a closed-loop system, the incoming missile is identified and the countermeasure system generates or tunes a jam code according to the specific incoming missile. The optimized jam code is directed at the missile which executes a maximum turn-away from its intended target. An additional feature of closed-loop techniques is the ability to monitor the classification and identification process during the jamming sequence. This provides a direct observation of the countermeasure effectiveness as well as an indication of the necessary corrective action required for the jam code. It will be appreciated that the benefits of the closed-loop performance system must be balanced against the cost of upgrading existing infrared directional countermeasure systems with a closed-loop capability, or against the cost of developing an entirely new closed-loop system.
One possible configuration for introducing a closed-loop receiver into a directional countermeasure system is to use a high resolution tracking sensor side-by-side with an infrared detector assembly. Accordingly, an independent receive channel, which is a separate optical path, must be added to the detection system with a separate expensive cooled detector. The cost and size impact of such a configuration to the countermeasure system is prohibitive.
Another approach is to incorporate an infrared detector assembly into the countermeasure system and split a portion of the received optical path for the high resolution tracking sensor. Unfortunately, this approach causes at least a 50% receive loss for both the track sensor and the receiver, plus the cost for adding another cryogenically cooled detector. Another problem with this approach is that the apertures of the sensor and the receiver may not match which would require a larger overall assembly to accommodate both.
Based upon the foregoing, it is apparent that there is a need in the art for a single imaging infrared receiver having a focal plane array capable of sufficient frame rates to provide sensor data for three primary closed-loop countermeasure functions. The receiver must have a passive high resolution tracking capability, it must be able to receive and process laser signals, and finally, the receiver must be able to perform countermeasure effectiveness measurements.
In light of the foregoing, it is a first aspect of the present invention to provide a closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using a high frame rate infrared receiver.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a countermeasure system with a missile warning system that detects the presence of an object that may be considered a threat to a platform upon which the system is associated.
Yet another aspect of the present invention, as set forth above, is to provide a countermeasure processor, in communication with the warning system, which coordinates all of the functions and processing of the closed-loop system.
Yet another aspect of the present invention, as set forth above, is to provide a track processor which receives a trajectory signal representative of the missile path from the countermeasure processor based upon the communication received from the warning system to generate a trajectory pointer signal.
Yet a further aspect of the present invention, as set forth above, is to provide a pointer which positions itself based upon signals received from the countermeasure processor and the track processor.
Still a further aspect of the present invention, as set forth above, is to provide an infrared receiver positioned by the pointer, wherein the infrared receiver has an infrared focal plane array that functions simultaneously as a laser receiver and a high resolution track sensor or camera.
Still a further aspect of the present invention, as set forth above, is to provide a laser carried by the pointer, which is bore-sighted with the infrared receiver, which receives instructional signals and commands from the countermeasure processor, wherein a laser beam generated by the laser is initially directed toward the incoming missile threat and obtains operational characteristics therefrom which are received by the infrared receiver, which in turn are transmitted to the countermeasure processor which generates a jam code that is included with the laser beam impinging upon the incoming missile.
Still an additional aspect of the present invention, as set forth above, is to instruct the focal plane array to initiate variable imaging rates, in particular, a first imaging rate is employed to initially acquire and track the incoming threat, a faster second imaging rate is employed to provide a high resolution tracking of the incoming threat and an even faster third imaging rate is employed to obtain operational characteristics of the incoming missile.
The foregoing and other aspects of the present invention, which shall become apparent as the detailed description proceeds, are achieved by a missile tracking and deflection system for protecting a platform, comprising a missile warning system for detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning signal, a countermeasure processor for receiving the warning signal and generating a warning report, a track processor for receiving the warning report and generating a pointer trajectory signal, a pointer for receiving the pointer trajectory signal to position the pointer toward the missile, a receiver carried by the pointer to receive a passive signature of the missile and generate a trajectory characteristic signal received by the track processor for updating the pointer trajectory signal, and a laser carried by the pointer which directs a laser beam at the missile to generate an active signature received by the receiver which generates a missile characteristic signal received by the countermeasure processor to identify the missile and generate a jam code carried by the laser beam to divert the trajectory of the missile away from the platform, the receiver observing the passive and active signatures, and generating the trajectory characteristic signal and the missile characteristic signal simultaneously.
Other aspects of the present invention are attained by a method for diverting the trajectory of a missile, comprising the steps of detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning signal, analyzing characteristics of the warning signal with a countermeasure processor which generates a trajectory signal, processing the trajectory signal to generate a trajectory pointer signal, receiving the pointer signal in a receiver which has a single focal plane array that tracks the trajectory of the missile and detects operational characteristics of the missile, the receiver delivering a signal to the countermeasure processor which generates a jam code employed to divert the trajectory of the missile.
Still other aspects of the present invention are attained by an object tracking system comprising a receiver for observing the object, the receiver having a focal plane array for obtaining information about the object, and a processor in communication with the receiver, the processor imaging the focal plane array over at least two frame rates, wherein a first frame rate images a large portion of the focal plane array to observe the object, and a second frame rate, faster than the first frame rate, images a smaller portion of the focal plane array to track the object.
For a complete understanding of the objects, techniques, and structure of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a platform and an incoming missile threat;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a closed-loop infrared countermeasure system according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an infrared receiver tracking and delivering a jam code to an incoming missile; and
FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing operation of the infrared countermeasure system.
Referring now to the drawings, and in particular, to FIGS. 1 and 2, it can be seen that a closed-loop infrared countermeasure system, according to the present invention, is designated generally by the numeral 10. It will be appreciated that the system 10 is incorporated into a platform 12 such as a plane, ship, or ground-based installation. The system 10 is employed to detect the presence of an in-bound infrared missile 14, determine the operating characteristics of the missile, and then divert the trajectory of the missile so that it turns away from the platform 12. The system 10 may also be employed to track any moving object by observing any time varying frequency components thereof. Although an infrared-based system is disclosed, it will be appreciated that the aspects of the present invention are applicable to other frequency-observable phenomena.
As seen in FIG. 2, the system 10 includes a missile warning system 16 which may be carried by the platform 12. The missile warning system 16 detects the presence of an object, which could be an incoming threat, by either an infrared camera, an ultraviolet camera, by sight, by radar, or any other device which can generate information about the possible location and trajectory of the object. The missile warning system 16 acquires passive information about the object and determines if the object is in fact a missile. Accordingly, the missile warning system 16 generates a hand-off signal 26 which is received by the system 10. It will be appreciated that the missile warning system 16 is a low resolution system that looks at high spatial coverage areas for the primary purpose of detecting the presence of any type of threat, such as a missile or enemy aircraft. The hand-off signal 26 includes information such as amplitude, how long the threat has been tracked, speed, intensity, and angle range from the platform 12.
A countermeasure processor 30, which provides the necessary software, hardware, and memory for controlling and coordinating the various aspects of the system 10, receives the hand-off signal 26. The countermeasure processor 30 prioritizes the threat according to the information acquired and predetermined criteria. The countermeasure processor 30 is in communication with a host platform 32 via host signal 34 for the purpose of communicating with the command structure controlling operation of the platform 12. Initially, the countermeasure processor 30 generates a trajectory signal 38 received by an infrared countermeasure track processor 40. Accordingly, the track processor 40 initiates a tracking sequence for the potential in-bound missile 14 indicated by the hand-off signal 26. In particular, the track processor 40 generates a trajectory pointer signal 42 which provides mechanical control functions to position selected components of the system 10 in the appropriate direction.
A pointer 44, as seen in FIGS. 2 and 3, receives the pointer signal 42 and slews the components thereof to observe the angle and position of the in-bound missile 14. The pointer 44 positions an infrared receiver 50 and an infrared laser 52 which are bore sighted.
The infrared receiver 50 is a high frame rate, infrared focal plane array which integrally and simultaneously combines the functions of a high resolution track sensor or a camera 54 and a laser receiver 56. In the preferred embodiment, the receiver 50 has an aperture of about 35-50 mm, although other aperture sizes could be used. The pointer 44 provides an optical path 57 for the infrared receiver 50. The infrared receiver 50 generates a trajectory characteristic signal 58 that is received by the track processor 40 for updating the trajectory pointer signal 42.
