JP4811336B2 - Manufacturing method of resin welded product - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method of manufacturing a resin welded product capable of preventing laser welding causing a leak-path from being carried out through simple and proper estimation relating to the size of a gap between resin members laser-welded. <P>SOLUTION: When a magnetic sensor is made to be a target of manufacturing as a resin welded product, the resin is welded to obtain the welding by irradiating a laser beam from a flange 21 side of a cap part 20 in such a state that the flange 21 of the cap part 20 made of a light-transmissive resin and a joint part 13 of a sensor body 10 made of a light absorbing resin are joined. Especially, before welding by irradiation of the laser beam, the size of the gap between the flange part 21 and the joint part 13 is measured by a degree of leak of a leak inspection in such a state that they are pressure welded at a predetermined pressure. In the result of the measurement, welding by irradiation of the laser beam is carried out on the condition that the degree of leak is within the specification range. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&amp;INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a resin for melting and welding these resins by irradiating a laser beam from the light transmitting resin side in a state where the light transmitting resin and the light non-transmitting (light absorbing) resin are bonded. The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a welded product.

  As is well known in such welding by laser light irradiation, that is, laser welding, by first irradiating laser light from the light-transmitting resin side to the light-transmitting resin and the light-absorbing resin, the light-absorbing resin The side heats and melts, and then the heat of fusion is transmitted to the light-transmitting resin side by heat conduction, so that the light-transmitting resin side is also melted. And as a result of both resin being melt | dissolved in this way, it leads to welding of those both resin. In this case, if there is a gap between the two resins, the thermal conductivity from the light-absorbing resin to the light-transmitting resin is extremely deteriorated to prevent heat melting on the light-transmitting resin side. It is also well known that the airtightness and welding strength between the resins are extremely reduced due to the fact that these resins are not sufficiently melted together. For this reason, measures such as measuring the size of the gap between the two resins before welding and eliminating the corresponding resin member when the measured size of the gap exceeds the standard value are effective. However, since the gap between the resins is usually very small, it is practically difficult to measure the size quantitatively. However, demanding strict tolerances for the resin molded products to be welded is not practical because it increases production costs.

Therefore, conventionally, for example, as seen in Patent Document 1, laser welding in the above-described mode is performed in two steps of temporary welding and main welding, and an airtight test is performed between the temporary welding and main welding. The method of doing etc. is also proposed. That is, in this method, first, as the temporary welding, for example, both the resin members are welded with a laser energy dose smaller than that of the main welding. After that, an air tightness test (leak test) is performed, and if the gap between the resin members due to temporary welding exceeds the allowable range, this is excluded as a defective product, and only when the gap is within the allowable range The main welding is performed with the original laser energy dosage for welding. By adopting such a manufacturing method for the resin welded product, it is possible to prevent the occurrence of a product that has poor weld strength due to the gap between the two resin members.
JP 2004-351730 A

  In this way, laser welding is performed in two steps of temporary welding and main welding, and an airtightness test is performed between the temporary welding and main welding, resulting in a gap between the two resin members. Certainly poor weld strength is less likely to occur. However, when trying to achieve both the hermeticity and the dimensional accuracy after processing (after welding) by minimizing the penetration of both resins involved in laser welding, the above-mentioned conventional manufacturing method is as follows. Inconvenience cannot be ignored.

First, although it is temporary welding, even if there is a minute gap between the resin members as long as the resin members are welded through laser light irradiation, the gap is closed or within the allowable range. There is a high possibility that it will end. If the above airtightness test (leak test) is performed in such a state, the test (inspection) naturally requires a long time. Depending on the required time, the welded part may be completely cooled. There is also a possibility of end. In this way, laser welding is divided into two steps,
(A) If a large amount of laser energy is administered at once, there is a concern that the quality of welding may be deteriorated, such as generation of voids due to excessive heat generation on the light absorbing resin side. There is also a concern that required dimensions cannot be maintained due to excessive melting of the resin.
(B) Therefore, a smooth change in the melt size is expected by gradually increasing the heat generation amount through laser irradiation over two steps.
In view of the fact that it is made under such an intention, a situation in which the welded portion cools down after temporary welding is not desirable. It is also possible to remelt the welded portion once cooled. However, in that case, a longer melting time is required, and there is a new concern about deterioration of quality of the remelted portion and deterioration of dimensional accuracy.

  Further, according to the verification and evaluation by the inventors, if there is a gap due to scratches or the like between the resin members, even if sufficient welding strength between the resin members can be secured, the resin It has also been confirmed that this is not always satisfied when it comes to leak standards as a welded product. The contents of verification and evaluation by the inventors will be described with reference to FIG.

