US3181087A

US3181087A - Hybrid transformer employing balancing resistors to increase isolation between loads

Info

Publication number: US3181087A
Application number: US105793A
Authority: US
Inventors: Almering Petrus Cornelis Maria
Original assignee: US Philips Corp
Current assignee: US Philips Corp; North American Philips Co Inc
Priority date: 1960-05-21
Filing date: 1961-04-26
Publication date: 1965-04-27
Anticipated expiration: 1982-04-27
Also published as: CH393437A; DE1153081B; NL251885A; NL113982C; GB914838A; FR1289315A; ES267472A1

Description

Apnl 27, 1965 P. c. M. ALMERING 3,131,087

HYBRID TRANSFORMER EMPLOYING BALANCING RESISTORS TO INCREASE ISOLATION BETWEEN LOADS Filed April 26. 1961 INVENTOR I PETRUS C.M.ALMERING.

HYBRID TRANSFORMER EMPLOYING BALANC- ING RESISTORS TO INCREASE ISOLATION BE- TWEEN LOADS J Petrus Cornelis Maria Almering, Hilversum, Netherlands,

assignor to North American Philips Company, 'Inc.,;

New York, N.Y., a corporation of Delaware Filed Apr. 26, 1961, Ser. No. 105,793 Claims priority, application Netherlands, May 21, 1960,

Claims. (Cl. 333-11) type, in which only one point of the two relatively decoupled fork branches can be connected to ground. I

In practice transformer forks are widely used for their particularly attractive electrical properties, since the relatively decoupled fork branches can be accurately adapted to the common fork branch, and no energy is dissipated in the fork itself during the transmission of signals. Such forked transformers have, however, a complicated struc ture.' They may comprise, for example, five transformer windings with ten external connecting wires. Such structure require particular care in design and fabrication to satisfy the requirements of the forks.

With resistor forks comprising resistors, this cornplicated structure of forked transformers is eliminated, but sinceresistor forks employ resistors, they have the serious disadvantage that an appreciable loss of energy occursin the transmission forks. This loss may amount, for example, to 10.7 db. I

The invention has for its object to provide a transmission fork which is distinguished electrically and structurally from each of the. aforesaid transmission forks, and which is particularly suitable for the miniature structures desirable in transistor systems.

According to the invention a transformer comprises two identical coupling windings, which are inductively coupled with a third winding connectedto the common fork branch. The ends of the third winding comprise the connecting terminals for the common fork branch. Corresponding ends of the two identical coupling windings are connected to each other by way of separate fork resistor. -The connecting terminals foreach of the, two decoupled fork branches comprise one end of one coupling winding and the end of the other coupling winding which is not connected the same fork resistor. 'The resistances of these fork resistors are substantially equal Patent 0 Patented Apr. 27, 1965 ample, be used in'transistor-equipped line repeaters for carrier-wave telephone transmission. In thiscase the line repeater supplies a cable connected to the terminals 5, '6, and a measuring instrument is connected to the terminals 3, 4. The figure illustrates the line repeater diagrammatically by the signal source 11, having a voltage 2E and by a series-connected resistor 12, which represents the internal resistance of the line repeater. at the terminals 3, 4, and 5, '6 (i.e. the measuring instrument and the cable respectively) are represented by the

resistors

13 and 14 respectively.

In order to provide a transmission fork which is electrically and structurally desirable, the transformer 10 comprises, in accordance with the invention, two

identical coupling windings

15, 16, which are inductively coupled with a winding 17,connected to the common fork branch 7. The ends of winding 17 comprise the connecting ter-i minals 8, 9 for the common fork branch. Corresponding ends of the two

identical coupling windings

15, 16 are connected to each other by way of

fork resistors

18 and 19 respectively. In other words,'the resistor19 is connected between the upper ends of

windings

15 and 16, and the resistor 18 is connected between the lower ends of

windings

15 and 16; The

connecting terminals

3, 4 and 5, 6 for the two

decoupled fork branches

1, 2 are each formed by one end of one coupling winding 15 and the end of the coupling winding 16 which is not connected to the same fork resistor. The resistances of

resistors

18, 19 are being rendered substantially equal to the characteristic terminal impedances of the decoupled

fork branches

1, 2. Central tappings of the

load'resistors

13 and 14 of this device may be connected simultaneouslyto ground without modification of the circuit.

In the normal operating state of the transmission fork, the

fork branches

1, 2 are loaded by

load resistors

13 and 14 respectively, having resistances equal to the characteristic terminal impedances R, so that each of the

resistors

18, 19, 13, 14 of the fork has the same value as the characteristic terminal impedance R. Thesignal source 11 with the internal resistance 12 is matched to the. load formed by the transmission fork, so that the internal resistance 12 of the signal source 11 is equal to the load formed by the transmission fork. This may always be accomplished by a suitable choice of the transformation ratio between the Winding 17 and the two

coupling windings

15, 16. If, for example, the internal resistance 12 of the signal source is /2. R, the transformato the characteristic terminalimpedances of the decoupled fork branches.

