US20180257032A1 - Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream - Google Patents

Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180257032A1
US20180257032A1 US15/977,630 US201815977630A US2018257032A1 US 20180257032 A1 US20180257032 A1 US 20180257032A1 US 201815977630 A US201815977630 A US 201815977630A US 2018257032 A1 US2018257032 A1 US 2018257032A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bicarbonate
gas stream
hypochlorite
products
gas
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/977,630
Inventor
Al E Yablonsky
Alexander Stola
Adam Germain
Joe Jones
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Carbonfree Chemicals Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
Skyonic (assignment For Benefit Of Creditors) LLC
Carbonfree Chemicals Holdings LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Skyonic (assignment For Benefit Of Creditors) LLC, Carbonfree Chemicals Holdings LLC filed Critical Skyonic (assignment For Benefit Of Creditors) LLC
Priority to US15/977,630 priority Critical patent/US20180257032A1/en
Assigned to SKYONIC CORPORATION reassignment SKYONIC CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JONES, JOE, GERMAIN, Adam, STOLA, Alexander, YABLONSKY, AL
Assigned to SKYONIC (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC reassignment SKYONIC (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SKYONIC CORPORATION
Assigned to CARBONFREE CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, LLC reassignment CARBONFREE CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SKYONIC (ASSIGNMENT FOR BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
Publication of US20180257032A1 publication Critical patent/US20180257032A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/77Liquid phase processes
    • B01D53/78Liquid phase processes with gas-liquid contact
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/501Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound
    • B01D53/502Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound characterised by a specific solution or suspension
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/52Hydrogen sulfide
    • B01D53/526Mixtures of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/54Nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/56Nitrogen oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/60Simultaneously removing sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/62Carbon oxides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B11/00Oxides or oxyacids of halogens; Salts thereof
    • C01B11/04Hypochlorous acid
    • C01B11/06Hypochlorites
    • C01B11/062Hypochlorites of alkali metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01DCOMPOUNDS OF ALKALI METALS, i.e. LITHIUM, SODIUM, POTASSIUM, RUBIDIUM, CAESIUM, OR FRANCIUM
    • C01D7/00Carbonates of sodium, potassium or alkali metals in general
    • C01D7/07Preparation from the hydroxides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01DCOMPOUNDS OF ALKALI METALS, i.e. LITHIUM, SODIUM, POTASSIUM, RUBIDIUM, CAESIUM, OR FRANCIUM
    • C01D7/00Carbonates of sodium, potassium or alkali metals in general
    • C01D7/10Preparation of bicarbonates from carbonates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25BELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B1/00Electrolytic production of inorganic compounds or non-metals
    • C25B1/01Products
    • C25B1/34Simultaneous production of alkali metal hydroxides and chlorine, oxyacids or salts of chlorine, e.g. by chlor-alkali electrolysis
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25BELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B15/00Operating or servicing cells
    • C25B15/08Supplying or removing reactants or electrolytes; Regeneration of electrolytes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/10Oxidants
    • B01D2251/108Halogens or halogen compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/30Alkali metal compounds
    • B01D2251/304Alkali metal compounds of sodium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/60Inorganic bases or salts
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/60Inorganic bases or salts
    • B01D2251/604Hydroxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/60Inorganic bases or salts
    • B01D2251/606Carbonates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2256/00Main component in the product gas stream after treatment
    • B01D2256/24Hydrocarbons
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/20Halogens or halogen compounds
    • B01D2257/204Inorganic halogen compounds
    • B01D2257/2045Hydrochloric acid
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/20Halogens or halogen compounds
    • B01D2257/204Inorganic halogen compounds
    • B01D2257/2047Hydrofluoric acid
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/30Sulfur compounds
    • B01D2257/304Hydrogen sulfide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/50Carbon oxides
    • B01D2257/504Carbon dioxide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2258/00Sources of waste gases
    • B01D2258/02Other waste gases
    • B01D2258/0283Flue gases
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/75Multi-step processes
    • Y02C10/04
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P20/00Technologies relating to chemical industry
    • Y02P20/151Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions, e.g. CO2
    • Y02P20/152