  First, as shown in FIG. 9A, a laser beam L is irradiated in a state where a light-transmitting resin member 200 is bonded to a light-absorbing resin member 100 having a groove-like scratch 101 having a certain depth and a certain width. As a result of scanning, the flaw 101 was apparently filled by the thermal expansion of the light-absorbing resin member 100, and the welding was completed with a so-called pseudo welded portion 110 as shown in FIG. 9B. In FIG. 9B, reference numeral 120 indicates a normal welded portion based on the above-described melting mechanism. And when the said airtightness test (leak test | inspection) was implemented in the state shown by this FIG.9 (b), it came to the result by which the leak specification as the said resin welded product was satisfy | filled. Moreover, although it has the said pseudo welding part 110, the said part is a part corresponding only to the said groove-shaped local flaw 101, and the welding strength itself of these resin members 100 and 200 is sufficient intensity | strength. Is maintained. However, after that, when an environmental test was carried out by a cooling cycle, the occurrence of cracks in the pseudo welded part 110 was confirmed, and in the airtightness test (leak test) at that time, the leak standard could not be satisfied after all. It was.

  As is clear from this, the welding strength and the airtightness or dimensional accuracy after processing (after welding) are completely different evaluation factors for the resin welded product, and welding is performed as in the conventional manufacturing method. It is possible that the evaluation of good or bad based only on strength is not appropriate depending on the resin welded product to be manufactured. In addition, in the case of the conventional manufacturing method, once temporarily welded, there is a high possibility that the presence of such a flaw cannot be confirmed in the above-described airtightness test (leak test). Even if it is done, the above-described cooling and heating cycle does not necessarily cause a crack that becomes a leak path to occur in the portion where the scratch exists.

  The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and can prevent the execution of laser welding in which a leak path is generated through simple and appropriate evaluation regarding the size of the gap between resin members to be laser-welded. It aims at providing the manufacturing method of a resin welded article.

  Further, the present invention is a resin capable of improving the yield while maintaining both airtightness and dimensional accuracy after processing (after welding), rather than welding strength as a resin welded product to be laser welded. It aims at providing the manufacturing method of a welding article.

  In order to achieve such an object, in the invention described in claim 1, the resin is melted by irradiating laser light from the light transmitting resin side in a state where the light transmitting resin and the light absorbing resin are joined. As a method of manufacturing a resin welded product that is intended to be welded, prior to welding by irradiation with the laser beam, between the first resin member made of the light transmitting resin and the second resin member made of the light absorbing resin. The size of the gap is measured with a leak degree by a leak inspection in a state where the first and second resin members are pressed against each other at a predetermined pressure, and the result of the measurement is that the leak degree is within a standard range. In addition, the first and second resin members are welded by irradiation with the laser beam.

  By adopting such a method as a method for manufacturing a resin welded product, a first resin member made of a light-transmitting resin and a second resin member made of a light-absorbing resin before laser welding, which has been considered difficult until now, are used. Measurement of the size of the gap between them becomes extremely easy and quantitative through leak inspection before laser welding. In addition, since the leak inspection is performed with the first and second resin members being pressed against each other at a predetermined pressure, the obtained leak level is almost constant as long as the above-described scratches are not present. It comes to take. In other words, if there is a gap such as a scratch, its size is directly reflected in the obtained degree of leak. Thereby, although it is simple, appropriate evaluation is attained regarding the magnitude | size of the clearance gap between the resin members welded by laser. Based on this evaluation, that is, on the condition that the leak level is within the standard range, laser welding of the first and second resin members is performed so that a leak path is generated. Execution can also be prevented.

  Further, in the invention according to claim 2, the resin which melts the resin by irradiating the laser beam from the light transmitting resin side in a state where the light transmitting resin and the light absorbing resin are joined and aims to weld the resin. In the method for manufacturing a welded product, the size of the gap between the first resin member made of the light-transmitting resin and the second resin member made of the light-absorbing resin prior to welding by the laser light irradiation. The first and second resin members are measured with a leak degree in a state in which the first and second resin members are pressed against each other at a predetermined pressure. As a result of the measurement, the first and second resin members are measured under the condition that the leak degree is within a standard range. In addition, the welding by the irradiation of the laser beam is performed in such a manner that the minimum melting required for the welding of the second resin member is obtained.

  Such a method as a method for manufacturing a resin-welded product also enables a simple and appropriate evaluation regarding the size of the gap between resin members to be laser-welded, and based on this evaluation, that is, the degree of leakage is By performing laser welding on the first and second resin members on condition that they are within the standard range, it is possible to prevent laser welding from occurring so that a leakage path is generated. In addition, here, laser welding is performed in such a manner that the minimum melting required for welding of the first and second resin members is obtained, so that the airtightness as the resin welded product can be improved. The yield can be improved while maintaining compatibility with the dimensional accuracy after processing (after welding).

  In the invention according to claim 1 or claim 2, the standard range for the degree of leakage is a range that can satisfy the durability of the welded portion by irradiation with the laser beam, that is, a crack caused by the above-described cooling cycle. If it is set to a range that is empirically required as a range that can prevent the occurrence of cracks, the combination of the first and second resin members that have such a crack generation factor is also passed through the leak inspection. It will be possible to accurately reject this.

