US3377156A - Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide - Google Patents

Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3377156A
US3377156A US476159A US47615965A US3377156A US 3377156 A US3377156 A US 3377156A US 476159 A US476159 A US 476159A US 47615965 A US47615965 A US 47615965A US 3377156 A US3377156 A US 3377156A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
carbon monoxide
gas
sulfur
iron
reduction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US476159A
Inventor
Kalina Theodore
John A Kivlen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Co
Original Assignee
Exxon Research and Engineering Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exxon Research and Engineering Co filed Critical Exxon Research and Engineering Co
Priority to US476159A priority Critical patent/US3377156A/en
Priority to GB33135/66A priority patent/GB1140958A/en
Priority to FR70959A priority patent/FR1489937A/en
Priority to DE19661508019 priority patent/DE1508019B2/en
Priority to BR181712/66A priority patent/BR6681712D0/en
Priority to ES0329663A priority patent/ES329663A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3377156A publication Critical patent/US3377156A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B13/00Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes
    • C21B13/0033In fluidised bed furnaces or apparatus containing a dispersion of the material
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B13/00Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes
    • C21B13/0073Selection or treatment of the reducing gases
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/02Roasting processes
    • C22B1/10Roasting processes in fluidised form
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/10Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions
    • Y02P10/122Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions by capturing or storing CO2
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/10Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions
    • Y02P10/134Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions by avoiding CO2, e.g. using hydrogen

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the production of metallic iron via reduction of iron ores by contact with reducing gases.
  • it relates to an improved iron ore reduction process wherein fluidized iron ores are metallized by direct contact with carbon monoxide, mixtures of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, or mixtures Ofcarbon monoxide with other gases which can also contain hydrogen.
  • particulate oxidic iron ores are introduced into the top of a reactor and flowed downwardly from one fluidized bed to the next succeeding bed, and within each bed the state of oxidation of the ore is progressively lowered.
  • the ore flows from one of a series of staged reduction zones to the next lower succeeding stage.
  • the ore is contacted by upwardly flowing gases, and reduced while concurrently the reducing components of the ascending gas is oxidized.
  • the partially oxidized gas can be regenerated by removal of oxidized components and reused.
  • the ore is reduced, e.g., from ferric oxide to magnetic oxide of iron (or mixture approximating the composition of such compound), from magnetic oxide of iron to ferrous oxide, and from ferrous oxide to substantially metallic iron.
  • the metallic iron product ranges from about 85 to about 95 percent, and higher, metallic iron.
  • Such fluidized iron ore reduction processes most often utilize externally generated synthesis gas, i.e., gaseous mixtures consisting of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, or mixtures of these and other gases, which are injected into the bottom stage of the reactor.
  • gaseous mixtures are generally formed from hydrocarbon fuels which are oxidized or burned in a deficiency of oxygen.
  • gaseous mixtures are hydrogen-enriched, e.g., via use of the water-gas shift reforming reaction. Because of the endothermic nature of hydrogen in the iron ore reduction reaction, however, it is generally desirable to employ gaseous mixtures wherein carbon monoxide is employed in relatively high concentration in the process.
  • reducing gas mixtures in whole or in part, in situ.
  • hydrocarbon fuels are fed directly into a stage of the process wherein metallization is high, e.g., perhaps to about 98 percent, so that the reducing gases are generated internally.
  • metallic iron is catalytic under certain conditions and the fuel is decomposed in situ to a gaseous mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
  • the presence of carbon monoxide in the gaseous mixture, whether introduced into or generated in situ within the process, is quite desirable, but its presence often creates difiiculties.
  • the solution of these and other difliculties is therefore the primary objective of the present invention.
  • the objective of this invention is to provide a process which will suppress or inhibit reversion of carbon monoxide.
  • a further and more specific objective is to provide the art with a simplified, new and novel fluidized iron ore reduction process, especially one utilizing a series of staged reduction zones, wherein carbon monoxide reversion is drastically suppressed even at temperatures which normally produce acute carbon reversion. It is yet another object to provide such process which is particularly useful in direct hydrocarbon injection.
  • Additives particularly suitable for use in accordance with the present invention are the divalent sulfur compounds, or sulfides. These can be characterized by the following formula wherein R and R are the same or different and can be hydrogen or monovalent organic radicals, e.g., hydrocarbon radicals, such as alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, arylalkyl, aralkyl and the like.
  • the organo radicals can be substituted or unsubstituted, and where substituted the hydrogen of the radical may be replaced by halogen, nitro groups, amino groups, carbonyl groups and the like; or, the radical, where of ring structure, can be ring substituted to form a heterocyclic radical.
  • the carbon of a ring can be substituted, for example, by sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen, or the like.
  • an organo radical should contain no more than about ten carbon atoms, and more preferably about six carbon atoms.
  • Exemplary ofthese classes of compounds are methyl sulfide, n-propyl sulfide, ethyl n-propyl sulfide, cetyl isoamyl sulfide, bis(trichloromethyl) sulfide, allyl benzyl sulfide, phenyl trichloromethyl sul- 4 fide, l-naphthyl phenyl sulfide, anthrene, 3(ethylmercapto) thiophene, anethiol, 8-quinolinethiol and the like.
  • the sulfides contain no more than one monovalent organo radical.
  • exemplary of such compounds are methyl mercaptan, isopropyl mercaptan, n-amyl mercaptan, allyl mercaptan, 3-acridinemercaptan, a-methyl benzyl mercaptan, Z-naphthalene thiol and the like. Mixtures of any of such compounds with other substances or with each other are suitable. Certain commercial mixtures and naturally occurring materials can also provide these compounds, or can be added to the process, to generate the desired compounds in situ.
  • R and R are both hydrogen, i.e., hydrogen sulfide.
  • Hydrogen sulfide is an outstanding compound because of its availability, its readily usable form, and its extremely high effectiveness in minute concentrations.
  • More complex sulfur compounds can also be employed.
  • Other divalent sulfur compounds are thus suitable. These include such compounds as the polysulfides, especially the disulfides illustrative of which are carbon disulfide, methylethyl disulfide, Z-fenchanyl methyl disulfide, tertbutyl-Z-naphthyl disulfide, 2-(o-nitrophenyldithio)benzothiazole, and the like.
  • oxidic ores as particulate solids particles, are contacted and fluidized with upwardly flowing carbon monoxide-containing gases in a process wherein a plurality of staged zones are provided.
  • the zones which contain the fluidized beds of ore at different stages of reduction can be operated at the same or at different elevated temperatures.
  • one or more ferric reduction zones operated at temperatures ranging from about 1000 F. to about 1800" F. and one or more, and preferably a plurality, of ferrous reduction zones operated at temperatures ranging from about 1300 F. to about 1700 F.
  • the sulfur or sulfur-containing compound, or compounds is preferably added to the carbon monoxide-containing reducing gas and then heated prior to or at the time of the injection into the process.
  • the carbon monoxide-containing reducing gases within which is provided the sulfur or sulfur-containing compound is injected into a ferrous reduction zone wherein the metallization ranges from about 85 percent to about 98 percent, and higher.
  • a large quantity of raw hematite ore i.e. a Carol Lake ore, is pulverized in a ball mill, to a particle size ranging from about to 210 microns, and divided into several like portions.
  • a portion of the .ore is charged into a fluidized iron ore reactor or reductionprocess wherein is provided a series of four staged fluidized zones, two ferric reduction zones and two ferrous reduction zones.
  • the ore is fluidized by an upwardly flowing gas initially of 20 percent carbon monoxide, 60 percent hydrogen, and 20 percent nitrogen to which is added parts of hydrogen sulfide, per million parts of gas.
  • the gas is preheated through a temperature range of 850 F. to 1300 F.
  • ferric reduction stages wherein ferric oxides are reduced essentially to magnetic oxides of iron, are operated at 1300 F. as were the'ferrous reduction stages wherein the ferrous 5 oxide is reduced, in the final stage, to provide 94 percent metallization.
  • Example 2 The foregoing demonstration is repeated in precise detai'l employing a second portion of the ore except in this instance 150 parts of hydrogen sulfide, based on the volume of the gas, is added to the entering gas charged into the ferrous reduction zone.
  • the beds appear normal and the process functions normally in every way and there is no evidence of any significant amount of carbon monoxide reversion.
  • the ferrous metal parts of the equipment are not carburized and little carbon is formed in the reaction.
  • Example 3 When Example 2 is repeated with another portion of ore heated to a temperature of 1400 -F. and ethyl mercaptan in concentrations of 200 parts, per million parts of carbon monoxide, is added to the reducing gas mixture, there is yet no significant evidence of carbon monoxide reversion.