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to the field of removing acid gases from a gas stream. More particularly, the present invention relates to removing H 2 S, NO x , SO x , and other pollutants from gas streams through the absorption of the acid gases from concentrated gas streams and then the separate generation of useful by-products comprising carbonate, bicarbonate, nitrate, and/or sulfate.
  • DEA diethanolamine
  • One of the downsides of many amine processes is that they suffer problems with formation of contaminants in the form of Heat Stable Amine Salts (HSAS), which reduce the efficiency of scrubbing in the system via the formation of salts of chloride, sulfate, formate, acetate, oxalate, cyanide, thiocyanide, and thiosulfate.
  • HSAS Heat Stable Amine Salts
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to devices, systems, and methods to remove sulfur-based and/or nitrogen-based acid gases from a gas stream with a proprietary aqueous mixture of bleach (NaClO) at concentrations from 0.01% to 12% and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO 3 ) at concentrations from 0.01% to 12%.
  • the system is able to target acid gases, such as H 2 S, while allowing organics, such as methane (CH 4 ) and ethane (C 2 H 6 ) to pass through unreacted.
  • a natural gas stream containing acid gas pollutants can be cleaned via the installation of this scrubbing system at a natural gas refinery, power plant, or other process plant.
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to devices, systems, and methods to remove sulfur-based and/or nitrogen-based acid gases in an absorption column.
  • a bicarbonate/carbonate stream generated in a different portion of the process can be directed to the absorption column and utilized as a reagent to sequester the sulfur-based and nitrogen-based acid gases.
  • Such embodiments can further comprise a chlor-alkali cell for generating hydroxide reagent that can be directly utilized in the sequestration of CO 2 and indirectly utilized (by reacting it with Cl 2 to produce a hypochlorite) in the sequestration of sulfur-based and nitrogen-based acid gases.
  • One aspect of the disclosure relates to a system for effectively reducing pollutants from a gas stream comprising: a first set of mixing equipment adapted to admix a hydroxide with a gas stream to create a first admixture in which carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide in the gas stream can react with a hydroxide to produce a bicarbonate product or a combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products in a first liquid outflow and a second set of mixing equipment adapted admix a hypochlorite and the bicarbonate product or the combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products with the gas stream to create a second admixture in which nitrogen-based or sulfur-based acid gases can react with the hypochlorite and the bicarbonate product or the combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products to produce nitrate or sulfate products in a second liquid outflow, wherein a gas stream flows through the second set of mixing equipment before at least a portion of the gas stream flows through the first set of mixing equipment.
  • Another aspect of the disclosure relates to a method of effectively reducing an amount of pollutants from a gas stream comprising (a) obtaining a hydroxide in an aqueous mixture; (b) obtaining a hypochlorite in an aqueous mixture; (c) admixing the hydroxide with carbon dioxide in the gas stream to produce bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products in a first admixture, thereby sequestering the carbon dioxide in a mineral product form; and (d) admixing the hypochlorite and at least a portion of the bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products from the first admixture with a sulfur-based or nitrogen-based acid gas in the gas stream to produce nitrate or sulfate product in a second admixture, thereby sequestering the acid gas.
  • Yet another aspect of the disclosure relates to a method of scrubbing natural gas stream, wherein the scrubbing phase consists of or consists essentially of admixing a hypochlorite oxidant and bicarbonate absorbent with a sulfur-based or nitrogen-based acid gas in the natural gas stream to produce nitrate or sulfate product in an admixture, thereby sequestering the acid gas.
  • gas stream comprises a gas stream with at least one acid gas.
  • gases stream include a raw natural gas stream, and a waste gas stream, such as a flue-gas stream.
  • Gas streams can be generated by a power generation process that uses combustion of carbon-based fuels, manufacturing process, industrial process, or a natural reservoir extraction process.
  • An acid gas can be carbon-, sulfur-, and/or nitrogen-based and can comprise H 2 S, SO x , NO x , and CO 2 .
  • Nitrogen oxides (NO x ) comprise NO, NO 2 , N 2 O 3 , N 2 O 5 , and associated dimers.
  • Sulfur oxides (SO x ) comprise SO 2 and SO 3 .
  • Other acid gases that can be removed from described embodiments include HF and HCl.
  • carbonates or “carbonate products” are generally defined as mineral components containing the carbonate group [CO 3 ] 2 ⁇ . Thus, the terms encompass both carbonate/bicarbonate mixtures and species containing solely the carbonate ion.
  • carbonates and carbonate products are generally defined as mineral components containing the bicarbonate group [HCO 3 ] 1 ⁇ . Thus, the terms encompass both carbonate/bicarbonate mixtures and species containing solely the bicarbonate ion.
  • the term “sequestration” is used to refer generally to techniques or practices whose partial or whole effect is to remove CO 2 from point emissions sources and to store that CO 2 in some form so as to prevent its return to the atmosphere. Use of this term does not exclude any form of the described embodiments from being considered “sequestration” techniques.
  • low-voltage electrolysis and “LVE” are used to refer to electrolysis at current densities below about 4 kA/m 2 .
  • Coupled is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly, and not necessarily mechanically. Two items are “couplable” if they can be coupled to each other, and, when coupled, may still be characterized as “couplable.” Unless the context explicitly requires otherwise, items that are couplable are also decouplable, and vice-versa.
  • One non-limiting way in which a first structure is couplable to a second structure is for the first structure to be configured to be coupled (or configured to be couplable) to the second structure.
  • an element of a device, system, or method that “comprises,” “has,” “includes” or “contains” one or more features possesses those one or more features, but is not limited to possessing only those one or more features.
  • terms such as “first” and “second” are used only to differentiate structures or features, and not to limit the different structures or features to a particular order.
  • a structure that is capable of performing a function or that is configured in a certain way is capable or configured in at least that way, but may also be capable or configured in ways that are not listed.
  • any of the present devices, systems, and methods can consist of or consist essentially of—rather than comprise/include/contain/have-any of the described elements and/or features and/or steps.
  • the term “consisting of” or “consisting essentially of” can be substituted for any of the open-ended linking verbs recited above, in order to change the scope of a given claim from what it would otherwise be using the open-ended linking verb.
  • FIG. 1 is a process-flow diagram showing the primary features of one embodiment of the acid gas removal unit utilizing hypochlorite and bicarbonate.
  • FIG. 2 is a a process-flow diagram showing primary features of one embodiment of the acid gas removal unit having a first stage utilizing hypochlorite and bicarbonate and a second stage utilizing sodium hydroxide to make the bicarbonate.
  • the process-flow diagram further shows how the units are integrated so that products of one unit can be the reactants for another unit(s).
  • FIGS. 3 a and 3 b show the results of a H 2 S removal study, namely, a plot of the percentage of H 2 S removal over time and the temperature of the absorption liquid over time, respectively.
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b show the study parameters and results, respectively, of a NO x removal study.
  • the present invention relates to at least a two-stage absorption processes in which an acid gas or acid gases, such as CO 2 , H 2 S, NO x , and/or SO x , are removed from a gas stream and converted into a carbonate, a bicarbonate, a sulfate, or a nitrate.
  • an acid gas or acid gases such as CO 2 , H 2 S, NO x , and/or SO x
  • Embodiments of the methods and apparatuses of the present disclosure comprise one or more of the following general components: (1) an aqueous decarbonation process whereby gaseous CO 2 is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture and then reacted with a hydroxide to form carbonate and/or bicarbonate products; (2) a separation process whereby the carbonate and/or bicarbonate products are separated from the liquid mixture; (3) a brine electrolysis process for production of the sodium hydroxide that is used in the absorbent fluid in the decarbonation process; (4) an aqueous oxidization process whereby an acid gas is absorbed into the aqueous oxidizing mixture and then reacted with a hypochlorite and a bicarbonate to form a sulfate and/or nitrate product; (5) a separation process whereby the sulfate and/or nitrate products generated in the oxidation process are extracted from the aqueous mixture; (6) a hypochlorite generation process for production of the hypo
  • one advantage of certain embodiments of the present disclosure is that they provide ecological efficiencies that are superior to those of the prior art, while absorbing most or all of the acid gases, including at least one or any combination of CO 2 , H 2 S, SO x , and NO x .
  • certain embodiments sequester carbon-dioxide and other acid gases into economically useful chemicals and co-incidentally produce useful by-products such as sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine gas, hydrochloric acid, and hydrogen gas. Because the by-products of the described processes are economically useful, those values offset the costs of acid gas removal and, in properly designed systems, potentially make the sequestration process profitable in itself. Moreover, unlike other processes in the art, the sequestration of CO 2 generates byproducts that can be utilized to sequester other acid gases, also adding to the cost and ecological efficiency.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a simplified process-flow diagram illustrating general, exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure. This diagram is offered for illustrative purposes only, and thus it merely depicts specific embodiments of the present disclosure and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any way.
  • the gas stream 2 to be scrubbed enters System 100 at a Hypochlorite/Bicarbonate Scrubber 105 .
  • Scrubber 105 is configured to remove (e.g., reduce the concentration of) acid gases comprising sulfur containing compounds and/or nitrogen containing compounds from gas stream 2 , utilizing hypochlorite and bicarbonate as the reactants.
  • the acid gases removed from gas stream 2 through such process can include at least one of H 2 S, NO x , SO x , and combinations thereof. Examples of the possible chemical reactions occurring in Scrubber 105 include the following.
  • Scrubber 105 can be any wet scrubbing configuration suitable to bring the gas stream 2 into contact with the liquid phase containing hypochlorite and bicarbonate, so as to effectively reduce the amount of nitrogen and sulfur containing compounds present in gas stream 2 .
  • the bicarbonate and hypochlorite reactants are delivered to Scrubber 105 separately, such as via lines 11 and 30 , respectively.
  • Scrubber 105 can be a packed or unpacked bubble column.
  • Scrubber 105 comprises a set of downcomers 106 configured to create a recirculation loop to recirculate the liquid phase containing hypochlorite and bicarbonate.
  • System 100 can comprise two Scrubbers 105 and gas stream 2 can be selectively routed to either one or both.
  • the liquid phase in one of the Scrubbers 105 may be substantially replaced with fresh reactor solution, while gas stream 2 is passing through the other Scrubber 105 .
  • the nitrate, sulfate, and or bicarbonate products produced in Scrubber 105 can be transported for further processing or storage, such as via line 5 .
  • gas stream 2 can be processed to remove any heavy metals, particulates, and residual water content, e.g., in Knockout Tank 103 .
  • Such processing may be needed when the gas stream is a natural gas or a flue gas stream.
  • Knockout Tank 103 can be configured to remove heavy metals, particulates by spraying a stream of a dilute hydroxide solution in Knockout Tank 103 that mixes with gas stream 2 .
  • the concentration of the hydroxide solution can be 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5% by wt. or any value therebetween.
  • a portion of the acid gases, particularly the sulfur-based acid gases, may also be removed in this process.
  • Knockout Tank 103 can be located after the Scrubber 105 to remove residual sulfur-containing and nitrogen-containing acid gases in gas stream 2 prior to it entering into Columns 110 / 111 as described below.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a simplified process-flow diagram illustrating general, exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure. This diagram is offered for illustrative purposes only, and thus it merely depicts specific embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any way.
  • the gas stream 2 to be scrubbed and decarbonated enters system 200 at a Hypochlorite/Bicarbonate Scrubber 105 , such as the one described above.
  • CO 2 which is a byproduct of this scrubbing process (see, e.g., equations (2), (5), (9), and (10)), becomes part of gas stream 2 exiting Scrubber 105 .
  • exiting gas stream 2 can potentially comprise both CO 2 originally present in the gas stream and CO 2 byproduct generated by the process in Scrubber 105 .
  • gas stream 2 may only comprise the CO 2 byproduct.
  • Gas stream 2 flowing from Scrubber 105 can be differentially introduced into Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 or Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111 , configured in series.
  • hydroxide from Chlor-alkali Cell 120 can be transferred to Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 , such as via line 20 , to react with carbon dioxide present in the portion of gas stream 2 introduced into Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 according to the reaction represented by equation 12.
  • the concentration of the hydroxide solution generated in the Chlor-alkali Cell 120 can be diluted to a preferred concentration prior to introducing into the Chlor-alkali Cell 120 .
  • a portion of the liquid phase comprising sodium carbonate from Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 is transported, such as via line 10 , to Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111 to cause conversion of carbonate to bicarbonate by reaction with residual CO 2 in the liquid phase, as represented by equation 13.
  • at least a portion of the bicarbonate generated in Column 111 is transported to Scrubber 105 , such as via line 11 , to be consumed, for example, according to reactions (2), (5), (9), and (10).
  • Gas stream 2 After passing through Scrubber 105 and one or both of Columns 110 and 111 , the gas stream has significantly reduced levels of acid gases. Gas stream 2 can then proceed to the next step, which will depend on the specific application within which this described process is being utilized. For example, an industrial process gas stream may require further cleaning or be directly discharged into the atmosphere. In other embodiments, such as in the context of cleaning a natural gas stream, the gas stream can be transported for use at another location, utilized in power generation, or stored for later use.
  • the sodium hydroxide generated in Cell 120 can be delivered, such as via line 20 , to either or both Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 and Hypochlorite Reactor 130 . At least a portion of the chlorine, also from Chlor-alkali Cell 120 , is delivered, such as via line 22 , to either or both Hypochlorite Reactor 130 and HCl Burner 140 .
  • hypochlorite Reactor 130 At least a portion of the chlorine is contacted with (e.g., bubbled through) at least a portion of the alkali hydroxide to produce a hypochlorite solution according to reaction 15. At least a portion of the hypochlorite solution can be fed into Scrubber 105 , such as via line 30 .
  • the sodium hypochlorite not needed for Scrubber 105 can be trucked to market as salable bleach.
  • the chlorine and hydrogen produced from the Chlor-alkali Cell 120 can be delivered to an HCl Burner 140 , such as via lines 22 and 21 , respectively to produce hydrogen chloride.
  • the generated HCl can be transferred to a tank for storage or transport via line 40 .
  • the net reaction can be represented by equation 16:
  • gas stream 2 is processed to remove residual SO x and NO x acid gases, e.g., in Knockout Tank 103 .
  • Knockout Tank 103 can be configured to absorb residual SO x and NO x by spraying a stream of a dilute hydroxide solution in Knockout Tank 103 that mixes with gas stream 2 .
  • the concentration of the dilute hydroxide stream can be 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5% by wt. or any value therebetween.
  • the hydroxide in the dilute hydroxide solution is generated in Chlor-Alkali Cell 120 .
  • the liquid phase from Scrubber 105 can be reacted with ammonia to generate ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium nitrate according to equations 17 and 18 provided below.
  • the liquid/solid phase products of equations 17 and/18 can be transferred for further processing or storage, such as via line 50 .
  • System 200 can comprise two Scrubbers 105 and gas stream 2 can be selectively routed to either one or both.
  • dual Scrubbers 105 can facilitate transfer of the liquid phase to Unit 150 and replenishment of the absorption fluid.
  • the bicarbonate by-product generated from decarbonation can be utilized along with hypochlorite to scrub the gas stream of a variety of acid gases in Scrubber 105 , and the generated CO 2 as a result of the scrubbing with the bicarbonate can be recaptured by the decarbonation process.
  • many of the generated by-products can be sold for economic gain, such as, sodium hypochlorite and sodium bicarbonate.
  • the sulfate and nitrate byproducts can be easily disposed of or can be further processed to generate fertilizer for economic gain.
  • the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ an aqueous sequestration process whereby an acid gas is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture where it then reacts with the hypochlorite and bicarbonate to form sulfate and/or nitrate products.
  • sodium hypochlorite and sodium bicarbonate are used as the scrubbing reagents.
  • the resulting products depend on the composition of the gas stream.
  • the products include sodium nitrate (NaNO 3 ) and sodium sulfate (Na 2 SO 4 ).
  • most of the sulfur-based acid gases and nitrogen-based acid gases are reacted in this manner, e.g., at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.1%, 99.2%, 99.3%, 99.4%, 99.5%, 99.6%, 99.7%, 99.8%, or 99.9% of the acid gases are reacted in this manner.
  • the process conditions and amount of reagents can be varied based on the composition of the gas stream, whether it only comprises sulfur-based acid gases, only nitrogen-based acid gases, or some combination thereof.
  • concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and sodium bicarbonate can each be between 0.1% to about 12% by weight, such as 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5%, 4%, 4.5%, 5%, 5.5%, 6%, 6.5%, 7%, 7.5%, 8%, 8.5%, 9%, 9.5%, 10%, 10.5%, 11%, 11.5%, or any value or range therebetween.
  • the sodium hypochlorite concentration is about 0.5% to about to about 6% by weight, to about 5% by weight, to about 4% by weight, or to about 3% by weight.
  • the sodium bicarbonate concentration is about 0.5% to about 8% by weight, to about 7% by weight, to about 6% by weight, to about 5% by weight, to about 4% by weight, or to about 3% by weight.
  • the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate can be between about 5:1 to about 1:1, such as about 4:1, 3:1, or 2:1.
  • the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate can be between about 2:1 to about 5:1 or to about 4:1.
  • the pH of the liquid phase within Scrubber 105 can be neutral to basic, such as between a pH of about 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11 or any value or range therebetween.
  • nitrate and/or sulfate products can occur over a wide range of temperatures and pressures.
  • the incoming gas can be between about 20° C. to about 140° C. and the incoming liquid reagent feed(s) can be between about 10° C. to about 100° C.
  • the headspace pressure in the absorption column can be between about 1 atm to about 3 atm.
  • Scrubber 105 can be a spray-tower, a packed or unpacked bubble column or a series thereof, or any other mixing configuration suitable to bring the absorbent solution(s) into effective contact with the gas stream.
  • FIG. 3 a plots the percent of H 2 S removal over time
  • FIG. 3 b plot the temperature of the liquid phase. After 2.5 hours of run time, the percentage of H 2 S removed from the gas begins to decline as does the temperature. This is likely due to a diminished concentration of hypochlorite, as this data was generated on a test run in batch mode.
  • a bench scale study of sequestering NO x with a hypochlorite-bicarbonate solution was also performed using various gaseous mixtures containing NO, NO 2 , SO 2 , and/or CO 2 and bubbling the gas mixture through the solution.
  • the results of the study show that different combinations of gasses and different concentrations of hypochlorite and bicarbonate can greatly affect the overall reactivity of the NO molecule and that the specific composition of the reactor may be tailored to some extent by the composition of the gas stream that is being treated.
  • the test parameters and results of the study are shown in the tables in FIGS. 4 a and 4 b , respectively.
  • the results of the study demonstrate efficacy and provide insight into how the concentrations and relative ratios of hypochlorite and bicarbonate affect sequestration.
  • the solutions with higher strength bleach and a higher gas flow tended to capture more NO, likely due to better contacting between the bleach and the NO.
  • Scrubber 105 embodiments use sodium hypochlorite, those of ordinary skill will understand that it is possible to obtain similar chemistry and oxidation with any number of hypochlorites or mixtures thereof, including but not limited to potassium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, and magnesium hypochlorite.
  • described embodiments also use sodium bicarbonate, yet those of ordinary skill will understand that it is possible to obtain similar chemistry and oxidation with any number of carbonates, bicarbonates or mixtures of carbonates and/or bicarbonates, including but not limited to sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, potassium carbonate, potassium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, calcium bicarbonate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium bicarbonate.
  • the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ an aqueous decarbonation process via Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 and Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111 , whereby gaseous CO 2 is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture where it then reacts with the hydroxide to form carbonate and bicarbonate products.
  • sodium hydroxide is used as the primary absorbent fluid.
  • Sodium hydroxide, in various concentrations, is known to readily scrub CO 2 .
  • each chamber can be a spray-tower, a packed or unpacked bubble column or a series thereof, or any other mixing configuration suitable to bring the hydroxide solution or carbonate solution in effective contact with the gas stream for absorption to carbonate in the case of Column 110 and conversion to bicarbonate in the case of Column 111 .
  • a broad range in the amount of bicarbonate/carbonate/caustic/bleach/other desirable products may be produced in the overall system.
  • the amount of bicarbonate required for scrubbing acid gases is dependent on the composition of the gas stream.
  • higher concentrations of sulfur-based and/or nitrogen-based acid gases can require more sodium bicarbonate to be directed to Scrubber 105 , and conversely, lower concentrations require less.
  • the formation of sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO 3 or sodium bicarbonate) and sodium carbonate (Na 2 CO 3 or soda ash) occurs over a wide range of temperatures and pressures and provides different end-points of the equilibrium given different partial pressures of CO 2 .
  • NaHCO 3 or sodium bicarbonate sodium hydrogen carbonate
  • Na 2 CO 3 or soda ash sodium carbonate
  • the reagent flow rates and/or the gas flow rates can be altered to cause the formation of carbonate and/or bicarbonate precipitants.
  • carbonate/bicarbonate precipitants may be separated from the liquid phase or dried by mechanical separation (e.g., a centrifuge) and/or the exchange of heat energy with incoming gases, in some embodiments.
  • mechanical separation e.g., a centrifuge
  • the heat for the separation process may be derived from the hydrogen produced in the original electrolysis.
  • the exiting liquid stream from the Column 110 and/or 111 may include water, NaHCO 3 , Na 2 CO 3 , and other dissolved gases in various equilibria.
  • to separate/remove the exiting liquid streams e.g., removing/separating the water from the carbonates (in this sense of the word, “carbonates” means mixtures of carbonate and bicarbonate) may include mechanical separation (such as centrifuge separation) and/or adding heat energy to evaporate water from the mixture.
  • pure carbonate, pure bicarbonate, and mixtures of the two in equilibrium concentrations and/or in a slurry or concentrated form may then be periodically transported to storage tanks and/or trucks/tank-cars.
  • the liquid streams may be displaced to evaporation tanks/fields, where the liquid, such as water, may be carried off by evaporation.
  • the water in the liquid phase binds carbon dioxide, causing the gas to be absorbed on contact, with a substantially instantaneous conversion to carbonate ion.
  • This phase of the reaction chain may be mass-transport limited such that once the carbon-dioxide has been absorbed, the subsequent ionic reaction occurs at rapid pace.
  • the reaction is reaction rate limited. Therefore, a system that separates these two phases as described herein can be more efficient, particularly for obtaining higher purity precipitants.
  • the exiting liquid stream may include water, Na 2 SO 4 , NaNO 3 , NaCl, NaOCl, NaHCO 3 , and other dissolved gases in various equilibria.
  • to separate/dispose of the exiting liquid streams can involve heating the liquid to evaporate the water.
  • the sulfate can be isolated by passing the liquid stream through a sulfate recovery process that separates sulfates from NaCl and then add CaCl 2 to convert the Na 2 SO 4 to CaSO 4 , which precipitates.
  • the aqueous phase can be reacted with ammonia to generate ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium nitrate according to equations 17 and 18, such as in Fertilizer Generating Unit 150 . In this manner, bicarbonate can be regenerated.
  • the ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium nitrate products can be utilized as a fertilizer.
  • the liquid streams may be displaced to evaporation tanks/fields, where the liquid, such as water, may be carried off by evaporation.
  • Chlor-alkali Cell 120 for production of the sodium hydroxide that is used as the absorbent fluid in the decarbonation process.
  • Chlor-alkali electrolysis is an electrochemical process primarily used in the production of concentrated sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) and chlorine gas, and is typically described throughout the relevant literature by equation 14:
  • Such electrolysis is typically accomplished by three general types of standard electrolysis cells: diaphragm, mercury, and membrane cells. Each of these types of cells produces the same output products from the same input reactants. They differ from each other primarily in the way the reactants and products are separated from each other.
  • a membrane cell may be used due to several factors. First, environmental concerns over mercury have reduced the demand for the mercury cell. Second, the diaphragm cells may produce a relatively weak caustic product which contains significant concentrations of salt and chloride ion and requires considerable subsequent reprocessing/separation to remove the significant salt content from the caustic. Third, improvements in fluorinated polymer technology have increased the life-time and electrical efficiency of membrane cell technology, where membrane lifetimes in excess of five years are routinely guaranteed in the industrial markets. Further, the power-per-ton-of-caustic efficiencies exceed those of both diaphragm and mercury cells in preferred implementations.
  • Membrane cells have several advantages over other chlor-alkali electrolysis processes. First, membrane cells neither contain nor produce any environmentally sensitive emissions (e.g., mercury) and are electrically efficient when compared with diaphragm and mercury cells. They also employ a concentrated/dilute/make-up NaCl loop such that they may be well-suited for use as a continuous “salt loop” processing unit. Next, NaOH produced in membrane cells without further evaporation/concentration may be a naturally appropriate level of concentration for use in a decarbonation process (e.g., 30-33% NaOH by weight). Membrane cell technology may also be easily scaled from laboratory to plant-size production by the addition of small incremental units.
  • environmentally sensitive emissions e.g., mercury
  • a concentrated/dilute/make-up NaCl loop such that they may be well-suited for use as a continuous “salt loop” processing unit.
  • NaOH produced in membrane cells without further evaporation/concentration may be a naturally appropriate level of concentration for use in a de
  • hydrogen produced by membrane cells is “clean,” approximately “electronic grade,” and relatively clear of NaCl or other contamination.
  • hydrogen may be compressed and tanked off as electronic-grade H 2 gas, used for power-production on-site such as combustion mix with low-grade coal or for combustion-technology gains.
  • the hydrogen may be used for a boiler fuel for the separation processes.
  • chlorine gas produced by the membrane process is less “wet” than that produced by other standard electrolytic processes. As such, a one-stage compression cycle may be sufficient for production of water-treatment grade chlorine.
  • acid is added to the solution before it is electrolyzed.
  • the acid can be any form of acid that can provide protonation to the solution, including but not limited to hydrochloric acid. Those of ordinary skill will understand that it is possible to obtain similar chemistry and electrolysis with any number of acids or mixtures of acids.
  • the acid is hydrochloric acid generated in Burner 140 through the combustion of byproducts, H 2 and Cl 2 .
  • the amount of acid added to the solution can be based on a determination of the optimum protonation rate that achieves the lowest energy to produce reactants and the highest energy to recover from products.
  • the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ a Hypochlorite Reactor 130 .
  • Chlorine gas generated in the chlor-alkali process in Cell 120 is collected and moved to Hypochlorite Reactor 130 and/or HCl Burner 140 .
  • the chlorine gas delivered to Hypochlorite Reactor 130 is contacted (bubbled) through a sodium hydroxide solution delivered directly or indirectly from Chlor-alkali Cell 120 .
  • Sodium hypochlorite solution results and can be used as the absorbent solution, along with a bicarbonate solution generated in Conversion/Bicarbonation Column 111 , in Scrubber 105 and/or trucked to market.
  • a typical incoming flue-gas temperature (after electro-static precipitation treatment, for instance) might well be 300° C.
  • a system in accordance with the present disclosure can comprise heat exchangers adapted to lower that flue-gas to a point less than 300° C., while warming the anolyte and catholyte fluids (which, for LVE, should generally be retained >87.5° C.). This facilitates operation without the power-losses associated with anolyte and catholyte heaters.
  • waste-heat recovery energy quantities may be found to entirely power embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Waste-heat recovery from other processes of the systems may also be employed similarly to gain efficiencies at other points in the system.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Gas Separation By Absorption (AREA)

Abstract

Apparatuses, systems, and methods for removing acid gases from a gas stream are provided. Gas streams include waste gas streams or natural gas streams. The methods include obtaining a hypochlorite and a carbonate or bicarbonate in an aqueous mixture, and mixing the aqueous mixture with the gas stream to produce sulfates or nitrates from sulfur-based and nitrogen-based acidic gases. Some embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to produce the carbonate and/or bicarbonate scrubbing reagent from CO2 in the gas stream. Still others are disclosed.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/599,137, filed Jan. 16, 2015 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/928,965 filed Jan. 17, 2014. The entire text the above-referenced disclosures are specifically incorporated herein by reference without disclaimer.
  • BACKGROUND A. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention generally relates to the field of removing acid gases from a gas stream. More particularly, the present invention relates to removing H2S, NOx, SOx, and other pollutants from gas streams through the absorption of the acid gases from concentrated gas streams and then the separate generation of useful by-products comprising carbonate, bicarbonate, nitrate, and/or sulfate.
  • B. Description of Related Art
  • Most of the energy used in the world today is derived from the combustion of carbon and hydrogen containing fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. In addition to carbon and hydrogen, these fuels can contain oxygen, moisture, and contaminants such as H2S, other sulfur-containing compounds that form SOx during combustion, nitrogen-containing compounds that form NOx during combustion, carbon dioxide, mercury, and other trace elements. Awareness to the damaging effects of the acid gas contaminants released during combustion, or present in the uncombusted fuel, triggers the enforcement of ever more stringent limits on emissions from power plants, refineries, and other industrial processes. Thus, pressures by regulators and the marketplace are increasing to achieve near zero emission of acid gas contaminants and to reduce CO2 emission.
  • Amine processes already exist, which can non-selectively remove CO2 and H2S from streams of flue gas. Nearly all amine processes seek to regenerate the amine, essentially using them as a catalyst; one commonly used in scrubbing CO2 and H2S from natural gas is diethanolamine (DEA). One of the downsides of many amine processes is that they suffer problems with formation of contaminants in the form of Heat Stable Amine Salts (HSAS), which reduce the efficiency of scrubbing in the system via the formation of salts of chloride, sulfate, formate, acetate, oxalate, cyanide, thiocyanide, and thiosulfate. Other issues amine systems commonly run into include injection chemicals concentrating in the amine system, hydrocarbons condensing in the system, and (insoluble) particulates or suspended solids building up in the amine system. A wide range of amine-based systems exist under different brand names, but most suffer from the problems listed above to some degree.
  • Removal of acid gases such as H2S and CO2 are necessary to comply with government regulation, and doing so more efficiently and at a lower capital cost is desired.
  • SUMMARY
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to devices, systems, and methods to remove sulfur-based and/or nitrogen-based acid gases from a gas stream with a proprietary aqueous mixture of bleach (NaClO) at concentrations from 0.01% to 12% and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) at concentrations from 0.01% to 12%. The system is able to target acid gases, such as H2S, while allowing organics, such as methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6) to pass through unreacted. With such systems, for example, a natural gas stream containing acid gas pollutants can be cleaned via the installation of this scrubbing system at a natural gas refinery, power plant, or other process plant.
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to devices, systems, and methods to remove sulfur-based and/or nitrogen-based acid gases in an absorption column. A bicarbonate/carbonate stream generated in a different portion of the process can be directed to the absorption column and utilized as a reagent to sequester the sulfur-based and nitrogen-based acid gases. Such embodiments can further comprise a chlor-alkali cell for generating hydroxide reagent that can be directly utilized in the sequestration of CO2 and indirectly utilized (by reacting it with Cl2 to produce a hypochlorite) in the sequestration of sulfur-based and nitrogen-based acid gases.
  • One aspect of the disclosure relates to a system for effectively reducing pollutants from a gas stream comprising: a first set of mixing equipment adapted to admix a hydroxide with a gas stream to create a first admixture in which carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide in the gas stream can react with a hydroxide to produce a bicarbonate product or a combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products in a first liquid outflow and a second set of mixing equipment adapted admix a hypochlorite and the bicarbonate product or the combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products with the gas stream to create a second admixture in which nitrogen-based or sulfur-based acid gases can react with the hypochlorite and the bicarbonate product or the combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products to produce nitrate or sulfate products in a second liquid outflow, wherein a gas stream flows through the second set of mixing equipment before at least a portion of the gas stream flows through the first set of mixing equipment.
  • Another aspect of the disclosure relates to a method of effectively reducing an amount of pollutants from a gas stream comprising (a) obtaining a hydroxide in an aqueous mixture; (b) obtaining a hypochlorite in an aqueous mixture; (c) admixing the hydroxide with carbon dioxide in the gas stream to produce bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products in a first admixture, thereby sequestering the carbon dioxide in a mineral product form; and (d) admixing the hypochlorite and at least a portion of the bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products from the first admixture with a sulfur-based or nitrogen-based acid gas in the gas stream to produce nitrate or sulfate product in a second admixture, thereby sequestering the acid gas.
  • Yet another aspect of the disclosure relates to a method of scrubbing natural gas stream, wherein the scrubbing phase consists of or consists essentially of admixing a hypochlorite oxidant and bicarbonate absorbent with a sulfur-based or nitrogen-based acid gas in the natural gas stream to produce nitrate or sulfate product in an admixture, thereby sequestering the acid gas.
  • As used herein, the phrase “gas stream” comprises a gas stream with at least one acid gas. Examples of a gas stream include a raw natural gas stream, and a waste gas stream, such as a flue-gas stream. Gas streams can be generated by a power generation process that uses combustion of carbon-based fuels, manufacturing process, industrial process, or a natural reservoir extraction process.
  • An acid gas can be carbon-, sulfur-, and/or nitrogen-based and can comprise H2S, SOx, NOx, and CO2. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) comprise NO, NO2, N2O3, N2O5, and associated dimers. Sulfur oxides (SOx) comprise SO2 and SO3. Other acid gases that can be removed from described embodiments include HF and HCl.
  • As used herein, the terms “carbonates” or “carbonate products” are generally defined as mineral components containing the carbonate group [CO3]2−. Thus, the terms encompass both carbonate/bicarbonate mixtures and species containing solely the carbonate ion. The terms “bicarbonates” and “bicarbonate products” are generally defined as mineral components containing the bicarbonate group [HCO3]1−. Thus, the terms encompass both carbonate/bicarbonate mixtures and species containing solely the bicarbonate ion.
  • As used herein, the term “sequestration” is used to refer generally to techniques or practices whose partial or whole effect is to remove CO2 from point emissions sources and to store that CO2 in some form so as to prevent its return to the atmosphere. Use of this term does not exclude any form of the described embodiments from being considered “sequestration” techniques.
  • As used herein, the terms “low-voltage electrolysis” and “LVE” are used to refer to electrolysis at current densities below about 4 kA/m2.
  • The term “coupled” is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly, and not necessarily mechanically. Two items are “couplable” if they can be coupled to each other, and, when coupled, may still be characterized as “couplable.” Unless the context explicitly requires otherwise, items that are couplable are also decouplable, and vice-versa. One non-limiting way in which a first structure is couplable to a second structure is for the first structure to be configured to be coupled (or configured to be couplable) to the second structure.
  • The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless this disclosure explicitly requires otherwise. The term “another” is defined as at least a second or more. The terms “substantially” and “about” are defined as at least close to (and includes) a given value or state (preferably within 10% of, more preferably within 1% of, and most preferably within 0.1% of).
  • The terms “substantially,” “approximately” and “about” are defined as being largely but not necessarily wholly what is specified (and include wholly what is specified) as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. In any disclosed embodiment, the term “substantially,” “approximately,” or “about” may be substituted with “within [a percentage] of” what is specified, where the percentage includes 0.1, 1, 5, and 10 percent.
  • The term “effective,” as that term is used in the specification and/or claims, means adequate to accomplish a desired, expected, or intended result.
  • The terms “comprise” (and any form of comprise, such as “comprises” and “comprising”), “have” (and any form of have, such as “has” and “having”), “include” (and any form of include, such as “includes” and “including”) and “contain” (and any form of contain, such as “contains” and “containing”) are open-ended linking verbs. As a result, any of the present devices, systems, and methods that “comprises,” “has,” “includes” or “contains” one or more elements possesses those one or more elements, but is not limited to possessing only those one or more elements. Likewise, an element of a device, system, or method that “comprises,” “has,” “includes” or “contains” one or more features possesses those one or more features, but is not limited to possessing only those one or more features. Additionally, terms such as “first” and “second” are used only to differentiate structures or features, and not to limit the different structures or features to a particular order.
  • Furthermore, a structure that is capable of performing a function or that is configured in a certain way is capable or configured in at least that way, but may also be capable or configured in ways that are not listed.
  • The feature or features of one embodiment may be applied to other embodiments, even though not described or illustrated, unless expressly prohibited by this disclosure or the nature of the embodiments.
  • Any of the present devices, systems, and methods can consist of or consist essentially of—rather than comprise/include/contain/have-any of the described elements and/or features and/or steps. Thus, in any of the claims, the term “consisting of” or “consisting essentially of” can be substituted for any of the open-ended linking verbs recited above, in order to change the scope of a given claim from what it would otherwise be using the open-ended linking verb.
  • Details associated with the embodiments described above and others are presented below.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The following drawings illustrate by way of example and not limitation. For the sake of brevity and clarity, every feature of a given structure may not be labeled in every figure in which that structure appears. Identical reference numbers do not necessarily indicate an identical structure. Rather, the same reference number may be used to indicate a similar feature or a feature with similar functionality, as may non-identical reference numbers.
  • FIG. 1 is a process-flow diagram showing the primary features of one embodiment of the acid gas removal unit utilizing hypochlorite and bicarbonate.
  • FIG. 2 is a a process-flow diagram showing primary features of one embodiment of the acid gas removal unit having a first stage utilizing hypochlorite and bicarbonate and a second stage utilizing sodium hydroxide to make the bicarbonate. The process-flow diagram further shows how the units are integrated so that products of one unit can be the reactants for another unit(s).
  • FIGS. 3a and 3b show the results of a H2S removal study, namely, a plot of the percentage of H2S removal over time and the temperature of the absorption liquid over time, respectively.
  • FIGS. 4a and 4b show the study parameters and results, respectively, of a NOx removal study.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention relates to at least a two-stage absorption processes in which an acid gas or acid gases, such as CO2, H2S, NOx, and/or SOx, are removed from a gas stream and converted into a carbonate, a bicarbonate, a sulfate, or a nitrate. Embodiments of the methods and apparatuses of the present disclosure comprise one or more of the following general components: (1) an aqueous decarbonation process whereby gaseous CO2 is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture and then reacted with a hydroxide to form carbonate and/or bicarbonate products; (2) a separation process whereby the carbonate and/or bicarbonate products are separated from the liquid mixture; (3) a brine electrolysis process for production of the sodium hydroxide that is used in the absorbent fluid in the decarbonation process; (4) an aqueous oxidization process whereby an acid gas is absorbed into the aqueous oxidizing mixture and then reacted with a hypochlorite and a bicarbonate to form a sulfate and/or nitrate product; (5) a separation process whereby the sulfate and/or nitrate products generated in the oxidation process are extracted from the aqueous mixture; (6) a hypochlorite generation process for production of the hypochlorite that is used as part of the aqueous oxidizing mixture; and (7) further processing or utilization of by-products from the decarbonation, oxidation, and electrolysis processes, including chlorine gas, hydrogen gas, hydrochloric acid, carbonate and bicarbonate, nitrates, sulfates, and bleach. Each of these general components is explained in further detail below.
  • While many embodiments of the present invention consume some energy to accomplish the absorption of acid gases from a gas stream and to accomplish the other objectives of embodiments of the present disclosure as described herein, one advantage of certain embodiments of the present disclosure is that they provide ecologic efficiencies that are superior to those of the prior art, while absorbing most or all of the acid gases, including at least one or any combination of CO2, H2S, SOx, and NOx.
  • Unlike other processes in the art, certain embodiments sequester carbon-dioxide and other acid gases into economically useful chemicals and co-incidentally produce useful by-products such as sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine gas, hydrochloric acid, and hydrogen gas. Because the by-products of the described processes are economically useful, those values offset the costs of acid gas removal and, in properly designed systems, potentially make the sequestration process profitable in itself. Moreover, unlike other processes in the art, the sequestration of CO2 generates byproducts that can be utilized to sequester other acid gases, also adding to the cost and ecological efficiency.
  • Another additional benefit of certain embodiments of the present disclosure that distinguishes them from other CO2-removal processes is that in some market conditions, the products are worth considerably more than the reactants required or the net-power or plant-depreciation costs. In other words, certain embodiments are industrial methods of producing chlor-hydro-carbonate products as well as nitrate and/or sulfate products at a profit, while accomplishing considerable removal of acid gases.
  • I. Flow Diagram: Absorption of Acid Gases Utilizing Hypochlorite/Bicarbonate
  • FIG. 1 depicts a simplified process-flow diagram illustrating general, exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure. This diagram is offered for illustrative purposes only, and thus it merely depicts specific embodiments of the present disclosure and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any way.
  • In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the gas stream 2 to be scrubbed enters System 100 at a Hypochlorite/Bicarbonate Scrubber 105. Scrubber 105 is configured to remove (e.g., reduce the concentration of) acid gases comprising sulfur containing compounds and/or nitrogen containing compounds from gas stream 2, utilizing hypochlorite and bicarbonate as the reactants. The acid gases removed from gas stream 2 through such process can include at least one of H2S, NOx, SOx, and combinations thereof. Examples of the possible chemical reactions occurring in Scrubber 105 include the following.
  • H2S:

  • H2S(g)+4NaClO(aq)→H2SO4(aq)+4NaCl(aq)  (1)

  • H2SO4(aq)+2NaHCO3(aq)→Na2SO4(aq)+2CO2(aq)+2H2O(l)  (2)
  • SOx:

  • 2SO2(g)+2H2O(l)+O2(g)→2H2SO4(aq)  (3)

  • SO3(g)+H2O(l)→H2SO4(aq)  (4)

  • H2SO4(aq)+2NaHCO3(aq)→Na2SO4(aq)+2CO2(g)+2H2O(l)  (5)
  • NOx:

  • NO(g)+NaClO(aq)→NaCl(aq)+NO2(g)  (6)

  • 2NO(g)+3NaClO(aq)+H2O(l)→3NaCl(aq)+2HNO3(aq)  (7)

  • 2NO2(g)+NaClO(aq)+H2O(l)→NaCl(aq)+2HNO3(aq)  (8)

  • HNO3(aq)+NaHCO3(aq)→NaNO3(aq)+CO2(g)+H2O(l)  (9)

  • 2NO2(g)+2NaHCO3(aq)→NaNO3(aq)+NaNO2(aq)+2CO2(g)+H2O(l)  (10)

  • NaNO2(aq)+NaClO(aq)→NaNO3(aq)+NaCl(aq)  (11)
  • Scrubber 105 can be any wet scrubbing configuration suitable to bring the gas stream 2 into contact with the liquid phase containing hypochlorite and bicarbonate, so as to effectively reduce the amount of nitrogen and sulfur containing compounds present in gas stream 2. In the embodiment shown, the bicarbonate and hypochlorite reactants are delivered to Scrubber 105 separately, such as via lines 11 and 30, respectively. In various embodiments, Scrubber 105 can be a packed or unpacked bubble column. In the embodiment shown, Scrubber 105 comprises a set of downcomers 106 configured to create a recirculation loop to recirculate the liquid phase containing hypochlorite and bicarbonate. In some embodiments, System 100 can comprise two Scrubbers 105 and gas stream 2 can be selectively routed to either one or both. In some embodiments, the liquid phase in one of the Scrubbers 105 may be substantially replaced with fresh reactor solution, while gas stream 2 is passing through the other Scrubber 105. The nitrate, sulfate, and or bicarbonate products produced in Scrubber 105 can be transported for further processing or storage, such as via line 5.
  • In advance of entering Scrubber 105, if desired, gas stream 2 can be processed to remove any heavy metals, particulates, and residual water content, e.g., in Knockout Tank 103. Such processing may be needed when the gas stream is a natural gas or a flue gas stream. In various embodiments, Knockout Tank 103 can be configured to remove heavy metals, particulates by spraying a stream of a dilute hydroxide solution in Knockout Tank 103 that mixes with gas stream 2. The concentration of the hydroxide solution can be 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5% by wt. or any value therebetween. A portion of the acid gases, particularly the sulfur-based acid gases, may also be removed in this process. In other embodiments, such as the one shown in FIG. 2 described below, Knockout Tank 103 can be located after the Scrubber 105 to remove residual sulfur-containing and nitrogen-containing acid gases in gas stream 2 prior to it entering into Columns 110/111 as described below.
  • II. Flow Diagram: Absorption of Carbon Dioxide and Other Acid Gases
  • FIG. 2 depicts a simplified process-flow diagram illustrating general, exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure. This diagram is offered for illustrative purposes only, and thus it merely depicts specific embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any way.
  • In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the gas stream 2 to be scrubbed and decarbonated enters system 200 at a Hypochlorite/Bicarbonate Scrubber 105, such as the one described above. CO2, which is a byproduct of this scrubbing process (see, e.g., equations (2), (5), (9), and (10)), becomes part of gas stream 2 exiting Scrubber 105. Thus, in various embodiments, exiting gas stream 2 can potentially comprise both CO2 originally present in the gas stream and CO2 byproduct generated by the process in Scrubber 105. In other embodiments, gas stream 2 may only comprise the CO2 byproduct.
  • Gas stream 2 flowing from Scrubber 105 can be differentially introduced into Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 or Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111, configured in series. In the depicted embodiment, hydroxide from Chlor-alkali Cell 120 can be transferred to Absorption/Carbonation Column 110, such as via line 20, to react with carbon dioxide present in the portion of gas stream 2 introduced into Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 according to the reaction represented by equation 12. In some embodiments, the concentration of the hydroxide solution generated in the Chlor-alkali Cell 120 can be diluted to a preferred concentration prior to introducing into the Chlor-alkali Cell 120.

  • 2NaOH+CO2→Na2CO3+H2O  (12)
  • A portion of the liquid phase comprising sodium carbonate from Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 is transported, such as via line 10, to Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111 to cause conversion of carbonate to bicarbonate by reaction with residual CO2 in the liquid phase, as represented by equation 13. In the depicted embodiment, at least a portion of the bicarbonate generated in Column 111 is transported to Scrubber 105, such as via line 11, to be consumed, for example, according to reactions (2), (5), (9), and (10).

  • Na2CO3+CO2+H2O→2NaHCO3  (13)
  • The process of decarbonation occurring in Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 and Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111 can be further modified, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art and taught, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,374, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • After passing through Scrubber 105 and one or both of Columns 110 and 111, the gas stream has significantly reduced levels of acid gases. Gas stream 2 can then proceed to the next step, which will depend on the specific application within which this described process is being utilized. For example, an industrial process gas stream may require further cleaning or be directly discharged into the atmosphere. In other embodiments, such as in the context of cleaning a natural gas stream, the gas stream can be transported for use at another location, utilized in power generation, or stored for later use.
  • Supporting processes and apparatuses are integrated into System 200 to generate additional reactants for the above-described absorption processes and include a Chlor-alkali Cell 120 and a Hypochlorite Reactor 130. Chor-alkali Cell 120 uses power to drive a reaction represented by equation 14.

  • 2NaCl+2H2O→2NaOH+Cl2+H2  (14)
  • The sodium hydroxide generated in Cell 120 can be delivered, such as via line 20, to either or both Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 and Hypochlorite Reactor 130. At least a portion of the chlorine, also from Chlor-alkali Cell 120, is delivered, such as via line 22, to either or both Hypochlorite Reactor 130 and HCl Burner 140.
  • In Hypochlorite Reactor 130, at least a portion of the chlorine is contacted with (e.g., bubbled through) at least a portion of the alkali hydroxide to produce a hypochlorite solution according to reaction 15. At least a portion of the hypochlorite solution can be fed into Scrubber 105, such as via line 30. The sodium hypochlorite not needed for Scrubber 105 can be trucked to market as salable bleach.

