JP2006200911A - Drop tester - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To more enhance the reproducibility of a test by effectively eliminating an unstable element like friction resistance when dropping a holding part for holding a test object while corresponding even to a test large in dropping height without bringing about the scaling-up of a tester, in a drop tester for performing a drop impact test by dropping the test object on a landing surface in a free fall state. <P>SOLUTION: The drop tester is equipped with a holding part 11 for holding the test object and a forced acceleration means 2 for forcibly accelerating the holding part and constituted so that the holding of the test object of the holding part is released at the point when the holding part which holds the test object is accelerated up to a desired speed in the dropping direction of the test object by the forced acceleration means to drop the test object toward the landing surface 6f. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a drop test apparatus used for a free drop test performed for reliability evaluation of a portable device or the like.

  For example, in portable devices such as mobile phones and mobile portable terminals, reliability against drop impacts that can occur while being carried is strongly required. For this reason, manufacturers of portable devices and manufacturers of circuit boards incorporated in portable devices repeatedly perform a predetermined number of drop tests for reliability evaluation when dropped. In the repeated drop test, if the manufacturer is a portable device, the portable device itself is used as a test object. If the manufacturer is a circuit board for a portable device, a circuit board fixed to a package frame simulating the package of the portable device is used. Usually, it is performed as a test object.

  In such a repeated drop test, the stability of the drop posture of the test object is particularly important as repeatability. Therefore, the drop test apparatus is devised for stabilizing the drop posture of the test object. Various techniques for stabilizing the drop posture in the conventional drop test apparatus are various, but the basics are common. That is, in the conventional drop test apparatus, the test object is held by some holding means, and the test object that has been freely dropped together with the holding means is released from the holding means immediately before the collision with the landing surface. The posture is stabilized (Patent Documents 1 to 7).

Special table 2003-502630 JP 2003-344251 A JP 2002-174574 A JP 2002-372485 A JP 2002-318181 A JP 2000-55778 A JP 9-318484 A

  As described above, in the conventional drop test apparatus, the test object is allowed to fall freely together with the holding means until just before the collision with the landing surface in order to stabilize the drop posture. In such a configuration, it is necessary to guide holding means that freely falls while holding the test object with some drop guide means, and as a result, there is a problem of frictional resistance in the drop guide means. In other words, the frictional resistance of the drop guide means is likely to fluctuate due to the influence of the lubricity of the lubricating oil used to reduce the frictional resistance, for example, due to the influence of the temperature atmosphere at the test site. Result in reduced test reproducibility.

  In addition, the conventional drop test device configured to allow the test object to fall freely along with the holding means requires a device height corresponding to the drop height, and the size of the device can be avoided in order to cope with a test with a high drop height. There was also a problem of not.

  The present invention has been made in the background of the circumstances as described above, and its purpose is to effectively eliminate unstable elements such as frictional resistance in the conventional drop test apparatus and further improve the reproducibility of the test. An object of the present invention is to provide a drop test apparatus that can make it possible to cope with a test with a high drop height without increasing the size of the apparatus.

  For the purpose described above, in the present invention, in a drop test apparatus for performing a drop impact test by dropping a test object in a free fall state and colliding with a landing surface, the drop test apparatus includes a holding unit that holds the test object. A force accelerating means for forcibly accelerating the holding part, and the holding part holding the test object is accelerated to a desired speed in the falling direction of the test object by the forced acceleration means; The holding by the holding part is released so that the test object is dropped toward the landing surface.

  Further, in the present invention, the holding unit is forcibly accelerated by transmitting the driving force for forced acceleration by the forced acceleration means via the timing belt in the drop test apparatus as described above.

  Further, in the present invention, in the drop test apparatus as described above, the holding unit includes a holding unit that holds the test object, and the test object is released when the holding unit releases the test object. It is assumed that a posture maintaining unit for maintaining the posture is provided.

  In the present invention, the holding unit that holds the test object is forcibly accelerated by the forced acceleration means and dropped. For this reason, it is possible to eliminate unstable elements such as frictional resistance with respect to dropping, and to improve the reproducibility of the test. Moreover, the fall due to forced acceleration is also effective for stabilizing the collision posture of the test object on the landing surface, which can improve the reproducibility of the test. Furthermore, the fall by forced acceleration makes it possible to adjust the fall speed, thereby making it possible to freely set the fall height. This means that it is possible to perform a drop test from a height higher than the height of the apparatus, and it is possible to cope with a test with a high drop height without increasing the size of the apparatus.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described. 1 to 4 show a configuration of a drop test apparatus according to an embodiment. As can be seen from these figures, the drop test apparatus has a forced acceleration means 2, an acceleration force transmission means 3, a holding means 4, and rebound prevention on a frame 1 that is formed in a vertically elongated rectangular parallelepiped shape using a steel material or the like. The means 5, the landing portion 6 and the control panel 7 (FIG. 4) are assembled as main elements. In FIG. 1 to FIG. 4, illustration of some of the components is appropriately omitted to avoid complication, and the reference numerals are also omitted as appropriate.

  The forced acceleration means 2 is assembled to the upper end portion of the frame 1 and forcibly accelerates the test object W held by the holding portion 11 in the holding means 4 described later together with the holding portion 11 to a desired speed in the dropping direction. To work. Therefore, the forced acceleration means 2 includes a drive source 12 that generates a driving force for forced acceleration. The drive source 12 can freely change the drive speed and can cope with a sudden stop. In order to meet such functionality, in this embodiment, the drive source 12 is configured by a servo motor with a brake. Further, the forced acceleration means 2 releases the test object held by the holding unit 11 when the holding unit 11 is accelerated to a desired speed and drops the test object toward the landing surface, that is, holds it at the time of the open fall. An electric brake 13 that functions to suddenly stop the section 11 is provided. The brake 13 is connected to the drive source 12 via an electric clutch 14 so that it can be separated from the drive source 12 when the brake 13 is opened and dropped. By interposing the clutch 14 between the brake 13 and the drive source 12 in this way, it is possible to effectively prevent the regenerative current from being generated in the servo motor of the drive source 12 when the holding unit 11 is suddenly stopped.

  As shown in FIGS. 1 and 4, the acceleration force transmission means 3 has a timing between a drive pulley 15 connected to the output shaft of the forced acceleration means 2 and a driven pulley 16 assembled to the lower end portion of the frame 1. The timing belt 17 is configured to transmit a driving force for forced acceleration by the forced acceleration means 2 to the holding means 4. That is, the timing belt 17 receives the driving force from the forced acceleration means 2 and rotates endlessly between the drive pulley 15 and the driven pulley 16, and the timing belt 17 is rotated endlessly for forced acceleration by the forced acceleration means 2. The driving force can be transmitted to the holding unit 11. By transmitting the driving force for forced acceleration by the timing belt 17 in this manner, the acceleration force transmitting means 3 can be reduced in weight, and the inertia load of the acceleration force transmitting means 3 with respect to the forced acceleration means 2 can be reduced. . By reducing such a load, the durability of the forced acceleration means 2 can be greatly increased. For example, the durability enough to withstand a drop test that is repeated several thousand times for one test object can be realized.

  The holding means 4 includes a holding unit 11, a support arm 18 that supports the holding unit 11, a lifting guide 19 that guides the lifting and lowering movement of the supporting arm 18, and a stop that serves as a stop receiver when suddenly stopping the lowering movement of the supporting arm 18. The receiving unit 21 is a main element, and the holding unit 11 holds the test object and then suddenly descends due to the forced acceleration by the forced accelerating means 2, and when the test object is accelerated to a desired speed, the test object is held. It is configured so that it can be opened and dropped toward the landing surface 6 f of the landing portion 6. As for the holding means 4, the portions of the holding portion 11 and the support arm 18 are enlarged in FIGS. 5 to 7.

  The holding unit 11 is attached to the tip of the support arm 18 and is configured to hold a test object and to release the holding when necessary. Specifically, the holding unit 11 includes a holding unit 22 and a posture maintaining unit 23. The parts of the holding unit 22 and the posture maintaining unit 23 are shown in a perspective view in FIG. The holding unit 22 includes a pair of holding claws 24 and 24 provided in an opposed state. Both holding claws 24, 24 are connected to an actuator unit 25 using, for example, an air actuator, and can be moved forward and backward in the opposite direction by the actuator unit 25, and the distance between them is changed by this forward / backward movement. The object can be held and released. Further, the holding claws 24, 24 are made to have a high coefficient of friction by stretching a high friction coefficient material 26 such as a rubber material on the holding surface, so that the test object W can be held more stably. Has been. Similar to the holding unit 22, the posture maintaining unit 23 includes a pair of posture maintaining claws 27 and 27 provided in an opposing state so that both the posture maintaining claws 27 and 27 can be advanced and retracted in the opposing direction by the actuator unit 25. Has been. This posture maintaining unit 23 functions to prevent the posture of the test object from collapsing when the holding unit 22 releases the holding of the test object, that is, to maintain the posture of the test object. That is, the posture maintaining claws 27 and 27 of the posture maintaining unit 23 are combined with the holding claws 24 and 24 so as to be along a slight gap with respect to the test object held by the holding unit 22. When the test object falls from the holding unit 22 that has been released from the holding, it is guided so that the dropping posture does not collapse. Therefore, the posture maintaining claws 27 and 27 have guide surfaces with a small friction coefficient. Here, FIG. 6 shows a state in which the holding claw 24 and the posture maintaining claw 27 are widened and a state in which the test object is held by narrowing the gap.

  The support arm 18 is formed in an arm shape elongated in a direction orthogonal to the traveling direction of the timing belt 17, and is connected to the timing belt 17 at an intermediate portion thereof, and moves up and down as the timing belt 17 rotates endlessly. The driving force for forced acceleration of the forced acceleration means 2 is transmitted to the holding part 11 by the downward movement.

  The elevating guide 19 functions to stabilize the elevating movement of the support arm 18. For this purpose, the elevating guide 19 is composed of a slide rail 28 provided so as to extend along the timing belt 17 and a slider 29 (FIG. 4) adapted to be slidably engaged with the slide rail 28. The support arm 18 is connected to the slider 29.

  The stop receiving part 21 functions as a stop receiver when the downward movement of the support arm 18 is suddenly stopped. That is, as the holding unit 11 releases the holding of the test object, the brake 13 is operated to suddenly stop the descending movement of the support arm 18. It is difficult to accurately stop 18 at a predetermined height position. Therefore, the support arm 18 can be accurately stopped at a predetermined height position while absorbing the kinetic energy by the stop receiving portion 21. Thus, the stop receiving portion 21 allows the support arm 18 to be accurately stopped at a predetermined height position, so that the holding portion 11 releases the holding of the test object. It is possible to make the position as close to the landing as possible, and therefore it is possible to make the fall distance of the test object after being released from the holding part 11 as short as possible. This contributes to reducing the possibility of a change in the drop posture of the test object released from the holding unit 11. That is, there is an effect of improving the reproducibility of the test by increasing the stability of the collision posture of the test object on the landing surface 6f. The stop receiving portion 21 also functions to cause the holding portion 11 to be positioned in the height direction with respect to the test object in the landing state when the holding portion 11 reholds the test object after landing. .

  Therefore, as shown in FIG. 8, the stop receiving portion 21 is formed with a bowl-shaped frame 31 as a skeleton. The bowl-shaped frame body 31 has a first-layer base frame 32 overlaid with a second-layer first movable frame 33, and a second-layer first movable frame 33 with a third-layer second movable frame 34. Are formed in a three-layer structure. The base frame 32 is formed in a structure in which the top frame portion 36 is supported by support columns 35 provided at four corners, and is provided in a fixed state. An air cylinder 37 for positioning the height of the support arm 18 is attached to the top frame portion 36. The first movable frame 33 is formed to have a structure in which a top frame portion 39 is supported by support columns 38 provided at four corners, and the support column 38 is supported by the top frame portion 36 of the base frame 32 so as to be slidable in the vertical direction. As a result, the base frame 32 is assembled so as to be movable up and down. A piston rod of an air cylinder 37 is connected to the top frame portion 39, and an air cylinder 41 for absorbing kinetic energy is attached. The second movable frame 34 is formed to have a structure in which the top frame portion 43 is supported by support columns 42 provided at four corners, and the support column 42 is slid in the vertical direction on the top frame portion 39 of the first movable frame 33. By being supported, the first movable frame 33 is assembled to be movable up and down. The top frame portion 43 is provided with a support arm receiving portion 44 that receives the support arm 18, and the piston rod of the air cylinder 41 is connected to the top frame portion 43.

  The rebound prevention means 5 prevents the test object from colliding with the landing surface 6f again and receiving a rebound impact by gripping the test object that has collided with the landing surface 6f in the air before dropping. 9 to 10 show an enlarged configuration of the rebound prevention means 5. As can be seen in these drawings, the rebound prevention means 5 includes a main gripping unit 45 and an auxiliary gripping unit 46 and a speed measuring means 47.

  The main gripping unit 45 includes a pair of gripping plates 48 and 48 provided in an opposed state. Both grip plates 48, 48 are respectively connected to an actuator portion 49 using an air actuator or the like, and can be moved forward and backward in the opposing direction by the actuator portion 49, and the distance between them is changed by this forward and backward movement. The test object can be held and released. Both grip plates 48, 48 are connected to an actuator portion 49 via an impact absorbing mechanism. The impact absorbing mechanism of this embodiment is configured as a slide support portion 51. The slide support 51 is formed so as to allow the grip plate 48 to freely slide in the vertical direction. Further, the slide support portion 51 is provided with an impact absorbing portion 52 using an air cylinder or the like. Such a slide support portion 51 releases the kinetic energy of the test object jumping up on both grip plates 48, 48 when the test object jumped up by colliding with the landing surface 6f is gripped by both grip plates 48, 48. To work. That is, the gripping plates 48 and 48 are slid upward as the test object jumps up, and the kinetic energy of the test object jumping up is released by receiving the sliding motion at the shock absorber 52. By doing in this way, it can suppress effectively that the impact at the time of holding of a test subject is applied directly to the main holding unit 45, and the endurance of the main holding unit 45 can be improved greatly.

  The auxiliary gripping unit 46 includes a pair of gripping plates 52 and 52 provided in a facing state, and both the gripping plates 52 and 52 are respectively connected to the actuator portion 53 so as to be able to advance and retract in the facing direction. The test object can be grasped and released by changing the distance between them by movement. These configurations are the same as the main gripping unit 45, but differ from the main gripping unit 45 in that the slide support portion 51 is omitted. Such an auxiliary gripping unit 46 has a role of assisting the gripping of the test object by the main gripping unit 45. That is, in order to make the posture of the test object constant when the test object is placed on the landing surface 6f by opening the grip for preventing rebound, the main grip unit 45 assists in gripping the test object. In addition, the test object is supplementarily gripped from a direction orthogonal to the gripping direction by the main gripping unit 45. For this reason, gripping of the test object by the auxiliary gripping unit 46 is performed at a slightly later timing than gripping of the test object by the main gripping unit 45. That is, after the test object is gripped by the main gripping unit 45, the gripping by the auxiliary gripping unit 46 is performed. For this reason, since the auxiliary gripping unit 46 does not receive an impact when gripping the test object, the slide support portion 51 in the main gripping unit 45 is not necessary.

  The speed measuring means 47 is configured by providing a sensor unit 47u formed by incorporating a plurality of photosensors in an opposed state, and measures the landing speed of the test object. The landing speed information of the test object measured by the speed measuring means 47 is given to a control system provided in the control panel 7 described later. Based on the landing speed information, the control system calculates the jumping timing after the collision with the landing surface 6f of the test object, and the actuator unit 49 of each of the main gripping unit 45 and the auxiliary gripping unit 46 from the jumping timing, The operation timing of 53 is calculated, and an operation command is issued to the actuator units 49 and 53 accordingly. In response to this, the actuator portions 49 and 53 are operated, and the main gripping unit 45 and the auxiliary gripping unit 46 grip the test object.

  The landing portion 6 is assumed to be a landing impact condition in the case of dropping when the portable device to be tested is actually used, and is usually formed by laying a concrete board or the like.

  The control panel 7 shown in FIG. 4 contains a power supply circuit for supplying driving power to the operation elements in the forced acceleration means 2, the holding means 4 and the rebound prevention means 5 and a control system for controlling the operation of each operation element. It has been. The control panel 7 is provided with a setting unit (not shown), and the setting unit can set the driving speed of the driving source 12 in the forced acceleration means 2. From the control panel 7, a power cable and a signal cable are drawn out by being supported by a cable bear 54 so that power can be supplied to each operation element and an operation signal can be transmitted.

  Below, the drop test performed with this drop test apparatus is demonstrated. Here, the case where a circuit board to be built in a portable device is a test object will be taken up. When performing a drop test of a circuit board, a circuit board fixed to a package frame simulating a package of a portable device is an actual test object. In the case of a circuit board, the drop test is usually repeated in units of several thousand times for one test object.

  This drop test apparatus can give a drop speed to the test object by forced acceleration by the forced acceleration means 2. Therefore, the drop height can be set freely by adjusting the drop speed. This means that it is possible to perform a drop test from a height higher than the height of the apparatus, and it is possible to cope with a test with a high drop height without increasing the size of the apparatus. Further, by adopting forced acceleration, it is possible to eliminate unstable elements such as frictional resistance with respect to falling, and it is possible to further improve the reproducibility of the test.

  Since the drop height can be freely set as described above, in order to perform the test, the drop height is first set by the control panel 7 as necessary. The fall height is set as the drive speed of the drive source 12 in the forced acceleration means 2. That is, by dropping the test object that is released from the holding unit 11 at the time of landing, the drop speed is set by setting the drive speed of the drive source 12 so that the drop speed at the free fall from the desired drop height is set. Set the height. Next, the test object is held by the holding unit 11. Then, when a test start button (not shown) provided on the control panel 7 or the like is pressed, the test is started. When the test is started, the support arm 18 at the initial height position suddenly descends while receiving the forced acceleration by the forced acceleration means 2 with the timing belt 17, and when the height position reaches a predetermined open position, An open position detecting means (not shown) such as a photo sensor detects it, and in response to this, the holding unit 11 releases the test object. Here, as described above, it is desirable that the open position is as close to the landing surface 6f as possible. In the drop test device of the present embodiment, the position of the support arm 18-a shown in FIG. The height position is 6 to 250 mm.

  When releasing the holding of the test object by the holding unit 11, the support arm 18 is suddenly stopped. As described above, the sudden stop is performed by a combination of braking by the brake 13 and absorption of the kinetic energy of the support arm 18 by the stop receiving portion 21, thereby accurately stopping the support arm 18 at a predetermined height position. be able to. The absorption of the kinetic energy of the support arm 18 by the stop receiving portion 21 is the support of the second movable frame 34 by the stop receiving portion 21 due to the descending force of the support arm 18 that is still going to descend by inertia even when braking by the brake 13 is applied. The second movable frame 34 received by the arm receiving portion 44 is lowered while applying a load to the air cylinder 41 for absorbing kinetic energy. In the drop test apparatus of the present embodiment, the position of the support arm 18-b shown in FIG. 1 is a stop height position, which is slightly below the open position.

  The test object released from the holding unit 11 falls from the open position toward the landing surface 6f. The fall is made in a state in which a drop speed due to free fall from the open position to the landing surface 6f is added to the drop speed at the time of opening. In other words, the free fall after the open position is performed with the momentum by the forced acceleration up to the open position. For this reason, the holding accuracy of the dropping posture of the test object after opening becomes high. This is similar to the stabilization of the falling posture of the test object by bringing the open position as close as possible to the landing surface 6f, thereby improving the stability of the collision posture of the test object on the landing surface 6f and reproducing the test. Contributes to improving the performance. In addition, the stabilization of the drop posture by forced acceleration and the stabilization of the drop posture by approaching the landing position at the open position are combined so that the collision posture of the test object on the landing surface 6f in the repeated test is always constant. The reproducibility of the test and thus the accuracy of the test can be greatly increased.

  The test object falling from the open position in this way collides with the landing surface 6f at a free fall speed from a predetermined drop height. The drop speed at the time of collision is obtained from the measurement result of the drop speed at the time of opening by the speed measuring means 47 in the rebound preventing means 5 as described above, and the grip timing of the test object by the rebound preventing means 5 is determined based on the result. It is set by a control system in the control panel 7. The rebound prevention means 5 performs a gripping operation as described above in response to a gripping command from the control system, and grips the test object that jumps up in response to the collision with the landing surface 6f in the air. This prevents the test object from colliding with the landing surface 6f again and receiving a rebound impact, thereby enabling a reliable single impact test and greatly improving the reliability of the test. When the rebound prevention means 5 grips the test object, the gripping is slowly released and the test object is gently placed on the landing surface 6f. By such an operation by the rebound prevention means 5, the test object can always take a state of landing on the landing surface 6f in a fixed posture. This makes it possible to automatically hold the test object again by the holding unit 11 and to fully automate the repeated test.

  Re-holding of the test object in the landing state by the holding unit 11 is performed by using the height direction positioning function of the holding unit 11 by the stop receiving unit 21. That is, the height of the first movable frame 33 is adjusted by the height positioning air cylinder 37 in the stop receiving portion 21, whereby the height direction position of the holding portion 11 is set with respect to the test object W on the landing surface 6 f. In this state, the test object is held again by the holding unit 11. The position of the support arm 18-c shown in FIG. 1 is the height position during re-holding. FIG. 3 shows a state in which the test object W is held again by the holding unit 11. In FIG. 3, the test object W held by the holding unit 11 in a state where the support arm 18 is at the initial height position is shown in a vertical state, and the test object W in a landing state is shown as a horizontal state. This indicates that both a drop test in the vertical state and a drop test in the horizontal state are possible. When the holding unit 11 re-holds the test object in this manner, the support arm 18 returns to the initial height position, suddenly descends again from the initial height position, and thereafter the same operation as described above is performed. Repeat a predetermined number of tests.

  Here, in the test on the circuit board, it is normal to perform the movement monitor for each collision with the landing surface 6f. The movement monitor is used to evaluate the drop impact resistance of the circuit board by monitoring how the resistance values of the soldered portions and internal contacts in the circuit board increase through repeated drop tests. For such a movement monitor, a movement monitor cable (not shown) or the like is arranged on the holding unit 11 so that the movement monitor can be automatically performed via the cable or the like.

  In the above embodiment, the forced acceleration means is formed by using the servo motor as a drive source. However, other forms are possible in practicing the present invention. For example, a form in which forced acceleration means is formed by using a linear motor as a drive source, or a form in which forced acceleration means is formed by using an air cylinder, particularly a rodless air cylinder, as a drive source is also a preferred form example. It is possible and can be appropriately selected from them in implementation.

  INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention improves the reproducibility of a repeated test for a drop test apparatus and enables the apparatus to be miniaturized, and can be widely used in the field of manufacturing portable devices that require a drop test of a product. .

It is the figure which looked at the drop test device by one embodiment from one side. It is the figure which looked at the drop test device of Drawing 1 from the upper part. It is the figure which looked at the drop test device of Drawing 1 from the left in Drawing 1. It is the figure which looked at the drop test apparatus of FIG. 3 from the left in FIG. It is a figure which expands and shows the part of a holding | maintenance part and a support arm. It is the figure which looked at the holding | maintenance part and support arm of FIG. 5 from the left in FIG. It is the figure which looked at the holding | maintenance part and support arm of FIG. 5 from the upper direction in FIG. It is a perspective view of the principal part of a holding unit and a posture maintenance unit. It is a figure which expands and shows a stop receiving part. It is a figure which expands and shows a rebound prevention means. It is the figure which looked at the rebound prevention means of FIG. 9 from the upper direction in FIG. It is the figure which looked at the rebound prevention means of FIG. 10 from the right side in FIG.

Explanation of symbols

2 Forced acceleration means 6f Landing 11 Holding part 17 Timing belt W Test object

Claims (3)

In the drop test device that performs the drop impact test by dropping the test object in a free fall state and colliding with the landing surface,
The test object includes a holding unit that holds the test object, and includes a forced acceleration unit that forcibly accelerates the holding unit, and the test object is held by the forced acceleration unit. A drop test apparatus, wherein the test object is dropped toward the landing surface by releasing the holding by the holding portion when accelerating to a desired speed in the falling direction.   The drop test apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the holding portion is forcibly accelerated by transmitting a driving force for forced acceleration by the forced acceleration means via a timing belt. The holding unit includes a holding unit that holds the test object and a posture maintaining unit that maintains the posture of the test object when the holding unit releases the holding of the test object. The drop test apparatus according to claim 1 or 2.

Images