The device according to the invention will now be described more fully with reference tothe figure which shows one embodiment of a transmission forkaccording to the invention. p

The transmission fork shown in the figure is of the balanced .typeand comprises two relatively

decoupled fork branches

1, 2 with the associated connecting ter

minals

3, 4 and 5, 6 respectively and a common fork branch 7 with the associated connecting terminals 8, 9.

' The commonbranch is coupled to the two relatively decoupled

fork branches

1, 2 by means of a transformer 10. The transmission'fork of the figure mayffor exwill appear across the winding 17. Since the transformation ratio is 1:1:1, this voltage also appears across each at the

coupling windings

15, 16. The currents passing throughthe twoi

coupling windings

15, 16 are identi-' cal, due to the symmetry of the transmission fork, and Since the total number of ampere turns of the transformer 10 is equal to zero the relationship between the currents I and the current I passing through the winding 17 is known. In the embodiment shown in which the'number of turns of the winding 17 and each of the two

coupling windings

15, 16 is the same, it follows that: j

Thus each, of the

coupling windings

15, 16 will be traversed by a current I and the voltage across each of these coupling windings will be to 2E I R.

The loads BEST AVAILABLE COPY In spite of the use of the

fork resistors

18, 19 in the transmission fork, no losses occur in the transmission fork in the above-described matched state, and the power fed by the signal source 11 to the transmission fork is divided equally between the

load resistors

13, 14. This is evident from the following network analysis. The variation of the current passing through the transmission fork may be defined in a simple manner. Assuming that the voltage across the coupling winding 15 produces a current I in the fork resistor 13 and the voltage across the coupling winding 1t: produces a current I in the fork resistor 19; the current through the load resistor 13 is designated by 1 In the figure the assumed directions of the various currents are indicated by the arrows.

The following equations may be found to define the currents I I and I Considering the circuit including coupling winding 15, load resistor 14, fork resistor 18, and coupling winding 15:

Considering the circuit including coupling winding 16, fork resistor 19, load resistor 14, and coupling winding 16:

Considering the circuit including coupling winding 16,

load resistor 13, fork resistor 18, and coupling winding 16:

2EI R=2I R-I R (y) In addition:

From these equations it is found that:

E 1 (VII) 1 :0 (VIII) Then the

fork resistors

18, 19 are not traversed by current, so that no power is dissipated in these

resistors

18, 19, whereas each of the

load resistors

13, 14 is traversed by a currentwhich is equal to corresponding to a power of This is exactly equal to half of the power furnished by the signal source 11 to the fork, since the power from the source is equal to the voltage across the winding 17 (ZE-J R), multiplied by the current traversing the winding 17 21 and hence equal to The power produced across the internal resistance 12 of the signal source 11 of the value /2 R is also equal to which only means that the signal source with the internal resistance 12 is matched to the fork, as stated above.

In the device shown the

load resistors

13, 14 are relatively decoupled in an effective manner by proportioning each of the

fork resistors

18 and 19 so as to be equal to the characteristic terminal impedance R of the fork. This means that a variation in load at the connecting terminals 3, 4 does not produce a current 4 variation at the

connecting terminals

5, 6. If, for example, in the device shown one of the

load resistors

13 or 14 is varied, equalization currents will flow through the fork resistors 18, 19 (as is evident from the Formulae I-IV with the given dimensions of the

fork resistors

18, 19 equal to the characteristic terminal impedance R) so that the current passing through the

other resistor

14 or 13 respectively and hence also the voltage across the

resistors

14 and 13 respectively remains constant.

Even with an excessive variation of, for example, the load resistor 13, such as by an interruption or a shortcircuit, so that the current passing through the load resistor 13 or the voltage across it is equal to zero, no variation occurs in the current passing through the other load resistor 14. This current then remains equal to the value as in the matched state of the fork. Conversely, with a shortcircuit or an interruption of the load resistor 14 the current passing through the load resistor 13 will remain equal to the value as in the matched state of the fork.

Apart from the above-stated advantages of the transmission fork shown, i.e. no loss of energy in the matched state and an effective decoupling of the

fork branches

13, 14, the transmission fork according to the invention has the important advantage, from an electrical standpoint, that the requirements for the forked transformer are materially simplified, since the parasitic trans,- former impedances which might affect the fork properties are found to be very low. In addition, the particularly simple structure of the transformer, which comprises only three windings with six connecting wires, renders this fork extremely suitable for the miniature structures actually used in transistor systems.

In the foregoing description it was assumed that the transformation ratio between the winding 17 and the

coupling windings

15, 16 is 12111. These considerations, however, apply with the same accuracy to a different transformation ratio for the matching of the signal source 11 to the fork.

The following data are given for a practically thoroughly tested fork of the type described:

Winding 17: 59 turns Winding 17 10 mh.

Coupling windings 15, 16: 42 turns,

Coupling windings 15, 16: 5 mh.

Resistors

14, 13, 18, 19: ohms

Transformation ratio windings

17, 16, 15: 1.41:1:1

For the ferromagnetic core of the transformer 10 use is made of a cross-shaped core of the dimensions 14 X 20 X 20 mm. of ferroxcube, which material consists mainly of high-permeable, non-conductive ferrites, whereas the dimensions of the total transmission fork are 16 x 22.5 X 22.5 mm.

It should be noted for the sake of completeness that the device shown may be used for other purposes. For example, a two-wire line may be connected to the terminals 8 and 9, and a transmitter branch and receiver branch may be connected to the terminals, 3, 4 or 5, 6 respectively. An effective relative decoupling between the transmitter branch and the receiver branch is obtained in the manner described above.

What is claimed is:

1. A circuit for connecting a first two-wire line to second and third two-wire lines, said circuit comprising a transformer having a first winding inductively coupled to second andthird windings, said second and third windings being identical to each other, means connecting third two-wire lines.

2. A circuit for connecting a second and third two-wire lines, said circuit comprising a transformer having a first winding with first and second terminals, said first windings being inductively coupled to a second winding having third and fourth terminals and a third winding having fifth and sixth terminals, said second and third windings being identical to each other, means connecting said first two-wire line between said first and second terminal, a firstresistor connected between said third and fifthterminals', a sec- 0nd resistor connected between said fourth and sixth terminals, means connecting said second two-wire line between said third and sixth terminals, and means con meeting said third two wire line between said fourth and fifth terminals,,saidfirst and second resistors each having a value substantially equal to the characteristic impedance of said second and third two-wire lines.

3. A circuit for connecting a source of signals to first and second two-wire lines, said circuit comprising a transformer having first, second and third inductively coupled windings, said second and third windings being identical to saidfirst winding to said first line, first and second re- 7 first two-wire line to BEST AVAILABLE COPY each other and having first and vsecond terminals, re-

spectively, and third and fourth terminals, respectively, means connecting said source to said first winding, first resistor means connected between said first and second terminals, second resistor means connected between said third and fourth terminals, means connecting said first two-wire line'between said first and fourth terminals,

and means connecting said second two-wire line between said second and third terminals, said first and second resistor means each having a value substantially equal to the characteristic impedance of said two-wire'lines.

4. The circuit of claim 3, wherein said source has an 5 internal resistance substantially equal'to the load on said source formed by said transformer.

5. The circuit of claim 3, comprising third and fourth resistors connected between said first and fourth, and second and third terminals, respectively, said third and fourthvresistors each having a value substantially equal to said characteristic impedance.

References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,035,536 -3/36 Cowan et a1 179-170 2,548,397 4/51 Schaevitz 323-4 10/59 Walter 333-41 v FOREIGN PATENTS" a 749,694 5/56 Great Britain.-

HERMAN KARL SAALBACH, Primary Examiner.

BENNETT G. MILLER, Examiner.

EST AVAILABLE COPY UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No 3, 181 ,087 April 27, 196

Petrus Cornelis Maria Almering It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.

same column 2, line Co. umn L, line 54, for "reslstor" read resistors column 2, 11ne S8, for "at" read of 72, strike out "to".

Signed and sealed this 2nd day of November 1965.

(SEAL) Allest:

ERNEST W. SWIDER EDWARD J. BRENNER Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents

Claims

1. A CIRCUIT FOR CONNECTING A FIRST TWO-WIRE LINE TO SECOND AND THIRD TWO-WIRE LINES, SAID CIRCUIT COMPRISING A TRANSFORMER HAVING A FIRST WINDING INDUCTIVELY COUPLED TO SECOND AND THIRD WINDINGS, SAID SECOND AND THIRD WINDINGS BEING IDENTICAL TO EACH OTHER, MEANS CONNECTING SAID FIRST WINDING TO SAID FIRST LINE, FIRST AND SECOND RESISTORS, MEANS CONNECTING SAID FIRST RESISTOR BETWEEN FIRST ENDS OF SAID SECOND AND THIRD WINDING, MEANS CONNECTING SAID SECOND RESISTOR BETWEEN SECOND ENDS OF SAID SECOND AND THIRD WINDINGS, AND MEANS CONNECTING SAID SECOND AND THIRD TWO-WIRE LINES BETWEEN FIRST ENDS OF SAID THIRD AND SECOND WINDINGS RESPECTIVELY AND SECOND ENDS OF SAID SECOND AND THIRD WINDINGS RESPECTIVELY, SAID FIRST AND SECOND RESISTORS EACH HAVING A VALUE SUBSTANTIALLY EQUAL TO THE CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE OF SAID SECOND AND THIRD TWO-WIRE LINES.