  • 2NaOH+Cl2→NaOCl+NaCl+H2O.  (15)
  • To capture the chlorine gas generated in the Chlor-alkali Cell 120 and not used in the Hypochlorite Reactor 130, the chlorine and hydrogen produced from the Chlor-alkali Cell 120 can be delivered to an HCl Burner 140, such as via lines 22 and 21, respectively to produce hydrogen chloride. The generated HCl can be transferred to a tank for storage or transport via line 40. The net reaction can be represented by equation 16:

  • Cl2+H2→2HCl  (16)
  • In the embodiment shown, after Scrubber 105, gas stream 2 is processed to remove residual SOx and NOx acid gases, e.g., in Knockout Tank 103. For example, Knockout Tank 103 can be configured to absorb residual SOx and NOx by spraying a stream of a dilute hydroxide solution in Knockout Tank 103 that mixes with gas stream 2. The concentration of the dilute hydroxide stream can be 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5% by wt. or any value therebetween. In the depicted embodiment, the hydroxide in the dilute hydroxide solution is generated in Chlor-Alkali Cell 120.
  • At least a portion of the reacted liquid phase from Scrubber 105 containing nitrates and/or sulfates, such as NaNO3 and/or NaSO4, can be transferred, such as via line 5, to Fertilizer Generating Unit 150. In Unit 150, the liquid phase from Scrubber 105 can be reacted with ammonia to generate ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium nitrate according to equations 17 and 18 provided below. The liquid/solid phase products of equations 17 and/18 can be transferred for further processing or storage, such as via line 50. Like System 100, System 200 can comprise two Scrubbers 105 and gas stream 2 can be selectively routed to either one or both. In some embodiments, dual Scrubbers 105 can facilitate transfer of the liquid phase to Unit 150 and replenishment of the absorption fluid.
  • Through the above-described process, the bicarbonate by-product generated from decarbonation can be utilized along with hypochlorite to scrub the gas stream of a variety of acid gases in Scrubber 105, and the generated CO2 as a result of the scrubbing with the bicarbonate can be recaptured by the decarbonation process. In addition, many of the generated by-products can be sold for economic gain, such as, sodium hypochlorite and sodium bicarbonate. The sulfate and nitrate byproducts can be easily disposed of or can be further processed to generate fertilizer for economic gain.
  • These methods and devices can be further modified, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art. Such principles and techniques are taught, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2006/0185985 and 2009/0127127, U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,374, filed Sep. 22, 2005, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed Sep. 20, 2005; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed Jan. 10, 2005; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed Sep. 23, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/235,482, filed Sep. 22, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed Sep. 20, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed Feb. 29, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed Mar. 3, 2008, International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed Sep. 19, 2008, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0202516, filed Jan. 11, 2013. The entire text of each of the above-referenced disclosures (including any appendices) is specifically incorporated by reference herein without disclaimer.
  • The above examples were included to demonstrate particular embodiments of the invention. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • III. Aqueous Sequestration (Absorption) of Acid Gases from Gas Streams and its Conversion into Nitrates and/or Sulfates
  • As noted above, in certain embodiments, the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ an aqueous sequestration process whereby an acid gas is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture where it then reacts with the hypochlorite and bicarbonate to form sulfate and/or nitrate products. In embodiments of the present disclosure, sodium hypochlorite and sodium bicarbonate are used as the scrubbing reagents. When an acid gas is brought into contact with aqueous sodium hypochlorite and aqueous sodium bicarbonate, the resulting products depend on the composition of the gas stream. In general, the products include sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). In some embodiments of the present disclosure, most of the sulfur-based acid gases and nitrogen-based acid gases are reacted in this manner, e.g., at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.1%, 99.2%, 99.3%, 99.4%, 99.5%, 99.6%, 99.7%, 99.8%, or 99.9% of the acid gases are reacted in this manner.
  • The process conditions and amount of reagents can be varied based on the composition of the gas stream, whether it only comprises sulfur-based acid gases, only nitrogen-based acid gases, or some combination thereof. Generally, the concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and sodium bicarbonate can each be between 0.1% to about 12% by weight, such as 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5%, 4%, 4.5%, 5%, 5.5%, 6%, 6.5%, 7%, 7.5%, 8%, 8.5%, 9%, 9.5%, 10%, 10.5%, 11%, 11.5%, or any value or range therebetween. For example, in certain embodiments, the sodium hypochlorite concentration is about 0.5% to about to about 6% by weight, to about 5% by weight, to about 4% by weight, or to about 3% by weight. Similarly, in certain embodiments, the sodium bicarbonate concentration is about 0.5% to about 8% by weight, to about 7% by weight, to about 6% by weight, to about 5% by weight, to about 4% by weight, or to about 3% by weight. In addition, in various embodiments, the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate can be between about 5:1 to about 1:1, such as about 4:1, 3:1, or 2:1. For example, the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate can be between about 2:1 to about 5:1 or to about 4:1. The pH of the liquid phase within Scrubber 105 can be neutral to basic, such as between a pH of about 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11 or any value or range therebetween.
  • The formation of nitrate and/or sulfate products can occur over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. With respect to temperature, by way of example, the incoming gas can be between about 20° C. to about 140° C. and the incoming liquid reagent feed(s) can be between about 10° C. to about 100° C. Also, by way of example, the headspace pressure in the absorption column can be between about 1 atm to about 3 atm.
  • In various embodiments, Scrubber 105 can be a spray-tower, a packed or unpacked bubble column or a series thereof, or any other mixing configuration suitable to bring the absorbent solution(s) into effective contact with the gas stream.
  • A bench scale study of sequestering H2S with a hypochlorite-bicarbonate solution was performed using a gaseous mixture of H2S and CO2 and bubbling it through the solution. The results of the study demonstrate efficacy and provide insight into how the concentrations and relative ratios of hypochlorite and bicarbonate affect sequestration. The test parameters and results are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below. FIG. 3a plots the percent of H2S removal over time and FIG. 3b plot the temperature of the liquid phase. After 2.5 hours of run time, the percentage of H2S removed from the gas begins to decline as does the temperature. This is likely due to a diminished concentration of hypochlorite, as this data was generated on a test run in batch mode.
  • TABLE 1
    4″ Column Composition
    Compound Quantity
    NaHCO3 251.98 g (6.38% wt)
    NaClO 1,946.67 (159.34) g
    (8.25%) (4.04% wt)
    H2O 1,748.65 g
  • TABLE 2
    Run Results
    Time mol % mol % mol %
    After CO2 N2 H2S % H2 S
    Sample Start
    10 0 5.52 Removed
    1 0:30 12.59 1.12 0.0037 99.93
    2 1:30 18.74 0.62 0.0036 99.93
    3 2:30 16.34 0.67 0.0029 99.95
    4 3:30 13.48 2.02 0.92 83.41
    5 4:30 12.07 0.29 2.33 57.83
    6 5:00 11.95 0.91 2.82 48.84
  • A bench scale study of sequestering NOx with a hypochlorite-bicarbonate solution was also performed using various gaseous mixtures containing NO, NO2, SO2, and/or CO2 and bubbling the gas mixture through the solution. The results of the study show that different combinations of gasses and different concentrations of hypochlorite and bicarbonate can greatly affect the overall reactivity of the NO molecule and that the specific composition of the reactor may be tailored to some extent by the composition of the gas stream that is being treated. The test parameters and results of the study are shown in the tables in FIGS. 4a and 4b , respectively. The results of the study demonstrate efficacy and provide insight into how the concentrations and relative ratios of hypochlorite and bicarbonate affect sequestration. The solutions with higher strength bleach and a higher gas flow tended to capture more NO, likely due to better contacting between the bleach and the NO.
  • While the described Scrubber 105 embodiments use sodium hypochlorite, those of ordinary skill will understand that it is possible to obtain similar chemistry and oxidation with any number of hypochlorites or mixtures thereof, including but not limited to potassium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, and magnesium hypochlorite. Similarly, described embodiments also use sodium bicarbonate, yet those of ordinary skill will understand that it is possible to obtain similar chemistry and oxidation with any number of carbonates, bicarbonates or mixtures of carbonates and/or bicarbonates, including but not limited to sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, potassium carbonate, potassium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, calcium bicarbonate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium bicarbonate.
  • IV. Aqueous Decarbonation (Absorption) of CO2 from Gas Streams and its Conversion into Carbonate and Bicarbonate
  • As noted above, in certain embodiments, the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ an aqueous decarbonation process via Absorption/Carbonation Column 110 and Bubble/Bicarbonation Column 111, whereby gaseous CO2 is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture where it then reacts with the hydroxide to form carbonate and bicarbonate products. In many embodiments of the present disclosure, sodium hydroxide is used as the primary absorbent fluid. Sodium hydroxide, in various concentrations, is known to readily scrub CO2. When carbon dioxide is brought into contact with aqueous sodium hydroxide, a range of products from pure sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) to pure sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) can be formed, and differing conditions can be produced that will drive the equilibrium in either direction. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, most or nearly all of the carbon dioxide is reacted in this manner. In some embodiments, the reaction may proceed to completion (or its near vicinity) and sufficient concentration of the desired carbonate product may be achieved (by either process chemistry or removal of water by various means) in order to cause precipitation of bicarbonate, carbonate, or a mixture of both.
  • In some embodiments, when carbon dioxide is brought into contact with aqueous sodium hydroxide, the fluid within the reaction columns approximates the behavior shown in equation 13. The two reaction process that take place are:
      • 1. An initial absorption phase in which CO2 is readily absorbed: As CO2 enters the liquid, it absorbs into the fluid to form carbonic acid, which then reacts with hydroxide. The absorption ability of the fluid declines as the OH concentration declines, and absorption ends and in some instances reverses when the OH concentration is consumed. The reaction, shown in equation 12 above, is exothermic during this portion and forms almost exclusively carbonate.
      • 2. A secondary conversion phase in which CO2 is absorbed, but less favorably than the previous step. As CO2 enters the liquid, it forms carbonic acid. This carbonic acid then reacts with the entering carbonate solution, forming a sodium bicarbonate solution by the following net stoichiometry:

  • Na2CO3(aq)+H2O(l)+CO2(aq)→2NaHCO3(aq)  (13)
  • In various embodiments, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the formation of bicarbonate occurs in two separate columns, with one column being used to produce sodium carbonate and the other chamber being used to produce sodium bicarbonate. In various embodiments, each chamber can be a spray-tower, a packed or unpacked bubble column or a series thereof, or any other mixing configuration suitable to bring the hydroxide solution or carbonate solution in effective contact with the gas stream for absorption to carbonate in the case of Column 110 and conversion to bicarbonate in the case of Column 111.
  • In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a broad range in the amount of bicarbonate/carbonate/caustic/bleach/other desirable products may be produced in the overall system. However, the amount of bicarbonate required for scrubbing acid gases is dependent on the composition of the gas stream. In certain embodiments, higher concentrations of sulfur-based and/or nitrogen-based acid gases can require more sodium bicarbonate to be directed to Scrubber 105, and conversely, lower concentrations require less.
  • These methods and devices can be further modified, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art. Such principles and techniques are taught, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,374, filed Sep. 22, 2005, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed Sep. 20, 2005; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed Jan. 10, 2005; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed Sep. 23, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/235,482, filed Sep. 22, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed Sep. 20, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed Feb. 29, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed Mar. 3, 2008, International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed Sep. 19, 2008, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0202516, filed Jan. 11, 2013. The entire text of each of the above-referenced disclosures (including any appendices) is specifically incorporated by reference herein without disclaimer.
  • V. Separation of Products
  • With regard to the Column 110 and/or 111 liquid stream, the formation of sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3 or sodium bicarbonate) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3 or soda ash) occurs over a wide range of temperatures and pressures and provides different end-points of the equilibrium given different partial pressures of CO2. By manipulating one or more of the basic concentration, reagent and/or gas flow rates, temperature, pressure, and fluid depth, formation of carbonate and/or bicarbonate precipitants may occur. In various embodiments, the reagent flow rates and/or the gas flow rates can be altered to cause the formation of carbonate and/or bicarbonate precipitants. Moreover, carbonate/bicarbonate precipitants may be separated from the liquid phase or dried by mechanical separation (e.g., a centrifuge) and/or the exchange of heat energy with incoming gases, in some embodiments. Alternatively or in addition thereto, in certain embodiments the heat for the separation process may be derived from the hydrogen produced in the original electrolysis.
  • The exiting liquid stream from the Column 110 and/or 111, depending upon absorber/system design, may include water, NaHCO3, Na2CO3, and other dissolved gases in various equilibria. In one embodiment, to separate/remove the exiting liquid streams, e.g., removing/separating the water from the carbonates (in this sense of the word, “carbonates” means mixtures of carbonate and bicarbonate) may include mechanical separation (such as centrifuge separation) and/or adding heat energy to evaporate water from the mixture. In other embodiments, pure carbonate, pure bicarbonate, and mixtures of the two in equilibrium concentrations and/or in a slurry or concentrated form may then be periodically transported to storage tanks and/or trucks/tank-cars. In other embodiments, the liquid streams may be displaced to evaporation tanks/fields, where the liquid, such as water, may be carried off by evaporation.
  • In a precipitation method according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure, the water in the liquid phase binds carbon dioxide, causing the gas to be absorbed on contact, with a substantially instantaneous conversion to carbonate ion. This phase of the reaction chain may be mass-transport limited such that once the carbon-dioxide has been absorbed, the subsequent ionic reaction occurs at rapid pace. However, for the formation of bicarbonate, the reaction is reaction rate limited. Therefore, a system that separates these two phases as described herein can be more efficient, particularly for obtaining higher purity precipitants.
  • With regard to Scrubber 105 liquid stream, the composition of the exiting liquid stream from Scrubber 105 largely depends on the contents of the gas stream. The exiting liquid stream may include water, Na2SO4, NaNO3, NaCl, NaOCl, NaHCO3, and other dissolved gases in various equilibria.
  • In one embodiment, to separate/dispose of the exiting liquid streams, e.g., removing/separating the water from the nitrates and sulfates, can involve heating the liquid to evaporate the water. In another embodiment, the sulfate can be isolated by passing the liquid stream through a sulfate recovery process that separates sulfates from NaCl and then add CaCl2 to convert the Na2SO4 to CaSO4, which precipitates. Similarly, in other embodiments, the aqueous phase can be reacted with ammonia to generate ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium nitrate according to equations 17 and 18, such as in Fertilizer Generating Unit 150. In this manner, bicarbonate can be regenerated. In addition, the ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium nitrate products can be utilized as a fertilizer.