The infrared receiver 50 provides a single focal plane array generally designated by the numeral 51 as best seen in FIG. 3 to function both as a passive viewing device and an active viewing device. The receiver 50 has a relatively large field of view, wherein the focal plane array 51 provides a full frame, 512×512 pixel display that generates an optical image that is converted into an electrical signal. Of course, other size focal plane arrays may be used. The receiver 50 functions as the tracking camera 54 by employing the focal plane array 51 to passively observe the trajectory of the missile. Since the receiver 50 employs a single focal plane array, the function of the camera 54 is inherently bore-sighted with the function of the laser receiver 56. Accordingly, both the receiver 56 and the camera 54 functionally observe substantially the same scene. As will be discussed hereinbelow, the laser receiver 56 functions to employ relatively smaller portions of the focal plane array to actively observe the trajectory of the missile. The infrared receiver 50 communicates with the countermeasure processor 30 via a missile characteristic signal 60.
Referring now to FIG. 4, an operational flow of the countermeasure processor system is designated generally by the numeral 100. After the pointer 44 slews itself toward the missile 14, the tracking camera 54, at step 102, observes a passive signature 62, typically thermal emissions generated by the missile. Other possible passive signatures that may be viewed with a similar camera are light frequencies in the visible or near visible spectrum including ultraviolet light, or acoustic signals. At step 102, a relatively low frame rate, up to about 120 frames per second and preferably about 60 frames per second, is used by the track camera 54 to communicate information obtained from the passive signature 62 to the track processor 40 via the trajectory characteristic signal line 58. Accordingly, at step 104, the countermeasure processor 30 instructs the track processor 40 to position the pointer 44 so that the missile 14 is centered in the focal plane array 51 of the receiver 50. At step 106, the countermeasure processor 30 instructs the track processor 40 to increase the imaging rate to a frame rate of the focal plane array of the receiver 50 to between about 120 to about 1000 frames per second and preferably about 400 frames per second. When this is done, the observation area of the focal plane array is reduced to a mid-size frame smaller than full frame or preferably to about 32×32 pixels centered about the missile 14 as it appears on the focal plane array 51.
At step 108, the countermeasure processor 30 generates an initiation signal 64 which instructs the infrared laser 52 to “illuminate” the missile 14. Upon receipt of the initiation signal 64, a laser beam 68 is generated by the laser 52 and directed at the missile 14. Accordingly, as the laser beam 68 impinges upon the missile 14, an active signature 70 is reflected and received by the laser receiver 56 aspect of the receiver 50. The countermeasure processor 30 then instructs the receiver 50, at step 110, to employ a frame rate of up to 50,000 frames per second and preferably about 32,000 frames per second over an even smaller sub-array frame size 90 of about 16×16 pixels. In other words, the ultra-fast imaging rate may be applied to a pixel array of 1×1 up to an array size employed for the prior imaging rate. It will be appreciated that these imaging rates are only limited by the operational characteristics of the receiver 50. The image of the active signature 70 is processed at step 112, in the manner described above to maintain the high resolution track on the missile 14. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the laser receiver 56 employs pixel detectors, such as photo diodes, which are digitally sampled and processed by the countermeasure processor 30 via the optical path 57 and the missile characteristic signal 60. The processor 30 in turn performs a Fourier analysis of the amplitude modulation or time varying characteristics of the incoming signals 62, 70 via the optical path 57 and/or the signal 60 to determine operational characteristics of the missile 14. The processor 30 monitors the performance of the laser 52 via a signal line 73.
Once the active signature 70 is returned from the missile 14, the infrared receiver 50 simultaneously generates corresponding updated signals for the trajectory characteristic signal 58, which in turn updates the pointer trajectory signal 42, and the missile characteristic signal line 60. At this time, the countermeasure processor 30 analyzes the components of the active signature 70 and generates a jam code 74, at step 114, for inclusion with the laser beam 68. Accordingly, the missile 14 is diverted from the actual platform and eventually self-destructs, as the jam code 74 is included with the laser beam 68. A countermeasure effectiveness measurement is performed by the countermeasure processor 30 by simultaneously examining dynamic track and classification and identification information provided by the trajectory characteristic signal 58 and the signature 70. As such, if the jam code 74 is found to be ineffective, the countermeasure processor 30 can immediately make adjustments thereto.
If desired, the system 10 may also provide dispensers 76 which eject infrared expendable devices 78 that may also be used to divert the trajectory and/or path of the incoming missile 14. The dispensers 76 are in communication with the host platform 32 so that it may be monitored thereby.
Based upon the foregoing structure and method of the use presented above, the system 10 effectively analyzes a trajectory of an incoming missile and its operational characteristics and generates a jam code to divert the trajectory of the missile away from the platform. Previous approaches to closed-loop laser infrared countermeasure required the use of a separate laser receiver to collect interrogation signals from an infrared missile and a separate infrared focal plane array camera for high resolution tracking of the threat. The separate laser interrogation receiver has significant negative system impacts on the cost, size, weight, power efficiency, performance, reliability, and maintainability. By employing the present invention, wherein the laser receiver function and the high resolution tracking function are incorporated into a single, infrared focal plane array, these system impacts are eliminated or greatly reduced. Still yet another advantage of the present invention is that current open-loop systems may be converted to closed-loop systems with substantially improved performance in defending from missile attacks. Moreover, the present invention avoids adding additional operating equipment which would require the splitting of signals and reducing the strength thereof to the detriment of the host platform 32. Another advantage of the present invention is that the same signal may be processed with a relatively smaller aperture than may be otherwise provided.
Thus, it can be seen that the objects of the invention have been satisfied by the structure and use of the invention as presented above. While in accordance with the patent statutes, only the best mode and preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented and described in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto or thereby. Accordingly, for an appreciation of the true scope and breadth of the invention, reference should be made to the following claims.
Claims (15)
1. A missile tracking and deflection system for protecting a platform, comprising:
a missile warning system for detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning hand-off signal;
a countermeasure processor for receiving said warning hand-off signal and generating a trajectory signal;
a track processor for receiving said trajectory signal and generating a pointer trajectory signal;
a pointer for receiving said pointer trajectory signal to position said pointer toward the missile;
a laser positioned by said pointer, said laser emitting a laser beam at the missile to generate an active signature; and
an infrared receiver comprising an infrared focal plane array that integrally and simultaneously combines a tracking camera and a laser receiver, said infrared receiver positioned by said pointer, said camera receiving a passive signature of the missile and generating a trajectory characteristic signal received by said track processor for updating said pointer trajectory signal, said laser receiver receiving said active signature and generating a missile characteristic signal received by said countermeasure processor to identify the missile and generate a jam code carried by said laser beam to divert the trajectory of the missile away from the platform.
2. The system according to claim 1 , wherein said focal plane array operates at least at a first and a second frame rate, said tracking camera operating at a first frame rate for tracking the missile over a large portion of said focal plane array to generate said trajectory characteristic signal which is received by said track processor for updating said trajectory pointer signal, said laser receiver operating at a second frame rate for observing the missile over a smaller portion of said focal plane array to receive said active signature.
3. The system according to claim 2 , wherein said infrared receiver is bore-sighted with said laser, said laser receiving an initiation signal from said countermeasure processor to generate said laser beam, the missile returning said active signature to said laser receiver which receives said active signature and monitors the trajectory of the missile.
4. The system according to claim 3 , wherein said focal plane array operates at a third frame rate over a mid-sized portion thereof, between said large portion and said small portion, said third frame rate establishing a high resolution tracking of the missile via said trajectory characteristic signal, wherein said countermeasure processor simultaneously monitors said trajectory characteristic signal and said active signature, and if needed, updates said jam code.
5. The system according to claim 4 , wherein said first frame rate is about no greater than 120 frames per second.
6. The system according to claim 4 , wherein said third frame rate is between about 120 to about 1000 frames per second and said mid-sized portion of said focal plane array is sized to be about 32×32 pixels.
7. The system according to claim 4 , wherein said second frame rate is greater than about 1000 frames per second and said small portion of said focal plane array is sized to be about 16×16 pixels.