  • Example 4 When the conditions of operation of the process of Example 2 are repeated except that 200 parts of benzyl mercaptan is injected into the process, there is little evidence of carbon monoxide reversion.
  • Such compounds in contact with the gas at the time of contact with catalytic metallic surfaces, or iron, provide benefits, whether added ab initio or generated in situ, from an added material itself capable of providing such compounds.
  • the improvement comprising heating said reducing gas to said temperature, and adding to said gas an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur and heat-decomposable sulfur compounds to cause said additive to be present in the gas during the heating thereof, while in contact with the catalytic metal surfaces, and while the gas is passing through a temperature ranging from about 800 F. to about 1500" F. to suppress reversion of the carbon monoxide.
  • the additive is gas is oxidized, withdrawn from the process, cooled, regenerated by removal of oxidized components, reheated in the presence of catalytic metal surfaces and thence reinjected into the process, the improvement comprising adding to the injected gas from about 5 to about 1000 parts of an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur 0r heat-decomposable sulfur compounds, based on a million parts of generated gas, to suppress carbon monoxide reversion.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Gas Separation By Absorption (AREA)
  • Treatments Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)

Description

United States Patent Ofilice 3,377,156 Patented Apr. 9, 1 968 3,377,156 PROCESS OF REDUCING IRON OXIDE ORES WITH GASES CONTAINING CAR- BON MONOXIDE Theodore Kalina, Elizabeth, and John A. Kivlen, Sparta,
N.J., assignors to Esso Research and Engineering Company, a corporation of Delaware N Drawing. Filed July 30, 1965, Ser. No. 476,159 15 Claims. (Cl. 7526) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE The reversion of gases containing carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and carbon when in contact with catalytic metal surfaces at high temperatures is suppressed or inhibited by providing small concentrations of sulfur or heat-decomposable sulfur compounds in the gases. This invention is especially useful in direct iron ore reduction processes.
This invention relates to the production of metallic iron via reduction of iron ores by contact with reducing gases. In particular, it relates to an improved iron ore reduction process wherein fluidized iron ores are metallized by direct contact with carbon monoxide, mixtures of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, or mixtures Ofcarbon monoxide with other gases which can also contain hydrogen.
It is well known to produce metallic iron by reduction of oxidic iron ores, i.e., ores containing or consisting essentially of oxides of iron, in beds fluidized by ascending gases, at temperatures ranging generally from about 1000 F. up to just below the sintering temperature, i.e., about 1800 F. for most ores. In such processes, several fluidized beds are generally provided, and these are staged as separate reduction zones operated at the same or different elevated temperatures. Generally, the several fluidized beds are housed within a single reactor.
In a typical staged fluidized iron ore reduction process, particulate oxidic iron ores are introduced into the top of a reactor and flowed downwardly from one fluidized bed to the next succeeding bed, and within each bed the state of oxidation of the ore is progressively lowered. Thus, the ore flows from one of a series of staged reduction zones to the next lower succeeding stage. Within each of the several stages, the ore is contacted by upwardly flowing gases, and reduced while concurrently the reducing components of the ascending gas is oxidized. If desired, the partially oxidized gas can be regenerated by removal of oxidized components and reused. In the several stages, the ore is reduced, e.g., from ferric oxide to magnetic oxide of iron (or mixture approximating the composition of such compound), from magnetic oxide of iron to ferrous oxide, and from ferrous oxide to substantially metallic iron. Generally, the metallic iron product ranges from about 85 to about 95 percent, and higher, metallic iron.
Such fluidized iron ore reduction processes most often utilize externally generated synthesis gas, i.e., gaseous mixtures consisting of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, or mixtures of these and other gases, which are injected into the bottom stage of the reactor. Such gaseous mixtures are generally formed from hydrocarbon fuels which are oxidized or burned in a deficiency of oxygen. Often such gaseous mixtures are hydrogen-enriched, e.g., via use of the water-gas shift reforming reaction. Because of the endothermic nature of hydrogen in the iron ore reduction reaction, however, it is generally desirable to employ gaseous mixtures wherein carbon monoxide is employed in relatively high concentration in the process.
Often also, it is desirable to form the reducing gas mixtures, in whole or in part, in situ. In accordance with this technique, generally termed direct injection, hydrocarbon fuels are fed directly into a stage of the process wherein metallization is high, e.g., perhaps to about 98 percent, so that the reducing gases are generated internally. Thus, metallic iron is catalytic under certain conditions and the fuel is decomposed in situ to a gaseous mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The presence of carbon monoxide in the gaseous mixture, whether introduced into or generated in situ within the process, is quite desirable, but its presence often creates difiiculties.
Gases which contain carbon monoxide even in relatively low concentrations will, under certain conditions, strongly react in the presence of certain metals, particularly iron. Certain forms of liberated carbon will vigorously and rapidly combine with the iron, e.g., the reactor and auxiliary equipment made of iron, so that a severe form of corrosion, i.e., catastrophic carburization, often results. Moreover, free carbon will be formed. This lessens efliciency. Further-more, the deposition of carbon, inter alia, by reversion of the carbon monoxide to free carbon, causes plugging and failure of e.g. standard heating equipment, pumps and transfer lines. These problems are most acute when carbon monoxide and mixtures of gases containing carbon monoxide are heated at temperatures ranging from about 800 F. to about 1300 F. In fluidized iron ore reduction processes, it is extremely diflicult, if indeed possible, to avoid heating such gases through this temperature range and hence the reversion of carbon monoxide to carbon, or creation of conditions for catastrophic carburization is an acute threat.
Even in processes wherein carbon monoxide-containing gaseous mixtures are desirably heated to higher temperatures, e.g., temperatures ranging from about 1300 to about 1800? F., it is extremely diflicult, if possible, to avoid cooling the gas through such temperature range. Thus, it is often desired to regenerate the reducing gases for further use by removal of carbon dioxide and water. But, to do so the gases rnust be cooled through this temperature range. On the other hand, it is often desired to elevate the temperature of a cool gas through this range. Thus, gas preheating is one method of introducing heat to the process. The carbon monoxide reversion problem, then, has been extremely troublesome and has handicapped the development of both indirect and direct injection techniques for the generation and use of carbon monoxide-containing gaseous mixtures in fluidized iron ore reduction processes.
The solution of these and other difliculties is therefore the primary objective of the present invention. In particular, it is the object of this invention to provide a new and improved process which will make feasible the more general use of carbon monoxide-containing reducing gas mixtures by obviating the problems due to carbon monoxide reversion. More particularly, the objective of this invention is to provide a process which will suppress or inhibit reversion of carbon monoxide. A further and more specific objective is to provide the art with a simplified, new and novel fluidized iron ore reduction process, especially one utilizing a series of staged reduction zones, wherein carbon monoxide reversion is drastically suppressed even at temperatures which normally produce acute carbon reversion. It is yet another object to provide such process which is particularly useful in direct hydrocarbon injection.
These and other objects are achieved in accordance with the present invention which contemplates the use of small and infinitesimal quantities of sulfur or heat decomposable sulfur-containing compounds injected, added to, admixed with or otherwise'incorporated within the carbon monoxide-containing reducing gas in contact with catalytic metallic surfaces, especially ferrous metal surfaces, e.g., iron. Such process finds particular application in a fluidized iron ore reduction process. By use of such compounds within the carbon monoxide gas, or gaseous mixture containing carbon monoxide, the gas can be utilized in reducing the iron ore and the reversion of carbon monoxide will be suppressed; and, in some instances virtually eliminated. In particular, it has been found that such gases can be heated or cooled through temperatures ranging from about 800 F. to about 1500" F., and particularly, even from about 900 F. to about 1200 F., even in the presence of metals, but yet carbon monoxide reversion is drastically inhibited or suppressed.
It has been found that as little as one part of sulfur, per million parts of gas can be of some beneficial effect in lessening carbon monoxide reversion in the gaseous reduction mixture. Preferably, however, it is desirable to employ at least about parts to about 1000 parts, and more preferably from about to about 300 parts of sulfur, per million parts of gas, since this concentration effectively suppresses carbon monoxide reversion, and yet does not create significant problems due to acid formation. Under most conditions, optimum benefits are produced by employing from about to about 200 parts sulphur, per million parts of gas. While sulfur concentrations greater than about 1000 parts per million parts of carbon monoxide can be employed, this is not generally desirable inasmuch as, inter alia, acid formation increases and there is little, if any, corresponding benefit resulting from the use of the increased sulfur concentration. Significantly higher amounts of sulfur can adversely affect the quality of the resultant metallized product.
The reason for the effectiveness of sulfur or heatdecomposable sulfur-containing compounds in suppressing carbon monoxide reversion is not known. It is believed, however, that the sulfur or sulfur compounds decompose in the process to provide an effective concentration of hydrogen sulfide in situ and hence, it is believed that it is in the hydrogen sulfide which actively suppresses carbon monoxide reversion. It is certainly known, however, that hydrogen sulfide is extremely effective, whether added abinitio or generated in situ, and will suppress carbon monoxide reversion when present in very small concentrations. Therefore, sulfur or any sulfur-bearing compound which will decompose at temperatures below about 1500 F. to form an effective concentration of hydrogen sulfide can be directly employed. On the other hand, sulfur-bearing compounds decomposable at higher temperatures can be indirectly heated to higher temperatures outside the process, or at a specific location within the process, and then injected into the process to suppress carbon monoxide reversion.
Additives particularly suitable for use in accordance with the present invention, whether added to the process ab initio or generated in situ, are the divalent sulfur compounds, or sulfides. These can be characterized by the following formula wherein R and R are the same or different and can be hydrogen or monovalent organic radicals, e.g., hydrocarbon radicals, such as alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, arylalkyl, aralkyl and the like. The organo radicals can be substituted or unsubstituted, and where substituted the hydrogen of the radical may be replaced by halogen, nitro groups, amino groups, carbonyl groups and the like; or, the radical, where of ring structure, can be ring substituted to form a heterocyclic radical. The carbon of a ring can be substituted, for example, by sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen, or the like. Preferably, an organo radical should contain no more than about ten carbon atoms, and more preferably about six carbon atoms. Exemplary ofthese classes of compounds are methyl sulfide, n-propyl sulfide, ethyl n-propyl sulfide, cetyl isoamyl sulfide, bis(trichloromethyl) sulfide, allyl benzyl sulfide, phenyl trichloromethyl sul- 4 fide, l-naphthyl phenyl sulfide, anthrene, 3(ethylmercapto) thiophene, anethiol, 8-quinolinethiol and the like.
Preferably, the sulfides contain no more than one monovalent organo radical. Exemplary of such compounds are methyl mercaptan, isopropyl mercaptan, n-amyl mercaptan, allyl mercaptan, 3-acridinemercaptan, a-methyl benzyl mercaptan, Z-naphthalene thiol and the like. Mixtures of any of such compounds with other substances or with each other are suitable. Certain commercial mixtures and naturally occurring materials can also provide these compounds, or can be added to the process, to generate the desired compounds in situ.
Most preferably R and R are both hydrogen, i.e., hydrogen sulfide. Hydrogen sulfide is an outstanding compound because of its availability, its readily usable form, and its extremely high effectiveness in minute concentrations.
More complex sulfur compounds can also be employed. Other divalent sulfur compounds are thus suitable. These include such compounds as the polysulfides, especially the disulfides illustrative of which are carbon disulfide, methylethyl disulfide, Z-fenchanyl methyl disulfide, tertbutyl-Z-naphthyl disulfide, 2-(o-nitrophenyldithio)benzothiazole, and the like.
In a particularly preferred embodiment according to this invention, oxidic ores, as particulate solids particles, are contacted and fluidized with upwardly flowing carbon monoxide-containing gases in a process wherein a plurality of staged zones are provided. The zones which contain the fluidized beds of ore at different stages of reduction can be operated at the same or at different elevated temperatures. Preferably, also, there is provided in accordance with such embodiment, one or more ferric reduction zones operated at temperatures ranging from about 1000 F. to about 1800" F. and one or more, and preferably a plurality, of ferrous reduction zones operated at temperatures ranging from about 1300 F. to about 1700 F. The sulfur or sulfur-containing compound, or compounds, is preferably added to the carbon monoxide-containing reducing gas and then heated prior to or at the time of the injection into the process. Preferably, the carbon monoxide-containing reducing gases within which is provided the sulfur or sulfur-containing compound is injected into a ferrous reduction zone wherein the metallization ranges from about 85 percent to about 98 percent, and higher.
The following nonlimiting examples and pertinent dem- .onstrations bring out the more salient features and provide a better understanding of the invention.
A large quantity of raw hematite ore, i.e. a Carol Lake ore, is pulverized in a ball mill, to a particle size ranging from about to 210 microns, and divided into several like portions.
9-methyl mercaptophen- 3-ethylcyclohex- Example 1 A portion of the .ore is charged into a fluidized iron ore reactor or reductionprocess wherein is provided a series of four staged fluidized zones, two ferric reduction zones and two ferrous reduction zones. The ore is fluidized by an upwardly flowing gas initially of 20 percent carbon monoxide, 60 percent hydrogen, and 20 percent nitrogen to which is added parts of hydrogen sulfide, per million parts of gas. The gas is preheated through a temperature range of 850 F. to 1300 F. and then injected into the lowermost ferrous reduction zone from whence it flows from a zone containing an iron ore at a lower level of oxidation to the next higher level of oxidation, i.e., from the bottom to the top of the reactor. In the top ferric zone the partially oxidized gas is burned with air to provide heat to the various reduction stages and the reduced ore moves from the top to the bottom of the reactor from one stage of reduction to the next. The ferric reduction stages, wherein ferric oxides are reduced essentially to magnetic oxides of iron, are operated at 1300 F. as were the'ferrous reduction stages wherein the ferrous 5 oxide is reduced, in the final stage, to provide 94 percent metallization.
Pursuant to operating at such conditions, the process does not show any significant sign of carbon monoxide reversion even after many hours of continuous operation. There is no indication whatsover of catastrophic carburetization.
Example 2 The foregoing demonstration is repeated in precise detai'l employing a second portion of the ore except in this instance 150 parts of hydrogen sulfide, based on the volume of the gas, is added to the entering gas charged into the ferrous reduction zone. The beds appear normal and the process functions normally in every way and there is no evidence of any significant amount of carbon monoxide reversion. The ferrous metal parts of the equipment are not carburized and little carbon is formed in the reaction.
Example 3 When Example 2 is repeated with another portion of ore heated to a temperature of 1400 -F. and ethyl mercaptan in concentrations of 200 parts, per million parts of carbon monoxide, is added to the reducing gas mixture, there is yet no significant evidence of carbon monoxide reversion.
Example 4 When the conditions of operation of the process of Example 2 are repeated except that 200 parts of benzyl mercaptan is injected into the process, there is little evidence of carbon monoxide reversion.
When ethyl sulfide, phenyl sulfide, and ethyl propyl sulfide, respectively, are successively added to the process in 100, 150, and 200 parts significant benefits also result. The tendency of carbon monoxide to revert is effectively suppressed.
-It has been concluded and firmly established that the sulfur compounds of this invention must be gasified and thoroughly dispersed Within the reducing gases at the time of reduction to provide benefits, Whether added ab initio or generated in situ from an added material capable of producing such compounds.
It is apparent that certain modifications and changes can be made in the present process without departing the spirit and scope of the invention. The key and novel feature of the invention is the use of small and minor portions of sulfur or heat-decomposable sulfur compounds directly added to, injected within, or otherwise physically dispersed with the reducing gases at the time of use or injection into the fluidized iron ore process.
Such compounds in contact with the gas at the time of contact with catalytic metallic surfaces, or iron, provide benefits, whether added ab initio or generated in situ, from an added material itself capable of providing such compounds.
Having described the invention, what is claimed is:
1. In a process for the production of metallic iron from oxidic iron ores wherein iron ore in particulate form is fed into the process and reduced by a stream of carbon monoxide containing gas heated to a temperature ranging from above about 1000 F. to just below the sintering temperature of the ore, the improvement comprising heating said reducing gas to said temperature, and adding to said gas an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur and heat-decomposable sulfur compounds to cause said additive to be present in the gas during the heating thereof, and while the gas is passing through a temperature ranging from about 800 F. to about 1500 F. to suppress reversion of the carbon monoxide.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the additive is provided in the gas in effective concentration ranging from about 5 to about 1000 parts, per million parts of gas.
3. In a process for the production of metallic iron from oxidic iron ores wherein iron ore in particulate form is fed into the process, staged in a series of beds fluidized by injecting carbon monoxide-containing gas heated to a .temperature ranging from above about 1000 F. to just below the sintering temperature of the ore, and reduced, at least a portion of the reducing gas is Oxidized, withdrawn from the process, cooled and regenerated by removal of oxidized components, reheated in the presence of catalytic metal surfaces and thence recycled to the -pI'0'CSS,"the improvement comprising heating said reducing gas to said temperature, and adding to said gas an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur and heat-decomposable sulfur compounds to cause said additive to be present in the gas during the heating thereof, while in contact with the catalytic metal surfaces, and while the gas is passing through a temperature ranging from about 800 F. to about 1500" F. to suppress reversion of the carbon monoxide.
4. In a process for the production of metallic iron wherein oxidic iron ore is successively reduced in a plurality of staged fluidized reduction zones with carbon monoxide-containing gases at temperatures above about 800 F., whereby said gases are partially oxidized to carbon dioxide and wherein said partially oxidized gases are cooled below about 800 F. and regenerated for further use and then reheated in contact with catalytic metal surfaces to temperatures above about 800 =F., the improvement comprising adding to said regenerated gas before reheating an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur and heat-decomposable sulfur compounds in an amount sutficient to suppress reversion of the carbon monoxide.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein the additive is hydrogen sulfide in an amount suflicient to provide a concentration of about 5 to about 1000 parts, per million parts of regenerated gas.
6. The process of claim 3 wherein the additive is provided in effective concentration ranging from about 5 to about 1000 parts, per million parts of gas.
7. The process of claim 3 wherein the additive is a divalent sulfur compound provided in effective quantities ranging from about 20 to about 300 parts, per million parts of gas.
8. The process of claim hydrogen sulfide.
9. The process of claim 3 wherein the additive is provided in elfective concentration ranging from about 50 to about 200 parts, per million parts of gas.
10. The process of claim 9 wherein the additive is a divalent sulfur-containing compound.
11. In a process for the production of metallic iron by direct reduction of particulate oxidic iron ores wherein ore is successively reduced in a plurality of staged fluidized reduction zones, including ferric and ferrous reduction zones, operated at temperatures ranging from about 1000 F. to about 1800 F. by preheated carbon monoxide-containing gas injected into a ferrous reduction zone, the improvement comprising adding and maintaining from about 5 to about 1000 parts of an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur and heatdecomposable sulfur compounds to the gas, based on a million parts of gas, while preheating the gas through a temperature range of from about 800 F. to injection temperature, to suppress carbon monoxide reversion.
12. In a process for the production of metallic iron by direct reduction of particulate oxidic iron ores wherein the ore is successively reduced in a plurality of staged fluidized reduction zones including a ferric and a ferrous reduction zone, and wherein hydrocarbon fuel is directly injected into a ferrous reduction zone operated at temperatures ranging from about 1300" F. to about 1700 F. to generate carbon monoxide-containing gases which reduces the ferrous oxide to from about to about 98 percent metallization, at least a portion of the reducing 3 wherein the additive is gas is oxidized, withdrawn from the process, cooled, regenerated by removal of oxidized components, reheated in the presence of catalytic metal surfaces and thence reinjected into the process, the improvement comprising adding to the injected gas from about 5 to about 1000 parts of an additive selected from the group consisting of sulfur 0r heat-decomposable sulfur compounds, based on a million parts of generated gas, to suppress carbon monoxide reversion.
13, The process of claim 12 wherein the additive is a divalent sulfur-containing compound.
14. The process of claim 12 wherein the additive is hydrogen sulfide.
15. The process of claim 5 wherein said hydrogen sulfide is provided in a concentration of about 20 to 300 parts per million parts of regenerated gas.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,711,368 6/1955 Lewis 75-26 2,740,706 4/1956 Pall et a1 7535 2,835,557 5/1958 West et al 75-26 3,020,149 2/1962 Old et al 75-26 BENJAMIN HENKIN, Primary Examiner.
US476159A 1965-07-30 1965-07-30 Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide Expired - Lifetime US3377156A (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US476159A US3377156A (en) 1965-07-30 1965-07-30 Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide
GB33135/66A GB1140958A (en) 1965-07-30 1966-07-22 Process for suppressing carbon monoxide reversion in iron ore reduction reactions
FR70959A FR1489937A (en) 1965-07-30 1966-07-26 Process for suppressing the reverse decomposition of carbon monoxide in the reduction of iron ores
DE19661508019 DE1508019B2 (en) 1965-07-30 1966-07-28 METHOD FOR PREVENTING CARBON MONOXYDE CATALYTIC DECAY
BR181712/66A BR6681712D0 (en) 1965-07-30 1966-07-29 PROCESS TO SUPPRESS THE REVERSAL OF CARBON MONOXIDE
ES0329663A ES329663A1 (en) 1965-07-30 1966-07-29 A procedure to deprive the reversion of carbon monoxide. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US476159A US3377156A (en) 1965-07-30 1965-07-30 Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3377156A true US3377156A (en) 1968-04-09

Family

ID=23890728

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US476159A Expired - Lifetime US3377156A (en) 1965-07-30 1965-07-30 Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US3377156A (en)
BR (1) BR6681712D0 (en)
DE (1) DE1508019B2 (en)
ES (1) ES329663A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1140958A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3960544A (en) * 1972-11-29 1976-06-01 British Titan Limited Process for the production of iron-containing titaniferous particles
US4213777A (en) * 1976-03-31 1980-07-22 Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft Making iron powder having fiber-like particles
US4239530A (en) * 1979-01-10 1980-12-16 Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University Process for producing metallized iron pellets

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1177076B (en) * 1983-12-02 1987-08-26 Skf Steel Eng Ab PROCESS AND PLANT TO REDUCE OXIDE MATERIAL SIMULTANEOUSLY GENERATING A GAS SUITABLE FOR THE RECOVERY OF THERMAL ENERGY
AT402825B (en) * 1994-06-23 1997-09-25 Voest Alpine Ind Anlagen METHOD FOR DIRECTLY REDUCING IRON-OXIDATING MATERIAL

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2711368A (en) * 1949-12-01 1955-06-21 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for reducing oxidic iron ore
US2740706A (en) * 1951-10-10 1956-04-03 Texaco Development Corp Method of reducing metal oxides
US2835557A (en) * 1955-03-30 1958-05-20 Int Nickel Co Method of producing nickel by the carbonyl process
US3020149A (en) * 1959-04-08 1962-02-06 Little Inc A Beneficiation of ores

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2711368A (en) * 1949-12-01 1955-06-21 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for reducing oxidic iron ore
US2740706A (en) * 1951-10-10 1956-04-03 Texaco Development Corp Method of reducing metal oxides
US2835557A (en) * 1955-03-30 1958-05-20 Int Nickel Co Method of producing nickel by the carbonyl process
US3020149A (en) * 1959-04-08 1962-02-06 Little Inc A Beneficiation of ores

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3960544A (en) * 1972-11-29 1976-06-01 British Titan Limited Process for the production of iron-containing titaniferous particles
US4213777A (en) * 1976-03-31 1980-07-22 Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft Making iron powder having fiber-like particles
US4239530A (en) * 1979-01-10 1980-12-16 Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University Process for producing metallized iron pellets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE1508019A1 (en) 1969-02-27
GB1140958A (en) 1969-01-22
DE1508019B2 (en) 1976-09-02
ES329663A1 (en) 1967-06-01
BR6681712D0 (en) 1973-07-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
GB1481856A (en) Use of reducing gas by solid fossil fuel gasification for direct iron ore reduction
KR860003349A (en) Pig iron production method
DE69804891T2 (en) Reduction of iron ore
US3377156A (en) Process of reducing iron oxide ores with gases containing carbon monoxide
KR860002103A (en) Direct reduction of materials containing iron oxide
US3615340A (en) Quenching and passivation of particulate metals
GB1386452A (en) Production of crude iron
US3637368A (en) Increased metallizations of iron ore from fluidized bed processes
US2919983A (en) Iron ore reduction process
US3393066A (en) Process for reduction of iron ore in staged fluid beds without bogging
US2014873A (en) Process of producing sponge iron
US3562780A (en) Temperature control of iron ore reducing fluidized beds
US3346365A (en) Treatment of fluidized oxidic iron ores to inhibit bogging
US4098604A (en) Method for reduction in a fluid bed of fine grained material containing iron oxide
US4198228A (en) Carbonaceous fines in an oxygen-blown blast furnace
US3072469A (en) Generation of reducing gas
RU2107099C1 (en) Method of production of liquid iron from lumpy iron ore
JP3964959B2 (en) Method for producing iron carbide
US3346366A (en) Fluidized ore reduction with basic nitrogenous additives to prevent bogging
JPS58167685A (en) Coal gasification
US4070180A (en) Process for the passivation of sponge iron utilizing reducing gases containing free oxygen
Clixby Simulated Blast Furnace Reduction of Acid Pellets in Temperature Range 950-1350 deg C
US3615352A (en) Process for reduction of iron ore in staged beds without bogging
US3694186A (en) Thermal decomposition of nickel carbonyl
US3407060A (en) Process for producing zinc in a blast furnace utilizing oxygen enriched air