  • Na2SO4(aq)+2NH3(aq)+2H2O(l)+2CO2(g)→(NH4)2SO4(aq)+2NaHCO3(s)  (17)

  • NaNO3(aq)+NH3(aq)+H2O(l)+CO2(g)→NH4NO3(aq)+NaHCO3(s)  (18)
  • In other embodiments, the liquid streams may be displaced to evaporation tanks/fields, where the liquid, such as water, may be carried off by evaporation.
  • VI. Electrolysis for the Production of Absorbent Fluids at Low Energies
  • As noted above, in certain embodiments, the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ a Chlor-alkali Cell 120 for production of the sodium hydroxide that is used as the absorbent fluid in the decarbonation process. Chlor-alkali electrolysis is an electrochemical process primarily used in the production of concentrated sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) and chlorine gas, and is typically described throughout the relevant literature by equation 14:

  • 2NaCl+2H2O→2NaOH+H2+Cl2  (14)
  • Such electrolysis is typically accomplished by three general types of standard electrolysis cells: diaphragm, mercury, and membrane cells. Each of these types of cells produces the same output products from the same input reactants. They differ from each other primarily in the way the reactants and products are separated from each other.
  • In one embodiment, a membrane cell may be used due to several factors. First, environmental concerns over mercury have reduced the demand for the mercury cell. Second, the diaphragm cells may produce a relatively weak caustic product which contains significant concentrations of salt and chloride ion and requires considerable subsequent reprocessing/separation to remove the significant salt content from the caustic. Third, improvements in fluorinated polymer technology have increased the life-time and electrical efficiency of membrane cell technology, where membrane lifetimes in excess of five years are routinely guaranteed in the industrial markets. Further, the power-per-ton-of-caustic efficiencies exceed those of both diaphragm and mercury cells in preferred implementations.
  • Many preferred embodiments may employ membrane cells in this function. Membrane cells have several advantages over other chlor-alkali electrolysis processes. First, membrane cells neither contain nor produce any environmentally sensitive emissions (e.g., mercury) and are electrically efficient when compared with diaphragm and mercury cells. They also employ a concentrated/dilute/make-up NaCl loop such that they may be well-suited for use as a continuous “salt loop” processing unit. Next, NaOH produced in membrane cells without further evaporation/concentration may be a naturally appropriate level of concentration for use in a decarbonation process (e.g., 30-33% NaOH by weight). Membrane cell technology may also be easily scaled from laboratory to plant-size production by the addition of small incremental units.
  • Further, hydrogen produced by membrane cells is “clean,” approximately “electronic grade,” and relatively clear of NaCl or other contamination. As such, hydrogen may be compressed and tanked off as electronic-grade H2 gas, used for power-production on-site such as combustion mix with low-grade coal or for combustion-technology gains. Alternatively, the hydrogen may be used for a boiler fuel for the separation processes. Additionally, chlorine gas produced by the membrane process is less “wet” than that produced by other standard electrolytic processes. As such, a one-stage compression cycle may be sufficient for production of water-treatment grade chlorine.
  • In certain embodiments, acid is added to the solution before it is electrolyzed. The acid can be any form of acid that can provide protonation to the solution, including but not limited to hydrochloric acid. Those of ordinary skill will understand that it is possible to obtain similar chemistry and electrolysis with any number of acids or mixtures of acids. In some embodiments, the acid is hydrochloric acid generated in Burner 140 through the combustion of byproducts, H2 and Cl2. The amount of acid added to the solution can be based on a determination of the optimum protonation rate that achieves the lowest energy to produce reactants and the highest energy to recover from products.
  • These methods and devices can be further modified, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art. Such principles and techniques, including techniques for using low-voltage electrolysis (LVE) to improve the thermodynamic efficiency of the process, are taught, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,374, filed Sep. 22, 2005, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed Sep. 20, 2005; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed Jan. 10, 2005; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed Sep. 23, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/235,482, filed Sep. 22, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed Sep. 20, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed Feb. 29, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed Mar. 3, 2008, International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed Sep. 19, 2008, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0202516, filed Jan. 11, 2013. The entire text of each of the above-referenced disclosures (including any appendices) is specifically incorporated by reference herein without disclaimer.
  • VII. Production of Hypochlorite
  • As noted above, in certain embodiments, the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure employ a Hypochlorite Reactor 130. Chlorine gas generated in the chlor-alkali process in Cell 120 is collected and moved to Hypochlorite Reactor 130 and/or HCl Burner 140. The chlorine gas delivered to Hypochlorite Reactor 130 is contacted (bubbled) through a sodium hydroxide solution delivered directly or indirectly from Chlor-alkali Cell 120. Sodium hypochlorite solution results and can be used as the absorbent solution, along with a bicarbonate solution generated in Conversion/Bicarbonation Column 111, in Scrubber 105 and/or trucked to market.
  • VIII. Recovery of Waste-Heat
  • Because certain embodiments of the present disclosure are employed in the presence of a power-plant or large emission of CO2 in the form of flue-gas or other hot gases from combustion, there may be ample opportunity to utilize this ‘waste’ heat in the optimization of the electro-chemical cell, unlike standard chlor-alkali processes. For instance, a typical incoming flue-gas temperature (after electro-static precipitation treatment, for instance) might well be 300° C. A system in accordance with the present disclosure can comprise heat exchangers adapted to lower that flue-gas to a point less than 300° C., while warming the anolyte and catholyte fluids (which, for LVE, should generally be retained >87.5° C.). This facilitates operation without the power-losses associated with anolyte and catholyte heaters.
  • Generally, since the flue-gas available at power-plant exits at temperatures between 100° C. (scrubbed typical), 300° C. (after precipitation processing), and 900° C. (precipitation entrance), or other such temperatures, considerable waste-heat processing can be extracted by cooling the incoming flue-gas through heat-exchange with a power-recovery cycle, of which an example is an ammonia-water cycle (“Kalina” cycle, for example), a steam cycle, or any such cycle that accomplishes the same thermodynamic means. Since some embodiments of the present disclosure rely upon DC power to accomplish the manufacture of the reagent/absorbent for the present disclosure, the process can be directly powered, partially or wholly, by waste-heat recovery that is accomplished without the normal transformer losses associated with converting that DC power to AC power for other uses. Further, through the use of waste-heat-to-work engines, significant efficiencies can be accomplished without an electricity generation step being employed at all. In some conditions, these waste-heat recovery energy quantities may be found to entirely power embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Waste-heat recovery from other processes of the systems may also be employed similarly to gain efficiencies at other points in the system.
  • The above specifications and examples provide a complete description of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments. Although certain embodiments have been described above with a certain degree of particularity, or with reference to one or more individual embodiments, those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the scope of this disclosure. As such, the illustrative embodiments of the present apparatuses, systems, and methods are not intended to be limiting. Rather, the present devices, systems, and methods include all modifications and alternatives falling within the scope of the claims, and embodiments other than those shown may include some or all of the features of the depicted embodiments. For example, components may be combined as a unitary structure and/or connections may be substituted. Further, where appropriate, aspects of any of the examples described above may be combined with aspects of any of the other examples described to form further examples having comparable or different properties and addressing the same or different problems. Similarly, it will be understood that the benefits and advantages described above may relate to one embodiment or may relate to several embodiments.
  • The claims are not to be interpreted as including means-plus- or step-plus-function limitations, unless such a limitation is explicitly recited in a given claim using the phrase(s) “means for” or “step for,” respectively.

Claims (39)

1. A system for effectively reducing pollutants from a gas stream comprising:
a first set of mixing equipment adapted to admix a hydroxide with a gas stream to create a first admixture in which carbon dioxide in the gas stream can react with a hydroxide to produce a bicarbonate product or a combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products in a first liquid outflow and
a second set of mixing equipment adapted admix a hypochlorite and the bicarbonate product or the combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products with the gas stream to create a second admixture in which nitrogen-based or sulfur-based acid gases can react with the hypochlorite and the bicarbonate product or the combination of bicarbonate and carbonate products to produce nitrate or sulfate products in a second liquid outflow,
wherein a gas stream flows through the second set of mixing equipment before at least a portion of the gas stream flows through the first set of mixing equipment.
2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a conduit adapted to transfer the liquid outflow to the second set of mixing equipment to create the second admixture.
3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a chlor-alkali cell adapted to electrochemically produce the hydroxide with a protonated brine solution, wherein the chlor-alkali cell is in fluid communication with the first set of mixing equipment.
4. The system of claim 3, further comprising a third set of mixing equipment adapted to admix hydroxide from the chlor-alkali cell with chlorine gas from the chlor-alkali cell, wherein the chlor-alkali cell is in fluid communication with the third set of mixing equipment and wherein the third set of mixing equipment is in fluid communication with the second set of mixing equipment.
5. The system of claim 3, further comprising a fourth set of mixing equipment adapted to admix hydroxide from the chlor-alkali cell with the gas stream before at least a portion of the gas stream flows through the first set of mixing equipment.
6. The system of claim 3, further comprising a burner adapted to combust hydrogen gas and chlorine gas from the chlor-alkali cell to produce hydrochloric acid.
7. The system of claim 4, wherein at least a portion of the hydrochloric acid is in communication with the chlor-alkali cell to protonate a brine solution.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the gas stream is a natural gas stream or a flue-gas stream.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the acid gas is NOx, SOx, or H2S.
10. The system of claim 9, further comprising a fifth set of mixing equipment adapted to convert the sulfate or nitrate products to ammonium sulfate or ammonium nitrate.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the acid gas is SOx or H2S.
12. The system of claim 11, further comprising a fifth set of mixing equipment adapted to separate the sulfate products from the second liquid outflow and form calcium sulfate in solid form.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the acid gas is NOx.
14. The system of claim 13, further comprising a fifth set of mixing equipment adapted to convert the nitrate products to ammonium nitrate.
15. The system of claim 1, wherein the second admixture comprises about 0.5% by weight to about 5% by weight of hypochlorite and about 0.5% by weight to about 5% by weight of bicarbonate.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate is about 1:1 to about 5:1.
17. The system of claim 1, wherein the first set of mixing equipment comprises two phases:
a first phase adapted to admix the hydroxide with a portion of the gas stream exiting the second set of mixing equipment to produce carbonate products in a first phase liquid outflow and
a second phase adapted to admix the first phase liquid outflow with another portion of the gas stream exiting the second set of mixing equipment to produce bicarbonate products in the first liquid outflow.
18. The system of claim 1, wherein the hypochlorite is in the form of sodium hypochlorite and the hydroxide is in the form of sodium hydroxide.
19. A method of effectively reducing an amount of pollutants from a gas stream comprising
(a) obtaining a hydroxide in an aqueous mixture;
(b) obtaining a hypochlorite in an aqueous mixture;
(c) admixing the hydroxide with carbon dioxide in the gas stream to produce bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products in a first admixture, thereby sequestering the carbon dioxide in a mineral product form; and
(d) admixing the hypochlorite and at least a portion of the bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products from the first admixture with a sulfur-based or nitrogen-based acid gas in the gas stream to produce nitrate or sulfate product in a second admixture, thereby sequestering the acid gas.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein step (c) comprises altering the reaction equilibrium to favor the production of bicarbonate products.
21. The method of claim 19, wherein obtaining the hydroxide comprises:
obtaining a group-1 or group-2 salt;
admixing the salt with acid and water, acid and steam, or acid, water, and steam to produce a protonated salt solution; and electrolyzing the protonated salt solution to produce the hydroxide, a hydrogen gas, and a chlorine gas.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein obtaining the hypochlorite comprises:
admixing the hydroxide with the chlorine gas to produce the hypochlorite.
23. The method of claim 22, further comprising obtaining the hydroxide in a second aqueous mixture and spraying the aqueous mixture to admix with the gas stream before the gas stream is admixed in step (c) and after the gas stream is admixed in step (d).
24. The method of claim 22, further comprising obtaining the hydroxide in a second aqueous mixture and spraying the aqueous mixture to admix with the gas stream before the gas stream is admixed in step (c) and step (d).
25. The method of claim 21, further comprising reacting the hydrogen gas and the chlorine gas to produce hydrochloric acid.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the protonated salt solution comprises at least a portion of the hydrochloric acid.
27. The method of claim 19, wherein the gas stream is a natural gas stream or a flue-gas stream.
28. The method of claim 19, wherein the acid gas is NOx, SOx, or H2S.
29. The method of claim 28, further comprising reacting the sulfate or nitrate products with ammonia and carbon dioxide to produce a bicarbonate and ammonium sulfate or ammonium nitrate.
30. The method of claim 19, wherein the acid gas is SOx or H2S.
31. The method of claim 30, further comprising separating the sulfate products from the second liquid outflow and converting the sulfate products to calcium sulfate.
32. The method of claim 19, wherein the acid gas is NOx.
33. The method of claim 32, further comprising a fifth set of mixing equipment adapted to convert the nitrate products to ammonium nitrate.
34. The method of claim 19, wherein admixing the hypochlorite and at least a portion of the bicarbonate products or a combination of carbonate and bicarbonate products comprises admixing a solution or the combination of solutions comprising 0.5% by weight to about 5% by weight of hypochlorite and about 0.5% by weight to about 5% by weight of bicarbonate.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate is about 1:1 to about 5:1.
36. The method of claim 19, wherein the hypochlorite is in the form of sodium hypochlorite and the hydroxide is in the form of sodium hydroxide.
37. A method to scrubbing natural gas stream, wherein the scrubbing phase consists essentially of
admixing hypochlorite and bicarbonate with a sulfur-based or nitrogen-based acid gas in the natural gas stream to produce nitrate or sulfate product in an admixture, thereby sequestering the acid gas.
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the concentration of hypochlorite is 0.5% by weight to 5% by weight and the concentration of bicarbonate is 0.5% by weight to 5% by weight.
39. The method of claim 38, wherein the molar ratio of hypochlorite to bicarbonate is about 1:1 to about 5:1.
US15/977,630 2014-01-17 2018-05-11 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream Abandoned US20180257032A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/977,630 US20180257032A1 (en) 2014-01-17 2018-05-11 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201461928965P 2014-01-17 2014-01-17
US14/599,137 US9968883B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2015-01-16 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream
US15/977,630 US20180257032A1 (en) 2014-01-17 2018-05-11 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/599,137 Continuation US9968883B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2015-01-16 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180257032A1 true US20180257032A1 (en) 2018-09-13

