EP1155173B1 - Stabilized spandex - Google Patents

Stabilized spandex Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1155173B1
EP1155173B1 EP99966245A EP99966245A EP1155173B1 EP 1155173 B1 EP1155173 B1 EP 1155173B1 EP 99966245 A EP99966245 A EP 99966245A EP 99966245 A EP99966245 A EP 99966245A EP 1155173 B1 EP1155173 B1 EP 1155173B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
spandex
glycol
poly
weight
huntite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP99966245A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1155173A1 (en
Inventor
Yuji Uemura
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Du Pont Toray Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Du Pont Toray Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Du Pont Toray Co Ltd filed Critical Du Pont Toray Co Ltd
Publication of EP1155173A1 publication Critical patent/EP1155173A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1155173B1 publication Critical patent/EP1155173B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F1/00General methods for the manufacture of artificial filaments or the like
    • D01F1/02Addition of substances to the spinning solution or to the melt
    • D01F1/10Other agents for modifying properties
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F6/00Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F6/58Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolycondensation products
    • D01F6/70Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolycondensation products from polyurethanes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to spandex containing a combination of additives and, more specifically, to spandex containing both an inorganic stabilizer and a polymeric hindered amine stabilizer.
  • a variety of additives has been used in attempts to prevent or diminish the yellowing and mechanical degradation of spandex that can result from exposure to various environmental factors. Durability and whiteness retention during laundering and use are important attributes for spandex.
  • United States Patent 2,999,839 discloses the use of poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate), alone or in combination with specific inorganic additives, as an additive in spandex.
  • this additive is not particularly effective at preventing yellowing when the spandex is exposed to the chlorine agents present in swimming pools and laundries.
  • spandex additives Various inorganic compounds such as zinc oxide and a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite are disclosed as spandex additives in United States Patents 4,340,527 and 5,626,960, respectively. These additives offer chlorine resistance to spandex but may not be able to prevent yellowing of the spandex on exposure to nitrogen oxides or UV light.
  • the present invention is spandex containing a stabilizing composition of
  • spandex containing both poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate) and a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite has high resistance to yellowing and high mechanical resistance to chlorine.
  • spandex means a manufactured fiber in which the fiber-forming substance is a long chain synthetic elastomer comprised of at least 85% by weight of a segmented polyurethane.
  • Spandex is typically prepared by either melt-spinning a polyurethane or dry- or wet-spinning a polyurethane or polyurethaneurea solution either into a column filled with a hot inert gas such as air, nitrogen or steam or into an aqueous bath to remove the solvent followed by winding up the fiber.
  • a hot inert gas such as air, nitrogen or steam or into an aqueous bath to remove the solvent followed by winding up the fiber.
  • the polyurethane is generally made by reacting a polymeric glycol with a diisocyanate to form a capped glycol, a mixture of isocyanate-terminated glycol and unreacted diisocyanate. If a polyurethane without urea moieties is desired, the capped glycol can be reacted with a diol chain extender and optionally a monofunctional chain terminator either in the melt or after being dissolved in a solvent. If a polyurethaneurea is desired, the capped glycol can be dissolved in a solvent before being reacted with a diamine chain extender and optional monofunctional chain terminator.
  • Polymeric glycols used to prepare polyurethanes for spandex include polyethers such as poly(tetramethyleneether) glycol, poly(3-methyl-1,5-pentamethyleneether) glycol, and poly(tetramethyleneether-co-2-methyltetra-methyleneether) glycol; polyesters such as the polycondensation products of diols such as ethylene glycol, 1,4-butane diol, and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propane diol with diacids such as adipic acid, succinic acid, dodecanedioic acid, and copolymers thereof; and polycarbonates such as poly(pentane-1,5-carbonate) diol and poly(hexane-1,6-carbonate) diol.
  • polyethers such as poly(tetramethyleneether) glycol, poly(3-methyl-1,5-pentamethyleneether) glycol, and poly(tetramethyleneether-co-2-methylt
  • Useful diisocyanates include 1,1'-methylenebis(4-isocyanatobenzene) ("MDI"), 1,1'-methylenebis(4-isocyanatocyclohexane), 4-methyl-1,3-phenylene diisocyanate, 5-isocyanato-1-(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, and mixtures thereof.
  • MDI 1,1'-methylenebis(4-isocyanatobenzene)
  • 4-methyl-1,3-phenylene diisocyanate 4-methyl-1,3-phenylene diisocyanate
  • 5-isocyanato-1-(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, and mixtures thereof.
  • Useful chain extenders for making polyurethanes include ethylene glycol, trimethylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol, neopentyl glycol, 1,2-propylene glycol, 1,4-cyclohexane dimethylol, 1,4-cyclohexane diol, 1,4-bis(2-hydroxyethoxy) benzene, bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate, paraxylylene diol, and mixtures thereof.
  • Useful chain extenders for making polyurethaneureas include ethylene diamine, 1,3-cyclohexane diamine, 1,4-cyclohexane diamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,2-diaminopropane, 1,3-diaminopentane, 2-methyl-1,5-pentanediamine, and mixtures thereof.
  • Chain terminators optionally used to control molecular weight can include diethylamine, cyclohexylamine, butylamine, hexanol, and butanol.
  • the concentration of the polyurethane(urea) in the spinning solution is in the range of about 30-40 weight percent, based on the total weight of the solution.
  • Suitable solvents for the spinning solution include dimethylacetamide (“DMAc”), N-methylpyrrolidone, and dimethylformamide.
  • the stabilizing composition can be introduced into the spandex of this invention by first preparing a slurry of the composition, and optionally other additives and/or a viscosity enhancer (for example some of the polyurethane from which the spandex is to be made), in DMAc and then mixing the slurry into the spinning solution just before spinning.
  • a viscosity enhancer for example some of the polyurethane from which the spandex is to be made
  • the spandex of this invention contains 0.5%-5% by weight of poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate).
  • the inorganic material of the stabilizing composition is a mixture of huntite [(Mg 3 Ca(CO 3 ) 4) ] and hydromagnesite (basic magnesium carbonate), generally represented as Mg 4 (CO 3 ) 4 • Mg(OH) 2 • 4H 2 O.
  • huntite (Mg 3 Ca(CO 3 ) 4)
  • hydromagnesite basic magnesium carbonate
  • Beneficial effects have been observed when the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite is incorporated into the spandex in an amount of at least about 0.25% by weight.
  • the inorganic material is present as 1.5-5% by weight, based on the weight of the spandex.
  • spandex was stretched 25% and soaked in the stretched condition for 96 hours in an 1 ppm aqueous chlorine solution (prepared with sodium hypochlorite) at 25°C and pH 7.5.
  • the spandex was rinsed and its tenacity was then measured using Instron® Models 1122 or 4500 at 21°C and 65% RH in accordance with the general method of ASTM D 2731-72.
  • Three filaments, a 2-inch (5-cm) gauge length and a zero-to-300% elongation cycle were used for each of the measurements.
  • T b tenacity-at break
  • %NCO Total isocyanate moiety content in the capped glycol was measured by the method of S. Siggia, "Quantitative Organic Analysis via Functional Group", 3rd Edition, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 559-561 (1963).
  • a solution of polyurethaneurea was prepared by the following conventional method. MDI and poly(tetramethyleneether) glycol (Terathane® 1800, a registered trademark of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company) were thoroughly mixed at a 1.58:1 molar ratio and stirred for about 3 hours at 90°C to give a capped glycol having 2.22% NCO. A 250-g quantity of the capped glycol was diluted with 440 g of DMAc (36wt% solids).
  • a slurry was prepared from a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite (50/50 weight ratio) (Ultracarb U3, having a median particle size of about 3.6 microns, manufactured by Microfine Minerals Ltd.), a condensation polymer of p-cresol and divinyl benzene (Methacrol® 2390 D, a registered trademark of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company), poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate) ("FHM", manufactured by Sanyo Kasei Kogyo KK), DMAc, and a small amount of the polyurethaneurea to be used as the spandex.
  • the slurry was milled with glass beads using a Dyno® Mill Type KDL-special (Shimaru Enterprise Corp.) to a final median particle size of about 0.4 micron.
  • the slurry was thoroughly mixed into the polyurethane solution to give a spinning solution.
  • the proportions in the slurry and the amount mixed into the polyurethane solution were such that the spinning solution contained 4wt% of the huntite/hydromagnesite mixture, 1.5wt% Methacrol® 2390D, and 0.58wt% poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate), all based on polymer solids.
  • the spinning solution was dry spun by conventional means to form a spandex of 4 coalesced filaments totalling 40 denier (44 decitex). Results of tests performed on the spandex are given in the Table.
  • Spandex was prepared in substantially the same way as described in Example 1 but withouc adding the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite. Test results are also given in the Table.
  • Spandex was prepared in substantially the same way as described in Example 1 but without adding either the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite or the poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate). Test results are also given in the the Table where "Comp.” denotes a Comparison Example and "Broke” means the spandex broke during treatment or during measurement so that determination of a value was not possible. Resistance to Yellowing ( ⁇ b) Durability against chlorine (% retention of T b ) Example Sunlight NO2 Chlorine 1 8.2 10.5 3.8 22 Comp. 1 8.9 11.2 12.0 Broke Comp. 2 9.6 14.2 15.8 Broke

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Artificial Filaments (AREA)

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to spandex containing a combination of additives and, more specifically, to spandex containing both an inorganic stabilizer and a polymeric hindered amine stabilizer.
Description of Background Art
A variety of additives (see eg Korean Laid-open Publication No. 92-2840) has been used in attempts to prevent or diminish the yellowing and mechanical degradation of spandex that can result from exposure to various environmental factors. Durability and whiteness retention during laundering and use are important attributes for spandex.
United States Patent 2,999,839 discloses the use of poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate), alone or in combination with specific inorganic additives, as an additive in spandex. However, this additive is not particularly effective at preventing yellowing when the spandex is exposed to the chlorine agents present in swimming pools and laundries.
Various inorganic compounds such as zinc oxide and a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite are disclosed as spandex additives in United States Patents 4,340,527 and 5,626,960, respectively. These additives offer chlorine resistance to spandex but may not be able to prevent yellowing of the spandex on exposure to nitrogen oxides or UV light.
Spandex with improved resistance to yellowing and mechanical degradation from various environmental factors is still needed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is spandex containing a stabilizing composition of
  • (A) 0.5-5% by weight of the spandex of poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate); and
  • (B) 0.25-5% by weight of the spandex of a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
    It has now been found that spandex containing both poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate) and a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite has high resistance to yellowing and high mechanical resistance to chlorine.
    As used herein, "spandex" means a manufactured fiber in which the fiber-forming substance is a long chain synthetic elastomer comprised of at least 85% by weight of a segmented polyurethane.
    Spandex is typically prepared by either melt-spinning a polyurethane or dry- or wet-spinning a polyurethane or polyurethaneurea solution either into a column filled with a hot inert gas such as air, nitrogen or steam or into an aqueous bath to remove the solvent followed by winding up the fiber.
    The polyurethane is generally made by reacting a polymeric glycol with a diisocyanate to form a capped glycol, a mixture of isocyanate-terminated glycol and unreacted diisocyanate. If a polyurethane without urea moieties is desired, the capped glycol can be reacted with a diol chain extender and optionally a monofunctional chain terminator either in the melt or after being dissolved in a solvent. If a polyurethaneurea is desired, the capped glycol can be dissolved in a solvent before being reacted with a diamine chain extender and optional monofunctional chain terminator.
    Polymeric glycols used to prepare polyurethanes for spandex include polyethers such as poly(tetramethyleneether) glycol, poly(3-methyl-1,5-pentamethyleneether) glycol, and poly(tetramethyleneether-co-2-methyltetra-methyleneether) glycol; polyesters such as the polycondensation products of diols such as ethylene glycol, 1,4-butane diol, and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propane diol with diacids such as adipic acid, succinic acid, dodecanedioic acid, and copolymers thereof; and polycarbonates such as poly(pentane-1,5-carbonate) diol and poly(hexane-1,6-carbonate) diol.
    Useful diisocyanates include 1,1'-methylenebis(4-isocyanatobenzene) ("MDI"), 1,1'-methylenebis(4-isocyanatocyclohexane), 4-methyl-1,3-phenylene diisocyanate, 5-isocyanato-1-(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, and mixtures thereof.
    Useful chain extenders for making polyurethanes include ethylene glycol, trimethylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol, neopentyl glycol, 1,2-propylene glycol, 1,4-cyclohexane dimethylol, 1,4-cyclohexane diol, 1,4-bis(2-hydroxyethoxy) benzene, bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate, paraxylylene diol, and mixtures thereof. Useful chain extenders for making polyurethaneureas (a sub-class of polyurethanes) include ethylene diamine, 1,3-cyclohexane diamine, 1,4-cyclohexane diamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,2-diaminopropane, 1,3-diaminopentane, 2-methyl-1,5-pentanediamine, and mixtures thereof. Chain terminators optionally used to control molecular weight can include diethylamine, cyclohexylamine, butylamine, hexanol, and butanol.
    The concentration of the polyurethane(urea) in the spinning solution is in the range of about 30-40 weight percent, based on the total weight of the solution. Suitable solvents for the spinning solution include dimethylacetamide ("DMAc"), N-methylpyrrolidone, and dimethylformamide.
    The stabilizing composition can be introduced into the spandex of this invention by first preparing a slurry of the composition, and optionally other additives and/or a viscosity enhancer (for example some of the polyurethane from which the spandex is to be made), in DMAc and then mixing the slurry into the spinning solution just before spinning. Separate slurries can be used for the various additives, but it is not necessary to do so. In order to obtain a uniformly mixed slurry with very finely divided particle sizes, the slurry is mixed at high shear, for example, by milling or otherwise grinding.
    The spandex of this invention contains 0.5%-5% by weight of poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate).
    The inorganic material of the stabilizing composition is a mixture of huntite [(Mg3Ca(CO3)4)] and hydromagnesite (basic magnesium carbonate), generally represented as Mg4(CO3)4 Mg(OH)2 4H2O. Beneficial effects have been observed when the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite is incorporated into the spandex in an amount of at least about 0.25% by weight. Generally, the inorganic material is present as 1.5-5% by weight, based on the weight of the spandex.
    In the Examples, several tests were used. For all yellowing resistance tests, "b" values were measured with a Colormaster differential colorimeter having a Model D-29-DP-9000 signal processor (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc.) and the difference between "b" values before and after testing ("Δb") was reported. The samples were not scoured before testing.
    To measure resistance to yellowing by chlorine, a spandex sample of about 10 grams was wound around a Teflon® sheet to prepare a sample card, which was then soaked for 30 minutes in an aqueous solution of 600ppm chlorine (prepared with sodium hypochlorite) at a temperature of 40 ± 2°C, followed by rinsing for 10 minutes with water and air drying at room temperature. The change in "b" value was then calculated and recorded as "delta b".
    To measure resistance to yellowing by simulated sunlight, about 10g of spandex was wound around a stainless steel sheet and irradiated in a Sunshine Weather Meter (Wel-Sun-HCH Model B, Suga Shikenki K.K., Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan) for 40 hours at 25% elongation, 63°C, and 60% relative humidity ("RH"), after which the "b" value was measured and compared with the corresponding value before irradiation to give "delta b".
    To measure resistance to yellowing caused by NO2, 10 grams of spandex was wound around a stainless steel sheet at low tension to form a layer of about 0.32-cm thickness and exposed for 40 hours to 7ppm NO2 gas in air at 40°C and 60% RH in a Scott Controlled Atmosphere tester (Scott Research Laboratories, Inc.). As before, "b" values before and after testing were compared to give "delta b".
    To measure the mechanical durability of spandex in the presence of chlorine, a sample of spandex was stretched 25% and soaked in the stretched condition for 96 hours in an 1 ppm aqueous chlorine solution (prepared with sodium hypochlorite) at 25°C and pH 7.5. The spandex was rinsed and its tenacity was then measured using Instron® Models 1122 or 4500 at 21°C and 65% RH in accordance with the general method of ASTM D 2731-72. Three filaments, a 2-inch (5-cm) gauge length and a zero-to-300% elongation cycle were used for each of the measurements. Each sample was cycled five times at a constant elongation rate of 50 centimeters per minute, and tenacity-at break ("Tb") was determined at the point at which the sample broke in a sixth cycle. Percent retention of Tb of the treated samples vs. untreated samples was calculated.
    Total isocyanate moiety content ("%NCO") in the capped glycol was measured by the method of S. Siggia, "Quantitative Organic Analysis via Functional Group", 3rd Edition, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 559-561 (1963).
    EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1
    A solution of polyurethaneurea was prepared by the following conventional method. MDI and poly(tetramethyleneether) glycol (Terathane® 1800, a registered trademark of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company) were thoroughly mixed at a 1.58:1 molar ratio and stirred for about 3 hours at 90°C to give a capped glycol having 2.22% NCO. A 250-g quantity of the capped glycol was diluted with 440 g of DMAc (36wt% solids). Then 30 g DMAc, 4 g ethylene diamine chain extender and 0.2 g diethylamine chain terminator were mixed and the resulting solution was added to the capped glycol solution and very rapidly mixed at room temperature using a commercial high speed stirrer (model B200G, Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Led.). The resulting solution was 35wt% in polyurethane and had a viscosity of 2000-3000 poise, measured in accordance with the general method of ASTM D1343-69 using a Model DV-8 Falling Ball Viscometer (Duratech Corp., Waynesboro, VA.), operated at 40°C.
    A slurry was prepared from a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite (50/50 weight ratio) (Ultracarb U3, having a median particle size of about 3.6 microns, manufactured by Microfine Minerals Ltd.), a condensation polymer of p-cresol and divinyl benzene (Methacrol® 2390 D, a registered trademark of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company), poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate) ("FHM", manufactured by Sanyo Kasei Kogyo KK), DMAc, and a small amount of the polyurethaneurea to be used as the spandex. The slurry was milled with glass beads using a Dyno® Mill Type KDL-special (Shimaru Enterprise Corp.) to a final median particle size of about 0.4 micron.
    The slurry was thoroughly mixed into the polyurethane solution to give a spinning solution. The proportions in the slurry and the amount mixed into the polyurethane solution were such that the spinning solution contained 4wt% of the huntite/hydromagnesite mixture, 1.5wt% Methacrol® 2390D, and 0.58wt% poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate), all based on polymer solids. The spinning solution was dry spun by conventional means to form a spandex of 4 coalesced filaments totalling 40 denier (44 decitex). Results of tests performed on the spandex are given in the Table.
    Comparison Example 1
    Spandex was prepared in substantially the same way as described in Example 1 but withouc adding the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite. Test results are also given in the Table.
    Comparison Example 2
    Spandex was prepared in substantially the same way as described in Example 1 but without adding either the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite or the poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate). Test results are also given in the the Table where "Comp." denotes a Comparison Example and "Broke" means the spandex broke during treatment or during measurement so that determination of a value was not possible.
    Resistance to Yellowing
    (Δb)
    Durability against chlorine (% retention of Tb)
    Example Sunlight NO2 Chlorine
    1 8.2 10.5 3.8 22
    Comp. 1 8.9 11.2 12.0 Broke
    Comp. 2 9.6 14.2 15.8 Broke
    The results in the Table show that the resistance of the spandex of this invention to yellowing and to mechanical degradation was significantly and synergistically improved when compared to spandex outside of the invention without the stabilizing composition or with only one of the two ingredients of the stabilizing composition.

    Claims (2)

    1. Spandex containing a stabilizing composition consisting essentially of
      (A) 0.5-5% by weight of the spandex of poly(N,N-diethyl-2-aminoethyl methacrylate); and
      (B) 0.25-5% by weight of the spandex of a mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite.
    2. The spandex of claim 1 wherein the mixture of huntite and hydromagnesite is present in an amount of 1.5-5% by weight of the spandex.
    EP99966245A 1998-12-16 1999-12-15 Stabilized spandex Expired - Lifetime EP1155173B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    JP37580498 1998-12-16
    JP37580498 1998-12-16
    PCT/US1999/029707 WO2000036195A1 (en) 1998-12-16 1999-12-15 Stabilized spandex

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1155173A1 EP1155173A1 (en) 2001-11-21
    EP1155173B1 true EP1155173B1 (en) 2004-03-24

    Family

    ID=18506092

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP99966245A Expired - Lifetime EP1155173B1 (en) 1998-12-16 1999-12-15 Stabilized spandex

    Country Status (3)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1155173B1 (en)
    KR (1) KR100580407B1 (en)
    WO (1) WO2000036195A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (2)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    KR100780395B1 (en) * 2006-09-04 2007-11-29 태광산업주식회사 Chlorine resistant polyurethaneurea elastic fiber and preparation of thereof
    KR20090005802A (en) * 2007-07-10 2009-01-14 주식회사 효성 Spandex fibers containing hydromagnesite

    Family Cites Families (7)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    NL235188A (en) * 1958-01-17
    NL288408A (en) * 1960-08-05
    US3428711A (en) 1966-02-01 1969-02-18 Du Pont Hindered polymeric tertiary amines as stabilizers for polyurethanes
    US3553290A (en) 1968-04-10 1971-01-05 Du Pont Spandex fibers stabilized with condensates of substituted phenols and divinyl benzenes
    US4340527A (en) * 1980-06-20 1982-07-20 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers
    GB2126812B (en) 1982-08-30 1986-05-08 Rca Corp Television sound detection system using a phase-locked loop
    US5626960A (en) * 1995-09-07 1997-05-06 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Spandex containing a huntite and hydromagnesite additive

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    KR20010101230A (en) 2001-11-14
    KR100580407B1 (en) 2006-05-16
    EP1155173A1 (en) 2001-11-21
    WO2000036195A1 (en) 2000-06-22

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP0558758B1 (en) Polyurethane composition
    US6916896B2 (en) High productivity spandex fiber process and product
    WO2007122124A1 (en) Segmented polyurethane elastomers with high elongation at tear
    EP1401946B1 (en) Spandex containing a mixture of phenolic compounds
    US6503996B1 (en) High-uniformity spandex and process for making spandex
    EP1155173B1 (en) Stabilized spandex
    US6372834B1 (en) Stabilized spandex
    US4837292A (en) Article of spandex having polycarbonate soft segment
    US4798880A (en) Spandex formed with a mixture of diamines
    KR100397704B1 (en) Stabilized spandex
    JP4264912B2 (en) Polyurethane urea composition and polyurethane elastic fiber
    US6225435B1 (en) Stable polyurethaneurea solutions
    KR100397705B1 (en) Spandex fiber having improved resistances to discoloration and chlorine
    US5288779A (en) Polyurethaneurea solutions and spandex therefrom
    JP2000282328A (en) Polyurethane-based elastic yarn
    US20120295506A1 (en) Spandex with high uniformity
    JP3921648B2 (en) Polyurethane elastic fiber
    KR100555269B1 (en) Polyurethane Fiber Containing Polyvinylidene Fluoride
    EP0964880B1 (en) Stable polyurethaneurea solutions
    EP1226197B1 (en) Spandex-fiber polyurethaneurea polymers prepared using 1,3-diaminopentane as chain extender
    WO1998025986A1 (en) Polyestercarbonate-polyurethaneurea fibers
    JPH08337631A (en) Polyurethaneurea composition
    JPH0533264A (en) Union fabric made of chlorine-resistant polyurethane elastic yarn
    DE1927675B (en) Threads and fibers made from a long-chain, synthetic, elastomeric, segmented polyurethane based on polyether

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20010608

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

    TPAD Observations filed by third parties

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS TIPA

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): IT

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20041228

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Payment date: 20181220

    Year of fee payment: 20