  Further, in the method for manufacturing a resin welded product, as set forth in the invention according to claim 3, the standard range for the degree of leakage is set to a limit range in which normal welding by the laser light irradiation is possible. The standard range may be ranked in a plurality of stages within the set range, and the rank obtained corresponding to the degree of leak based on the leak inspection may be fed back to the welding condition by the laser light irradiation. As a result, for example, even if the measured leak level exceeds the standard range in the standard range set to the highest rank, the leak level is included in any of the ranks. The normal welding can be maintained through feedback to the welding conditions, and the yield can be further improved.

  In addition, as feedback to the welding conditions by irradiation of the laser beam of the rank obtained in this way, feedback to the laser output of the laser beam, or invention of claim 5, for example, according to the invention of claim 4. As described above, feedback to the pressure at which the first and second resin members are pressed against each other at the time of laser light irradiation is effective.

  By the way, in the feedback to the laser output, the lower the rank, that is, the higher the degree of leak based on the leak inspection within the standard range, the higher the laser output. On the other hand, the first and second resin members In the feedback to the pressure that presses the pressure, the lower the rank, the higher the pressure. Among these, the feedback to the laser output of the former is particularly effective because the melting mode of the first and second resin members can be directly changed.

  On the other hand, such a method for producing a resin-welded product includes, for example, a sensor chip having a magnetic detection element and a magnet for applying a magnetic field to the magnetic detection element of the sensor chip, as in the invention according to claim 6, Application to a magnetic sensor for detecting a movement mode of the magnetic body by sensing a change in the magnetic field applied from the magnet in cooperation with the movement of the magnetic body in the vicinity of the sensor chip through the magnetic detection element. It is possible and effective.

That is, such a magnetic sensor
a. The sensor chip is led out from the front end of the sensor body which is resin-molded by casting the metal terminal so that the power supply terminal and the output terminal are electrically connected to the metal terminal penetrating the sensor body of the magnetic sensor. Arranged on the chip mounting part,
b. The magnet is formed in a cylindrical shape and is inserted in a manner covering the sensor chip chip mounting portion together with the sensor chip.
c. The sensor body has a joint portion connected to the outer periphery of the surface from which the chip mounting portion is led out, and the bottomed cylindrical cap portion that is also molded with resin closes the surface from which the chip mounting portion of the sensor body is led out Then, the opening end of the cap part is joined to the joint part, so that both the sensor chip and the chip mounting part and the magnet are protected from the external atmosphere.
When the cap portion is in pressure contact with the joint portion of the sensor body, the leak inspection is performed as a measurement of the degree of leakage of the gas fed into the cap portion, and the cap portion is moved to the first portion. The resin member is used, and the joint portion of the sensor body is used as the second resin member, and the manufacturing is performed in such a manner that welding is performed by irradiation with the laser beam.

  When such a magnetic sensor is used, for example, as a rotation detection device that detects the rotation speed of a crankshaft of an internal combustion engine, both airtightness through the cap portion and dimensional accuracy after processing (after welding) can be achieved. Since it is strongly desired, the significance of adopting the manufacturing method described above for its manufacture is significant.

  In such a magnetic sensor, the resin-molded sensor body usually has a gap at the interface between the resin constituting the sensor body and the metal terminal when molding by injection molding or the like. Although the above-described leak inspection can be performed by utilizing this, the gap itself is not large as a leak path for such a leak inspection, and therefore the time required for the inspection cannot be ignored.

  In this regard, as in the invention according to claim 7, the sensor body to be molded with resin is used for leak inspection that penetrates the surface on which the chip mounting portion of the sensor body is led out along the metal terminal. If the through holes are provided in advance, it is possible to perform a leak inspection in a shorter time, and as a result, it is possible to expect a reduction in manufacturing cost including the time required for the manufacturing.

  FIG. 1 to FIG. 1 show an embodiment in which the method for manufacturing a resin welded product according to the present invention is embodied in a method for manufacturing a magnetic sensor used for detecting the rotational speed of a crankshaft of an internal combustion engine, for example, as a rotation detection device. Explanation will be made with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional structure of a magnetic sensor to be manufactured in this embodiment, and FIG. 2 shows an exploded perspective structure of the magnetic sensor. Reference is first made to FIGS. 1 and 2. The structure of the magnetic sensor to be manufactured will be described.

  As shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, this magnetic sensor is roughly composed of a sensor main body 10 integrally molded with the above-described light-absorbing resin and laser welding to the sensor main body 10 to protect the tip portion thereof. The cap portion 20 formed of the above-described light transmissive resin is basically provided.

  Among these, the sensor body 10 is provided with a chip mounting portion 11 projecting in a plate shape at the tip thereof, and a sensor chip SC made of a bare chip is mounted on the chip mounting portion 11. The sensor chip SC is a chip in which, for example, a magnetic detection element (magnetoelectric conversion element) including a magnetoresistive element (MRE) and a processing circuit for processing the converted electric signal are integrated. In this sensor chip SC, a magnetic field is always received from the magnet 30 interposed between the chip mounting portion 11 of the sensor body 10 and the cap portion 20, and the magnetism near the tip portion of the cap portion 20 is detected. A change in the magnetic field generated by cooperation with the movement (rotation) of the body is detected through the magnetic detection element, and an electrical signal corresponding to the movement mode of the magnetic body is output.

  Further, in the sensor body 10, a chip mounting portion lead-out surface 12, which is a surface from which the chip mounting portion 11 is led out, is provided with a joint portion 13 that is continuous with the outer periphery thereof. Thus, the cap part 20 is laser-welded.

  In addition, the sensor body 10 is provided with a bolt fastening flange 14 via a portion where an O-ring Or is provided behind the joint portion 13, and is connected to the rear of the bolt fastening flange 14. In this manner, the connector portion 15 is provided. Incidentally, in the bolt fastening flange 14, a metal ring Mr is integrally cast on the inner peripheral surface of the bolt insertion hole, and the connector portion 15 has a power supply terminal and an output of the magnetic sensor. Metal terminals T1, T2 and T3 serving as terminals are derived. These metal terminals T1, T2, and T3 are also integrally cast with the sensor main body 10 when the sensor main body 10 is resin-molded by, for example, injection molding. These metal terminals T1, T2, and T3 reach the chip mounting portion 11 on the front end side of the sensor body 10, and are respectively connected to the power supply terminal and the output terminal of the sensor chip SC mounted on the chip mounting portion 11. It is electrically connected by a bonding wire Bw. In this embodiment, the sensor main body 10 has a chip mounting portion lead-out surface from the inner surface of the connector portion 15 to facilitate the leak inspection between the joint portion 13 and the cap portion 20. 12, a leak inspection through hole 16 is provided along the metal terminal (T2). The through-holes 16 are also collectively formed through the mold shape during resin molding of the sensor body 10 by, for example, injection molding.

  On the other hand, the cap portion 20 is laser welded to the joint portion 13 of the sensor body 10 after the magnet 30 is inserted through the hollow portion 31 so as to cover the chip mounting portion 11 of the sensor body 10. Thus, the sensor chip SC and other electrical connection parts are protected from the external environment. For laser welding, the cap portion 20 is provided with a flange 21 at the opening end thereof in a shape that matches the shape of the joint portion 13 formed in a tapered shape.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the manufacturing process of the magnetic sensor manufacturing method. Next, the manufacturing method of the magnetic sensor having the above structure will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 3, when manufacturing such a magnetic sensor, first, the parts constituting the magnetic sensor, such as the sensor main body 10 and the cap portion 20, are molded by injection molding using an appropriate mold (steps). A). In this resin molding, a light-absorbing resin is used as the sensor body 10 and a light-transmitting resin is used as the cap portion 20 as described above.

  After the molding of each part in this way, the shape inspection for inspecting whether or not the shape and dimension of each of the molded parts are within the standard range is performed by, for example, sampling inspection for each lot ( Step B). Then, when an inspection result indicating that the shape and size of each of the molded parts are not within the standard range is obtained through the shape inspection in step B (step C: NO), an error in the shape and size. This information is fed back to the part molding conditions in step A, specifically, mold inspection, resin injection pressure adjustment, and the like are performed, so that the molding accuracy of these parts is maintained.

On the other hand, in the shape inspection in the process B, when an inspection result indicating that the shape and dimensions of each part are within the standard range (within tolerance) is obtained (process C: YES), through the subsequent process D, These parts will be assembled. That is, in this process D, in the aspect shown in FIG.
(I) The sensor chip SC is mounted on the chip mounting portion 11 of the sensor body 10 and wired to the metal terminals T1, T2, T3.
(Ii) The magnet 30 is inserted so as to cover the chip mounting portion 11 on which the sensor chip SC has been mounted and wired.
(Iii) Further, the cap part 20 is placed on the sensor body 10 so as to cover the inserted magnet 30 together with the chip mounting part 11.
Such work is performed.

  Thereafter, in step E, the flange 20 of the cap portion 20 is pressed against the joint portion 13 of the sensor body 10 in a state where the covered cap portion 20 is pressed against the sensor body 10 with a predetermined pressure. In a state where 21 is in close contact, the leak inspection of the process F is performed. FIG. 4 shows a leak inspection mode in a state where the cap portion 20 according to these steps E and F is pressed.

  That is, as shown in FIG. 4, in the step E, first, the connector portion 15 of the sensor body 10 is mounted and fixed in the mounting hole 41 with respect to the rotation support base 40 that is rotatably supported. Then, the cap part 20 is pressurized with a predetermined pressure F 1 by the clamp 50, and the flange 21 of the cap part 20 is pressed against the joint part 13 of the sensor body 10. And while maintaining the same state, as the process F, gas (in this example, air) from the connector part 15 through the through hole 16 to the cap part 20 through the leak tester 60 connected to the rotation support base 40. And the size of the gap between the joint portion 13 of the sensor body 10 and the flange 21 of the cap portion 20 is measured with the degree of leakage of the supplied gas. As the leak tester 60, for example, a well-known method of measuring the degree of leakage of an object to be inspected (here, between the joint portion 13 and the flange 21) based on a flow meter method, a pressure meter method, a differential pressure meter method, or the like. The tester is used. In addition, in resin injection molding, etc., even when the sensor body 10 is resin molded as it is, there is a minute gap at the interface between the metal terminals (T1, T2, T3) to be cast and the surrounding resin. To do. For this reason, although it is possible to supply gas into the cap part 20 from the said connector part 15 through this clearance gap, in that case, the said leak inspection will naturally require a long time. Therefore, in the embodiment, as described above, the time required for the leak inspection is shortened by providing the through hole 16 in the sensor body 10.

Further, in this embodiment, when performing the leak inspection, as shown as step G and step H in FIG. 3, “first standard value LK1” and “second standard” with respect to the measured leak degree. Here, ranking is performed using two standard values such as “value LK2”. That is, these two standard values are

1st standard value LK1 <2nd standard value LK2 (limit value in which normal welding is possible)

Specifically, the ranking is performed in the following manner with respect to the measured leakage degree.
(A) The degree of leak is less than the above “first standard value LK1” (in the first standard range). That is, it can be determined as “good” (process G: YES).
(B) The degree of leak is not less than the “first standard value LK1” and less than the “second standard value LK2” (in the second standard range). That is, depending on the processing conditions, it can be a “non-defective product” (process G: NO, process H: YES).
(C) The leakage degree is not less than the “second standard value LK2” (outside the standard range). That is, a product that must be discarded as a “defective product” (process H: NO).

In this embodiment, after ranking is performed in this manner, the following processing is performed according to each of the ranks (a) to (c).
First, in step J, laser welding with a reference laser output LPW set in advance corresponding to the “first standard value LK1” is performed for those determined to be the rank (a). In addition, for what is determined to be the rank (b), in step I, the laser output is temporarily increased to the laser output “LPW + α” corresponding to the “second standard value LK2”. Laser welding is performed in step J based on the laser output LPW (← LPW + α). And about what was determined to be the said rank (c), subsequent manufacture is discontinued and discarded. FIG. 5 shows a specific embodiment of the laser welding performed as the step J with respect to the rank (a) or the rank (b) determined.

  That is, as shown in FIG. 5, in this embodiment, it is assumed that laser welding is performed following the above-described leak inspection, and it is determined that rank (a) or rank (b) is obtained through the ranking. In that case, the leak tester 60 (FIG. 4) is first removed from the rotation support base 40. Then, the output setting of the laser light L is performed in a state where the pressurization to the cap portion 20 at the above-described predetermined pressure F1 by the clamp 50 is maintained, and FIG. 5 based on the set laser output LPW is shown. In parallel with the irradiation of the laser beam L in the aspect, the rotational drive in the aspect indicated by the arrow F2 with respect to the rotation support base 40 is executed. As a result, on the pressure contact surface of the flange 21 of the cap portion 20 made of light-transmitting resin with respect to the joint portion 13 of the sensor main body 10 made of light-absorbing resin, the melting of the resins based on the mechanism described above is started sequentially. Eventually, the welding between the joint portion 13 and the flange 21 that are in pressure contact with each other is completed.

  After the laser welding is completed in this manner, as step K in the process flow shown in FIG. 3, after cooling the magnetic sensor, the clamp 50 is released, and the magnetic sensor is removed from the rotation support base 40, and its external appearance is Inspected. That is, in this appearance inspection, laser welding abnormalities such as “no burnt burns”, “no abnormal surface melting”, etc. are visually inspected. If the result of the inspection is no abnormal welding (step L: YES) If it is stored as “non-defective product” and a welding abnormality is recognized (step L: NO), it is discarded as “defective product”. In addition, the appearance inspection in this process K is implemented for the total number of the manufactured magnetic sensors.

FIGS. 6 to 8 exemplify the verification results of the inventors regarding such a manufacturing method. Hereinafter, the usefulness of the manufacturing method will be verified based on FIGS. 6 to 8.
First of all, FIG. 6 shows the actual measurement value of each sample regarding the leak level (leak rate) in the leak test, and the “first standard value” used when ranking the leak levels. The setting examples of “LK1” and “second standard value LK2” are shown. In addition, FIG. 7 shows the above-mentioned ranking based on the “first standard value LK1” and “second standard value LK2”, and after performing laser welding corresponding to the next process, the leak inspection is performed again. The measurement results are shown on the basis of the correspondence with the actual measurement values of the respective samples. That is, actually, the “first standard value LK1” and the “second standard value LK2” are set so that the standard value LKS shown in FIG. 7 is satisfied, and the rank (a) and The processing conditions (laser welding conditions) in (b) will be set. Incidentally, in the magnetic sensor, the standard value (limit value) LKS with respect to the degree of leakage when this is used as the previous rotation detection device and air is used as the gas for leak inspection is “1.0 × 10 ^−3. [Atom · cubic centimeter per second (atm · cm ³ / s)] ”. Therefore, also in the verification here, as shown in FIG. 6, the “first standard value LK1” is set to “1.0 × 10 ⁻³ [atm · cm ³ / s]”. The “second standard value LK2” is set to “1.0 × 10 ⁻² [atm · cm ³ / s]”. 6 and FIG. 7, the “gap size [square millimeter (mm ² )]” corresponding to each horizontal axis is, for example, a groove (such as the scratch 101 illustrated in FIG. Is the cross-sectional area of the groove). Accordingly, when the size of the gap is, for example, “0.4 [mm ² ]”, the depth of the groove is “ 0.8 mm "and the groove width is" 1.0 mm "(□) means that the groove depth is" 0.4 mm "and the groove width is" 2.0 mm "(△ The depth of the groove is “0.2 mm”.

  On the other hand, FIG. 8 shows the processing conditions (laser welding conditions) for those determined to be the rank (a) or (b) as a result of the ranking with respect to the above-described leakage degree, that is, set in the previous step J or step I. An example of the laser output (heat amount) is shown. Here, the laser output (the laser used) that can actually set the melt depth applied to the laser welding to “around 110 [micrometers (μm)]” for those determined to be rank (a) as a result of the ranking. Then, it was set to about “100 [Watt (W)]”). In addition, for those determined to be rank (b), the laser output (about 120 [Watt (W)] for the laser used) where the melt depth required for the laser welding can be set to “around 150 to 160 [μm]”. ). That is, in the case of the example here, the laser output LPW set in the previous process J is about “100 [W]” (hereinafter referred to as the first laser welding condition), and is set in the previous process I. The laser output LPW is about “120 [W] (α = 20 [W])” (hereinafter referred to as second laser welding condition). And, for each sample shown in FIG. 6, that is, each sample showing the measurement result in the leak inspection before laser welding, by performing laser welding under these laser welding conditions according to the ranking, The result illustrated in FIG. 7 is obtained. In order to obtain the results shown in FIG. 7, laser welding at various outputs is attempted to such an extent that all the samples illustrated in FIG. 6 can be temporarily welded (the laser shown in FIG. 8). (Refer to the indication points corresponding to the laser power other than the welding conditions and the melting depth).

Here, as apparent from comparison between FIGS. 6 and 7, before laser welding, the larger the gap size, the more the gap between the gap size and the leak rate (leak rate). The degree tends to increase, and after laser welding, basically, the same tendency is maintained and the degree of leakage tends to decrease as a whole. Further, as apparent from FIG. 6, the degree of leakage before laser welding and the above “first standard value LK1” when the gap is “0 to 0.4 [mm ² ]”. In comparison, it can be seen that, among these, those having a size of “0 to 0.2 [mm ² ]” already satisfy the same standard value LK1 at the stage before laser welding. That is, by performing laser welding on such a sample under the first laser welding conditions, the leak standard LKS is reliably satisfied as shown in FIG. On the other hand, a sample having a gap size of “0.2 to 0.4 [mm ² ]” deviates from the “first standard value LK1” at the stage before laser welding, but such a sample. However, it is understood that by performing laser welding under the second laser welding conditions, the leak standard LKS is also satisfied, as shown in FIG. By the way, if the size of these gaps is “0.2 to 0.4 [mm ² ]”, if not all of them, the above-mentioned “second standard value LK2” is satisfied or close to it. Take the leak level (leak rate). Therefore, the “second standard value LK2” is set to a limit value that allows for safety, that is, the above-described value of “1.0 × 10−2 [atm · cm ³ / s]”. Thus, even those satisfying the standard value LK2 can be appropriately laser welded through the second laser welding conditions. Note that the minimum melting (melting depth) required for welding can be obtained regardless of the first laser welding conditions selected based on the ranking described above or the second laser welding conditions. It has been confirmed by the inventors that the airtightness and the dimensional accuracy after welding can be suitably achieved.

As described above, according to the method for manufacturing a resin welded product, that is, a magnetic sensor according to this embodiment, the following effects can be obtained.
(1) Prior to laser welding to the contact surface between the joint portion 13 of the sensor body 10 and the flange 21 of the cap portion 20, the size of the gap between the contact surfaces is determined, and the flange 21 is applied to the joint portion 13 with a predetermined pressure. Measured with the degree of leak by leak inspection in pressure contact state. For this reason, it is very easy and quantitative to measure the size of the gap before laser welding, which has been considered difficult until now. In addition, since this leak inspection is performed in a state where the joint portion 13 of the sensor body 10 and the flange 21 of the cap portion 20 are in pressure contact with each other, if there is a gap such as a scratch, the size of the leak inspection is determined by this degree of leakage. It will be reflected directly. Thereby, although it is simple, appropriate evaluation is attained regarding the magnitude | size of the clearance gap between the resin members welded by laser. In other words, laser welding that causes the previous leakage path is prevented in advance, and as a result, an improvement in yield can be expected.

  (2) Also, when performing laser welding, the welding depth is set to a laser welding condition such that welding is realized with a minimum melting such as “110 to 160 [μm]”. Thus, it is possible to achieve both the airtightness of the portion and the dimensional accuracy after welding.

  (3) The standard values for the degree of leakage are ranked using two standard values such as “first standard value LK1” and “second standard value LK2”, and the ranked rank is ranked by the laser beam L. Feedback was made to the welding conditions by irradiation. That is, the laser output is made variable in accordance with the rank, and either the first laser welding condition or the second laser welding condition is selected. Thus, for example, even if the measured leak level may exceed the standard range in the standard range set to the highest rank, specifically, it is ranked as the rank (b). In addition, normal welding can be maintained through feedback to the welding conditions, and the yield can be further improved.

  (4) A leak inspection through hole 16 penetrating from the connector portion 15 to the chip mounting portion lead-out surface 12 is formed in the sensor body 10 along the metal terminal (T2). As a result, a leak inspection can be performed in a shorter time, and as a result, it is possible to expect a reduction in manufacturing cost including the time required for the manufacturing.

In addition, the said embodiment can also be implemented with the following forms which changed this suitably, for example.
In the above embodiment, the leak inspection through-hole 16 is formed in the sensor body 10, but the formation of the through-hole 16 may be omitted. That is, in such a magnetic sensor, the resin-molded sensor body 10 is usually formed at the interface between the resin constituting the sensor body 10 and the metal terminals (T1, T2, T3) during molding by injection molding or the like. Since a gap is generated, the above-described leak inspection can be performed using this gap. However, considering the time required for the leak inspection, it is more desirable to positively form the through hole 16.

In the above embodiment, the measured leak level is ranked using the two standard values such as the “first standard value LK1” and the “second standard value LK2”, and according to the ranked rank Although the laser output is changed, the laser welding conditions that can be changed include the pressure applied to the cap portion 20 by the clamp 50. That is, when laser welding illustrated in FIG. 5 is performed, the pressure applied to the cap portion 20 by the clamp 50 may be changed in a plurality of stages according to the rank. Incidentally, in this case, the ranked rank is fed back to the pressure applied by the clamp 50, that is, the pressure when the flange 21 of the cap portion 20 is pressed against the joint portion 13 of the sensor body 10. Further, in such a ranking, in the above-described embodiment, the ranking is performed according to the above-described modes (a) to (c). In particular, the above-mentioned “first standard value LK1” or “second” Regarding the relationship with the “standard value LK2”, although it depends on the setting mode of the standard value itself,
(A ′) The leakage degree is equal to or less than the “first standard value LK1” (in the first standard range). That is, it can be judged as “good”.
(B ′) The degree of leakage exceeds the “first standard value LK1” and is equal to or less than the “second standard value LK2” (in the second standard range). In other words, depending on the processing conditions, it can be “good”.
(C ′) The degree of leakage exceeds the “second standard value LK2” (outside the standard range). In other words, it must be discarded as a “defective product”.
You may make it change in such a mode.

  In the above ranking, the number of standard values used as a reference, the number of ranks to be ranked, etc. are arbitrary. Further, it is possible to determine whether or not to perform laser welding based on a single standard value without necessarily performing such ranking.

  In the above embodiment, air is used as a gas for leak inspection. However, when higher accuracy is required for leak inspection, helium and other rare gases can be appropriately employed.

  In addition, even when air is used as a gas for leak inspection, the standard range (standard value) for the degree of leak is set to a range that can satisfy the durability of the welded portion by irradiation with laser light L, that is, the above-described cooling cycle. It is also effective to set a range that is empirically required as a range that can also prevent the occurrence of cracks due to it. In other words, in this case, the combination of the sensor body 10 and the cap portion 20 that has such a cause of cracks can be accurately rejected through the leak inspection.

  In the above embodiment, the leak inspection and the laser welding are performed as a continuous process in order to make the jigs such as the rotation support base 40 and the clamp 50 common. It can also be carried out as a discontinuous process using different devices. In particular, when inspecting the sealing performance of the O-ring Or attached to the sensor body 10 as well, the leak inspection is performed in batches for each lot, for example, using a dedicated device or jig. Thereafter, those that are determined to be capable of normal laser welding may be subjected to laser welding through a dedicated laser welding apparatus or the like.

  In the above embodiment, the case where the manufacturing method according to the present invention is applied to the manufacture of a magnetic sensor has been illustrated. However, other than that, for example, a first resin member made of a light-transmitting resin and a second resin member made of a light-absorbing resin, such as a resin intake manifold manufactured by laser welding of a split body, are formed by laser welding. The present invention is also applicable to any manufacturing method.

Sectional drawing which shows the cross-sectional structure about the magnetic sensor made into object in one Embodiment of the manufacturing method of the resin welded product concerning this invention. The perspective view which shows the disassembled perspective structure of the magnetic sensor made into the object in the embodiment. The flowchart which shows the manufacturing process about the manufacturing method of the embodiment. Sectional drawing which shows the test | inspection aspect about the leak test process in the manufacturing process. Sectional drawing which shows the welding aspect about the laser welding process in the manufacturing process. The graph which shows the relationship between the magnitude | size of the clearance gap between the sensor main body and the cap part of various sample magnetic sensors in the leak test | inspection before laser welding as a verification of the manufacturing method of the embodiment, and a leak rate. The graph which shows the relationship between the magnitude | size of the clearance gap between the sensor main body and cap part of various sample magnetic sensors in the leak test | inspection after laser welding as a verification of the manufacturing method of the embodiment, and a leak rate. The graph which shows the relationship between the laser output (heat amount) employ | adopted for the laser welding, and the melting depth, when obtaining the result of FIG. (A), (b) shows the melting mechanism, scratches, etc. when scanning while irradiating a laser beam with a light-transmitting resin bonded to a light-absorbing resin as verification of a general resin-welded product manufacturing method. Sectional drawing which shows the generation | occurrence | production cause of the leak path | route resulting from.

Explanation of symbols

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 ... Sensor main body, 11 ... Chip mounting part, 12 ... Chip mounting part derivation surface, 13 ... Joint part, 14 ... Flange for bolt fastening, 15 ... Connector part, 16 ... Through-hole, 20 ... Cap part, 21 ... Flange, DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 30 ... Magnet, 31 ... Hollow part, 40 ... Rotation support stand, 41 ... Mounting hole, 50 ... Clamp, 60 ... Leak tester, 100 ... Light-absorbing resin member, 101 ... Scratch, 110 ... Pseudo welding part, 200 ... Light Transparent resin member, SC ... sensor chip, Bw ... bonding wire, Or ... O-ring, Mr ... metal ring, T1, T2, T3 ... metal terminal.

Claims (7)

In a method for manufacturing a resin-welded product in which the resin is melted by irradiating laser light from the light-transmitting resin side in a state where the light-transmitting resin and the light-absorbing resin are bonded,
Prior to welding by the irradiation of the laser beam, the size of the gap between the first resin member made of the light-transmitting resin and the second resin member made of the light-absorbing resin is set to the first and second sizes. Of the first resin member and the second resin member on the condition that the leakage degree is within a standard range as a result of the measurement. A method of manufacturing a resin welded product, comprising performing welding by irradiation with the laser beam. In a method for manufacturing a resin-welded product in which the resin is melted by irradiating laser light from the light-transmitting resin side in a state where the light-transmitting resin and the light-absorbing resin are bonded,
Prior to welding by the irradiation of the laser beam, the size of the gap between the first resin member made of the light-transmitting resin and the second resin member made of the light-absorbing resin is set to the first and second sizes. Of the first resin member and the second resin member on the condition that the leakage degree is within a standard range as a result of the measurement. A method for producing a resin welded product, comprising performing welding by irradiating the laser beam in such a manner that the minimum melting required for welding is obtained. The standard range for the degree of leak is set to a limit range in which normal welding by laser light irradiation is possible, and the standard range is ranked in a plurality of stages within the set range for the leak inspection. The method for manufacturing a resin welded product according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a rank obtained in accordance with a degree of leakage based on the feedback is fed back to a welding condition by irradiation with the laser beam. The method for manufacturing a resin welded product according to claim 3, wherein feedback to the welding condition by irradiation of the laser beam with the obtained rank is performed as feedback to the laser output of the laser beam. 4. The resin according to claim 3, wherein feedback to the welding condition by irradiation of the laser beam of the obtained rank is performed as feedback to a pressure that presses the first and second resin members at the time of irradiation of the laser beam. Manufacturing method of welded product. A resin welded product to be manufactured includes a sensor chip having a magnetic detection element and a magnet for applying a magnetic field to the magnetic detection element of the sensor chip, and cooperates with the movement of a magnetic body in the vicinity of the sensor chip. A magnetic sensor for detecting a movement mode of the magnetic body by sensing a change in a magnetic field applied from the magnet generated through the magnetic detection element,
a. The sensor chip is led out from the front end of the sensor body which is resin-molded by casting the metal terminal so that the power supply terminal and the output terminal are electrically connected to the metal terminal penetrating the sensor body of the magnetic sensor. Arranged on the chip mounting part,
b. The magnet is formed in a cylindrical shape and is inserted in a manner covering the sensor chip chip mounting portion together with the sensor chip.
c. The sensor body has a joint portion connected to the outer periphery of the surface from which the chip mounting portion is led out, and the bottomed cylindrical cap portion that is also molded with resin closes the surface from which the chip mounting portion of the sensor body is led out Then, the opening end of the cap part is joined to the joint part, so that both the sensor chip and the chip mounting part and the magnet are protected from the external atmosphere.
When the cap portion is in pressure contact with the joint portion of the sensor body, the leak inspection is performed as a measurement of the degree of leakage of the gas fed into the cap portion, and the cap portion is moved to the first portion. The method for manufacturing a resin welded product according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the resin member is welded by irradiating the laser light using the joint portion of the sensor body as the second resin member. 7. The leak inspection through-hole penetrating a surface of the sensor main body from which the chip mounting portion is led out is provided in advance in the sensor main body formed of the resin. 7. Manufacturing method of resin welded product.

Images