8. A method for diverting the trajectory of a missile, comprising the steps of:
detecting the presence of a missile and generating a warning hand-off signal;
analyzing characteristics of said warning handoff signal with a countermeasure processor which generates a trajectory signal;
processing said trajectory signal to generate a trajectory pointer signal;
receiving said pointer signal in a pointer that follows the missile trajectory, said pointer positioning a laser and an infrared receiver which has a single focal plane array that integrally and simultaneously combines the functions of a tracking camera and a laser receiver;
directing said laser to generate a laser beam toward the missile so as to generate an active signature;
observing said active signature with said laser receiver and observing a passive signature of the missile with said tracking camera to track the trajectory of the missile, said laser receiver observing said active signature to detect the operational characteristics of the missile, said infrared receiver delivering a signal to said countermeasure processor which generates a jam code employed to divert the trajectory of the missile.
9. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising the steps of:
generating a missile characteristic signal by said laser receiver based upon said active signature; and
receiving said missile characteristic signal in said countermeasure processor which in turn generates said jam code for inclusion with said laser beam.
10. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising the steps of:
generating a trajectory characteristic signal by said infrared receiver based upon said active signature or said passive signature; and
receiving said trajectory characteristic signal in a track processor which updates said trajectory signal.
11. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising the step of: imaging said focal plane array at a rate of about no greater than 120 frames per second when initially receiving said pointer signal.
12. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising the step of:
imaging said focal plane array at a rate between about 120 to about 1000 frames per second to establish a high resolution track on the missile.
13. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising the step of:
imaging said focal plane array at a rate greater than about 1000 frames per second when said laser beam illuminates the missile and whereupon said jam code is included with said laser beam.
14. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising the step of:
dispensing expendable countermeasure devices at the missile as instructed by said countermeasure processor.
15. An object tracking system comprising:
an infrared receiver for observing the object, said infrared receiver having a focal plane array for obtaining information about the object, said focal plane array integrally and simultaneously combining a tracking camera and a laser receiver;
a processor in communication with said infrared receiver, said processor controlling said focal plane array over at least two frame rates, wherein said tracking camera images a large portion of said focal plane array to passively observe the object at a first frame rate, and wherein said tracking camera images a smaller portion of said focal plane array to track the object at a second frame rate, faster than said first frame rate; and
a laser bore sighted with said infrared receiver and in communication with said processor, said processor activating said laser to direct a laser beam toward the object, whereupon said processor initiates a third frame rate, faster than said second frame rate, and said laser receiver monitors a returned laser beam signal from the object, wherein said processor receives said returned laser beam signal and images an even smaller portion of said focal plane array at an even faster third frame rate to observe the effect of said laser beam on the object.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/072,841 US6369885B1 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1998-05-05 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver |
GB0310788A GB2386015B (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1999-03-20 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver |
GB9906393A GB2337172B (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1999-03-20 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver |
GB0310792A GB2386016B (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1999-03-20 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver |
US10/093,975 US6674520B2 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 2002-03-08 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using a high frame rate infrared receiver with nulling sequence |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/072,841 US6369885B1 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1998-05-05 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/093,975 Continuation-In-Part US6674520B2 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 2002-03-08 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using a high frame rate infrared receiver with nulling sequence |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6369885B1 true US6369885B1 (en) | 2002-04-09 |
Family
ID=22110076
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/072,841 Expired - Lifetime US6369885B1 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1998-05-05 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver |
US10/093,975 Expired - Lifetime US6674520B2 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 2002-03-08 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using a high frame rate infrared receiver with nulling sequence |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/093,975 Expired - Lifetime US6674520B2 (en) | 1998-05-05 | 2002-03-08 | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using a high frame rate infrared receiver with nulling sequence |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6369885B1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2337172B (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040004707A1 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2004-01-08 | Deflumere Michael E. | Dual-mode focal plane array for missile seekers |
WO2004109251A2 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2004-12-16 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Back illumination method for counter measuring ir guided missiles |
US20050001755A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Steadman Robert L. | Externally cued aircraft warning and defense |
US20050224706A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2005-10-13 | Von Rosenberg Charles W Jr | System and processes for causing the simultaneity of events including controlling a pulse repetition frequency of a pulsed laser for disabling a scanning imaging system |
US20050275582A1 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2005-12-15 | Mohan Paul L | System and method for onboard detection of ballistic threats to aircraft |
US7190304B1 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2007-03-13 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | System for interception and defeat of rocket propelled grenades and method of use |
WO2007116403A2 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2007-10-18 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
US7688247B2 (en) | 2003-06-04 | 2010-03-30 | Elop Electro-Optical Industries Ltd. | Fiber laser based directional infrared countermeasure (DIRCM) system |
DE102009009698A1 (en) | 2009-02-19 | 2010-08-26 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | A method for eye-safe operation of a pulsed noise laser in a DIRCM system |
WO2011015175A1 (en) | 2009-08-07 | 2011-02-10 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Method for operating a jamming laser in a dircm system in a manner that is safe for eyes |
US7907278B1 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2011-03-15 | Lowell Williams | Staring imaging grating spectrometer for detection of projectiles |
EP1580518B1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2014-04-23 | Rafael-Armament Development Authority Ltd. | System and method for automatically acquiring a target with a narrow field-of-view gimbaled imaging sensor |
US9279643B2 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2016-03-08 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Preemptive countermeasure management |
US10822110B2 (en) | 2015-09-08 | 2020-11-03 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Threat countermeasure assistance system |
CN114119649A (en) * | 2021-11-23 | 2022-03-01 | 中国航空工业集团公司洛阳电光设备研究所 | Missile approaching alarm testing method based on image injection |
US11460275B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2022-10-04 | Bird Aerosystems Ltd. | Device, system, and method of aircraft protection and countermeasures against threats |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6410897B1 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2002-06-25 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for aircraft protection against missile threats |
DE10112176A1 (en) * | 2001-03-12 | 2002-09-19 | Bodenseewerk Geraetetech | Device for aiming a laser beam at a target |
US6872960B2 (en) * | 2001-04-18 | 2005-03-29 | Raytheon Company | Robust infrared countermeasure system and method |
US20050150371A1 (en) * | 2003-01-29 | 2005-07-14 | Rickard John T. | System and method for the defense of aircraft against missile attack |
US6977598B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2005-12-20 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Aircraft protection system and method |
US6738012B1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2004-05-18 | Honeywell Industrial Inc. | Protecting commercial airliners from man portable missiles |
RU2238510C1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2004-10-20 | Закрытое акционерное общество "СТИВТ" | Method and system of automatic control |
EP1757178A4 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2016-12-28 | Bae Sys Inf & Elect Sys Integ | Electronic signal blanking in optical transceivers |
US10101455B1 (en) | 2005-03-08 | 2018-10-16 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Apparatus utilizing electro-optical/infrared threat warning, proactive and reactive countermeasures |
US7292319B1 (en) | 2005-05-24 | 2007-11-06 | Lockheed Martin Corp. | Optical tracking device employing a three-axis gimbal |
US7336407B1 (en) | 2005-07-28 | 2008-02-26 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Scanner/pointer apparatus having super-hemispherical coverage |
IL179453A (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2013-10-31 | Rafael Advanced Defense Sys | Laser based countermeasures system and method |
FR2924230B1 (en) * | 2007-11-22 | 2010-01-15 | Sagem Defense Securite | COUNTERMEASURE DEVICE FOR INFRARED GUIDANCE |
KR100973041B1 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2010-07-29 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | Directional infrared countermeasure apparatus and method |
IL226817A0 (en) * | 2013-06-06 | 2013-12-31 | Bird Aerosystems Ltd | System, device, and method of protecting aircrafts against incoming threats |
IL285271A (en) * | 2021-08-01 | 2023-02-01 | Bird Aerosystems Ltd | Device, system, and method of aircraft protection and countermeasures against missiles |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3828122A (en) * | 1970-09-29 | 1974-08-06 | Bendix Corp | Tv area correlation tracker |
US4227212A (en) * | 1978-09-21 | 1980-10-07 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Adaptive updating processor for use in an area correlation video tracker |
GB2208256A (en) | 1983-04-15 | 1989-03-15 | Philips Electronic Associated | Infra-red radiation imaging devices and systems |
US5129595A (en) | 1991-07-03 | 1992-07-14 | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | Focal plane array seeker for projectiles |
EP0665445A1 (en) | 1994-01-31 | 1995-08-02 | DIEHL GMBH & CO. | Apparatus for defence against an attacking missile |
US5528354A (en) * | 1992-07-10 | 1996-06-18 | Bodenseewerk Geratetechnik Gmbh | Picture detecting sensor unit |
US5662291A (en) | 1994-12-15 | 1997-09-02 | Daimler-Benz Aerospace Ag | Device for self-defense against missiles |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3942890A (en) * | 1974-03-21 | 1976-03-09 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Secure active sensor |
US4406429A (en) * | 1978-04-13 | 1983-09-27 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Missile detecting and tracking unit |
US4651647A (en) * | 1985-04-01 | 1987-03-24 | Werkzeugmaschinenfabrik Oerlikon-Buehrle Ag | Adjustable range proximity fuze |
-
1998
- 1998-05-05 US US09/072,841 patent/US6369885B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1999
- 1999-03-20 GB GB9906393A patent/GB2337172B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-08 US US10/093,975 patent/US6674520B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3828122A (en) * | 1970-09-29 | 1974-08-06 | Bendix Corp | Tv area correlation tracker |
US4227212A (en) * | 1978-09-21 | 1980-10-07 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Adaptive updating processor for use in an area correlation video tracker |
GB2208256A (en) | 1983-04-15 | 1989-03-15 | Philips Electronic Associated | Infra-red radiation imaging devices and systems |
US5129595A (en) | 1991-07-03 | 1992-07-14 | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | Focal plane array seeker for projectiles |
US5528354A (en) * | 1992-07-10 | 1996-06-18 | Bodenseewerk Geratetechnik Gmbh | Picture detecting sensor unit |
EP0665445A1 (en) | 1994-01-31 | 1995-08-02 | DIEHL GMBH & CO. | Apparatus for defence against an attacking missile |
US5600434A (en) | 1994-01-31 | 1997-02-04 | Diehl Gmbh & Co. | Apparatus for defending against an attacking missile |
US5662291A (en) | 1994-12-15 | 1997-09-02 | Daimler-Benz Aerospace Ag | Device for self-defense against missiles |
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6864965B2 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2005-03-08 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Dual-mode focal plane array for missile seekers |
US20040004707A1 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2004-01-08 | Deflumere Michael E. | Dual-mode focal plane array for missile seekers |
US6969845B2 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2005-11-29 | Textron Systems Corporation | System and processes for causing the simultaneity of events including controlling a pulse repetition frequency of a pulsed laser for disabling a scanning imaging system |
US20050224706A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2005-10-13 | Von Rosenberg Charles W Jr | System and processes for causing the simultaneity of events including controlling a pulse repetition frequency of a pulsed laser for disabling a scanning imaging system |
WO2005008197A2 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2005-01-27 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Dual-mode focal plane array for missile seekers |
WO2005008197A3 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2005-06-16 | Bae Systems Information | Dual-mode focal plane array for missile seekers |
WO2004109251A3 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2009-03-26 | Bae Systems Information | Back illumination method for counter measuring ir guided missiles |
WO2004109251A2 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2004-12-16 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Back illumination method for counter measuring ir guided missiles |
US7688247B2 (en) | 2003-06-04 | 2010-03-30 | Elop Electro-Optical Industries Ltd. | Fiber laser based directional infrared countermeasure (DIRCM) system |
US20050001755A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Steadman Robert L. | Externally cued aircraft warning and defense |
US6980152B2 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-12-27 | Textron Systems Corporation | Externally cued aircraft warning and defense |
AU2004309783B2 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2009-12-03 | Textron Systems Corporation | Externally cued aircraft warning and defense |
US7190304B1 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2007-03-13 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | System for interception and defeat of rocket propelled grenades and method of use |
EP1580518B1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2014-04-23 | Rafael-Armament Development Authority Ltd. | System and method for automatically acquiring a target with a narrow field-of-view gimbaled imaging sensor |
US20050275582A1 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2005-12-15 | Mohan Paul L | System and method for onboard detection of ballistic threats to aircraft |
US6980151B1 (en) | 2004-06-14 | 2005-12-27 | General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc. | System and method for onboard detection of ballistic threats to aircraft |
EP2442131A1 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2012-04-18 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
WO2007116403A2 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2007-10-18 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
US8279429B2 (en) | 2006-04-10 | 2012-10-02 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
WO2007116403A3 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2007-11-22 | Elta Systems Ltd | Distributed jammer system |
AU2007237067C1 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2012-05-24 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
US7920255B2 (en) | 2006-04-10 | 2011-04-05 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
AU2007237067B2 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2011-12-22 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Distributed jammer system |
US7907278B1 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2011-03-15 | Lowell Williams | Staring imaging grating spectrometer for detection of projectiles |
DE102009009698B4 (en) * | 2009-02-19 | 2010-11-18 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | A method for eye-safe operation of a pulsed noise laser in a DIRCM system |
WO2010094254A1 (en) | 2009-02-19 | 2010-08-26 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Method for operating a pulsed interference laser in an eye-safe manner in a dircm system |
DE102009009698A1 (en) | 2009-02-19 | 2010-08-26 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | A method for eye-safe operation of a pulsed noise laser in a DIRCM system |
US8948591B2 (en) | 2009-02-19 | 2015-02-03 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Method for operating a pulsed interference laser in an eye-safe manner in a DIRCM system |
WO2011015175A1 (en) | 2009-08-07 | 2011-02-10 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Method for operating a jamming laser in a dircm system in a manner that is safe for eyes |
US8634065B2 (en) | 2009-08-07 | 2014-01-21 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Method for operating a jamming laser in a DIRCM system in a manner that is safe for eyes |
US9279643B2 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2016-03-08 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Preemptive countermeasure management |
US10822110B2 (en) | 2015-09-08 | 2020-11-03 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Threat countermeasure assistance system |
US11460275B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2022-10-04 | Bird Aerosystems Ltd. | Device, system, and method of aircraft protection and countermeasures against threats |
CN114119649A (en) * | 2021-11-23 | 2022-03-01 | 中国航空工业集团公司洛阳电光设备研究所 | Missile approaching alarm testing method based on image injection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2337172A (en) | 1999-11-10 |
GB2337172B (en) | 2003-08-27 |
US6674520B2 (en) | 2004-01-06 |
GB9906393D0 (en) | 1999-05-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6369885B1 (en) | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver | |
US12092756B1 (en) | Deterrent for unmanned aerial systems | |
KR100524337B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for aircraft protection against missile threats | |
US10907940B1 (en) | Deterrent for unmanned aerial systems using data mining and/or machine learning for improved target detection and classification | |
US5061930A (en) | Multi-mode missile seeker system | |
US9170069B1 (en) | Aimpoint offset countermeasures for area protection | |
US5408541A (en) | Method and system for recognizing targets at long ranges | |
US8269957B2 (en) | Laser based countermeasures system and method | |
CA2071580C (en) | Very high angular resolution laser beam rider detector | |
US9074852B2 (en) | Surveillance image denial verification | |
JPH02105087A (en) | Method and device for discriminating start and flight of body | |
USH299H (en) | Covert beam projector | |
US6260792B1 (en) | Tracking and guidance system with modulated missile-mounted laser beacon | |
US8169597B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for laser return characterization in a countermeasures system | |
GB2386016A (en) | Closed-loop infrared countermeasure system using high frame rate infrared receiver | |
US12104881B2 (en) | Countermeasure system having a confirmation device and method thereof | |
US10101455B1 (en) | Apparatus utilizing electro-optical/infrared threat warning, proactive and reactive countermeasures | |
WO2024231894A1 (en) | Next-generation electro-optical defence system: evolution of functionalities of dircm systems for extending capabilities of protection of platforms and for increasing pilots' awareness | |
JP2023037618A (en) | Optical detection system and method for detecting hostile optical component |