Family

ID=53543481

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/599,137 Active 2035-11-22 US9968883B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2015-01-16 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream
US15/977,630 Abandoned US20180257032A1 (en) 2014-01-17 2018-05-11 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/599,137 Active 2035-11-22 US9968883B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2015-01-16 Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US9968883B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3094401A4 (en)
CN (1) CN106061583A (en)
AR (1) AR099387A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2937108A1 (en)
TW (1) TW201532658A (en)
WO (1) WO2015109190A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT202000024397A1 (en) * 2020-10-15 2022-04-15 Domenico Flagiello OXIDATIVE WET WASHING OF SOX AND NOX ARISING FROM COMBUSTION SMOKE USING SODIUM CHLORITE AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS.
DE102022119806A1 (en) 2022-08-05 2024-02-08 Metaliq GmbH Process and system for producing sodium carbonate

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9144769B2 (en) 2012-01-09 2015-09-29 Scio-Tech, Llc Removal of atmospheric pollutants from gas, related apparatus, processes and uses thereof
US9981241B2 (en) 2012-01-09 2018-05-29 Alloys Cleaning, Inc. Removal of atmospheric pollutants from gas, related apparatuses, processes and uses thereof
EP2802407B1 (en) * 2012-01-09 2018-10-31 Alloy Cleaning, Inc Removal of atmospheric pollutants from gas and related apparatus
CN107531500A (en) 2015-02-23 2018-01-02 无碳化工控股有限责任公司 The regeneration of the carbon dioxide sequestration and magnesium hydroxide that are carried out using magnesium hydroxide
CN106179225A (en) * 2016-08-22 2016-12-07 陈永桥 A kind of novel nitrogen oxide adsorbent and preparation method thereof
CN107042062A (en) * 2017-01-19 2017-08-15 四川京典能源科技有限公司 Gas sweetening method of denitration
US11097221B2 (en) 2018-10-05 2021-08-24 8 Rivers Capital, Llc Direct gas capture systems and methods of use thereof
EP3914376A4 (en) * 2019-01-28 2023-02-15 Richardson, Robert George Chemical sequestering of co2, nox and so2
KR20220038076A (en) 2019-07-03 2022-03-25 8 리버스 캐피탈, 엘엘씨 Alkaline Removal of CO2 from Gas Streams with Simultaneous Generation of Chemicals
CN111924807A (en) * 2020-05-26 2020-11-13 萍乡市华星环保工程技术有限公司 Method and device for trapping carbon dioxide and simultaneously producing sulfuric acid by sodium bisulfate
CN112957902A (en) * 2021-02-05 2021-06-15 中国华能集团清洁能源技术研究院有限公司 System and method for absorbing carbon dioxide in thermal power plant flue gas caustic soda solution
CN112957892B (en) * 2021-02-05 2022-09-20 中国华能集团清洁能源技术研究院有限公司 System and method for absorbing carbon dioxide in boiler flue gas
CN112957901A (en) * 2021-03-17 2021-06-15 辽宁工程技术大学 Absorbent for removing coal seam hydrogen sulfide and coal seam sulfur elements and preparation method thereof
CN115159555B (en) * 2022-08-01 2023-12-22 华中科技大学 Method and system for treating solid waste incineration flue gas

Family Cites Families (130)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1918153A (en) 1931-03-18 1933-07-11 Pure Oil Co Process for extracting hydrogen sulphide from refinery gases
US2383674A (en) 1941-08-21 1945-08-28 Hooker Electrochemical Co Process for production of sodium bicarbonate
US2357130A (en) 1942-05-05 1944-08-29 Harbison Walker Refractories Production of magnesium chloride from calcium chloride and dolomite
US3801698A (en) 1971-01-18 1974-04-02 Stone & Webster Eng Corp Removal of acidic gases from hydrocarbon streams
US3934012A (en) 1972-06-19 1976-01-20 Texaco Inc. Method of separating hydrogen sulfide from carbon dioxide
US3864236A (en) 1972-09-29 1975-02-04 Hooker Chemicals Plastics Corp Apparatus for the electrolytic production of alkali
US4147599A (en) 1977-07-19 1979-04-03 Diamond Shamrock Corporation Production of alkali metal carbonates in a cell having a carboxyl membrane
US3855398A (en) 1973-04-12 1974-12-17 Allied Chem Sodium carbonate and bicarbonate sperulites from chlorine electrolytic cell liquors
AR208406A1 (en) 1974-05-22 1976-12-27 Rhone Poulenc Ind PROCEDURE AND APPARATUS TO OBTAIN SODIUM BICARBONATE
DE2528611C3 (en) 1975-06-26 1981-09-17 Bayer Ag, 5090 Leverkusen Process and device for the continuous production of crystals
JPS5284194A (en) 1975-12-30 1977-07-13 Asahi Glass Co Ltd Electrolysis of alkali chloride
JPS5285997A (en) 1976-01-09 1977-07-16 Sumitomo Chem Co Ltd Purification of alkali
US4069117A (en) 1976-01-28 1978-01-17 Cooper Hal B H Process for removing and recovering acidic gases from gaseous mixtures containing them
CA1129628A (en) * 1976-08-16 1982-08-17 Hal B.H. Cooper Removal and recovery of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide from gaseous mixtures containing them
US4128701A (en) 1977-12-23 1978-12-05 United Technologies Corp. Hydrogen/chlorine regenerative fuel cell
US4417961A (en) 1981-03-30 1983-11-29 The Dow Chemical Company Membrane cell brine feed
IT1155444B (en) 1982-12-23 1987-01-28 Zanussi A Spa Industrie ELECTROLYTIC DEVICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CHLORINE WATER
JPS6148587A (en) 1984-08-14 1986-03-10 Asahi Glass Co Ltd Method for adding hydrochloric acid to electrolytic cell
GB8423642D0 (en) 1984-09-19 1984-10-24 Ici Plc Electrolysis of alkali metal chloride solution
DE3481413D1 (en) 1984-11-27 1990-04-05 Sulzer Ag METHOD FOR PRODUCING HIGH PURITY MAGNESIUM OXIDE.
US4749453A (en) 1986-01-10 1988-06-07 The Boeing Company Method and apparatus for making hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide
US4764286A (en) 1986-06-26 1988-08-16 The Dow Chemical Company Catalytic decomposition of sodium hypochlorite in highly alkaline solutions
US5080799A (en) 1990-05-23 1992-01-14 Mobil Oil Corporation Hg removal from wastewater by regenerative adsorption
RU2019271C1 (en) 1992-04-28 1994-09-15 Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт углеводородного сырья Method for purification of pyrogas against carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide
RU2031695C1 (en) 1992-04-28 1995-03-27 Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт углеводородного сырья Method for purifying pyrogas against carbon and hydrogen sulfide
RU2054959C1 (en) 1992-06-24 1996-02-27 Научно-производственное объединение "Эмекат" Carbon oxide and hydrocarbons discharging gasses purification method and method to prepare catalyst for its realization
IL103918A (en) 1992-11-29 1996-10-16 Hamit Energy As Method for reducing atmospheric pollution caused by SO2
JP3329662B2 (en) 1996-06-18 2002-09-30 住友大阪セメント株式会社 Method for producing silica gel and silica sol
DE19631794A1 (en) 1996-08-07 1997-08-07 Peter Prof Pohl Removal of carbon di:oxide from exhaust gas of incinerators
US6908570B2 (en) 1996-08-14 2005-06-21 Discovery Resources, Inc. Compositions for improved recovery of metals
JPH1057745A (en) 1996-08-16 1998-03-03 Nippon Steel Corp Recovering and fixing method of carbon dioxide
US5888256A (en) 1996-09-11 1999-03-30 Morrison; Garrett L. Managed composition of waste-derived fuel
AR010696A1 (en) 1996-12-12 2000-06-28 Sasol Tech Pty Ltd A METHOD FOR THE ELIMINATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE FROM A PROCESS GAS
GEP19991612B (en) 1997-06-20 1999-04-29 Lili Svanidze Device for Removing Heavy Metals from Car Exhaust Gases
CA2288645A1 (en) 1998-06-08 1999-12-08 Airborne Industrial Minerals Inc. Method for removing hydrogen sulfide from natural gas
AU5568099A (en) 1998-08-18 2000-03-14 United States Department Of Energy Method and apparatus for extracting and sequestering carbon dioxide
US5980854A (en) 1998-09-23 1999-11-09 Noranda, Inc. Method for the production of a magnesium chloride solution
US6592829B2 (en) 1999-06-10 2003-07-15 Praxair Technology, Inc. Carbon dioxide recovery plant
CA2379709A1 (en) * 1999-07-19 2001-01-25 Ebara Corporation Acid gas scrubbing apparatus and method
US6340736B1 (en) 1999-11-29 2002-01-22 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for the production of polycarbonates with brine recycling
US6488740B1 (en) 2000-03-01 2002-12-03 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Apparatus and method for decreasing contaminants present in a flue gas stream
US6896865B2 (en) 2000-04-28 2005-05-24 Tosoh Corporation Method for recovering hydrogen chloride from chlorine based waste and use of recovered hydrogen chloride
KR100400179B1 (en) 2001-03-15 2003-10-01 김명한 Method of decoloration of blue jean adaptable to client's design
WO2002079084A1 (en) 2001-03-28 2002-10-10 Osaka Gas Co., Ltd. Carbon monoxide removal method, operating method for fuel reforming system, carbon monoxide remover, fuel reforming system having the carbon monoxide remover, and filter
JP4975908B2 (en) 2001-04-02 2012-07-11 奥多摩工業株式会社 Method for producing calcium carbonate
RU2199374C1 (en) 2001-06-13 2003-02-27 Казанское открытое акционерное общество "Органический синтез" Method of alkali purification of pyrolysis gases
CA2352626A1 (en) 2001-07-12 2003-01-12 Co2 Solution Inc. Coupling for linking a hydrogen fuel cell to an enzyme bioreactor for processing and sequestering co2
US6676824B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2004-01-13 Hatch Associates Ltd. Process for purification of molten salt electrolytes
ATE393650T1 (en) 2001-08-01 2008-05-15 Bruce F Monzyk PHOTOLYTIC OXYGENATION UNIT WITH CARBON DIOXIDE FIXATION AND SEPARATION
US7427449B2 (en) 2001-10-23 2008-09-23 General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. Integrated oxygen generation and carbon dioxide absorption method apparatus and systems
US7361279B2 (en) 2002-07-26 2008-04-22 Mark Hernandez Removing metals from solution using metal binding compounds and sorbents therefor
US7922992B2 (en) 2002-09-13 2011-04-12 Ica Trinova, Llc Composition and method for producing carbon dioxide
US7628967B2 (en) 2002-10-01 2009-12-08 Airborne Industrial Minerals, Inc. Removal of Hg, NOx, and SOx with using oxidants and staged gas/liquid contact
US20040126293A1 (en) 2002-10-23 2004-07-01 Geerlings Jacobus Johannes Cornelis Process for removal of carbon dioxide from flue gases
GEP20043357B (en) 2002-10-23 2004-03-10 Device for Purification of Industrial Gases from Metals
DE10255239A1 (en) 2002-11-26 2004-06-09 Basf Ag Process for the removal of mercury from solutions contaminated with mercury
JP2004174369A (en) 2002-11-27 2004-06-24 Meidensha Corp Gas treatment method and system therefor
WO2004094023A2 (en) 2003-04-21 2004-11-04 Manufacturing And Technology Conversion, Inc. Process for the treatment of waste or gaseous streams
US20040213705A1 (en) 2003-04-23 2004-10-28 Blencoe James G. Carbonation of metal silicates for long-term CO2 sequestration
US7132090B2 (en) 2003-05-02 2006-11-07 General Motors Corporation Sequestration of carbon dioxide
US7604787B2 (en) 2003-05-02 2009-10-20 The Penn State Research Foundation Process for sequestering carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide
JP2004352587A (en) 2003-05-30 2004-12-16 Toshiba Corp System and method for recovering carbon dioxide in exhaust gas
US20050011770A1 (en) 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Tatenuma Katsuyoshi Reduction method of atmospheric carbon dioxide, recovery and removal method of carbonate contained in seawater, and disposal method of the recovered carbonate
FR2863911B1 (en) 2003-12-23 2006-04-07 Inst Francais Du Petrole CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROCESS IN THE FORM OF A MINERAL IN WHICH THE CARBON IS AT THE DEGREE OF OXIDATION +3
WO2006009600A2 (en) 2004-05-04 2006-01-26 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Systems and methods for extraction of carbon dioxide from air
US7699909B2 (en) 2004-05-04 2010-04-20 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Systems and methods for extraction of carbon dioxide from air
US7947239B2 (en) 2004-05-04 2011-05-24 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Carbon dioxide capture and mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions
NO20042646D0 (en) 2004-05-12 2004-06-23 Promeks As Improved process for the production of pure amorphous silica especially zerogel for stabilization of ol, as well as for insulation formula
WO2006023743A2 (en) 2004-08-20 2006-03-02 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Laminar scrubber apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from air and methods of use
EP1793913A2 (en) 2004-08-20 2007-06-13 Global Research Technologies, LLC Removal of carbon dioxide from air
US20060051274A1 (en) 2004-08-23 2006-03-09 Wright Allen B Removal of carbon dioxide from air
US7727374B2 (en) 2004-09-23 2010-06-01 Skyonic Corporation Removing carbon dioxide from waste streams through co-generation of carbonate and/or bicarbonate minerals
CN101128248A (en) 2005-02-02 2008-02-20 环球研究技术有限公司 Removal of carbon dioxide from air
US8864876B2 (en) 2005-02-14 2014-10-21 Neumann Systems Group, Inc. Indirect and direct method of sequestering contaminates
FR2882998B1 (en) 2005-03-08 2007-06-08 Solvay PROCESS FOR OBTAINING SODIUM CARBONATE CRYSTALS
US20130213280A9 (en) 2005-04-18 2013-08-22 Klaus S. Lackner Methods and systems for reducing carbon dioxide emissions
US7909911B2 (en) 2007-10-18 2011-03-22 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Carbon dioxide permeable membrane
EP1879693A4 (en) 2005-04-18 2010-06-30 Univ Columbia Methods and systems for reducing emissions
US7371357B2 (en) 2005-04-27 2008-05-13 Clean World Strategies Corp. Process for removal of pollutants
US7713399B2 (en) * 2005-05-12 2010-05-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for treating a sulfur-containing spent caustic refinery stream using a membrane electrolyzer powered by a fuel cell
EP1899043A4 (en) 2005-07-05 2011-03-23 Greensols Australia Pty Ltd Preparation and use of cationic halides, sequestration of carbon dioxide
US20070187247A1 (en) 2005-07-20 2007-08-16 Lackner Klaus S Electrochemical methods and processes for carbon dioxide recovery from alkaline solvents for carbon dioxide capture from air
CA2616701C (en) 2005-07-28 2018-10-02 Global Research Technologies, Llc Removal of carbon dioxide from air
DE602006016988D1 (en) 2005-12-20 2010-10-28 Shell Int Research METHOD FOR SEQUESTRATING CARBON DIOXIDE
AU2007233275B2 (en) 2006-03-08 2012-07-26 Carbon Sink, Inc. Air collector with functionalized ion exchange membrane for capturing ambient CO2
EP2438978B1 (en) 2006-03-10 2013-11-13 C-Quest Technologies International LLC Method for recycling industrial by-products
ATE545456T1 (en) 2006-04-27 2012-03-15 Harvard College CARBON DIOXIDE COLLECTION AND RELATED METHODS
KR20090086530A (en) 2006-10-02 2009-08-13 글로벌 리서치 테크놀로지스, 엘엘씨 Method and apparatus for extracting carbon dioxide from air
AU2007319211A1 (en) 2006-11-15 2008-05-22 Global Research Technologies, Llc Removal of carbon dioxide from air
US20090081096A1 (en) 2007-03-28 2009-03-26 Pellegrin Roy J Method and means for capture and long-term sequestration of carbon dioxide
CA2682952C (en) 2007-04-03 2016-06-14 New Sky Energy, Inc. Electrochemical system, apparatus, and method to generate renewable hydrogen and sequester carbon dioxide
US8715393B2 (en) 2007-04-17 2014-05-06 Kilimanjaro Energy, Inc. Capture of carbon dioxide (CO2) from air
EA200901435A1 (en) 2007-05-24 2010-06-30 Калера Корпорейшн HYDRAULIC CEMENTS CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS OF CARBONATE COMPOUNDS
JP2010531732A (en) 2007-06-28 2010-09-30 カレラ コーポレイション Desalination method including precipitation of carbonate compounds
US7753618B2 (en) 2007-06-28 2010-07-13 Calera Corporation Rocks and aggregate, and methods of making and using the same
US20090074656A1 (en) 2007-09-18 2009-03-19 Calvin Billings Process for production of hydrogen from coal and other fossil fuels
RU2477168C2 (en) 2007-09-20 2013-03-10 Скайоник Корпорейшн Removal of carbon dioxide from flow of wastes by combined production of carbonate and/or bicarbonate minerals
US8012453B2 (en) 2007-10-25 2011-09-06 Surendra Saxena Carbon sequestration and production of hydrogen and hydride
WO2009061836A1 (en) 2007-11-05 2009-05-14 Global Research Technologies, Llc Removal of carbon dioxide from air
EP2070578A1 (en) 2007-12-14 2009-06-17 Université Joseph Fourier Process for the sequestration of CO2 by reaction with alkaline solid wastes
US7749476B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2010-07-06 Calera Corporation Production of carbonate-containing compositions from material comprising metal silicates
US7754169B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2010-07-13 Calera Corporation Methods and systems for utilizing waste sources of metal oxides
JP2012513944A (en) 2007-12-28 2012-06-21 カレラ コーポレイション How to capture CO2
WO2009102816A2 (en) 2008-02-11 2009-08-20 Auxsol, Inc. Removing carbon dioxide from gaseous emissions
US7919064B2 (en) 2008-02-12 2011-04-05 Michigan Technological University Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide in flue gases
CA2715874C (en) 2008-02-19 2019-06-25 Global Research Technologies, Llc Extraction and sequestration of carbon dioxide
WO2009146436A1 (en) 2008-05-29 2009-12-03 Calera Corporation Rocks and aggregate, and methods of making and using the same
US8999279B2 (en) 2008-06-04 2015-04-07 Carbon Sink, Inc. Laminar flow air collector with solid sorbent materials for capturing ambient CO2
US7993500B2 (en) 2008-07-16 2011-08-09 Calera Corporation Gas diffusion anode and CO2 cathode electrolyte system
CN104722466A (en) 2008-07-16 2015-06-24 卡勒拉公司 Low-energy 4-cell Electrochemical System With Carbon Dioxide Gas
WO2010019600A2 (en) 2008-08-11 2010-02-18 Global Research Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for extracting carbon dioxide from air
WO2010022399A1 (en) 2008-08-22 2010-02-25 Global Research Technologies, Llc Removal of carbon dioxide from air
US7842126B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2010-11-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy CO2 separation from low-temperature flue gases
US9133581B2 (en) 2008-10-31 2015-09-15 Calera Corporation Non-cementitious compositions comprising vaterite and methods thereof
EP2384520A1 (en) 2008-12-23 2011-11-09 Calera Corporation Low-energy electrochemical proton transfer system and method
CN101878327A (en) 2008-12-23 2010-11-03 卡勒拉公司 Low-energy electrochemical hydroxide system and method
CN101493007B (en) * 2008-12-30 2013-07-17 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 Natural gas separation and waste gas geological sequestration method based on mixed fluid self-separation
US8883104B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2014-11-11 Calera Corporation Gas stream multi-pollutants control systems and methods
WO2010104989A1 (en) 2009-03-10 2010-09-16 Calera Corporation Systems and methods for processing co2
US8967252B2 (en) 2009-05-11 2015-03-03 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Systems, methods, and devices for tagging carbon dioxide stored in geological formations
US20120220019A1 (en) 2009-07-23 2012-08-30 Lackner Klaus S Air collector with functionalized ion exchange membrane for capturing ambient co2
US20110091955A1 (en) * 2009-10-19 2011-04-21 Constantz Brent R Methods and systems for treating industrial waste gases
CN102762277A (en) 2009-12-18 2012-10-31 斯凯约尼克公司 Carbon dioxide sequestration through formation of group-2 carbonates and silicon dioxide
US8114214B2 (en) 2009-12-31 2012-02-14 Calera Corporation Methods and compositions using calcium carbonate
US20110243822A1 (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Airborne Technologies Inc. Flue gas clean up methods
KR101036553B1 (en) 2010-11-10 2011-05-24 한국지질자원연구원 Method for production of carbonate using carbon dioxide micro bubble and carbonate thereof
KR101126939B1 (en) 2011-09-14 2012-03-21 한국지질자원연구원 Methods of forming carbonate minerals and apparatus of forming the carbonate minerals
US8535630B2 (en) 2011-11-07 2013-09-17 Bechtel Power Corporation Method and apparatus for SOx and CO2 removal from flue gas
CN104284707A (en) 2012-01-11 2015-01-14 斯凯约尼克公司 Carbon dioxide sequestration involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes
US9714406B2 (en) 2012-09-04 2017-07-25 Blue Planet, Ltd. Carbon sequestration methods and systems, and compositions produced thereby

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT202000024397A1 (en) * 2020-10-15 2022-04-15 Domenico Flagiello OXIDATIVE WET WASHING OF SOX AND NOX ARISING FROM COMBUSTION SMOKE USING SODIUM CHLORITE AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS.
WO2022079596A1 (en) * 2020-10-15 2022-04-21 Boldrocchi S.R.L. Wet-oxidation scrubbing of sox and nox deriving from flue-gas using sodium chlorite aqueous solutions
DE102022119806A1 (en) 2022-08-05 2024-02-08 Metaliq GmbH Process and system for producing sodium carbonate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2937108A1 (en) 2015-07-23
EP3094401A4 (en) 2017-08-09
CN106061583A (en) 2016-10-26
US20150202568A1 (en) 2015-07-23
TW201532658A (en) 2015-09-01
WO2015109190A8 (en) 2016-02-18
WO2015109190A1 (en) 2015-07-23
AR099387A1 (en) 2016-07-20
EP3094401A1 (en) 2016-11-23
US9968883B2 (en) 2018-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9968883B2 (en) Systems and methods for acid gas removal from a gaseous stream
JP6145129B2 (en) Method for removing carbon dioxide from waste gas streams by simultaneous production of carbonate and / or bicarbonate minerals
JP4780730B2 (en) Removal of carbon dioxide from waste streams by simultaneous production of carbonate and / or bicarbonate minerals
US20110203939A1 (en) Carbon dioxide sequestration through formation of group-2 carbonates and silicon dioxide
ZA200703068B (en) Removing carbon dioxide from waste streams through co-generation of carbonate and/or bicarbonate minerals
WO2012122496A1 (en) Carbon dioxide sequestration methods using group 2 silicates and chlor-alkali processes
US10052584B2 (en) Water recycling in a CO2 removal process and system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SKYONIC CORPORATION, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YABLONSKY, AL;STOLA, ALEXANDER;GERMAIN, ADAM;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150115 TO 20150708;REEL/FRAME:046501/0408

Owner name: SKYONIC (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS),

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SKYONIC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:046501/0664

Effective date: 20161028

Owner name: CARBONFREE CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, LLC, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SKYONIC (ASSIGNMENT FOR BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC;REEL/FRAME:047031/0437

Effective date: 20161213

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION