EP1733071A2 - Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits - Google Patents

Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Info

Publication number
EP1733071A2
EP1733071A2 EP05734780A EP05734780A EP1733071A2 EP 1733071 A2 EP1733071 A2 EP 1733071A2 EP 05734780 A EP05734780 A EP 05734780A EP 05734780 A EP05734780 A EP 05734780A EP 1733071 A2 EP1733071 A2 EP 1733071A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gas mixture
fluorocarbon
oxygen
activated
chamber
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP05734780A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Herbert Harold Sawin
Bo Bai
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology filed Critical Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publication of EP1733071A2 publication Critical patent/EP1733071A2/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
    • H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
    • H01J37/32798—Further details of plasma apparatus not provided for in groups H01J37/3244 - H01J37/32788; special provisions for cleaning or maintenance of the apparatus
    • H01J37/32853—Hygiene
    • H01J37/32862—In situ cleaning of vessels and/or internal parts
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08—CLEANING
    • B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
    • B08B7/0035—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
    • C23C16/4401—Means for minimising impurities, e.g. dust, moisture or residual gas, in the reaction chamber
    • C23C16/4405—Cleaning of reactor or parts inside the reactor by using reactive gases
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F4/00—Processes for removing metallic material from surfaces, not provided for in group C23F1/00 or C23F3/00
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/30—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of perfluorocarbons [PFC], hydrofluorocarbons [HFC] or sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]

Definitions

  • PECVD plasma-on-assisted chemical vapor deposition
  • the use of remote plasma sources avoids some of the erosion of the interior chamber materials that occurs with in situ chamber cleans in which the cleaning is performed by creating a plasma discharge within the PECVD chamber.
  • capacitively and inductively coupled RF as well as microwave remote sources have been developed for these sorts of applications, the industry is rapidly moving toward transformer coupled inductively coupled sources in which the plasma has a torroidal configuration and acts as the secondary of the transformer.
  • the use of lower frequency RF power allows the use of magnetic cores which enhance the inductive coupling with respect to capacitive coupling; thereby allowing the more efficient transfer of energy to the plasma without excessive ion bombardment which limits the lifetime of the remote plasma source chamber interior.
  • a pretreatment gas mixture that is activated to treat the interior surface of the pathway through which an activated cleaning gas passes to the process chamber comprises fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen.
  • a preferred pretreatment gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of less than 1 :1.
  • a more preferred pretreatment gas mixture contains no oxygen.
  • a cleaning gas mixture that is activated to remove the surface deposition comprises oxygen and fluorocarbon.
  • a preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least 1:3.
  • a more preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1.
  • the fluorocarbon of the invention is herein referred to as a compound comprising of C and F.
  • Preferred fluorocarbon in this invention is perfluorocarbon compound.
  • fluorocarbon rich plasma it is meant that the gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than about 1 :1 is activated to form a plasma.
  • the cleaning gas mixture is composed of
  • the fluorocarbon is Zyron® C318N4 with minimum 99.99 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, and Zyron® 8020 with minimum 99.9 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, both are manufactured by DuPont and supplied in cylinders.
  • Nitrogen source in the examples is nitrogen gas manufactured by Airgas with grade of 4.8 and Argon is manufactured by Airgas with grade of 5.0.
  • the activated gas then passed through an aluminum water-cooled heat exchanger to reduce the thermal loading of the aluminum process chamber.
  • the surface deposits covered wafer was placed on a temperature controlled mounting in the process chamber.
  • the neutral temperature is measured by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES), in which rovibrational transition bands of diatomic species like C 2 and N 2 are theoretically fitted to yield neutral temperature. See also B. Bai and H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22 (5), 2014 (2004), herein incorporated as a reference.
  • the etching rate of the surface deposits by the activated gas is measured by interferometry equipment in the process chamber.
  • N 2 gas is added at the entrance of the pump both to dilute the products to a proper concentration for FTIR measurement and TO re ⁇ uce tne nang-up o ⁇ pro ⁇ ucis in the pump in the case that wet pump is used.
  • FTIR was used to measure the concentration of species in the pump exhaust.
  • Example 1 It was discovered that after certain periods of use, the etching rate of Zyron® C318N4 will drop to approximately one half of the previous rate. At the same time a much larger amount of COF 2 in the effluent gases was observed. It was also found that rapid closing and opening of the oxygen valve for a period of a few seconds could increase the etching rate back to the previous level.
  • the feeding gas composed of O 2 , Zyron® C318N4 (C 4 F ⁇ ) and Ar, wherein O 2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C F ⁇ flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr.
  • etching rate jumped up at the transient closing off of oxygen.
  • the etching rate then slowly decreased and leveled off corresponding to the COF 2 and CO 2 concentration change in the emission gases.
  • the RF power was turned off at 450 seconds.
  • the gas mixture passed through the heat exchanger for two minutes. After the treatment, the etching rate was measured again under the same condition as before the treatment. The etching rate was found to be 1150 Angstrom/min, 30% higher than the one before the treatment.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
  • Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Cleaning In General (AREA)
  • ing And Chemical Polishing (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to an improved remote plasma cleaning method for removing surface deposits from a surface, such as the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices. The improvement involves a fluorocarbon rich plasma pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits.

Description

TITLE OF INVENTION Remote Chamber Methods for Removing Surface Deposits
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention. The present invention relates to methods for removing surface deposits by using an activated gas created by remotely activating a gas mixture comprising of oxygen and fluorocarbon. More specifically, this invention involves a fluorocarbon rich plasma pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits. 2. Description of Related Art. Remote plasma sources for the production of atomic fluorine are widely used for chamber cleaning in the semiconductor processing industry, particularly in the cleaning of chambers used for Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition
(PECVD). The use of remote plasma sources avoids some of the erosion of the interior chamber materials that occurs with in situ chamber cleans in which the cleaning is performed by creating a plasma discharge within the PECVD chamber. While capacitively and inductively coupled RF as well as microwave remote sources have been developed for these sorts of applications, the industry is rapidly moving toward transformer coupled inductively coupled sources in which the plasma has a torroidal configuration and acts as the secondary of the transformer. The use of lower frequency RF power allows the use of magnetic cores which enhance the inductive coupling with respect to capacitive coupling; thereby allowing the more efficient transfer of energy to the plasma without excessive ion bombardment which limits the lifetime of the remote plasma source chamber interior. The semiconductor industry has shifted away from mixtures of fluorocarbons with oxygen for chamber cleaning, which initially were the dominant gases used for in situ chamber cleaning for a number of reasons. First, the emissions of global warming gases from such processes was commonly much higher than that of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) processes. NF3 dissociates more easily in a discharge and is not significantly formed by recombination of the product species. Therefore, low levels of global warming emissions can be achieved more easily. In contrast, fluorocarbons are more difficult to breakdown in a discharge and recombine to form species such as tetrafluoromethane (CF4) which are even more difficult to break down than other fluorocarbons. Secondly, it was commonly found that fluorocarbon discharges produced "polymer" depositions that require more frequent wet cleans to remove these deposits that build up after repetitive dry cleans. The propensity of fluorocarbon cleans to deposit "polymers" occurs to a greater extent in remote cleans in which no ion bombardment occurs during the cleaning. These observations dissuaded the industry from developing industrial processes based on fluorocarbon feed gases. In fact, the PECVD equipment manufacturers tested remote cleans based on fluorocarbon discharges, but to date have been unsuccessful because of polymer deposition in the process chambers. However, if the two drawbacks as described above can be resolved, fluorocarbon gases are desirable for their low cost and low- toxicity. While prior work has been done on perfluorocarbon/oxygen discharges with nitrogen addition to enhance the etching of silicon nitride. The enhancement is regarded as the result of the formation of NO by the discharge which in turn reacts with N on the silicon nitride surface, followed by the effective fluorination of Si atoms to form volatile products. CH. Oh et al. Surface and Coatings Technology 171 (2003) 267.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than 1 :1 ; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGfS) Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an apparatus useful for carrying out the present process. Figure 2. Plot of the effect of transient oxygen shut off to Zyron® C318N4 (C F8) on (a) gas emission, measured by FTIR, (b) etching rate.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Surface deposits removed in this invention comprise those materials commonly deposited by chemical vapor deposition or plasma- enhanced chemical vapor deposition or similar processes. Such materials include silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, such as FSG (fluorosilicate glass) and SiCOH or PECVD OSG including Black Diamond (Applied Materials), Coral (Novellus Systems) and Aurora (ASM International). One embodiment of this invention is removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices. Such process chamber could be a Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) chamber or a Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) chamber. The process of the present invention involves an activating step using sufficient power to form an activated gas mixture. Activation may be accomplished by any means allowing for the achievement of dissociation of a large fraction of the feed gas, such as: RF energy, DC energy, laser illumination and microwave energy. The neutral temperature of the resulting plasma depends on the power and the residence time of the gas mixture in the remote chamber. Under certain power input and conditions, neutral temperature will be higher with longer residence time. Here, preferred neutral temperature of activated cleaning gas mixture is over about 3,000 K. Under appropriate conditions (considering power, gas composition, gas pressure and gas residence time), neutral temperatures of at least about 6000K may be achieved, for example, with octafluorocyclobutane. The activated gas is formed in a remote chamber that is outside of the process chamber, but in close proximity to the process chamber. The remote chamber is connected to the process chamber by any means allowing for transfer of the activated gas from the remote chamber to the process chamber. The remote chamber and means for connecting the remote chamber with the process chamber are constructed of materials known in this field to be capable of containing activated gas mixtures. For instance, aluminum and stainless steel are commonly used for the chamber components. Sometimes AI2O3 is coated on the interior surface to reduce the surface recombination. A pretreatment gas mixture that is activated to treat the interior surface of the pathway through which an activated cleaning gas passes to the process chamber comprises fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen. A preferred pretreatment gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of less than 1 :1. A more preferred pretreatment gas mixture contains no oxygen. A cleaning gas mixture that is activated to remove the surface deposition comprises oxygen and fluorocarbon. A preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least 1:3. A more preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1. The fluorocarbon of the invention is herein referred to as a compound comprising of C and F. Preferred fluorocarbon in this invention is perfluorocarbon compound. A perfluorocarbon compound in this invention is herein referred to as a compound consisting of C, F and optionally oxygen. Such perfluorocarbon compounds include, but are not limited to tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, octafluoropropane, hexafluorocyclopropane decafluorobutane, octafluorocyclobutane, carbonyl fluoride and octafluorotetrahydrofuran. The gas mixture that is activated to form either the pretreatment gas mixture or the cleaning gas mixture may further comprise carrier gases such as argon and helium. A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a method for removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising perfluorocarbon compound and no oxygen; (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and perfluorocarbon compound, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and perfluorocarbon compound is at least 1 :3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated cleaning gas mixture; and thereafter (d) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the interior of said deposition chamber and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. It was found that a fluorocarbon rich plasma pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits can increase the etching rate. By "fluorocarbon rich plasma", it is meant that the gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than about 1 :1 is activated to form a plasma. In one embodiment of this invention, as described in Example 1 , when the cleaning gas mixture is composed of
02, Zyron® C318N4 (C4F8) and Ar, a rapid closing and opening of the oxygen valve for a period of a few seconds can increase the etching rate. In another embodiment of this invention, as described in Examples 2 and
3, a pretreatment gas mixture consisting of fluorocarbon and Ar is activated and passes through the heat exchanger, a portion of pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits. This treatment can also increase the etching rate. It was also found that at the similar conditions of this invention, the drawbacks of the perfluorocarbon compound, i.e. global warming gases emission and polymer deposition, can be overcome. In the cleaning process of this invention, no significant polymer depositions on the interior surface of process chamber was found. The global warming gas emissions were also very low as shown in Figure 2a. The following Examples are meant to illustrate the invention and are not meant to be limiting:
EXAMPLES Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the remote plasma source and apparatus used to measure the etching rates, plasma neutral temperatures, and exhaust emissions. The remote plasma source is a commercial toroidal-type MKS ASTRON®ex reactive gas generator unit made by MKS Instruments, Andover, MA, USA. The feed gases (e.g. oxygen, fluorocarbon, Argon) were introduced into the remote plasma source from the left, and passed through the toroidal discharge where they were discharged by the 400 KHz radio-frequency power to form an activated gas mixture. The oxygen is manufactured by Airgas with 99.999% purity. The fluorocarbon is Zyron® C318N4 with minimum 99.99 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, and Zyron® 8020 with minimum 99.9 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, both are manufactured by DuPont and supplied in cylinders. Nitrogen source in the examples is nitrogen gas manufactured by Airgas with grade of 4.8 and Argon is manufactured by Airgas with grade of 5.0. The activated gas then passed through an aluminum water-cooled heat exchanger to reduce the thermal loading of the aluminum process chamber. The surface deposits covered wafer was placed on a temperature controlled mounting in the process chamber. The neutral temperature is measured by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES), in which rovibrational transition bands of diatomic species like C2 and N2 are theoretically fitted to yield neutral temperature. See also B. Bai and H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22 (5), 2014 (2004), herein incorporated as a reference. The etching rate of the surface deposits by the activated gas is measured by interferometry equipment in the process chamber. N2 gas is added at the entrance of the pump both to dilute the products to a proper concentration for FTIR measurement and TO reαuce tne nang-up oτ proαucis in the pump in the case that wet pump is used. FTIR was used to measure the concentration of species in the pump exhaust. Example 1 It was discovered that after certain periods of use, the etching rate of Zyron® C318N4 will drop to approximately one half of the previous rate. At the same time a much larger amount of COF2 in the effluent gases was observed. It was also found that rapid closing and opening of the oxygen valve for a period of a few seconds could increase the etching rate back to the previous level. In this experiment, the feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® C318N4 (C4Fβ) and Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C Fβ flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The 400 KHz 8.9 KW RF power was turned on at -800 seconds and the feeding gas was activated to a neutral temperature estimated to be 5000 K. The activated gas then entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. At the time of zero second, the oxygen valve was shut off for two seconds and then reopened. As a result of this oxygen feed transient, the COF2 emission decreased abruptly and the CO2 emission increased to maintain the carbon mass balance. After this transient, COF2 concentration slowly increased while CO2 concentration slowly decreased. However, after five minutes, the COF2 and CO2 concentration of emission leveled and did not appear to be returning to the prior levels before the O2 induced transition. The results are shown in Figure 2a. As demonstrated in Figure 2b, etching rate jumped up at the transient closing off of oxygen. The etching rate then slowly decreased and leveled off corresponding to the COF2 and CO2 concentration change in the emission gases. The RF power was turned off at 450 seconds.
Example 2 This experiment was designed to measure the effect of the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment on the interior surface of the apparatus. The etching rate was measured as 900 Angstrom/min according to the conditions described below before the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment. The feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® 8020 (C F8) and Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C4F8 flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz 8.8 KW RF power to a neutral temperature of estimated to be 5000 K. The activated gas then passed through the heat exchanger connection, entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. Then the heat exchanger connection between the remote plasma source and the process chamber was treated by fluorocarbon rich plasma. The feeding gas mixture for the treatment consisted of 250 seem Zyron® 8020 and 2000 seem Ar. After activated by 400 KHz 7.0 KW RF power, the gas mixture passed through the heat exchanger for 2 minutes. After the treatment, the etching rate was measured again under the same condition as before the treatment. The etching rate was found to be 1350 Angstrom/min, 30% higher than the one before the treatment. Example 3 This experiment was designed to measure the effect of the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment on the interior surface of the apparatus. The etching rate was measured as 850 Angstrom/min according to the conditions described below before the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment. The feeding gas composed of O2, C3F8 and Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1000 seem, Ar flow rate is 2750 seem, C3F8 flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz 6.0 KW RF power to a neutral temperature of estimated to be 4500 K. The activated gas then passed through the heat exchanger connection, entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. Then the heat exchanger connection between the remote plasma source and the process chamber was treated by fluorocarbon rich plasma. The feeding gas mixture for the treatment consisted of 250 seem C3F8 and 2750 seem Ar. After activated by 400 KHz 5.0 KW RF power, the gas mixture passed through the heat exchanger for two minutes. After the treatment, the etching rate was measured again under the same condition as before the treatment. The etching rate was found to be 1150 Angstrom/min, 30% higher than the one before the treatment.

Claims

CLAIM(S What is claimed is:
1. A method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than 1 :1 ; and thereafter
(b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits;
(c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter
(d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said pretreatment gas mixture contains no oxygen.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said surface deposits is removed from the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas mixture is activated by an RF power source, a DC power source or a microwave power source.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein neutral temperature of said activated cleaning gas mixture is at least about 3000 K.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said fluorocarbon is a perfluorocarbon compound.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas mixture further comprises a carrier gas.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the surface deposit is selected from a group consisting of silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon of said cleaning gas mixture is at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1
EP05734780A 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits Withdrawn EP1733071A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55622704P 2004-03-24 2004-03-24
US64044404P 2004-12-30 2004-12-30
US64083304P 2004-12-30 2004-12-30
PCT/US2005/010691 WO2005095670A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1733071A2 true EP1733071A2 (en) 2006-12-20

Family

ID=34965582

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05734780A Withdrawn EP1733071A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
EP05760434A Withdrawn EP1737998A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
EP05760380A Withdrawn EP1733072A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05760434A Withdrawn EP1737998A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
EP05760380A Withdrawn EP1733072A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (3) EP1733071A2 (en)
JP (3) JP2007530792A (en)
KR (3) KR20070037434A (en)
BR (3) BRPI0508204A (en)
TW (3) TWI281715B (en)
WO (3) WO2005095670A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0697467A1 (en) * 1994-07-21 1996-02-21 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for cleaning a deposition chamber
US7581549B2 (en) * 2004-07-23 2009-09-01 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method for removing carbon-containing residues from a substrate
CN101238238A (en) * 2005-08-02 2008-08-06 麻省理工学院 Remote cavity method of using sulfur fluoride from CVD/PECVD cavity for removing surface deposits
US9034199B2 (en) 2012-02-21 2015-05-19 Applied Materials, Inc. Ceramic article with reduced surface defect density and process for producing a ceramic article
US9212099B2 (en) 2012-02-22 2015-12-15 Applied Materials, Inc. Heat treated ceramic substrate having ceramic coating and heat treatment for coated ceramics
JP6390977B2 (en) * 2012-12-18 2018-09-19 シースター ケミカルズ インク． Thin film deposition reactor and process and method for dry cleaning thin film layers in situ
JP6202423B2 (en) * 2013-03-05 2017-09-27 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 Plasma cleaning method and plasma cleaning apparatus
US9850568B2 (en) 2013-06-20 2017-12-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Plasma erosion resistant rare-earth oxide based thin film coatings
EP3090073B1 (en) * 2013-12-30 2020-02-05 The Chemours Company FC, LLC Method of etching a film on a semiconductor in a semiconductor manufacturing process chamber
KR102662111B1 (en) * 2018-12-25 2024-05-03 가부시끼가이샤 레조낙 Attachment removal method and film forming method
US11854773B2 (en) 2020-03-31 2023-12-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Remote plasma cleaning of chambers for electronics manufacturing systems
CN116145106A (en) * 2023-02-21 2023-05-23 苏州鼎芯光电科技有限公司 Cleaning method for semiconductor coating process chamber

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5158644A (en) * 1986-12-19 1992-10-27 Applied Materials, Inc. Reactor chamber self-cleaning process
JP2002280376A (en) * 2001-03-22 2002-09-27 Research Institute Of Innovative Technology For The Earth Method and apparatus of cleaning cvd apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2005095670A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20070037434A (en) 2007-04-04
WO2005095670A3 (en) 2006-05-04
BRPI0508214A (en) 2007-07-17
TWI284929B (en) 2007-08-01
WO2005098086A3 (en) 2006-05-04
WO2005090638A8 (en) 2006-11-16
JP2007531289A (en) 2007-11-01
BRPI0508205A (en) 2007-07-17
EP1733072A2 (en) 2006-12-20
WO2005095670A2 (en) 2005-10-13
WO2005090638A2 (en) 2005-09-29
TW200623281A (en) 2006-07-01
WO2005090638A3 (en) 2006-04-13
KR20070040748A (en) 2007-04-17
WO2005098086A2 (en) 2005-10-20
WO2005090638A9 (en) 2006-01-26
BRPI0508204A (en) 2007-07-17
EP1737998A2 (en) 2007-01-03
TW200623240A (en) 2006-07-01
TWI281715B (en) 2007-05-21
TW200623251A (en) 2006-07-01
KR20070043697A (en) 2007-04-25
JP2007530792A (en) 2007-11-01
TWI281714B (en) 2007-05-21
JP2007531288A (en) 2007-11-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060144820A1 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
EP1733071A2 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
US20070107750A1 (en) Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits from the interior of chemical vapor deposition chambers
US20050258137A1 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
US20070028944A1 (en) Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits
US20090047447A1 (en) Method for removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor
EP2007923B1 (en) Etching process
US20070207275A1 (en) Enhancement of remote plasma source clean for dielectric films
WO2007027350A2 (en) Method of removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapour deposition (cvd) chamber
US20070028943A1 (en) Method of using sulfur fluoride for removing surface deposits
WO2008039465A2 (en) Method for removing surface deposits in the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor
US7479191B1 (en) Method for endpointing CVD chamber cleans following ultra low-k film treatments
KR102275996B1 (en) Hydrofluoroolefin etching gas mixtures
US20060144819A1 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20061006

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IE IT NL

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070524

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IE IT NL

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20081126