JP5612532B2 - Steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness and method for producing the same - Google Patents
Steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness and method for producing the same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP5612532B2 JP5612532B2 JP2011098419A JP2011098419A JP5612532B2 JP 5612532 B2 JP5612532 B2 JP 5612532B2 JP 2011098419 A JP2011098419 A JP 2011098419A JP 2011098419 A JP2011098419 A JP 2011098419A JP 5612532 B2 JP5612532 B2 JP 5612532B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- cooling
- less
- temperature
- rolling
- plate thickness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/14—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing titanium or zirconium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D8/00—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
- C21D8/02—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
- C21D8/0221—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the working steps
- C21D8/0226—Hot rolling
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D8/00—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
- C21D8/02—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
- C21D8/0247—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the heat treatment
- C21D8/0263—Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the heat treatment following hot rolling
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/02—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/04—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/06—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/08—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing nickel
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/12—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, vanadium, or niobium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/42—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/44—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
Description
本発明は、(母材の)低温靭性および溶接継手(HAZ)破壊靭性に優れた鋼板およびその製造方法に関するものであり、例えば寒冷地の海洋構造物等に使用される場合であっても、優れた低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性を発揮する鋼板、およびその製造方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness (base metal) and welded joint (HAZ) fracture toughness, and a method for producing the same, for example, when used for offshore structures in cold regions, etc. The present invention relates to a steel sheet exhibiting excellent low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness, and a method for producing the same.
近年、石油等の資源の掘削や生産は、海洋の大水深域や寒冷域へ移行している。よってこの様な領域において、資源の掘削等に用いられる海洋構造物用の鋼板には、低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性に優れていることが要求される。 In recent years, drilling and production of resources such as oil have shifted to ocean deep water and cold regions. Therefore, in such a region, a steel plate for offshore structures used for resource excavation and the like is required to be excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness.
上記溶接継手破壊靭性を高めたものとして、例えば特許文献1がある。この特許文献1には、Ti、Nの化学成分値、TiNの粒径、及びその粒径の個数を規定することで、溶接熱影響部の破壊靱性に優れた高CTOD保証低温用鋼が得られる旨示されている。具体的には、溶接前の鋼材中に粒径0.01〜0.1μmのTiNが5×105〜5×106個/mm2存在し、かつ粒径0.5μm以上のTiNを10個/cm2以下とすればよいことが示されている。 For example, Patent Document 1 discloses an improved weld joint fracture toughness. In this Patent Document 1, by defining the chemical component values of Ti and N, the grain size of TiN, and the number of the grain sizes, a high CTOD guaranteed low temperature steel having excellent fracture toughness in the weld heat affected zone is obtained. Is shown. Specifically, TiN particle size 0.01~0.1μm in the steel material before welding 5 × 10 5 ~5 × 10 6 cells / mm 2 exists and a particle size 0.5μm or more TiN 10 It is shown that the number of particles / cm 2 or less is sufficient.
特許文献2には、極寒冷氷海域での海洋構造物などに適した鋼板が示されており、(a)有効結晶粒径の細粒化、(b)島状マルテンサイトの低減と微量Nbによる粒界焼入れ性の向上、(c)析出硬化の抑制、(d)HAZ硬さの低減、の4つを同時に組み合わせて実施することにより、多層盛溶接部のCTOD特性を著しく向上できた旨示されている。また、製造条件として、
(ア)鋼スラブを、950〜1300℃に加熱し、再結晶温度域で圧下率が10〜90%の粗圧延を行い、続いてAr3点以上の未再結晶温度域で圧下率が10〜90%の仕上圧延を行い、直ちに冷却速度が1〜50℃/sで650〜500℃まで制御冷却し、室温まで空冷するか、または、
(イ)鋼スラブを、950〜1300℃に加熱し、再結晶温度域で圧下率が10〜90%の粗圧延を行い、続いてAr3点以上の未再結晶温度域で圧下率が10〜90%の仕上圧延を行い、直ちに冷却速度が1〜50℃/sで200℃以下に制御冷却し、その後、500℃〜650℃で焼き戻しを行うことがあげられている。
Patent Document 2 discloses a steel sheet suitable for an offshore structure in an extremely cold ice sea area. (A) Fine grain size of effective crystal grain size, (b) Reduction of island martensite and trace Nb The effect of improving the grain boundary hardenability by the combination of (c) suppression of precipitation hardening, (d) reduction of HAZ hardness, and simultaneously improving the CTOD characteristics of the multi-layer welds has been achieved. It is shown. As manufacturing conditions,
(A) The steel slab is heated to 950 to 1300 ° C., rough rolling is performed with a reduction rate of 10 to 90% in the recrystallization temperature range, and then the reduction rate is 10 in the non-recrystallization temperature range of Ar 3 points or more. Perform ~ 90% finish rolling, immediately control cooling to 650-500 ° C. at a cooling rate of 1-50 ° C./s, air cool to room temperature, or
(A) The steel slab is heated to 950 to 1300 ° C., rough rolling is performed with a reduction rate of 10 to 90% in the recrystallization temperature range, and then the reduction rate is 10 in the non-recrystallization temperature range of Ar 3 points or more. It is mentioned that finish rolling of ˜90% is performed, the cooling is immediately controlled to 200 ° C. or less at a cooling rate of 1 to 50 ° C./s, and then tempering is performed at 500 to 650 ° C.
特許文献3には、低温靱性と溶接性に優れた厚手高張力鋼板の製造方法が示されており、規定の鋼を900〜1150℃に加熱し、中間段階厚さまで圧延して一旦圧延を中断して冷却するかまたは圧延せずスラブ状態のまま冷却し、表面温度がAr3を割る前に該鋼をAr3+150℃〜Ar3の温度に均一に保熱し、次いでAr3以上で圧下率50〜70%の圧延を行い、圧延後、冷却速度1〜10℃/secで250〜600℃まで冷却し、引き続き空冷する方法や、鋼を900〜1150℃に加熱し、中間段階厚さまで圧延して一旦圧延を中断して冷却するか、または圧延せずスラブ状態のまま冷却し表面温度がAr3を割る前に該鋼をAr3+150℃〜Ar3の温度に均一に保熱し、次いでAr3以上で圧下率50〜70%の圧延を行い、圧延後、冷却速度1〜10℃/secで250〜600℃まで冷却し、引き続き空冷する方法が提案されている。 Patent Document 3 shows a method for producing a thick high-tensile steel sheet excellent in low-temperature toughness and weldability. The specified steel is heated to 900 to 1150 ° C., rolled to an intermediate stage thickness, and the rolling is temporarily interrupted. to remain cool slab state or without rolling to cool, heated uniformly coercive the steel to a temperature of Ar 3 + 0.99 ° C. to Ar 3 before the surface temperature divided by Ar 3, then the rolling reduction at Ar 3 or more Rolling 50 to 70%, after rolling, cooling to 250 to 600 ° C at a cooling rate of 1 to 10 ° C / sec, followed by air cooling, or heating steel to 900 to 1150 ° C and rolling to intermediate thickness once or cooled to interrupt rolling, or uniformly heated holding the steel before cooling to the surface temperature remains slab state without rolling divide Ar 3 temperature of Ar 3 + 0.99 ° C. to Ar 3 are, then Reduction rate of 50 to 70% at Ar 3 or higher A method is proposed in which after rolling, after rolling, the steel is cooled to 250 to 600 ° C. at a cooling rate of 1 to 10 ° C./sec and then air-cooled.
特許文献4には、大入熱で溶接を行った場合にもHAZの低温靭性に優れると共に、母材(鋼板)の低温靭性にも優れた低降伏比高張力鋼板が示されており、その製造方法として、熱間圧延を行った後、鋼板の(Ar3変態点−40℃)を超える温度から10℃/秒以上の平均冷却速度で(Ar3変態点−40℃)以下の温度まで冷却し、当該温度で一旦冷却を中断して30〜150秒の空冷を行い、引き続きt/4(t:板厚)位置の温度が(Ar3変態点−80℃)〜(Ar3変態点−190℃)の温度範囲から350℃超、550℃以下の温度範囲まで10℃/秒以上の平均冷却速度で冷却することが示されている。 Patent Document 4 discloses a low-yield ratio high-tensile steel sheet that is excellent in low-temperature toughness of HAZ and excellent in low-temperature toughness of a base material (steel sheet) even when welding is performed with high heat input. As a manufacturing method, after performing hot rolling, from the temperature exceeding (Ar 3 transformation point −40 ° C.) of the steel sheet to the temperature below (Ar 3 transformation point −40 ° C.) at an average cooling rate of 10 ° C./second or more. After cooling, the cooling is temporarily interrupted at that temperature, and air cooling is performed for 30 to 150 seconds. Subsequently, the temperature at the t / 4 (t: plate thickness) position is (Ar 3 transformation point −80 ° C.) to (Ar 3 transformation point). It is shown that cooling is performed at an average cooling rate of 10 ° C./second or more from a temperature range of −190 ° C. to a temperature range of more than 350 ° C. and 550 ° C. or less.
しかし特許文献1〜4には、母材の低温靭性として、特に確保の困難な板厚中央部(t/2)C方向の低温靭性を高めると共に、溶接継手破壊靭性(HAZ−CTOD特性)を高めることについては検討されていない。 However, in Patent Documents 1 to 4, as the low-temperature toughness of the base material, the low-temperature toughness in the center direction (t / 2) C direction, which is particularly difficult to ensure, is enhanced, and the weld joint fracture toughness (HAZ-CTOD characteristics) is also provided. It is not considered to increase.
本発明は上記の様な事情に着目してなされたものであって、その目的は、従来の鋼板よりも優れた低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性を示す鋼板(特には、大水深域や寒冷域に建設される海洋構造物に好適に用いられる鋼板)と、該鋼板の製造方法を確立することにある。 The present invention has been made paying attention to the above-mentioned circumstances, and the purpose thereof is a steel plate (in particular, a deep water region or a cold region) exhibiting low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness superior to those of conventional steel plates. And a method of manufacturing the steel sheet.
上記課題を解決し得た本発明の低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性に優れた鋼板は、
C:0.02〜0.10%(「質量%」の意味。以下同じ)、
Si:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、
Mn:1.0〜2.0%、
Ni:0.10〜1%、
Nb:0.005〜0.03%、
Ti:0.005〜0.02%、
N:0.0030〜0.065%、
P:0.02%以下(0%を含まない)、
S:0.015%以下(0%を含まない)、および
Al:0.01〜0.06%
を満たし、残部が鉄および不可避不純物であって、
下記(A)〜(D)の全ての条件を満たし、引張強さが470MPa以上であるところに特徴を有する。
The steel sheet excellent in the low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness of the present invention that has solved the above problems is
C: 0.02 to 0.10% (meaning “mass%”; the same shall apply hereinafter)
Si: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%),
Mn: 1.0-2.0%,
Ni: 0.10 to 1%,
Nb: 0.005 to 0.03%,
Ti: 0.005 to 0.02%,
N: 0.0030 to 0.065%,
P: 0.02% or less (excluding 0%),
S: 0.015% or less (excluding 0%), and Al: 0.01 to 0.06%
And the balance is iron and inevitable impurities,
All the following conditions (A) to (D) are satisfied, and the tensile strength is 470 MPa or more.
(A)表面部、t/4部[tは板厚を示す。以下同じ]、およびt/2部において、アシキュラーフェライト分率を測定したときに、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最低値(Amin)が50面積%以上であり、かつ、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最高値(Amax)と前記最低値(Amin)の差が下記(1)式を満たす。
Amax−Amin≦20面積%・・・・・(1)
(B)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、2つの結晶の方位差が15°以上の大角粒界で囲まれた領域(大角結晶粒)の平均結晶粒径を測定したときに、該平均結晶粒径の最高値(Mmax)が40μm以下であり、かつ、前記最高値(Mmax)と前記平均結晶粒径の最低値(Mmin)の差が下記(2)式を満たす。
Mmax−Mmin<40μm・・・・・(2)
(C)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、硬さを測定したときに、硬さの最高値(Hvmax)と硬さの最低値(Hvmin)の差が下記(3)式を満たす。
Hvmax−Hvmin≦50・・・・・(3)
(D)JIS G 0901で規定の超音波探傷試験を、検出感度+12dBで全面探傷したときに、内部欠陥のUTエコー高さが50%以下である。
(A) Surface part, t / 4 part [t indicates the plate thickness. The same shall apply hereinafter), and when the fraction of the acicular ferrite is measured at part t / 2, the minimum value (Amin) of the acicular ferrite fraction is 50 area% or more and the highest acicular ferrite fraction The difference between the value (Amax) and the minimum value (Amin) satisfies the following formula (1).
Amax−Amin ≦ 20 area% (1)
(B) At the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the average crystal grain size of a region (large-angle crystal grain) surrounded by a large-angle grain boundary in which the orientation difference between the two crystals is 15 ° or more was measured. Sometimes, the maximum value (Mmax) of the average crystal grain size is 40 μm or less, and the difference between the maximum value (Mmax) and the minimum value (Mmin) of the average crystal grain size satisfies the following formula (2): .
Mmax−Mmin <40 μm (2)
(C) When the hardness is measured at the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the difference between the maximum hardness value (Hvmax) and the minimum hardness value (Hvmin) is the following (3) Satisfy the formula.
Hvmax−Hvmin ≦ 50 (3)
(D) When an ultrasonic flaw detection test specified in JIS G 0901 is subjected to full flaw detection with a detection sensitivity of +12 dB, the UT echo height of the internal defect is 50% or less.
上記鋼板は、更に他の元素として、
V:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、
B:0.0005〜0.003%、および
Ca:0.0005〜0.003%
よりなる群から選択される少なくとも1種の元素を含んでいてもよい。
The above steel plate is still another element,
V: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%),
B: 0.0005 to 0.003%, and Ca: 0.0005 to 0.003%
It may contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of:
また上記鋼板は、更に他の元素として、
Cu:0.3%以下(0%を含まない)、
Cr:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、および
Mo:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)
よりなる群から選択される少なくとも1種の元素を含んでいてもよい。
In addition, the steel plate, as another element,
Cu: 0.3% or less (excluding 0%),
Cr: 0.5% or less (not including 0%) and Mo: 0.5% or less (not including 0%)
It may contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of:
上記鋼板は、海洋構造物用として用いることができる。 The steel sheet can be used for offshore structures.
本発明は、上記鋼板の製造方法も規定するものであって、該製造方法は、上記成分組成を満たすスラブを用い、1050℃以上に加熱した後、第1熱間圧延、第1冷却、第2熱間圧延、および第2冷却を、それぞれ下記条件(a)〜(d)を満たすように順次行うところに特徴を有する。 The present invention also defines a method for manufacturing the steel sheet, and the manufacturing method uses a slab that satisfies the above component composition, and after heating to 1050 ° C. or higher, the first hot rolling, the first cooling, It is characterized in that the two hot rolling and the second cooling are sequentially performed so as to satisfy the following conditions (a) to (d), respectively.
(a)第1熱間圧延において、t/2部の温度が950℃以上の状態で圧下率が10%以上の最終パス圧延を行う。 (A) In the first hot rolling, the final pass rolling is performed at a reduction rate of 10% or more in a state where the temperature at t / 2 part is 950 ° C. or higher.
(b)第1冷却として、下記条件を満たす2段階冷却を行うことにより、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内にする。
(1段目冷却)0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度で0.5T秒以上[Tは、第1冷却の開始板厚(mm)を示す。以下同じ]1.5T秒以下冷却した後、空冷を0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下行う。
(2段目冷却)1段目冷却に引き続き、0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度で0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下冷却した後、空冷を0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下行う。
(B) As the first cooling, the temperature difference between the surface part and the t / 2 part is set within 70 ° C. by performing two-stage cooling satisfying the following conditions.
(First stage cooling) The thickness in the plate thickness direction average cooling rate of 0.6 ° C./s or more is 0.5 T seconds or more [T represents the starting plate thickness (mm) of the first cooling. The same applies hereinafter] After cooling for 1.5 T seconds or less, air cooling is performed for 0.5 T seconds to 1.5 T seconds.
(Second stage cooling) Following the first stage cooling, after cooling at an average cooling rate of 0.6 ° C./s or more in the plate thickness direction from 0.07 T seconds to 1.3 T seconds, the air cooling is performed from 0.07 T seconds to 1 Perform for 3T seconds or less.
(c)第2熱間圧延において、t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲の圧延を、下記(4)式を満たすように行う。
Q+(Ni+Nb)×10≧33・・・・・(4)
[上記(4)式において、
Q:t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲における累積圧下率(%)、
Ni:Ni含有量(質量%)、
Nb:Nb含有量(質量%)を示す。
尚、圧下率は、下記(5)式で求められるものである。
圧下率=100×(圧延開始前厚−圧延完了厚)/圧延開始前厚・・・・・(5)]
(C) In the second hot rolling, rolling in a temperature range where the temperature at t / 2 part is less than 950 ° C. is performed so as to satisfy the following expression (4).
Q + (Ni + Nb) × 10 ≧ 33 (4)
[In the above equation (4),
Q: Cumulative rolling reduction (%) in a temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is less than 950 ° C.
Ni: Ni content (mass%),
Nb: Nb content (% by mass).
In addition, the rolling reduction is obtained by the following equation (5).
Reduction ratio = 100 × (thickness before rolling start−thickness after rolling) / thickness before rolling start (5)]
(d)第2冷却として、表面部の温度がAr3変態点以上の温度域から、t/2部の温度が500℃以下の温度域までを、下記(6)式を満たす板厚方向平均冷却速度で冷却する。
板厚方向平均冷却速度≧6420t−1.60・・・・・(6)
[上記(6)式において、tは最終製品板厚(mm)を示す。
また、板厚方向平均冷却速度は、下記(7)式から求められるものである。
板厚方向平均冷却速度(℃/s)=(θs−θf)/τ・・・・・(7)
上記(7)式において、θsは冷却開始時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、θfは冷却停止時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、τは冷却時間(s)を示す。]
(D) As the second cooling, from the temperature range where the temperature of the surface part is equal to or higher than the Ar 3 transformation point to the temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is 500 ° C. or less, the plate thickness direction average satisfying the following expression (6) Cool at the cooling rate.
Average cooling rate in the plate thickness direction ≧ 6420t −1.60 (6)
[In the above formula (6), t represents the final product plate thickness (mm).
Moreover, the plate thickness direction average cooling rate is obtained from the following equation (7).
Plate thickness direction average cooling rate (° C./s)=(θs−θf)/τ (7)
In the above equation (7), θs represents the plate thickness direction average temperature (° C.) at the start of cooling, θf represents the plate thickness direction average temperature (° C.) at the time of cooling stop, and τ represents the cooling time (s). ]
本発明によれば、板厚方向によらず組織や硬さが一定であり、かつ鋼板内部の欠陥が抑制されているため、従来の鋼板よりも優れた低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性を兼備する。この様な本発明の鋼板は、特に、大水深域や寒冷域に建設される海洋構造物に好適に用いられる。 According to the present invention, the structure and hardness are constant regardless of the plate thickness direction, and defects inside the steel plate are suppressed, so that both low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness superior to conventional steel plates are combined. . Such a steel sheet of the present invention is particularly suitably used for offshore structures constructed in deep water or cold regions.
本発明者は、優れた低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性、具体的には、下記(I)および(II)を満たす鋼板を得るべく鋭意研究を重ねた。
(I)母材の優れた低温靭性として、後述する実施例で測定する板厚中央部(t/2)C方向のvTrsが、−100℃以下(好ましくは−110℃以下、より好ましくは−120℃以下、更に好ましくは−130℃以下)を示すこと。
(II)優れた溶接継手破壊靭性として、後述する実施例で測定するHAZ部の限界CTOD値(−10℃)(以下、この特性を「HAZ−CTOD特性」ということがある)が、0.46mm以上(好ましくは0.6mm以上、より好ましくは0.8mm以上、更に好ましくは1mm以上、特に好ましくは1.2mm以上)を示すこと。
This inventor repeated earnest research to obtain the steel plate which satisfy | fills the outstanding low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness, specifically, the following (I) and (II).
(I) As an excellent low temperature toughness of the base material, the vTrs in the thickness direction central portion (t / 2) C direction measured in Examples described later is −100 ° C. or lower (preferably −110 ° C. or lower, more preferably − 120 ° C. or lower, more preferably −130 ° C. or lower).
(II) As an excellent weld joint fracture toughness, the critical CTOD value (−10 ° C.) of the HAZ part measured in Examples described later (hereinafter, this characteristic may be referred to as “HAZ-CTOD characteristic”) is 0. 46 mm or more (preferably 0.6 mm or more, more preferably 0.8 mm or more, still more preferably 1 mm or more, particularly preferably 1.2 mm or more).
尚、本発明で、上記(I)の低温靭性の評価位置を、特に「板厚中央部(t/2)C方向」としたのは、脆性亀裂発生特性としてt/2部の靭性を評価することが重要であり、またt/2部において、L方向よりC方向の方がvTrsは+20℃ほど高い値を示すことが知られているが、本発明では、L方向よりも評価のより厳しい(即ち、より安全側の評価となる)C方向で評価することによって、確実に優れた低温靭性を示す鋼板を得るためである。 In the present invention, the evaluation position of the low temperature toughness of the above (I) is particularly set to “plate thickness central part (t / 2) C direction”. The toughness of the t / 2 part is evaluated as a brittle crack generation characteristic. It is known that the vTrs is higher by about + 20 ° C. in the C direction than in the L direction at the t / 2 part. However, in the present invention, the evaluation is more effective than in the L direction. This is to obtain a steel sheet that reliably exhibits excellent low-temperature toughness by evaluating in the severe C direction (that is, a safer evaluation).
そして本発明者は、上記(I)(II)の両特性を達成させるには、主として、板厚方向における組織や硬さ等を均一にする必要があることをまず見出し、更に詳細について研究したところ、上述した(A)〜(D)の全ての条件を満たすようにすればよいことを見出した。以下、上記両特性と(A)〜(D)の条件の関係について詳述する。 The inventor first found that it is necessary to make the structure, hardness, etc. in the thickness direction uniform in order to achieve both of the above characteristics (I) and (II), and further studied in detail. However, it has been found that all the conditions (A) to (D) described above may be satisfied. Hereinafter, the relationship between the above two characteristics and the conditions (A) to (D) will be described in detail.
まず上記(I)を満たすには、下記の(A)および(B)を満たすようにすればよいことを見いだした。
(A)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、アシキュラーフェライト分率を測定したときに、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最低値(Amin)が50面積%以上であり、かつ、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最高値(Amax)と前記最低値(Amin)の差が下記(1)式を満たす。
Amax−Amin≦20面積%・・・・・(1)
(B)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、2つの結晶の方位差が15°以上の大角粒界で囲まれた領域(大角結晶粒)の平均結晶粒径を測定したときに、該平均結晶粒径の最高値(Mmax)が40μm以下であり、かつ、前記最高値(Mmax)と前記平均結晶粒径の最低値(Mmin)の差が下記(2)式を満たす。
Mmax−Mmin<40μm・・・・・(2)
First, it was found that the following (A) and (B) should be satisfied in order to satisfy the above (I).
(A) When the acicular ferrite fraction is measured at the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the minimum value (Amin) of the acicular ferrite fraction is 50 area% or more, and The difference between the maximum value (Amax) of the acicular ferrite fraction and the minimum value (Amin) satisfies the following formula (1).
Amax−Amin ≦ 20 area% (1)
(B) At the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the average crystal grain size of a region (large-angle crystal grain) surrounded by a large-angle grain boundary in which the orientation difference between the two crystals is 15 ° or more was measured. Sometimes, the maximum value (Mmax) of the average crystal grain size is 40 μm or less, and the difference between the maximum value (Mmax) and the minimum value (Mmin) of the average crystal grain size satisfies the following formula (2): .
Mmax−Mmin <40 μm (2)
上記(A)について説明する。 The above (A) will be described.
本発明では、板厚方向全体の組織の均一化を図るため、広い製造条件で安定した均一組織の得られやすいアシキュラーフェライトを主体とすることとした。即ち、本発明の鋼板は、板厚方向によらずアシキュラーフェライト主体の組織を有するものである。 In the present invention, in order to make the entire structure in the plate thickness direction uniform, the main component is acicular ferrite, which is easy to obtain a stable uniform structure under a wide range of manufacturing conditions. That is, the steel sheet of the present invention has a structure mainly composed of acicular ferrite regardless of the thickness direction.
従来の鋼板は、表面部やt/4部の組織はアシキュラーフェライト主体であっても、t/2部が別の組織(即ち、アシキュラーフェライトが50面積%未満)であるため、板厚方向で組織に違いが生じ、これが、母材の低温靭性向上の阻害要因の一つになっていたものと考えられる。本発明では、鋼板の表面部やt/4部だけでなく、t/2部もアシキュラーフェライト主体(50面積%以上)として、板厚方向によらずアシキュラーフェライト主体の組織とする(即ち、板厚方向でのアシキュラーフェライト分率の差を小さくする)ことによって、最も確保しにくいと言われているt/2部C方向の低温靭性を確保できたのである。 In the conventional steel plate, even though the surface portion and the structure of t / 4 part are mainly composed of acicular ferrite, the thickness of t / 2 part is different (that is, the acicular ferrite is less than 50% by area). It is considered that the structure was different depending on the direction, and this was one of the impediments to improving the low temperature toughness of the base material. In the present invention, not only the surface portion and t / 4 portion of the steel sheet, but also the t / 2 portion is mainly composed of acicular ferrite (50 area% or more), and has a structure mainly composed of acicular ferrite regardless of the plate thickness direction (ie, By reducing the difference in the acicular ferrite fraction in the plate thickness direction), it was possible to secure the low temperature toughness in the t / 2 part C direction, which is said to be most difficult to ensure.
図1は、後述する実施例の結果を用い(以下、図2〜4、6〜11も同様に実施例の結果を用いて整理したものである)、表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部のアシキュラーフェライト分率の最大値と最小値の差(Amax−Amin,アシキュラーフェライト分率差)と、t/2部C方向のvTrsの関係を整理したものであるが、この図1から、(Amax−Amin)を20面積%以下とすることによって、vTrs≦−100℃を達成できることがわかる。(Amax−Amin)は、好ましくは15面積%以下であり、より好ましくは10面積%以下である。 FIG. 1 uses the results of the examples described later (hereinafter, FIGS. 2 to 4 and 6 to 11 are also organized using the results of the examples), the surface portion, the t / 4 portion, and the t The relationship between the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of the / 2 part acicular ferrite fraction (Amax−Amin, the difference between the acicular ferrite fractions) and the vTrs in the t / 2 part C direction is organized. 1 that vTrs ≦ −100 ° C. can be achieved by setting (Amax−Amin) to 20 area% or less. (Amax−Amin) is preferably 15 area% or less, more preferably 10 area% or less.
尚、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最小値(Amin)は、50面積%以上であり、好ましくは55面積%以上、より好ましくは60面積%以上である。 The minimum value (Amin) of the acicular ferrite fraction is 50 area% or more, preferably 55 area% or more, more preferably 60 area% or more.
本発明は、板厚方向のいずれの位置においても、アシキュラーフェライト主体(50面積%以上)であることを規定するが、その他の組織については特に問わず、例えば上部ベイナイト等の組織が存在しうる。 Although the present invention stipulates that it is mainly composed of acicular ferrite (50 area% or more) at any position in the plate thickness direction, other structures are not particularly limited, and there are structures such as upper bainite. sell.
次に(B)について説明する。 Next, (B) will be described.
上述したアシキュラーフェライトを主体とするような単相組織では、粒界が亀裂進展の抵抗となるものと考えられる。そして亀裂進展の際に粒界と亀裂が衝突する頻度を高めれば、亀裂の進展が抑制できるものと考えられる。即ち、粒界を細かくすることによって、亀裂との衝突頻度を高めれば良いと考えられる。但し、粒界を形成する2つの結晶面の方位差が小さい(例えば15°未満の)小角粒界では、粒界エネルギーが小さくその効果が小さいので、前記方位差が15°以上の大角粒界(大傾角境界)を対象に、この大角粒界で囲まれた結晶粒(大角結晶粒)の粒径(大角結晶粒径)を微細化する必要がある。 In the single-phase structure mainly composed of the above-mentioned acicular ferrite, it is considered that the grain boundary serves as resistance to crack propagation. If the frequency of the collision between the grain boundary and the crack is increased during the crack growth, it is considered that the crack growth can be suppressed. That is, it is considered that the frequency of collision with cracks should be increased by making the grain boundaries finer. However, in a small-angle grain boundary where the orientation difference between two crystal planes forming the grain boundary is small (for example, less than 15 °), the grain boundary energy is small and the effect is small, so the large-angle grain boundary where the orientation difference is 15 ° or more. It is necessary to refine the grain size (large-angle crystal grain size) of the crystal grains (large-angle crystal grains) surrounded by the large-angle grain boundary for (large tilt boundary).
この様な観点から、本発明では、表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部の大角結晶粒径の最大値(Mmax)を40μm以下とする。Mmaxは好ましくは35μm以下、より好ましくは30μm以下である。 From such a viewpoint, in the present invention, the maximum value (Mmax) of the large-angle crystal grain size of the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion is set to 40 μm or less. Mmax is preferably 35 μm or less, more preferably 30 μm or less.
本発明では更に、板厚方向にわたって、大角結晶粒の均一な微細化を図ることにより、板厚方向全体において低温靭性を確保することができ、t/2部C方向の優れた低温靭性を確保することができる。 Furthermore, in the present invention, low-temperature toughness can be ensured in the entire plate thickness direction by uniformly refining large-angle crystal grains in the plate thickness direction, and excellent low-temperature toughness in the t / 2 part C direction can be ensured. can do.
図2は、表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部における大角結晶粒の平均結晶粒径の最大値と最小値の差(Mmax−Mmin,大角結晶粒径差)と、t/2部C方向のvTrsの関係を示した図である。この図2から、(Mmax−Mmin)を40μm未満とすることによって、vTrs≦−100℃を達成できることがわかる。(Mmax−Mmin)は、好ましくは35μm以下であり、より好ましくは30μm以下であり、更に好ましくは20μm以下である。 FIG. 2 shows the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value (Mmax−Mmin, large-angle crystal grain size difference) of the average crystal grain size of the large-angle crystal grains at the surface part, t / 4 part, and t / 2 part, and t / 2. It is the figure which showed the relationship of vTrs of the part C direction. From FIG. 2, it can be seen that by setting (Mmax−Mmin) to less than 40 μm, vTrs ≦ −100 ° C. can be achieved. (Mmax−Mmin) is preferably 35 μm or less, more preferably 30 μm or less, and even more preferably 20 μm or less.
次に、上記(II)を満たすには、下記の(C)および(D)を満たすようにすればよいことを見いだした。
(C)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、硬さを測定したときに、硬さの最高値(Hvmax)と硬さの最低値(Hvmin)の差が下記(3)式を満たす。
Hvmax−Hvmin≦50・・・・・(3)
(D)JIS G 0901で規定の超音波探傷試験を、検出感度+12dBで全面探傷したときに、内部欠陥のUTエコー高さが50%以下である。
Next, it was found that the following (C) and (D) should be satisfied in order to satisfy the above (II).
(C) When the hardness is measured at the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the difference between the maximum hardness value (Hvmax) and the minimum hardness value (Hvmin) is the following (3) Satisfy the formula.
Hvmax−Hvmin ≦ 50 (3)
(D) When an ultrasonic flaw detection test specified in JIS G 0901 is subjected to full flaw detection with a detection sensitivity of +12 dB, the UT echo height of the internal defect is 50% or less.
上記(C)についてまず説明する。 First, the above (C) will be described.
鋼板の表面部と内部の硬さ差が大きいと、そこに応力集中が生じ、破壊靱性(HAZ−CTOD特性)が劣化する。よって表面部と内部の硬さ差は小さくするのがよい。 When the difference in hardness between the surface portion and the inside of the steel sheet is large, stress concentration occurs there, and fracture toughness (HAZ-CTOD characteristics) deteriorates. Therefore, it is preferable to reduce the difference in hardness between the surface portion and the inside.
図3は、表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部の硬さの最大値(Hvmax)と最小値(Hvmin)の差(硬さ差、Hvmax−Hvmin)と、HAZ部の限界CTOD値(−10℃)の関係を示した図であるが、この図3から、上記硬さ差を50以下とすることによって、HAZ部の限界CTOD値(−10℃):0.46mm以上を達成できることがわかる。上記硬さ差は、好ましくは40以下であり、より好ましくは30以下である。 FIG. 3 shows the difference between the maximum value (Hvmax) and minimum value (Hvmin) of the hardness of the surface part, t / 4 part, and t / 2 part (hardness difference, Hvmax−Hvmin), and the limit CTOD of the HAZ part. Although it is a figure which showed the relationship of a value (-10 degreeC), by making the said hardness difference into 50 or less from this FIG. 3, limit CTOD value (-10 degreeC) of HAZ part: 0.46 mm or more You can see that it can be achieved. The hardness difference is preferably 40 or less, and more preferably 30 or less.
次に上記(D)について説明する。 Next, the above (D) will be described.
内部欠陥のUTエコー高さが大きい、つまり大きな欠陥があると、そこに応力集中が生じ、破壊靱性が低下する。 If the UT echo height of the internal defect is large, that is, if there is a large defect, stress concentration occurs there, and the fracture toughness decreases.
図4は、超音波探傷試験におけるエコー高さと、HAZ部の限界CTOD値(−10℃)との関係を示した図であるが、この図4から、UTによるエコー高さが50%以下であると、HAZ部の限界CTOD値(−10℃):0.46mm以上を達成できることがわかる。前記UTによるエコー高さは、好ましくは45%以下であり、より好ましくは40%以下である。 FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between the echo height in the ultrasonic flaw detection test and the critical CTOD value (−10 ° C.) of the HAZ part. From FIG. 4, the echo height by the UT is 50% or less. When it exists, it turns out that the limit CTOD value (-10 degreeC) of a HAZ part: 0.46 mm or more can be achieved. The echo height due to the UT is preferably 45% or less, more preferably 40% or less.
[製造方法]
本発明の鋼板は、上記の通り、特に(Amax−Amin)、(Mmax−Mmin)、(Hvmax−Hvmin)を小さくするなど、板厚方向における組織等を均一にする必要があるが、厚肉材になると、圧延時の板厚方向の温度差が大きくなるため、上記均一化は困難となる。本発明は、この様な状況下、上記(A)〜(D)の全てを満たし、更には470MPa以上の引張強さを有する鋼板を得るための手段についても検討した。
[Production method]
As described above, the steel sheet of the present invention needs to have a uniform structure in the thickness direction, such as reducing (Amax-Amin), (Mmax-Mmin), (Hvmax-Hvmin), etc. If it becomes a material, the temperature difference in the plate thickness direction during rolling becomes large, so that the above-mentioned uniforming becomes difficult. Under such circumstances, the present invention has also studied means for obtaining a steel sheet that satisfies all of the above (A) to (D) and further has a tensile strength of 470 MPa or more.
その結果、製造工程において、後述する成分組成を満たすスラブを用い、1050℃以上に加熱した後、特には、第1熱間圧延、第1冷却、第2熱間圧延、および第2冷却を、規定の条件(a)〜(d)を満たすように順次行う必要があることを見いだした。 As a result, in the manufacturing process, after using a slab satisfying the component composition described later, after heating to 1050 ° C. or more, in particular, the first hot rolling, the first cooling, the second hot rolling, and the second cooling, It has been found that it is necessary to carry out sequentially so as to satisfy the prescribed conditions (a) to (d).
以下、製造工程順に説明する。 Hereinafter, it demonstrates in order of a manufacturing process.
まず図5に示すとおり、スラブを1050℃以上に加熱するが、これは、アシキュラーフェライトの形成や結晶粒の微細化に有効なNbを全固溶させること、および組織をオーステナイト単相とすることを目的とする。上記加熱温度は好ましくは1100℃以上であるが、上限は1200℃程度である。 First, as shown in FIG. 5, the slab is heated to 1050 ° C. or higher, which means that Nb effective for the formation of acicular ferrite and refinement of crystal grains is completely dissolved, and the structure is an austenite single phase. For the purpose. The heating temperature is preferably 1100 ° C. or higher, but the upper limit is about 1200 ° C.
〈(a)第1熱間圧延 〉
第1熱間圧延(粗圧延)において、t/2部の温度が950℃以上の状態で圧下率が10%以上の最終パス圧延を行う。図6は、上記圧下率とUTによるエコー高さの関係を示した図である。この図6より、上記圧下率を10%以上とすることによって、内部欠陥が圧着され、上記(D)で規定するUTによるエコー高さ:50%以下を達成できることがわかる。この様にUTによるエコー高さ:50%以下を達成することで、前記図4に示した通り、HAZ−CTOD特性を高めることができる。上記圧下率は、好ましくは12%以上、より好ましくは15%以上である。
<(A) First hot rolling>
In the first hot rolling (rough rolling), final pass rolling is performed with a rolling reduction of 10% or more in a state where the temperature at t / 2 part is 950 ° C. or higher. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the relationship between the rolling reduction ratio and the echo height due to the UT. From FIG. 6, it can be seen that by setting the rolling reduction ratio to 10% or more, internal defects are pressure-bonded and the echo height by the UT defined by (D) above: 50% or less can be achieved. Thus, by achieving the echo height by UT: 50% or less, the HAZ-CTOD characteristic can be enhanced as shown in FIG. The rolling reduction is preferably 12% or more, more preferably 15% or more.
上記圧下率の上限は、第2熱間圧延時の累積圧下率を確保する観点から、20%程度となる。 The upper limit of the rolling reduction is about 20% from the viewpoint of securing the cumulative rolling reduction during the second hot rolling.
尚、第1熱間圧延におけるその他の条件については問わず、例えば最終前のパスの圧延条件についても特に限定されない。 The other conditions in the first hot rolling are not limited, and for example, the rolling conditions of the pass before the final are not particularly limited.
〈(b)第1冷却 〉
第1冷却として、下記条件を満たす2段階冷却を行うことにより、第1冷却後の表面部とt/2部の温度差(以下、単に「表面部とt/2部の温度差」ということがある。)を70℃以内にする。尚、この第1冷却は、第1熱間圧延(粗圧延)に引き続いて行えばよく、下記の2段階冷却の開示温度は特に問わないが、表面温度にておおよそ900〜950℃の範囲内である。
<(B) First cooling>
By performing two-stage cooling that satisfies the following conditions as the first cooling, the temperature difference between the surface portion after the first cooling and the t / 2 portion (hereinafter simply referred to as “temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion”) Be within 70 ° C. The first cooling may be performed subsequent to the first hot rolling (rough rolling), and the disclosed temperature of the following two-stage cooling is not particularly limited, but the surface temperature is within a range of about 900 to 950 ° C. It is.
(1段目冷却)0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度で0.5T秒以上[Tは、第1冷却の開始板厚(mm)]1.5T秒以下冷却した後、空冷を0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下行う。
(2段目冷却)1段目冷却に引き続き、0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度で0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下冷却した後、空冷を0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下行う。
(First stage cooling) After cooling for 0.5 T seconds or more at a plate thickness direction average cooling rate of 0.6 ° C./s or more [T is the starting plate thickness (mm) of the first cooling] for 1.5 T seconds or less, Air cooling is performed for 0.5 T seconds or more and 1.5 T seconds or less.
(Second stage cooling) Following the first stage cooling, after cooling at an average cooling rate of 0.6 ° C./s or more in the plate thickness direction from 0.07 T seconds to 1.3 T seconds, the air cooling is performed from 0.07 T seconds to 1 Perform for 3T seconds or less.
前記図3に示したとおり、HAZ−CTOD特性を十分に高めるには、Hvmax−Hvmin≦50を達成させる必要がある。本発明では、この硬さ差の規定を達成すべく検討したところ、この第1冷却で、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とすればよいことをまず見出した。 As shown in FIG. 3, it is necessary to achieve Hvmax−Hvmin ≦ 50 in order to sufficiently enhance the HAZ-CTOD characteristic. In the present invention, investigations were made to achieve the regulation of the hardness difference, and it was first found that the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion should be within 70 ° C. in the first cooling.
図7は、表面部とt/2部の温度差と、硬さ差(Hvmax−Hvmin)の関係を示した図である。この図7より、上記硬さ差を50以下とするには、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とする必要があることがわかる。表面部とt/2部の温度差は、好ましくは65℃以内であり、より好ましくは60℃以内とすれば、上記硬さ差を更に小さくでき、結果としてより優れたHAZ−CTOD特性を確保できる。また、Amin、(Amax−Amin)、Mmax、(Mmax−Mmin)を規定の範囲内とするためにも、この第1冷却で表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とすることが有効である。 FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the relationship between the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion, and the hardness difference (Hvmax−Hvmin). From FIG. 7, it is understood that the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion needs to be within 70 ° C. in order to make the hardness difference 50 or less. The temperature difference between the surface part and the t / 2 part is preferably within 65 ° C, and more preferably within 60 ° C, the hardness difference can be further reduced, and as a result, more excellent HAZ-CTOD characteristics can be secured. it can. Also, in order to keep Amin, (Amax−Amin), Mmax, and (Mmax−Mmin) within the specified ranges, the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion should be within 70 ° C. in this first cooling. Is effective.
また本発明者は、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とするための具体的手段についても検討した。その結果、第1熱間圧延(粗圧延)後の冷却(第1冷却)を上記の通り2段階冷却とすればよいことを見出した。更に、2段階冷却における1段目冷却、2段目冷却のそれぞれにおいて、冷却速度、冷却時間を規定することによって、結晶粒の粗大化を招くことなく短時間で、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内にできることを見出した。 The inventor also examined specific means for setting the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion within 70 ° C. As a result, it was found that the cooling (first cooling) after the first hot rolling (rough rolling) may be two-stage cooling as described above. Furthermore, in each of the first-stage cooling and the second-stage cooling in the two-stage cooling, by defining the cooling rate and the cooling time, the surface portion and the t / 2 portion can be formed in a short time without causing coarsening of crystal grains. It was found that the temperature difference can be within 70 ° C.
まず1段目冷却は、0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度(以下、このときの冷却速度を「C11」と示すことがある)で0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下冷却し、次いで、空冷を0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下行う。板厚方向平均冷却速度は、後述する実施例に示す方法で求められる冷却速度である(以下、同じ)。 First, the first-stage cooling is an average cooling rate in the thickness direction of 0.6 ° C./s or more (hereinafter, the cooling rate at this time may be indicated as “C 11 ”) for 0.5 Tsec or more and 1.5 Tsec. Thereafter, cooling is performed, and then air cooling is performed for 0.5 T seconds to 1.5 T seconds. The sheet thickness direction average cooling rate is a cooling rate obtained by the method shown in Examples described later (hereinafter the same).
C11が、0.6℃/s未満であると、表面部とt/2部の温度差を規定の時間内に70℃以内にすることが困難となる。好ましくは0.7℃/s以上、より好ましくは0.8℃/s以上、更に好ましくは1.0℃/s以上である。尚、C11が高すぎると鋼板表面部にスケールが生成し、冷却効率が低下する。よってこれを防止するため、C11の上限は5.0℃/s程度とする。 If C 11 is less than 0.6 ° C./s, it is difficult to make the temperature difference between the surface portion and t / 2 portion within 70 ° C. within a specified time. Preferably it is 0.7 degreeC / s or more, More preferably, it is 0.8 degreeC / s or more, More preferably, it is 1.0 degreeC / s or more. Note that the scale is generated on the surface of the steel sheet part when C 11 is too high, the cooling efficiency is reduced. Therefore in order to prevent this, the upper limit of the C 11 is set to 5.0 ° C. / s approximately.
C11:0.6℃/s以上での冷却時間(C11冷却時間)は、0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下である。 C 11 : The cooling time (C 11 cooling time) at 0.6 ° C./s or more is 0.5 T seconds or more and 1.5 T seconds or less.
図8は、1段目冷却において(C11冷却時間/第1冷却の開始板厚)(この比を「1段目冷却係数」という)の値と、表面部とt/2部の温度差との関係を示す図である。この図8より、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とするには、1段目冷却係数を0.5以上とする必要があることがわかる。1段目冷却係数は、好ましくは0.8以上、より好ましくは1.0以上である。 8, (C 11 starting thickness of the cooling time / first cooling) in the first stage cooling and the value of (the ratio of "first stage cooling coefficient"), the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 parts It is a figure which shows the relationship. FIG. 8 shows that the first stage cooling coefficient needs to be 0.5 or more in order to make the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion within 70 ° C. The first stage cooling coefficient is preferably 0.8 or more, more preferably 1.0 or more.
一方、1段目冷却係数が大きすぎても、即ち、冷却時間が長すぎても、鋼板表面に酸化物が生成して冷却効率が低下し、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とすることができないため、1段目冷却係数の上限は1.5とする。 On the other hand, even if the first-stage cooling coefficient is too large, that is, the cooling time is too long, oxides are generated on the steel sheet surface and the cooling efficiency is lowered, and the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion is 70. The upper limit of the first stage cooling coefficient is set to 1.5 because it cannot be set within the temperature.
C11:0.6℃/s以上で冷却を行った後は、空冷を0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下行う。この空冷を行って復熱させることによって、鋼板表面に生成する酸化物を最小限にして、効率的に冷却することができる。 C 11 : After cooling at 0.6 ° C./s or higher, air cooling is performed for 0.5 T seconds to 1.5 T seconds. By performing this air cooling and reheating, it is possible to minimize the oxide generated on the surface of the steel sheet and efficiently cool it.
この空冷での1段目冷却係数の決定理由は、上記の通りである。尚、表面部とt/2部の温度差を短時間で確実に70℃以内とするには、空冷時間を、C11での冷却時間と同等以上とするのがよいことから、空冷における1段目冷却係数は、上記0.6℃/s以上で冷却時の1段目冷却係数と同じとするか、またはそれ以上(但し、上限は1.5)とすればよい。 The reason for determining the first-stage cooling coefficient in this air cooling is as described above. In order to ensure that the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion is within 70 ° C. in a short time, the air cooling time should be equal to or greater than the cooling time at C 11. The stage cooling coefficient may be equal to or higher than the above-described first stage cooling coefficient at 0.6 ° C./s or higher (however, the upper limit is 1.5).
上記1段目冷却に引き続き、2段目冷却を行う。 Subsequent to the first stage cooling, the second stage cooling is performed.
2段目冷却は、0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度(以下、このときの冷却速度を「C12」と示すことがある)で0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下冷却し、次いで、空冷を0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下行う。 The second-stage cooling is an average cooling rate in the thickness direction of 0.6 ° C./s or more (hereinafter, the cooling rate at this time may be indicated as “C 12 ”) from 0.07 Tsec to 1.3 Tsec. After cooling, air cooling is performed for 0.07 T seconds or more and 1.3 T seconds or less.
C12を0.6℃/s以上とした理由は、1段目冷却と同じである。 The reason why C 12 is set to 0.6 ° C./s or more is the same as that in the first stage cooling.
C12:0.6℃/s以上での冷却時間(C12冷却時間)は、0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下である。 C 12 : The cooling time (C 12 cooling time) at 0.6 ° C./s or more is 0.07 T seconds or more and 1.3 T seconds or less.
図9は、2段目冷却において(C12冷却時間/第1冷却の開始板厚)(この比を「2段目冷却係数」という)の値と、表面部とt/2部の温度差との関係を示す図である。この図9より、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とするには、2段目冷却係数を0.07以上とする必要があることがわかる。2段目冷却係数は、好ましくは0.1以上、より好ましくは0.2以上である。 9, in the second stage cooling (starting thickness of the C 12 cooling time / first cooling) and the value of (the ratio of "second-stage cooling coefficient"), the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 parts It is a figure which shows the relationship. FIG. 9 shows that the second stage cooling coefficient needs to be 0.07 or more in order to make the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 portion within 70 ° C. The second stage cooling coefficient is preferably 0.1 or more, more preferably 0.2 or more.
一方、2段目冷却係数が大きすぎても、即ち、冷却時間が長すぎても鋼板表面に酸化物が生成して冷却効率が低下し、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とすることができないため、2段目冷却係数の上限は1.3とする。 On the other hand, even if the second stage cooling coefficient is too large, that is, if the cooling time is too long, an oxide is generated on the surface of the steel sheet and the cooling efficiency is lowered. The upper limit of the second stage cooling coefficient is 1.3.
C12:0.6℃/s以上で冷却を行った後は、空冷を0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下行う。この空冷を行って復熱させることによって、鋼板表面に生成する酸化物を最小限にして、効率的に冷却することができる。 C 12 : After cooling at 0.6 ° C./s or higher, air cooling is performed at 0.07 T seconds or more and 1.3 T seconds or less. By performing this air cooling and reheating, it is possible to minimize the oxide generated on the surface of the steel sheet and efficiently cool it.
この空冷での2段目冷却係数の決定理由は、上記の通りである。尚、表面部とt/2部の温度差を短時間で確実に70℃以内とするには、ここでの空冷時間も、C12での冷却時間と同等以上とするのがよい。よって空冷における2段目冷却係数は、上記0.6℃/s以上で冷却時の2段目冷却係数と同じとするか、またはそれ以上(但し、上限は1.3)とすればよい。 The reason for determining the second-stage cooling coefficient in this air cooling is as described above. Incidentally, to within surely 70 ° C. in a short time the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 parts, even cooling time here, it is preferable to cool time equal or at C 12. Therefore, the second-stage cooling coefficient in air cooling may be the same as or higher than the second-stage cooling coefficient during cooling at 0.6 ° C./s or more (however, the upper limit is 1.3).
本発明では、上記の通り、上記1段目冷却に引き続いて2段目冷却を行うところに重要なポイントを有する。(0.6℃/s以上で冷却+空冷)を2回繰り返し実施することにより、1段目冷却における空冷(複熱)時に鋼板表面に生成する酸化皮膜を除去して冷却効率を高めることができる。その結果、1回のみの(0.6℃/s以上で冷却+空冷)とトータルの冷却時間が同じでも、冷却効率がより高いため、結晶粒の粗大化を招くことなく、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内とすることができる。 As described above, the present invention has an important point in that the second stage cooling is performed subsequent to the first stage cooling. (Cooling + air cooling at 0.6 ° C / s or more) is repeated twice to improve the cooling efficiency by removing the oxide film formed on the steel sheet surface during air cooling (double heat) in the first stage cooling. it can. As a result, even if the total cooling time is the same as only once (cooling at 0.6 ° C./s or higher + air cooling), since the cooling efficiency is higher, the surface portion and t The temperature difference of / 2 parts can be within 70 ° C.
これに対し、上述した特許文献2や特許文献4では、この様な冷却方法について記載されておらず、生産性の観点から、通常、0.6℃/s以上の冷却1回のみであると思われる。その結果、これら従来技術においては、板厚方向の組織等の均一化が図られていないものと思われる。 On the other hand, in Patent Document 2 and Patent Document 4 described above, such a cooling method is not described, and from the viewpoint of productivity, usually only one cooling of 0.6 ° C./s or more is performed. Seem. As a result, in these prior arts, it seems that the structure in the thickness direction is not uniformized.
また、特許文献3の製造方法とは、板厚表層部からt/2の温度差を小さくするというコンセプトは同じであるが、この特許文献3では、鋼片を保温するという手段をとっている。しかしこの様に保温を行うと、板厚表層部からt/2の温度差が小さくなるのに時間がかかる、即ち、長時間高温にさらされるため、結晶粒の粗大化を招くことが想定される。 In addition, the manufacturing method of Patent Document 3 has the same concept of reducing the temperature difference of t / 2 from the plate thickness surface layer portion, but in Patent Document 3, a method of keeping the steel piece warm is taken. . However, if the temperature is kept in this way, it takes time for the temperature difference of t / 2 from the surface layer portion to become small, that is, it is assumed that the crystal grains will be coarsened because it is exposed to a high temperature for a long time. The
〈(c)第2熱間圧延 〉
第2熱間圧延(仕上げ圧延)において、t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲の圧延を、下記(4)式を満たすように行う。
Q+(Ni+Nb)×10≧33・・・・・(4)
[上記(4)式において、
Q:t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲における累積圧下率(%)、
Ni:Ni含有量(質量%)、
Nb:Nb含有量(質量%)を示す。
尚、圧下率は、下記(5)式で求められる。
圧下率=100×(圧延開始前厚−圧延完了厚)/圧延開始前厚・・・・・(5)]
<(C) Second hot rolling>
In the second hot rolling (finish rolling), rolling in a temperature range where the temperature at t / 2 part is less than 950 ° C. is performed so as to satisfy the following expression (4).
Q + (Ni + Nb) × 10 ≧ 33 (4)
[In the above equation (4),
Q: Cumulative rolling reduction (%) in a temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is less than 950 ° C.
Ni: Ni content (mass%),
Nb: Nb content (% by mass).
In addition, a rolling reduction is calculated | required by following (5) Formula.
Reduction ratio = 100 × (thickness before rolling start−thickness after rolling) / thickness before rolling start (5)]
第2熱間圧延(仕上げ圧延)を上記条件で行うことによって、板厚方向全体をアシキュラーフェライト組織化でき、(A)で規定するアシキュラーフェライトの規定を達成させることができる。また(B)で規定する大角結晶粒の規定を達成させることができる。 By performing the second hot rolling (finish rolling) under the above conditions, the entire thickness direction can be formed into an acicular ferrite structure, and the acicular ferrite defined in (A) can be achieved. Moreover, the definition of the large-angle crystal grains specified in (B) can be achieved.
図10は、(4)式の左辺値[Q+(Ni+Nb)×10]とアシキュラーフェライト分率差(Amax−Amin)の関係を示す図であるが、この図より、(4)式の左辺値が33以上となるように第2熱間圧延を行う(即ち、鋼中Ni量およびNb量に応じて、(4)式の左辺値が33以上となるように、t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲における累積圧下率をコントロールする)ことによって、(Amax−Amin)を20面積%以下にできることがわかる。 FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the relationship between the left side value [Q + (Ni + Nb) × 10] of equation (4) and the acicular ferrite fraction difference (Amax−Amin). From this figure, the left side of equation (4) The second hot rolling is performed so that the value is 33 or more (that is, the temperature of t / 2 part so that the value on the left side of the equation (4) becomes 33 or more according to the amount of Ni and the amount of Nb in the steel. (Amax−Amin) can be reduced to 20 area% or less by controlling the cumulative rolling reduction in the temperature range of less than 950 ° C.
また図11は、(4)式の左辺値と、大角結晶粒径の最大値と最小値の差(Mmax−Mmin、大角結晶粒径差)の関係を示す図であるが、この図より、(4)式の左辺値が33以上となるように第2熱間圧延を行うことによって、(Mmax−Mmin)を40μm未満にできることがわかる。 FIG. 11 is a diagram showing the relationship between the left side value of the formula (4) and the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of the large-angle crystal grain size (Mmax−Mmin, large-angle crystal grain size difference). It can be seen that (Mmax−Mmin) can be made less than 40 μm by performing the second hot rolling so that the left side value of the equation (4) is 33 or more.
(4)式の左辺値は、好ましくは40以上、より好ましくは50以上である。 The left side value of the formula (4) is preferably 40 or more, more preferably 50 or more.
第2熱間圧延(仕上げ圧延)におけるその他の条件については特に限定されず、一般に行われている条件を採用することができる。 Other conditions in the second hot rolling (finish rolling) are not particularly limited, and generally performed conditions can be employed.
本発明では、前記第2熱間圧延の後、更に第2冷却を、下記条件(d)を満たすように行うことによって、一定以上の強度を確保することができる。 In the present invention, after the second hot rolling, the second cooling is further performed so as to satisfy the following condition (d), whereby a certain strength or more can be ensured.
〈(d)第2冷却 〉
第2冷却として、表面部の温度がAr3変態点以上の温度域から、t/2部の温度が500℃以下の温度域までを、下記(6)式を満たす板厚方向平均冷却速度(以下、このときの冷却速度を「C2」と示すことがある)で冷却する。
板厚方向平均冷却速度≧6420t−1.60・・・・・(6)
[上記(6)式において、tは最終製品板厚(mm)を示す。
また、板厚方向平均冷却速度は、下記(7)式から求められるものである。
板厚方向平均冷却速度(℃/s)=(θs−θf)/τ・・・・・(7)
上記(7)式において、θsは冷却開始時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、θfは冷却停止時の板厚方向平均温度、τは冷却時間(s)を示す。]
<(D) Second cooling>
As the second cooling, the average cooling rate in the plate thickness direction satisfying the following expression (6) from the temperature range where the temperature of the surface portion is equal to or higher than the Ar 3 transformation point to the temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is 500 ° C. or less ( Hereinafter, the cooling rate at this time may be indicated as “C 2 ”).
Average cooling rate in the plate thickness direction ≧ 6420t −1.60 (6)
[In the above formula (6), t represents the final product plate thickness (mm).
Moreover, the plate thickness direction average cooling rate is obtained from the following equation (7).
Plate thickness direction average cooling rate (° C./s)=(θs−θf)/τ (7)
In the above equation (7), θs represents the average thickness direction temperature (° C.) at the start of cooling, θf represents the average thickness direction temperature at the time of cooling stop, and τ represents the cooling time (s). ]
本発明では、第2熱間圧延を上記条件で行い、かつ表面部の温度がAr3変態点以上の温度域から、t/2部の温度が500℃以下の温度域までの冷却速度(C2)を、上記(6)式を満たす板厚方向平均冷却速度とすることで、広い冷却速度範囲内(冷却速度が約2〜30℃/sの範囲)で硬さの値が安定し、一定以上の強度(470MPa以上、好ましくは510MPa以上の引張強さ)を確実に確保することができる。 In the present invention, the second hot rolling is performed under the above conditions, and the cooling rate (C from the temperature range where the temperature of the surface portion is equal to or higher than the Ar 3 transformation point to the temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 portion is equal to or lower than 500 ° C. (C 2 ) is a plate thickness direction average cooling rate that satisfies the above formula (6), so that the hardness value is stable within a wide cooling rate range (cooling rate is in the range of about 2 to 30 ° C./s), A certain level of strength (a tensile strength of 470 MPa or more, preferably 510 MPa or more) can be ensured.
第2冷却後(即ち、t/2部の温度が500℃以下の温度域までを上記条件で冷却した後)、室温までの冷却については特に問わず、空冷等により冷却してもよい。 After the second cooling (that is, after cooling to a temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is 500 ° C. or lower under the above conditions), the cooling to room temperature is not particularly limited, and the cooling may be performed by air cooling or the like.
以上の説明を、前記図5において概略的に示している。 The above description is schematically shown in FIG.
本発明の鋼板は、その後に、熱処理(焼入れ、焼戻し)等を行わなくとも、上述した(I)(II)の特性を発揮するため、上記冷却ままで使用することができる。 Since the steel sheet of the present invention exhibits the above-mentioned characteristics (I) and (II) without performing heat treatment (quenching, tempering) or the like thereafter, it can be used as it is cooled.
本発明の鋼板は、母材の低温靭性、HAZ−CTOD特性の両特性を具備すべく、特に、上記条件で製造して規定の組織等を確保する点にポイントを有するが、上記組織等を確実に確保して、上記両特性を十分に発揮させると共に、例えば海洋構造物等に用いられる鋼板として溶接性、高強度等も兼備させるには、下記成分組成を満たす必要がある。 The steel sheet of the present invention has a point in that it has both the low-temperature toughness of the base material and the HAZ-CTOD characteristics, particularly in terms of securing the specified structure and the like by manufacturing under the above conditions. In order to ensure the above and sufficiently exhibit both of the above characteristics, and also to have weldability, high strength, etc. as a steel plate used for, for example, an offshore structure, it is necessary to satisfy the following component composition.
〔C:0.02〜0.10%〕
Cは、鋼材(母材)の強度を確保するために欠くことのできない元素である。こうした効果を発揮させるには、0.02%以上含有させる必要がある。Cは、0.04%以上含有させることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.05%以上である。しかしCが0.10%を超えると、溶接時にHAZに島状マルテンサイト(MA)を多く生成してHAZの靭性劣化を招くばかりでなく、溶接性にも悪影響を及ぼす。また、アシキュラーフェライトの確保が困難となる他、硬さ差や大角結晶粒径差が大きくなる。従ってCは0.10%以下、好ましくは0.08%以下、より好ましくは0.06%以下とする。
[C: 0.02-0.10%]
C is an element indispensable for securing the strength of the steel material (base material). In order to exert such effects, it is necessary to contain 0.02% or more. C is preferably contained in an amount of 0.04% or more, more preferably 0.05% or more. However, if C exceeds 0.10%, a lot of island martensite (MA) is generated in the HAZ at the time of welding to cause deterioration of the toughness of the HAZ, and also adversely affect the weldability. Further, it becomes difficult to secure acicular ferrite, and the hardness difference and the large-angle crystal grain size difference become large. Therefore, C is 0.10% or less, preferably 0.08% or less, more preferably 0.06% or less.
〔Si:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)〕
Siは、固溶強化により鋼材の強度を確保するのに寄与する元素である。しかしSiが0.5%を超えると、溶接時にHAZに島状マルテンサイト(MA)を多く生成してHAZ靭性の劣化を招くばかりでなく、溶接性にも悪影響を及ぼす。従ってSiは0.5%以下とする。好ましくは0.3%以下であり、より好ましくは0.2%以下、更に好ましくは0.18%以下である。なお、Siを添加して鋼材の強度を確保するためには、0.02%以上含有させることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.05%以上、更に好ましくは0.1%以上含有させるのがよい。
[Si: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%)]
Si is an element that contributes to securing the strength of a steel material by solid solution strengthening. However, if Si exceeds 0.5%, not only does martensite (MA) form in the HAZ during welding to cause deterioration of the HAZ toughness, but also adversely affects weldability. Therefore, Si is 0.5% or less. Preferably it is 0.3% or less, More preferably, it is 0.2% or less, More preferably, it is 0.18% or less. In order to secure the strength of the steel material by adding Si, it is preferable to contain 0.02% or more, more preferably 0.05% or more, and still more preferably 0.1% or more. .
〔Mn:1.0〜2.0%〕
Mnは、鋼材(母材)の強度向上に寄与する元素である。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、1.0%以上含有させる必要がある。Mnは、好ましくは1.2%以上、より好ましくは1.4%以上含有させるのがよい。しかし2.0%を超えると、鋼材(母材)の溶接性を劣化させる。従ってMnは、2.0%以下に抑える必要がある。好ましくは1.8%以下であり、より好ましくは1.6%以下とする。
[Mn: 1.0 to 2.0%]
Mn is an element that contributes to improving the strength of the steel material (base material). In order to exhibit such an effect effectively, it is necessary to contain 1.0% or more. Mn is preferably contained at 1.2% or more, more preferably 1.4% or more. However, if it exceeds 2.0%, the weldability of the steel material (base material) is deteriorated. Therefore, Mn needs to be suppressed to 2.0% or less. Preferably it is 1.8% or less, More preferably, you may be 1.6% or less.
〔Ni:0.10〜1%〕
Niは、鋼材の強度を高めると共に、鋼材自体の靭性を向上させるのにも寄与する元素である。また変態開始温度を長時間・低温側へシフトさせる働きがあり、これが組織のアシキュラーフェライト化を促す。また、Niを含有させて、焼入れ性を高めることで、板厚方向における冷却速度の差異の影響を小さくでき、結果として板厚方向における硬さ差を小さくすることができる。こうした作用を有効に発揮させるには、0.10%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.12%以上、更に好ましくは0.14%以上である。Niはできるだけ含有させることが好ましいが、高価な元素であるため、過剰に含有するとコスト高となる。従って、経済的理由から上限は1%とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.8%以下、更に好ましくは0.6%以下である。
[Ni: 0.10 to 1%]
Ni is an element that contributes to increasing the strength of the steel material and improving the toughness of the steel material itself. It also has the function of shifting the transformation start temperature to a low temperature for a long time, which promotes the formation of acicular ferrite in the structure. Moreover, by containing Ni and improving hardenability, the influence of the difference in the cooling rate in the plate thickness direction can be reduced, and as a result, the hardness difference in the plate thickness direction can be reduced. In order to exhibit such an action effectively, it is preferable to contain 0.10% or more. More preferably it is 0.12% or more, and still more preferably 0.14% or more. Ni is preferably contained as much as possible, but since it is an expensive element, if it is contained excessively, the cost becomes high. Therefore, the upper limit is preferably 1% for economic reasons. More preferably, it is 0.8% or less, More preferably, it is 0.6% or less.
〔Nb:0.005〜0.03%〕
Nbは、固溶によるソリュートドラック効果および炭窒化物析出によるピン止め効果の2つの効果により、再結晶粒の粗大化を抑制するため、母材靭性の向上に寄与する。またNiと同様に変態開始温度を長時間・低温側へシフトさせる働きがあり、これが組織のアシキュラーフェライト化を促す。更に、NbはNb析出物を形成して析出強化を図るのに有効な元素であるが、Nb量が少なく、Nb析出物量が少ない場合、表面部は冷却速度が高いため、高強度(高硬度)を確保できるが、t/2部は冷却速度が小さくかつNb析出物も少ないため、強度(硬度)が低く、結果として表面部とt/2部の硬さ差が生じる。
これらのことから、Nbは0.005%以上含有させる。好ましくは0.007%以上、より好ましくは0.009%以上である。しかしNbが0.03%を超えると、母材靭性およびHAZ靭性が劣化する。従ってNbは0.03%以下とする。好ましくは0.025%以下、より好ましくは0.02%以下である。
[Nb: 0.005 to 0.03%]
Nb contributes to the improvement of the base metal toughness because it suppresses the coarsening of recrystallized grains due to the two effects of the solution drag effect due to solid solution and the pinning effect due to carbonitride precipitation. Also, like Ni, it has the function of shifting the transformation start temperature to a low temperature side for a long time, which promotes the formation of acicular ferrite in the structure. Further, Nb is an element effective for forming precipitation of Nb and strengthening precipitation. However, when the amount of Nb is small and the amount of Nb precipitate is small, the surface portion has a high cooling rate, so that high strength (high hardness) However, since the cooling rate is small and the Nb precipitates are also small in the t / 2 part, the strength (hardness) is low, resulting in a difference in hardness between the surface part and the t / 2 part.
From these things, Nb is contained 0.005% or more. Preferably it is 0.007% or more, More preferably, it is 0.009% or more. However, if Nb exceeds 0.03%, the base metal toughness and the HAZ toughness deteriorate. Accordingly, Nb is set to 0.03% or less. Preferably it is 0.025% or less, More preferably, it is 0.02% or less.
〔Ti:0.005〜0.02%〕
Tiは、鋼材中にTiNなどの窒化物やTi酸化物を生成し、HAZ靭性の向上に寄与する元素である。こうした効果を発揮させるには、Tiは0.005%以上含有させる必要がある。好ましくは0.007%以上、より好ましくは0.010%以上とする。しかしTiが過剰に含まれると鋼材(母材)の靭性が劣化するため、Tiは0.02%以下に抑えるべきである。Tiは、好ましくは0.018%以下であり、より好ましくは0.016%以下である。
[Ti: 0.005 to 0.02%]
Ti is an element that generates nitrides such as TiN and Ti oxide in the steel material and contributes to the improvement of HAZ toughness. In order to exert such effects, it is necessary to contain Ti by 0.005% or more. Preferably it is 0.007% or more, more preferably 0.010% or more. However, if Ti is excessively contained, the toughness of the steel (base material) deteriorates, so Ti should be suppressed to 0.02% or less. Ti is preferably 0.018% or less, and more preferably 0.016% or less.
〔N:0.0030〜0.065%〕
Nは、窒化物(例えば、TiNなど)を析出する元素であり、該窒化物は、ピン止め効果により、溶接時にHAZに生成するオーステナイト粒の粗大化を防止してフェライト変態を促進し、HAZ靭性の向上に寄与する。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、0.0030%以上含有させる必要がある。Nは、好ましくは0.0035%以上、より好ましくは0.004%以上である。Nは多いほどTi含有窒化物を形成してオーステナイト粒の微細化が促進されるため、HAZの靭性向上に有効に作用する。しかしNが0.065%を超えると、固溶N量が増大して母材自体の靭性が劣化し、HAZ靭性も低下する。従ってNは0.065%以下に抑える必要がある。好ましくは0.055%以下、より好ましくは0.045%以下とする。
[N: 0.0030 to 0.065%]
N is an element that precipitates nitrides (eg, TiN), and the nitrides prevent the austenite grains formed in the HAZ from being coarsened during welding and promote ferrite transformation by the pinning effect. Contributes to improved toughness. In order to exhibit such an effect effectively, it is necessary to contain 0.0030% or more. N is preferably 0.0035% or more, more preferably 0.004% or more. As N increases, Ti-containing nitrides are formed and austenite grain refinement is promoted, which effectively improves the toughness of HAZ. However, when N exceeds 0.065%, the amount of solute N increases, the toughness of the base metal itself deteriorates, and the HAZ toughness also decreases. Therefore, N must be suppressed to 0.065% or less. Preferably it is 0.055% or less, More preferably, it is 0.045% or less.
〔P:0.02%以下(0%を含まない)〕
Pは、偏析し易い元素であり、特に鋼材中の結晶粒界に偏析して母材の靭性を劣化させる。従ってPは0.02%以下に抑制する必要がある。Pは、好ましくは0.018%以下、より好ましくは0.015%以下とする。
[P: 0.02% or less (excluding 0%)]
P is an element that easily segregates, and particularly segregates at a grain boundary in the steel material to deteriorate the toughness of the base material. Therefore, P must be suppressed to 0.02% or less. P is preferably 0.018% or less, more preferably 0.015% or less.
〔S:0.015%以下(0%を含まない)〕
Sは、Mnと結合して硫化物(MnS)を生成し、母材の靭性や板厚方向の延性を劣化させる有害な元素である。従ってSは0.015%以下に抑制する必要がある。好ましくは0.012%以下であり、より好ましくは0.008%以下、更に好ましくは0.006%以下である。
[S: 0.015% or less (excluding 0%)]
S is a harmful element that combines with Mn to produce sulfide (MnS) and degrades the toughness of the base material and the ductility in the thickness direction. Therefore, S must be suppressed to 0.015% or less. Preferably it is 0.012% or less, More preferably, it is 0.008% or less, More preferably, it is 0.006% or less.
〔Al:0.01〜0.06%〕
Alは、脱酸のために有用な元素であり、またAlNを形成して結晶粒の微細化に有効な元素である。こうした効果を発揮させるにはAl量を0.01%以上とする必要がある。好ましくは0.02%以上、より好ましくは0.03%以上である。しかしながら過剰になると、母材靭性およびHAZ靭性を劣化させるため、Alは0.06%以下に抑える必要がある。Alは、好ましくは0.04%以下、より好ましくは0.035%以下である。
[Al: 0.01 to 0.06%]
Al is an element useful for deoxidation, and is an element that is effective in forming AlN to refine crystal grains. In order to exert such an effect, the Al amount needs to be 0.01% or more. Preferably it is 0.02% or more, More preferably, it is 0.03% or more. However, when it is excessive, the base metal toughness and the HAZ toughness are deteriorated, so Al needs to be suppressed to 0.06% or less. Al is preferably 0.04% or less, more preferably 0.035% or less.
本発明の鋼材は、上記元素を必須成分として含有するものであり、残部は鉄および不可避不純物からなる。不可避不純物は鋼材の諸特性を害さない程度に含まれていてもよく、例えば、MgやAs,Se等が合計で0.1%程度以下、好ましくは0.09%程度以下含まれていてもよい。 The steel material of this invention contains the said element as an essential component, and remainder consists of iron and an unavoidable impurity. Inevitable impurities may be contained to such an extent that they do not impair various properties of the steel material. For example, Mg, As, Se, etc. may be contained in a total of about 0.1% or less, preferably about 0.09% or less. Good.
本発明の鋼材は、更に他の元素として、HAZ靭性を更に向上させる元素(V、B、Ca)や、鋼材の強度を向上させる元素(Cu、Cr、Mo)を含有させることも有効である。詳細は以下の通りである。 It is also effective for the steel material of the present invention to contain elements (V, B, Ca) that further improve the HAZ toughness and elements (Cu, Cr, Mo) that improve the strength of the steel material as other elements. . Details are as follows.
〔V:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、B:0.0005〜0.003%、およびCa:0.0005〜0.003%よりなる群から選択される少なくとも1種の元素〕
V、B、Caは、いずれもHAZ靭性を向上させる元素である。
[V: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%), B: 0.0005 to 0.003%, and Ca: at least one element selected from the group consisting of 0.0005 to 0.003% ]
V, B, and Ca are all elements that improve the HAZ toughness.
Vを含有させる場合、0.002%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.005%以上、更に好ましくは0.01%以上である。一方、V量が0.5%を超えると、析出する炭窒化物が粗大化して母材靭性が劣化する。よって、V量は0.5%以下とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.1%以下、更に好ましくは0.05%以下である。 When V is contained, 0.002% or more is preferably contained. More preferably it is 0.005% or more, and still more preferably 0.01% or more. On the other hand, if the V content exceeds 0.5%, the precipitated carbonitrides become coarse and the base metal toughness deteriorates. Therefore, the V amount is preferably 0.5% or less. More preferably, it is 0.1% or less, More preferably, it is 0.05% or less.
Bは、粒界フェライトの生成を抑制してHAZ靭性を向上させる元素である。この様な効果を発揮させるには、0.0005%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.0010%以上である。しかしB量が0.003%を超えると、オーステナイト粒界にBNとして析出し、HAZ靭性の低下を招く。従ってB量は0.003%以下とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.002%以下である。 B is an element that suppresses the formation of grain boundary ferrite and improves the HAZ toughness. In order to exhibit such an effect, it is preferable to contain 0.0005% or more. More preferably, it is 0.0010% or more. However, if the amount of B exceeds 0.003%, it precipitates as BN at the austenite grain boundary, leading to a reduction in HAZ toughness. Accordingly, the B content is preferably 0.003% or less. More preferably, it is 0.002% or less.
Caは、添加するとTiN生成温度が下がるため、微細なTiNを析出させ、HAZ靭性を向上させる元素である。また、Caを含有させることによって、粗大な析出物(Al2O3を核とした粗大なTiN)の形成を抑制し、HAZ靭性を高めることができる。 Ca is an element that precipitates fine TiN and improves HAZ toughness because the TiN formation temperature decreases when added. Moreover, by containing Ca, formation of coarse precipitates (coarse TiN with Al 2 O 3 as a nucleus) can be suppressed, and HAZ toughness can be enhanced.
この様なCaによる作用を有効に発揮させるには、0.0005%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.0010%以上である。しかしCa量が0.003%を超えると、余分な介在物が析出してHAZ靭性の低下を招く。従ってCa量は0.003%以下とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.002%以下である。 In order to effectively exhibit such an action of Ca, it is preferable to contain 0.0005% or more. More preferably, it is 0.0010% or more. However, if the Ca content exceeds 0.003%, excess inclusions are precipitated, leading to a reduction in HAZ toughness. Therefore, the Ca content is preferably 0.003% or less. More preferably, it is 0.002% or less.
これらの元素は、単独で、または複数を含有させてもよい。 These elements may be contained alone or in combination.
〔Cu:0.3%以下(0%を含まない)、Cr:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、およびMo:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)よりなる群から選択される少なくとも1種の元素〕
Cu、Cr、Moは、いずれも鋼材の強度を高めるのに寄与する元素であり、Cuは、固溶強化して鋼材の強度を高める元素であり、Cr、Moは、焼き入れ性を向上させて鋼材の強度を高める元素である。これらの効果を発揮させるには、それぞれ下記含有量とするのがよい。
[From the group consisting of Cu: 0.3% or less (not including 0%), Cr: 0.5% or less (not including 0%), and Mo: 0.5% or less (not including 0%) At least one element selected]
Cu, Cr, and Mo are all elements that contribute to increasing the strength of the steel material, Cu is an element that enhances the strength of the steel material by solid solution strengthening, and Cr and Mo improve the hardenability. It is an element that increases the strength of steel. In order to exert these effects, the following contents are preferable.
Cuは、0.05%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.1%以上、更に好ましくは0.2%以上である。しかし0.3%を超えて含有すると、鋼材の靭性が劣化するため、Cuは0.3%以下とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.28%以下であり、更に好ましくは0.25%以下である。 It is preferable to contain Cu 0.05% or more. More preferably, it is 0.1% or more, More preferably, it is 0.2% or more. However, if the content exceeds 0.3%, the toughness of the steel material deteriorates, so Cu is preferably 0.3% or less. More preferably, it is 0.28% or less, More preferably, it is 0.25% or less.
Crは、0.1%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.2%以上、更に好ましくは0.25%以上である。しかしCr量が0.5%を超えると、鋼材(母材)の焼入れ性が著しく高まることで母材靭性が劣化し、またMA(島状マルテンサイト)などの生成により、HAZ靭性も低下する。従ってCrは0.5%以下とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.4%以下、更に好ましくは0.3%以下である。 It is preferable to contain 0.1% or more of Cr. More preferably, it is 0.2% or more, More preferably, it is 0.25% or more. However, if the Cr content exceeds 0.5%, the hardenability of the steel (base material) is remarkably increased, so that the base material toughness deteriorates, and the HAZ toughness also decreases due to the generation of MA (island martensite) and the like. . Therefore, Cr is preferably 0.5% or less. More preferably, it is 0.4% or less, More preferably, it is 0.3% or less.
Moは、0.1%以上含有させることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.2%以上、更に好ましくは0.3%以上である。しかしMo量が0.5%を超えると、上記Crの場合と同様に、鋼材(母材)の焼入れ性が著しく高まることで母材靭性が劣化し、またMA(島状マルテンサイト)などの生成により、HAZ靭性も低下する。従ってMoは0.5%以下とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.45%以下、更に好ましくは0.4%以下である。 It is preferable to contain Mo 0.1% or more. More preferably, it is 0.2% or more, More preferably, it is 0.3% or more. However, if the Mo content exceeds 0.5%, as in the case of Cr, the hardenability of the steel material (base material) is remarkably increased, so that the base material toughness deteriorates, and MA (island martensite) or the like Due to the formation, the HAZ toughness also decreases. Therefore, Mo is preferably 0.5% or less. More preferably, it is 0.45% or less, More preferably, it is 0.4% or less.
これらの元素は、単独で、または複数を含有させてもよい。 These elements may be contained alone or in combination.
本発明は、特に、板厚方向の組織等の均一化が困難である比較的厚肉の鋼板(板厚が例えば30〜100mm程度の鋼板)を対象とすれば、本発明の効果が存分に発揮される。 The present invention is particularly effective for a relatively thick steel plate (a steel plate having a thickness of, for example, about 30 to 100 mm) for which it is difficult to make a uniform structure or the like in the thickness direction. To be demonstrated.
また本発明の鋼板は、上述したとおり、低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性に優れているので、例えば寒冷地等に建設される海洋構造物に好適に用いられる。その他、造船等にも用いることができる。 Moreover, since the steel plate of this invention is excellent in low-temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness as above-mentioned, it is used suitably for the offshore structure constructed in a cold region etc., for example. In addition, it can be used for shipbuilding.
以下、実施例を挙げて本発明をより具体的に説明するが、本発明はもとより下記実施例によって制限を受けるものではなく、前・後記の趣旨に適合し得る範囲で適当に変更を加えて実施することも勿論可能であり、それらはいずれも本発明の技術的範囲に包含される。 EXAMPLES Hereinafter, the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to examples. However, the present invention is not limited by the following examples, but may be appropriately modified within a range that can meet the purpose described above and below. Of course, it is possible to implement them, and they are all included in the technical scope of the present invention.
鋼を溶製し、凝固して得られた下記表1に示す化学成分組成の各種スラブを用い、前記図5および下記表2,3に示す製造条件にて各種鋼板を製作した。尚、第1冷却における1段目冷却時の空冷時間は、表2に示す各C11冷却時間と同じとし、第1冷却における2段目冷却時の空冷時間は、表2に示す各C12冷却時間と同じとした。また、圧延中の板厚方向各部の温度は、下記の方法で測定した。 Various steel plates were manufactured under the manufacturing conditions shown in FIG. 5 and Tables 2 and 3 using various slabs having chemical composition shown in Table 1 obtained by melting and solidifying steel. The air cooling time at the first stage cooling in the first cooling is the same as the C 11 cooling time shown in Table 2, and the air cooling time at the second stage cooling in the first cooling is C 12 shown in Table 2. It was the same as the cooling time. Moreover, the temperature of each part in the sheet thickness direction during rolling was measured by the following method.
[圧延中の板厚方向各部の温度測定方法]
1.プロセスコンピュータを用い、加熱開始から加熱終了までの雰囲気温度や在炉時間に基づいて鋼片の表面から裏面までの位置の加熱温度を算出する。
2.算出した加熱温度を用い、圧延中の圧延パススケジュールやパス間の冷却方法(水冷あるいは空冷)のデータに基づいて、板厚方向の任意の位置における圧延温度を差分法など計算に適した方法を用いて計算しつつ圧延を実施する。
3.鋼板の表面温度は圧延ライン上に設置された放射型温度計を用いて実測する。但し、プロセスコンピュータでも理論値を計算しておく。
4.第1熱間圧延(粗圧延)開始時、第1熱間圧延(粗圧延)終了時、第2熱間圧延(仕上げ圧延)開始時にそれぞれ実測した鋼板の表面温度を、プロセスコンピュータから算出される計算温度と照合する。
5.計算温度と実測温度の差が±30℃以上の場合は、実測表面温度を計算表面温度に置き換えプロセスコンピュータ上の計算温度とし、±30℃未満の場合は、プロセスコンピュータから算出された計算温度をそのまま用いる。
6.上記算出された計算温度を用い、制御対象としている領域の圧延温度を管理する。
[Temperature measurement method for each part in the thickness direction during rolling]
1. Using a process computer, the heating temperature at the position from the front surface to the back surface of the steel slab is calculated based on the atmospheric temperature from the start of heating to the end of heating and the in-furnace time.
2. Using the calculated heating temperature, based on the rolling pass schedule during rolling and the data of the cooling method (water cooling or air cooling) between passes, a method suitable for calculation such as the difference method is used to calculate the rolling temperature at any position in the plate thickness direction. The rolling is carried out while using the calculation.
3. The surface temperature of the steel sheet is measured using a radiation type thermometer installed on the rolling line. However, the theoretical value is also calculated in the process computer.
4). The surface temperature of the steel sheet measured at the start of the first hot rolling (rough rolling), at the end of the first hot rolling (rough rolling), and at the start of the second hot rolling (finish rolling) is calculated from the process computer. Check against calculated temperature.
5. If the difference between the calculated temperature and the measured temperature is ± 30 ° C or more, replace the measured surface temperature with the calculated surface temperature and use it as the calculated temperature on the process computer. If it is less than ± 30 ° C, use the calculated temperature calculated from the process computer. Use as is.
6). Using the calculated temperature calculated above, the rolling temperature in the region to be controlled is managed.
製造過程における「板厚方向平均温度」は、上記方法で求められた、鋼片の表面から裏面までの位置の温度の平均値である。 The “plate thickness direction average temperature” in the production process is an average value of the temperatures at positions from the front surface to the back surface of the steel slab, which are obtained by the above method.
また、板厚方向平均冷却速度は、下記(7)式から求めたものである。
板厚方向平均冷却速度(℃/s)=(θs−θf)/τ・・・・・(7)
[上記(7)式において、θsは冷却開始時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、θfは冷却停止時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、τは冷却時間(s)を示す。]
Moreover, the plate thickness direction average cooling rate is obtained from the following equation (7).
Plate thickness direction average cooling rate (° C./s)=(θs−θf)/τ (7)
[In the above equation (7), θs represents the average thickness direction temperature (° C.) at the start of cooling, θf represents the average thickness direction temperature (° C.) at the time of cooling stop, and τ represents the cooling time (s). ]
上記の様にして得られた各鋼板について、鋼板(母材)およびHAZにおける評価を、それぞれ下記の要領で実施した。 About each steel plate obtained as mentioned above, evaluation in a steel plate (base material) and HAZ was implemented in the following way, respectively.
[板厚方向の硬さ差(Hvmax−Hvmin)]
図12において拡大された試験片(板幅(C方向)中央部から採取され、試験片上面は鋼板表面であり、試験片下面は別の鋼板表面である)の断面(斜線部)の表面から1mm深さの位置(表面部)、t/4部、t/2部の3箇所において、各箇所につき5点ずつ、ビッカース硬さ試験(荷重98N)を実施した。そして合計3部×5点=15点のうちの最高値(Hvmax)と最低値(Hvmin)を求め、(Hvmax−Hvmin)を計算した。その結果を表4に示す。
[Hardness difference in thickness direction (Hvmax−Hvmin)]
From the surface of the cross section (shaded portion) of the test piece enlarged in FIG. 12 (taken from the center of the plate width (C direction), the upper surface of the test piece is the steel plate surface, and the lower surface of the test piece is the surface of another steel plate). The Vickers hardness test (load 98N) was carried out at five points at each of the three locations of the 1 mm depth position (surface portion), t / 4 part, and t / 2 part. Then, a maximum value (Hvmax) and a minimum value (Hvmin) out of a total of 3 parts × 5 points = 15 points were obtained, and (Hvmax−Hvmin) was calculated. The results are shown in Table 4.
[板厚方向のアシキュラーフェライト分率差(Amax−Amin)]
上記硬さ差の測定と同様に図12に示された試験片を用い、断面における表面から1mm深さの位置、t/4部、t/2部の3部において各部につき5箇所ずつ、ナイタール腐食した光学顕微鏡写真(倍率:400倍)を撮影し、画像解析を行った。詳細には、上記光学顕微鏡写真をアシキュラーフェライトの組織写真(例えば、鋼のベイナイト写真集-I, 社団法人日本鉄鋼協会, 1992, P89)と比較して、上記光学顕微鏡写真中のアシキュラーフェライト部を塗りつぶし、上記光学顕微鏡写真に占める塗りつぶした部分の面積率を画像解析により測定し、アシキュラーフェライト分率とした。これを合計3部×5箇所=15箇所について行い、この15箇所のうち、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最高値(Amax)とアシキュラーフェライト分率の最低値(Amin)を求め、次いで(Amax−Amin)(アシキュラーフェライト分率差)を計算した。その結果を表4に示す。
[Acicular ferrite fraction difference in the plate thickness direction (Amax−Amin)]
The test piece shown in FIG. 12 was used in the same manner as the measurement of the above hardness difference, and 5 parts per part at 3 parts of 1 mm depth from the surface in the cross section, t / 4 part, t / 2 part, and nital. Corroded optical micrographs (magnification: 400 times) were taken and image analysis was performed. Specifically, the above optical micrograph is compared with a structural photograph of acicular ferrite (eg, Steel Bainite Photobook-I, Japan Iron and Steel Institute, 1992, P89). The area ratio of the filled portion in the optical micrograph was measured by image analysis to obtain an acicular ferrite fraction. This is performed for a total of 3 parts × 5 places = 15 places, and among these 15 places, the highest value (Amax) of the acicular ferrite fraction and the lowest value (Amin) of the acicular ferrite fraction are obtained, and then (Amax− Amin) (acicular ferrite fraction difference) was calculated. The results are shown in Table 4.
[板厚方向の大角結晶粒径差(Mmax−Mmin)]
上記硬さ差の測定と同様に図12に示された試験片を用い、断面における表面から1mm深さの位置、t/4部、t/2部の3部において各部につき5箇所ずつ、FE−SEM−EBSP(Electron Back Scattering Pattern)(電子放出型走査電子顕微鏡を用いた電子後方散乱回折像法)によって大角粒界径(大角結晶粒径)を測定した。具体的には、以下の通りである。
(i)前記図12に示すとおり、圧延方向と板厚方向からなる面であって、板厚方向が0〜tである(即ち、鋼板の表裏面を含む)サンプルを準備する。
(ii)#150〜#1000までの湿式エメリー研磨紙、またはそれと同等の機能を有する研磨方法(上記湿式エメリー研磨紙以外の研磨紙、ダイヤモンドスラリーなどの研磨剤を用いた研磨方法)によって鏡面仕上を施す。
(iii)TexSEM Laboratories社製のEBSP装置を使用し、t/4部において、結晶方位差が15°以上の境界を結晶粒界と設定して大角粒界で囲まれた領域(大角結晶粒)の結晶粒径を測定した。このときの測定条件は、測定範囲:200×200μm、測定ステップ:0.5μm間隔とし、測定方位の信頼性を示すコンフィデンス・インデックス(Confidence Index)が0.1よりも小さい測定点は解析対象から除外した。
(iv)データの解析法として、上記結晶粒径が2.5μm以下のものはノイズと考え削除した。そして1観察面における大角結晶粒の平均結晶粒径を、合計3部×5箇所=15箇所のそれぞれにおいて求めた。
[Large-angle crystal grain size difference in the plate thickness direction (Mmax−Mmin)]
Similarly to the measurement of the hardness difference, the test piece shown in FIG. 12 was used, and FE was used at five positions for each part at a position of 1 mm depth from the surface in the cross section, three parts of t / 4 part and t / 2 part. -The large-angle grain boundary diameter (large-angle crystal grain size) was measured by SEM-EBSP (Electron Back Scattering Pattern) (electron backscattering diffraction image method using an electron emission scanning electron microscope). Specifically, it is as follows.
(I) As shown in FIG. 12, a sample having a rolling direction and a plate thickness direction and having a plate thickness direction of 0 to t (that is, including the front and back surfaces of the steel plate) is prepared.
(Ii) Mirror finish by wet emery polishing paper of # 150 to # 1000 or a polishing method having the same function (polishing method other than the above wet emery polishing paper, polishing method using abrasive such as diamond slurry) Apply.
(Iii) A region surrounded by large-angle grain boundaries by using a EBSP apparatus manufactured by TexSEM Laboratories, and setting a boundary with a crystal orientation difference of 15 ° or more as a crystal grain boundary at t / 4 part (large-angle crystal grains) The crystal grain size of was measured. The measurement conditions at this time are the measurement range: 200 × 200 μm, the measurement step: 0.5 μm interval, and the measurement points having a confidence index (Confidence Index) indicating the reliability of the measurement direction are less than 0.1 are analyzed. Excluded.
(Iv) As a method for analyzing the data, those having a crystal grain size of 2.5 μm or less were considered as noise and deleted. Then, the average crystal grain size of the large-angle crystal grains in one observation plane was determined in each of a total of 3 parts × 5 spots = 15 spots.
そして、上記15箇所の大角結晶粒の平均結晶粒径のうち、最高値をMmax、最低値をMminとし、(Mmax−Mmin)を求めた。その結果を表4に示す。 Of the average crystal grain sizes of the 15 large-angle crystal grains, the maximum value was Mmax and the minimum value was Mmin, and (Mmax−Mmin) was determined. The results are shown in Table 4.
[超音波探傷試験](内部欠陥のUTエコー高さ)
JIS G 0901に規定する方法で、+12dB全面探傷を行い、内部欠陥のUTエコー高さを測定した。その結果を表4に示す。
[Ultrasonic testing] (UT echo height of internal defects)
A +12 dB whole surface flaw detection was performed by a method specified in JIS G 0901, and the UT echo height of the internal defect was measured. The results are shown in Table 4.
[母材の低温靭性]
t/2部(板厚中央部)において試験片の長手方向がC方向(圧延方向に垂直な方向)となるように、NK U4号試験片を採取し、JIS Z 2242に規定の方法でシャルピー衝撃試験を実施し、遷移曲線よりvTrs(脆性破面遷移温度)を求めた。そして、vTrs≦−100℃を母材の低温靭性に優れると評価した。その結果を表4に示す。
[Low temperature toughness of base metal]
NK U4 test specimens were collected so that the longitudinal direction of the test specimens was in the C direction (direction perpendicular to the rolling direction) at t / 2 part (plate thickness center part), and Charpy was measured by the method specified in JIS Z 2242. An impact test was performed, and vTrs (brittle fracture surface transition temperature) was determined from the transition curve. And it evaluated that vTrs <=-100 degreeC was excellent in the low temperature toughness of a base material. The results are shown in Table 4.
[HAZ−CTOD特性の評価]
下記表5の条件で図13に示すとおり、SAW溶接を行って溶接継手を作成した。CTOD試験は、API−2Zに従って、CG−HAZ領域を15%以上含むようにノッチを導入し、BS7448に従って試験を実施した。詳細には、図13に示すとおり、試験片板厚中央をセンター採寸として2/3の領域において、Fusion Lineから母材側に0.5mmの粗大粒領域(CG HAZ)が15%以上含まれるようにノッチを導入し、試験温度−10℃においてCTOD試験を3本について行い、限界CTOD値を求めた。そして、3本のうち最も小さい限界CTOD値が0.46mm以上のものを溶接継手破壊靭性に優れると評価した。その結果を表4に示す。
[Evaluation of HAZ-CTOD characteristics]
As shown in FIG. 13 under the conditions shown in Table 5, SAW welding was performed to create a welded joint. In the CTOD test, notches were introduced so as to include 15% or more of the CG-HAZ region according to API-2Z, and the test was performed according to BS7448. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 13, in the region of 2/3 with the center of the specimen thickness as the center measurement, a coarse grain region (CG HAZ) of 0.5 mm is included in the base material side from the Fusion Line by 15% or more. Thus, notches were introduced, and three CTOD tests were conducted at a test temperature of −10 ° C. to determine the limit CTOD value. And it evaluated that the thing with the smallest limit CTOD value of 0.46 mm or more is excellent in the weld joint fracture toughness among three. The results are shown in Table 4.
[引張試験]
ASTM A370-07aに記載のDiameter=12.5mm、Gauge length=50mmの形状の試験片を板厚方向t/4 C方向から採取し、ASTM A370に規定の方法で引張試験を行い、引張強さ(TS)、降伏強さ(YP)、EL(伸び)、YR(降伏比)を求めた。その結果を表4に示す。尚、本発明の鋼板は、TS≧470MPa、YP≧345MPa、およびEL≧23%を満たしている。
[Tensile test]
Test pieces with a shape of Diameter = 12.5 mm and Gauge length = 50 mm described in ASTM A370-07a were taken from the thickness direction t / 4 C direction, and subjected to a tensile test by the method prescribed in ASTM A370, and the tensile strength (TS), yield strength (YP), EL (elongation), and YR (yield ratio) were determined. The results are shown in Table 4. The steel sheet of the present invention satisfies TS ≧ 470 MPa, YP ≧ 345 MPa, and EL ≧ 23%.
表1〜4から次のように考察できる。 It can consider as follows from Tables 1-4.
即ち、No.1〜12は、本発明の要件を全て満たすものであり、優れた低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性を発揮していることがわかる。 That is, no. 1-12 satisfy | fills all the requirements of this invention and it turns out that the outstanding low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness are exhibited.
これに対し、本発明で規定する要件を外れるものは、特性の劣るものとなっている。 On the other hand, those that deviate from the requirements defined in the present invention are inferior in characteristics.
No.13、26は、第1冷却における1段目冷却時間(C11冷却時間、空冷時間)が短いため、鋼板の冷却が不十分となり、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内にできず、その結果、硬さ差、Amin、(Amax−Amin)、Mmax、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定範囲を外れ、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣るものとなった。 No. 13 and 26, the first stage cooling time in the first cooling (C 11 cooling time, cooling time) is short, the cooling of the steel sheet becomes insufficient, a temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 parts within 70 ° C. As a result, the hardness difference, Amin, (Amax−Amin), Mmax, and (Mmax−Mmin) were out of the specified range, and both the low temperature toughness and the welded joint fracture toughness were inferior.
No.15は、第1冷却における1段目冷却時間(C11冷却時間、空冷時間)が長すぎるため、また、No.16は、第1冷却における2段目冷却時間(C12冷却時間、空冷時間)が長すぎるため、いずれも表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内にできず、その結果、硬さ差、Amin、(Amax−Amin)、Mmax、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定範囲を外れ、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣るものとなった。 No. 15, the first stage cooling time in the first cooling (C 11 cooling time, cooling time) for too long, also, No. 16, the second stage cooling time in the first cooling (C 12 cooling time, cooling time) for too long, none can the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 parts within 70 ° C., as a result, hard The thickness difference, Amin, (Amax−Amin), Mmax, and (Mmax−Mmin) were out of the specified range, and both the low temperature toughness and the weld joint fracture toughness were inferior.
No.14、27は、第1冷却における2段目冷却時間(C12冷却時間、空冷時間)が短いため、1段目冷却で生成した鋼板表面の酸化皮膜を十分除去できず、冷却効率が低下した結果、表面部とt/2部の温度差が70℃を超えたと想定される。その結果、硬さ差、Amin、(Amax−Amin)、Mmax、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定範囲を外れ、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣るものとなった。 No. 14 and 27, the second stage cooling time in the first cooling (C 12 cooling time, cooling time) is short, it can not be sufficiently removed the oxide film of the resulting steel sheet surface in the first stage cooling, cooling efficiency is lowered As a result, it is assumed that the temperature difference between the surface part and t / 2 part exceeded 70 ° C. As a result, the hardness difference, Amin, (Amax−Amin), Mmax, and (Mmax−Mmin) deviated from the specified ranges, and both the low temperature toughness and the welded joint fracture toughness were inferior.
No.25は、第1冷却における1段目と2段目のどちらの冷却時間も短いため、硬さ差、Amin、(Amax−Amin)、Mmax、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定範囲を外れ、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣るものとなった。 No. 25, since the cooling time of both the first stage and the second stage in the first cooling is short, the difference in hardness, Amin, (Amax-Amin), Mmax, (Mmax-Mmin) is out of the specified range, and low temperature toughness It was inferior to both the weld joint fracture toughness.
No.17は、第1冷却における1段目冷却のC11が、またNo.18は、第1冷却における2段目冷却のC12が、いずれも0.6℃/sを下回っているため、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内にできず、その結果、(Amax−Amin)や、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定上限を超えた。また、硬さ差も規定上限を超えるものとなった。その結果、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣っている。 No. No. 17 is C 11 of the first stage cooling in the first cooling. 18, the second stage C 12 of cooling in the first cooling, since all are well below the 0.6 ° C. / s, can not be the temperature difference between the surface portion and the t / 2 parts within 70 ° C., as a result , (Amax−Amin) and (Mmax−Mmin) exceeded the specified upper limit. Also, the hardness difference exceeded the specified upper limit. As a result, both low temperature toughness and welded joint fracture toughness are inferior.
No.28は、第1冷却を、2段階冷却とせず1段のみの冷却としたので、この冷却で生成した鋼板表面の酸化皮膜が十分に取れず、冷却効率が低下した結果、表面部とt/2部の温度差が70℃を超えたと想定される。その結果、硬さ差、Amin、(Amax−Amin)、Mmax、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定範囲を外れ、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣るものとなった。 No. 28, since the first cooling was not a two-stage cooling but only a one-stage cooling, an oxide film on the surface of the steel plate generated by this cooling could not be sufficiently removed, resulting in a decrease in cooling efficiency. It is assumed that the temperature difference of 2 parts exceeded 70 ° C. As a result, the hardness difference, Amin, (Amax−Amin), Mmax, and (Mmax−Mmin) deviated from the specified ranges, and both the low temperature toughness and the welded joint fracture toughness were inferior.
No.23、24は、第1熱間圧延を規定の条件で行わなかったため、内部欠陥が十分に圧着せず、内部欠陥のUTエコー高さが高くなり、その結果、HAZ−CTOD特性に劣るものとなった。 No. 23 and 24, because the first hot rolling was not performed under the prescribed conditions, the internal defects were not sufficiently crimped, and the UT echo height of the internal defects was high, resulting in inferior HAZ-CTOD characteristics. became.
No.29は、成分組成を満たしているが、第2熱間圧延において(4)式を満たす条件(累積圧下率)で圧延を行わなかったため、(Amax−Amin)や、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定上限を超えた。その結果、溶接継手破壊靭性と低温靭性に劣るものとなった。 No. No. 29 satisfies the component composition, but in the second hot rolling, rolling was not performed under the condition (cumulative rolling reduction) satisfying the expression (4), so (Amax−Amin) and (Mmax−Mmin) are defined. The upper limit was exceeded. As a result, the weld joint fracture toughness and low temperature toughness were inferior.
No.19は、第2冷却が規定の条件を満たしていないため、所望の強度を確保することができなかった。 No. In No. 19, since the second cooling did not satisfy the prescribed condition, the desired strength could not be ensured.
No.20〜22は、製造条件は規定の通りであるが、成分組成が規定範囲を外れている例である。No.20は、Ni量が不足し(4)式を満足せず、No.21は、Nb量が不足し(4)式を満足せず、また、No.22は、C量が過剰であるため、いずれもAminが著しく小さくなり、(Amax−Amin)や、(Mmax−Mmin)が規定上限を超えた。また、硬さ差も規定上限を超えるものとなった。その結果、低温靭性と溶接継手破壊靭性のどちらにも劣るものとなった。 No. 20 to 22 are examples in which the production conditions are as defined, but the component composition is outside the specified range. No. No. 20 does not satisfy the formula (4) because the amount of Ni is insufficient. No. 21 does not satisfy the formula (4) because the amount of Nb is insufficient. In No. 22, since the amount of C was excessive, Amin was extremely small, and (Amax−Amin) and (Mmax−Mmin) exceeded the specified upper limit. Also, the hardness difference exceeded the specified upper limit. As a result, both low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness were inferior.
Claims (5)
Si:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、
Mn:1.0〜2.0%、
Ni:0.10〜1%、
Nb:0.005〜0.03%、
Ti:0.005〜0.02%、
N:0.0030〜0.065%、
P:0.02%以下(0%を含まない)、
S:0.015%以下(0%を含まない)、および
Al:0.01〜0.06%
を満たし、残部が鉄および不可避不純物であって、
下記(A)〜(D)の全ての条件を満たし、引張強さが470MPa以上であることを特徴とする低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性に優れた鋼板。
(A)表面部、t/4部[tは板厚を示す。以下同じ]、およびt/2部において、アシキュラーフェライト分率を測定したときに、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最低値(Amin)が50面積%以上であり、かつ、アシキュラーフェライト分率の最高値(Amax)と前記最低値(Amin)の差が下記(1)式を満たす。
Amax−Amin≦20面積%・・・・・(1)
(B)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、2つの結晶の方位差が15°以上の大角粒界で囲まれた領域(大角結晶粒)の平均結晶粒径を測定したときに、該平均結晶粒径の最高値(Mmax)が40μm以下であり、かつ、前記最高値(Mmax)と前記平均結晶粒径の最低値(Mmin)の差が下記(2)式を満たす。
Mmax−Mmin<40μm・・・・・(2)
(C)表面部、t/4部、およびt/2部において、硬さを測定したときに、硬さの最高値(Hvmax)と硬さの最低値(Hvmin)の差が下記(3)式を満たす。
Hvmax−Hvmin≦50・・・・・(3)
(D)JIS G 0901で規定の超音波探傷試験を、検出感度+12dBで全面探傷したときに、内部欠陥のUTエコー高さが50%以下である。 C: 0.02 to 0.10% (meaning “mass%”; the same shall apply hereinafter)
Si: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%),
Mn: 1.0-2.0%,
Ni: 0.10 to 1%,
Nb: 0.005 to 0.03%,
Ti: 0.005 to 0.02%,
N: 0.0030 to 0.065%,
P: 0.02% or less (excluding 0%),
S: 0.015% or less (excluding 0%), and Al: 0.01 to 0.06%
And the balance is iron and inevitable impurities,
A steel sheet that satisfies all the following conditions (A) to (D) and has excellent low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness, characterized by having a tensile strength of 470 MPa or more.
(A) Surface part, t / 4 part [t indicates the plate thickness. The same shall apply hereinafter), and when the acicular ferrite fraction is measured at t / 2, the minimum value (Amin) of the acicular ferrite fraction is 50 area% or more and the highest acicular ferrite fraction The difference between the value (Amax) and the minimum value (Amin) satisfies the following formula (1).
Amax−Amin ≦ 20 area% (1)
(B) At the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the average crystal grain size of a region (large-angle crystal grain) surrounded by a large-angle grain boundary in which the orientation difference between the two crystals is 15 ° or more was measured. Sometimes, the maximum value (Mmax) of the average crystal grain size is 40 μm or less, and the difference between the maximum value (Mmax) and the minimum value (Mmin) of the average crystal grain size satisfies the following formula (2): .
Mmax−Mmin <40 μm (2)
(C) When the hardness is measured at the surface portion, t / 4 portion, and t / 2 portion, the difference between the maximum hardness value (Hvmax) and the minimum hardness value (Hvmin) is the following (3) Satisfy the formula.
Hvmax−Hvmin ≦ 50 (3)
(D) When an ultrasonic flaw detection test specified in JIS G 0901 is subjected to full flaw detection with a detection sensitivity of +12 dB, the UT echo height of the internal defect is 50% or less.
V:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、
B:0.0005〜0.003%、および
Ca:0.0005〜0.003%
よりなる群から選択される少なくとも1種の元素を含む請求項1に記載の鋼板。 As other elements,
V: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%),
B: 0.0005 to 0.003%, and Ca: 0.0005 to 0.003%
The steel plate according to claim 1, comprising at least one element selected from the group consisting of:
Cu:0.3%以下(0%を含まない)、
Cr:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)、および
Mo:0.5%以下(0%を含まない)
よりなる群から選択される少なくとも1種の元素を含む請求項1または2に記載の鋼板。 As other elements,
Cu: 0.3% or less (excluding 0%),
Cr: 0.5% or less (not including 0%) and Mo: 0.5% or less (not including 0%)
The steel plate according to claim 1 or 2, comprising at least one element selected from the group consisting of:
請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の成分組成を満たすスラブを用い、1050℃以上に加熱した後、第1熱間圧延、第1冷却、第2熱間圧延、および第2冷却を、それぞれ下記条件(a)〜(d)を満たすように順次行うことを特徴とする低温靭性および溶接継手破壊靭性に優れた鋼板の製造方法。
(a)第1熱間圧延において、t/2部の温度が950℃以上の状態で圧下率が10%以上の最終パス圧延を行う。
(b)第1冷却として、下記条件を満たす2段階冷却を行うことにより、表面部とt/2部の温度差を70℃以内にする。
(1段目冷却)0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度で0.5T秒以上[Tは、第1冷却の開始板厚(mm)を示す。以下同じ]1.5T秒以下冷却した後、空冷を0.5T秒以上1.5T秒以下行う。
(2段目冷却)1段目冷却に引き続き、0.6℃/s以上の板厚方向平均冷却速度で0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下冷却した後、空冷を0.07T秒以上1.3T秒以下行う。
(c)第2熱間圧延において、t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲の圧延を、下記(4)式を満たすように行う。
Q+(Ni+Nb)×10≧33・・・・・(4)
[上記(4)式において、
Q:t/2部の温度が950℃未満の温度範囲における累積圧下率(%)、
Ni:Ni含有量(質量%)、
Nb:Nb含有量(質量%)を示す。
尚、圧下率は、下記(5)式で求められるものである。
圧下率=100×(圧延開始前厚−圧延完了厚)/圧延開始前厚・・・・・(5)]
(d)第2冷却として、表面部の温度がAr3変態点以上の温度域から、t/2部の温度が500℃以下の温度域までを、下記(6)式を満たす板厚方向平均冷却速度で冷却する。
板厚方向平均冷却速度≧6420t−1.60・・・・・(6)
[上記(6)式において、tは最終製品板厚(mm)を示す。
また、板厚方向平均冷却速度は、下記(7)式から求められるものである。
板厚方向平均冷却速度(℃/s)=(θs−θf)/τ・・・・・(7)
上記(7)式において、θsは冷却開始時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、θfは冷却停止時の板厚方向平均温度(℃)、τは冷却時間(s)を示す。] It is a manufacturing method of the steel plate in any one of Claims 1-4,
Using the slab satisfying the component composition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, after heating to 1050 ° C or higher, the first hot rolling, the first cooling, the second hot rolling, and the second cooling, The manufacturing method of the steel plate excellent in the low temperature toughness and the weld joint fracture toughness characterized by performing sequentially so that the following conditions (a)-(d) may be satisfy | filled.
(A) In the first hot rolling, the final pass rolling is performed at a reduction rate of 10% or more in a state where the temperature at t / 2 part is 950 ° C. or higher.
(B) As the first cooling, the temperature difference between the surface part and the t / 2 part is set within 70 ° C. by performing two-stage cooling satisfying the following conditions.
(First stage cooling) The thickness in the plate thickness direction average cooling rate of 0.6 ° C./s or more is 0.5 T seconds or more [T represents the starting plate thickness (mm) of the first cooling. The same applies hereinafter] After cooling for 1.5 T seconds or less, air cooling is performed for 0.5 T seconds to 1.5 T seconds.
(Second stage cooling) Following the first stage cooling, after cooling at an average cooling rate of 0.6 ° C./s or more in the plate thickness direction from 0.07 T seconds to 1.3 T seconds, the air cooling is performed from 0.07 T seconds to 1 Perform for 3T seconds or less.
(C) In the second hot rolling, rolling in a temperature range where the temperature at t / 2 part is less than 950 ° C. is performed so as to satisfy the following expression (4).
Q + (Ni + Nb) × 10 ≧ 33 (4)
[In the above equation (4),
Q: Cumulative rolling reduction (%) in a temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is less than 950 ° C.
Ni: Ni content (mass%),
Nb: Nb content (% by mass).
In addition, the rolling reduction is obtained by the following equation (5).
Reduction ratio = 100 × (thickness before rolling start−thickness after rolling) / thickness before rolling start (5)]
(D) As the second cooling, from the temperature range where the temperature of the surface part is equal to or higher than the Ar 3 transformation point to the temperature range where the temperature of t / 2 part is 500 ° C. or less, the plate thickness direction average satisfying the following expression (6) Cool at the cooling rate.
Average cooling rate in the plate thickness direction ≧ 6420t −1.60 (6)
[In the above formula (6), t represents the final product plate thickness (mm).
Moreover, the plate thickness direction average cooling rate is obtained from the following equation (7).
Plate thickness direction average cooling rate (° C./s)=(θs−θf)/τ (7)
In the above equation (7), θs represents the plate thickness direction average temperature (° C.) at the start of cooling, θf represents the plate thickness direction average temperature (° C.) at the time of cooling stop, and τ represents the cooling time (s). ]
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2011098419A JP5612532B2 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2011-04-26 | Steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness and method for producing the same |
KR1020120043166A KR101364949B1 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2012-04-25 | Steel plate with excellent low-temperature toughness and welded joint fracture toughness, and its manufacturing method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2011098419A JP5612532B2 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2011-04-26 | Steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness and method for producing the same |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2012229470A JP2012229470A (en) | 2012-11-22 |
JP5612532B2 true JP5612532B2 (en) | 2014-10-22 |
Family
ID=47431242
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2011098419A Expired - Fee Related JP5612532B2 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2011-04-26 | Steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness and method for producing the same |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP5612532B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101364949B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6280824B2 (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2018-02-14 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | High strength steel plate and manufacturing method thereof |
CN104532147B (en) * | 2014-12-24 | 2016-10-26 | 舞阳钢铁有限责任公司 | Fixing offshore platform S460G2+QT steel plate and production method thereof |
KR101736611B1 (en) * | 2015-12-04 | 2017-05-17 | 주식회사 포스코 | Steel having superior brittle crack arrestability and resistance brittle crack initiation of welding point and method for manufacturing the steel |
KR101726082B1 (en) * | 2015-12-04 | 2017-04-12 | 주식회사 포스코 | Steel having superior brittle crack arrestability and resistance brittle crack initiation of welding point and method for manufacturing the steel |
KR101949036B1 (en) * | 2017-10-11 | 2019-05-08 | 주식회사 포스코 | Thick steel sheet having excellent low temperature strain aging impact properties and method of manufacturing the same |
KR101999018B1 (en) * | 2017-12-24 | 2019-07-10 | 주식회사 포스코 | Thick steel plate with excellent low-temperature toughness and method for manufacturing the same |
CN110106442A (en) * | 2019-05-28 | 2019-08-09 | 南京钢铁股份有限公司 | A kind of ultra-fine acicular structure structural steel and its production method |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0757885B2 (en) * | 1987-04-24 | 1995-06-21 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Manufacturing method of steel plate with excellent low temperature toughness |
JPH066743B2 (en) * | 1987-12-16 | 1994-01-26 | 住友金属工業株式会社 | Method for manufacturing high strength ultra thick steel |
JPH07116504B2 (en) * | 1990-12-25 | 1995-12-13 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Manufacturing method of 50 kg class low yield ratio thick high-strength steel plate having a plate thickness of 50 mm or more with a small hardness difference in the plate thickness direction |
JP3301348B2 (en) * | 1997-04-24 | 2002-07-15 | 住友金属工業株式会社 | Manufacturing method of hot-rolled high-tensile steel sheet |
JP2003183731A (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-07-03 | Jfe Steel Kk | Method for manufacturing non-heat-treated steel sheet with high tensile strength |
JP4660250B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2011-03-30 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Thick high-strength steel sheet with excellent low-temperature toughness in the heat affected zone by high heat input welding |
KR100718410B1 (en) * | 2005-12-09 | 2007-05-14 | 가부시키가이샤 고베 세이코쇼 | Steel sheet excellent in low-temperature toughness property in welded joint |
KR100797326B1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-01-22 | 주식회사 포스코 | Steel plate for riser pipe guaranteed pwht and method of manufacturing thereof |
KR100815717B1 (en) * | 2006-11-02 | 2008-03-20 | 주식회사 포스코 | High strength linepipe steel plate for large diameter pipe with high low-temperature ductility and hic resistance at the h2s containing environment and manufacturing method thereof |
JP5223379B2 (en) * | 2007-03-08 | 2013-06-26 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | High strength hot rolled steel sheet for spiral pipe with excellent low temperature toughness and method for producing the same |
KR100957970B1 (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2010-05-17 | 주식회사 포스코 | High-strength and high-toughness thick steel plate and method for producing the same |
JP5216530B2 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2013-06-19 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Thick steel plate with excellent brittle crack propagation stop properties |
-
2011
- 2011-04-26 JP JP2011098419A patent/JP5612532B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2012
- 2012-04-25 KR KR1020120043166A patent/KR101364949B1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR101364949B1 (en) | 2014-02-19 |
KR20120121362A (en) | 2012-11-05 |
JP2012229470A (en) | 2012-11-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR101846759B1 (en) | Steel plate and method for manufacturing same | |
JP5574059B2 (en) | High-strength H-section steel with excellent low-temperature toughness and method for producing the same | |
JP5618036B1 (en) | Thick steel plate excellent in multi-layer welded joint CTOD characteristics and method for producing the same | |
JP5337412B2 (en) | Thick steel plate excellent in brittle crack propagation stopping characteristics and method for producing the same | |
JP5096087B2 (en) | High tensile strength steel plate for high heat input welding with excellent base metal low temperature toughness | |
JP5612532B2 (en) | Steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness and weld joint fracture toughness and method for producing the same | |
JP5733484B1 (en) | Thick steel plate excellent in multi-layer welded joint CTOD characteristics and method for producing the same | |
KR20130025947A (en) | Wear-resistant steel sheet having excellent welded part toughness and lagging destruction resistance properties | |
JP5618037B1 (en) | Thick steel plate excellent in multi-layer welded joint CTOD characteristics and method for producing the same | |
JP4220871B2 (en) | High-tensile steel plate and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP6400516B2 (en) | High strength steel material with excellent fatigue crack propagation resistance and method for producing the same | |
JP5741378B2 (en) | High tensile steel plate with excellent toughness and method for producing the same | |
WO2014175122A1 (en) | H-shaped steel and method for producing same | |
JP2005232513A (en) | High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method | |
JP5272759B2 (en) | Thick steel plate manufacturing method | |
JP5139015B2 (en) | Thick high-strength steel sheet for large heat input welding with low base metal low-temperature toughness variation and excellent heat-affected zone toughness, and method for producing the same | |
WO2021020220A1 (en) | High-strength steel sheet for sour resistant line pipe, manufacturing method thereof, and high-strength steel pipe made using high-strength steel sheet for sour resistant line pipe | |
JP5668668B2 (en) | Steel with excellent toughness of weld heat affected zone, welded joint, and method for manufacturing welded joint | |
EP3730642A1 (en) | Structural steel having excellent brittle crack propagation resistance, and manufacturing method therefor | |
JP4437972B2 (en) | Thick steel plate with low base material toughness with little acoustic anisotropy and method for producing the same | |
CN108350539B (en) | Steel member, steel plate, and method for manufacturing same | |
JP6400517B2 (en) | High strength steel material with excellent fatigue crack propagation resistance and method for producing the same | |
JP4354754B2 (en) | High-tensile steel plate with excellent base metal toughness and HAZ toughness | |
JP4868762B2 (en) | High-strength, high-toughness bainite non-tempered steel sheet with small acoustic anisotropy | |
JP2006002236A (en) | High tensile strength steel plate having reduced anisotropy in material and having excellent low temperature toughness |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20130902 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20140815 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20140826 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20140904 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5612532 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |