EA018318B1 - Antidotes for agricultural crops - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to the novel use of antidotes for agricultural crops selected from a group of polymeric chemicals, and in particular their use to reduce and/or prevent the phytotoxicity of insecticidal compositions comprising diafenthiuron on crops of useful plants. The invention thus includes novel insecticidal compositions comprising diafenthiurons and antidotes for agricultural crops, and to the use of such compositions in controlling insects in crops of useful plants. The invention further discloses combination packages of diafenthiuron and antidotes.

Description

(57) The invention relates to a new use of antidotes for crops selected from the group of polymer chemical compounds, and especially to their use for reducing and / or preventing phytotoxicity of insecticidal compositions containing diaphentiuron for cultivated crops. Thus, the application describes new insecticidal compositions containing diaphentiuron and antidote for crops, and the use of these compositions for controlling insects in crops of cultivated plants. The application also describes combined packaging containing diapentyuron and an antidote for agricultural plants.

The invention relates to a new use of antidotes for crops selected from the group of polymer chemical compounds, and especially to their use for reducing and / or preventing phytotoxicity of insecticidal compositions containing diaphentiuron for cultivated cultivated plants. Thus, the invention relates to new insecticidal compositions containing diapentyuron and antidote for crops, and to the use of these compositions for controlling insects in crops of cultivated plants. The invention also relates to combination packs containing diafentyuron and an antidote for crops.

When used in recommended consumption rates and dilutions, the insecticide diafentiuron {1-tert-butyl-3- (2,6-diisopropyl-4-phenoxyphenyl) thiourea; serial number 229 in THe Re811C1be Mapia1 14th ed., ed. S. I. 8. Totyp, publishing house of HRDS, 2006} effectively destroys a wide range of insect pests without any significant damage to the crop they process.

However, there is evidence that, in certain climatic conditions and / or under certain modes of use, diaphentiuron can cause reddening of leaves and / or necrotic spots. For this reason, there is a need to develop methods to avoid these potential problems. For example, due to the increased frequency of growing genetically modified cotton, in particular in arid climates and when local farmers practice using small volumes for spraying and applying pesticides using a single nozzle, this unexpected problem associated with phytotoxicity is required to solve to provide the farmer with a broader arsenal of control of cotton insect pests that are normally not controlled by GM (gene modification) or by traditional insect control agents.

Thus, the first object of the invention is an insecticidal composition containing diapentyuron and antidote for crops.

The present invention is based on the unexpectedly established fact that certain polymer chemical compounds have the ability to attenuate the phytotoxicity caused by diaphentiuron. In particular, the polymer compounds may preferably be vinyl acetate polymers or copolymers; acrylic polymers or copolymers; or polyethers.

Examples of acceptable polymer chemical compounds that can be used according to the invention are (but not limited to) Aboch 8etcoe E-135, NooCu1 A2099, BeoCu1A-1120, BeoCu1 A615, \ 1os1p11 Lim2418, \ 1os1n11 ING 578, TE. ICSE 17-0422, Ushati 18160, 8apbou and 1pb1gop. which are the following products commercially available.

A11ox 8-specific E-135 (supplied by Sgoba) is a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate.

No. oSgu1 A-2099 (supplied by the company I8M No.OK.egt8) is an acrylic-styrene copolymer.

No. СУ1 А-1120 (supplied by the company И8М No.ОК.е§т8) is an acrylic-styrene copolymer.

No. oSgu1 A-615 (supplied by the company I8M No.OK.e8Sh8) is an acrylic copolymer.

MoM1y LIM2418 (supplied by Ce1apege) is a copolymer of vinyl acetate and VeoUa® (versatile vinyl ester).

MoM111 ING 578 (supplied by Ce1apege) is a vinyl acetate homopolymer.

TEMSNUY 17-0422 (supplied by 8oy Wabeg) is an acrylic polymer.

Ushati 18160 (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) is a vinyl acetate polymer.

8apbouy (supplied by 8updep1a 1pb1a) is an alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

1pb1gop (supplied by 1pbod1 SietuP Sotrapu) is an alkylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol.

These polymeric chemical compounds, as a rule, are used as adjuvants in many industries, for example, NosGu1 A2099 is used in glossy printing varnishes and protective coatings, and NosGU1 A-615 is used in transparent finishes for wooden products and in plastic coatings. АпνΐιίΜ 8appb1111 and 1pb1gop are produced as surfactants intended for use in agrochemical formulations, and Ushati 18160 was used in fungicidal formulations, however, none of the compounds from the above group of chemicals was previously used as an (I) antidote for crops or (II) in combination with diafentyuron. Thus, when creating the invention, it was completely unexpectedly found that the inclusion of these adjuvants in compositions containing diaphentiuron weakens the phytotoxic effect found when diaphentiuron is treated with crops as a means of controlling insects, in particular

- 1 018318 in the case when these adjuvants are present in low concentrations (usually 2 vol.% Or less) during such treatments. Thus, another object of the invention is the use of an adjuvant to reduce the phytotoxicity of diafentyuron.

The next object of the invention is a method of reducing or preventing phytotoxicity with respect to cultivated crops, when phytotoxicity is due to the treatment of these crops with diafentyuron, said crops of these crops being treated with diafentyuron in combination with an antidote for crops selected from the group from Άίίοχ 8knote Е-135, еоеоСгу1 А-2099, №оСгу1Л1120, ёоСгу1 А615, Μοχ \ ί1ϊ11ι ΕΌΜ2418, ΜοχνϊΗΐΙι ΌΗΕ 578, Tech1SVUB 17-0422, Ushati1 18160, 8; ικΙονϊί and Ιηάίτοη. The phytotoxic effect on plants can be assessed visually depending on the percentage of redness of the leaves and / or the appearance of necrosis. The crop antidotes used according to the invention are typically polymeric chemical compounds and, as a rule, can reduce the phytotoxicity manifested in reddening of the leaves to a level of 10% or less, compared to the level of phytotoxicity to untreated plants. The preferred polymer chemical compounds used according to the invention, as a rule, can reduce phytotoxicity to a level of 7% or less, and the most preferred polymer chemical compounds can reduce phytotoxicity to a level of 5% or less. The above values are approximate, since any purely visual assessment is probably subjective to some extent.

Diafentiuron intended for use according to the invention can be obtained according to the method described in I8 4328247, or it can be used as a commercially available product (for example, in the form of ROBO® 50 ^ P, ROBO® 5008C or REOA8I8®; company 8ппеп1а Сгар Рго1ес1юп AO, Basel).

As noted above, the antidote for crops, which is used according to the invention, as a rule, is selected from the group consisting of 8οχ 8ет ^ 1е Е-135 (supplied by Stop), NeοС ^ у1 А-2099, НеοС ^ у1Α-1120, НеοС ^ y1 A615 (all supplied by Ό8Μ No.ο ^ 8ΐη8) Μο \ νί1ί11ι BOM 2418, Μο \ νί1ί11ι ΌΗΕ 578 (both supplied by Ce1apeke) TECH1SKUB 17-0422 (supplied by 8οοΙΙ Vayeg). Ushati1 18160 (supplied by Ce1apeke), 8; · ιηάονίΙ (supplied by 8updep1a Ιηάίη) and Ιηάίτοη (supplied by Ιηάοίΐ1 Syetkap Sárapu). A person skilled in the art should know and understand that other adjuvants that are similar in chemical composition can also be used to achieve the effects of the invention. Preferably, polymeric chemicals / adjuvants that are used as antidotes for crops have a minimum film-forming temperature below 30 ° C, more preferably 20 ° C or lower, and a solubility in water of 1% or less.

Each component of the insecticidal composition of the invention can be used in unmodified form, i.e. in the form in which it can be obtained by synthesis. However, each component can be included in the formulation (either individually or in combination with another component) by any suitable method using standard formulation adjuvants, such as carriers, solvents, and surfactants, for example, as described below in the present description. Such formulations may be concentrates that are reconstituted prior to use, although ready-to-use formulations may also be prepared. For dilution, for example, water, liquid fertilizers, microelements, biological organisms, oils or solvents can be used.

Thus, another object of the invention is an insecticidal formulation containing (Ι) diapentyuron, (ΙΙ) the crop antidote described herein, and (III) a standard adjuvant for the formulations. In one embodiment of this aspect of the invention, a diafentyuron formulation is prepared using a standard formulation adjuvant and then combined with a crop antidote (which may be included in the formulation or may be in the form obtained by synthesis) before spraying. In another embodiment, diafentiuron, an antidote for crops, and a standard adjuvant for formulations, all together, can be included in the formulation.

The formulations of the invention may take various physical forms, for example, sprayable powders, gels, wettable powders, water dispersible granules, water dispersible tablets, effervescent granules, emulsifiable concentrates, microemulsion concentrates, oil-in emulsions -water, flowing oils, aqueous dispersions, oil dispersions, suspoemulsions, capsule suspensions, emulsifiable granules, soluble liquids, water-soluble concentrates (containing water or miscible with water th organic solvent as a carrier), impregnated polymer films or other known forms described, for example, in Μ; · ιηι.ι; · ι1 οη Оеме ^ рteг ηηά Ике οί ЕОО 8рес1Пса1юп5 ίοτ Р1ап1 Р ^ οίесί ^ οη Рогойс ο ed., 1999.

In specific embodiments, diafentiuron is included in the preparative

- 2 018318 form in the form of a wettable powder or suspension concentrate, and the antidote for crops is in unmodified form or it is included in the preparative form in the form of a liquid. In other embodiments, diafentiuron, an antidote for crops, and a standard adjuvant for formulations can be included in the form of a wettable powder or suspension concentrate.

Formulations can be prepared, for example, by mixing diafentyuron and / or an antidote for crops with standard adjuvants for formulations to formulate the composition in the form of finely divided solid particles, granules, solutions, dispersions or emulsions. Other standard formulation adjuvants, such as finely divided solids, mineral oils, vegetable or animal oils, modified vegetable or animal oils, organic solvents, water, surfactants, or combinations thereof, can also be included in the formulations provided in the invention.

Standard adjuvants for formulations that can be used to prepare the formulations of the invention are well known. So, it is possible to use such liquid carriers as water, toluene, xylene, petroleum ether, vegetable oils, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, cyclohexanone, carboxylic anhydrides, acetonitrile, acetophenone, amyl acetate, 2-butanone, butylene carbonate, chlorobenzene, cyclohexane, cyclohexanol, acetic acid esters, diacetone alcohol, 1,2-dichloropropane, diethanolamine, para-diethylbenzene, diethylene glycol, diethylene glycol abietate, diethylene glycol butyl ether, diethylene glycol ethyl ether, diethylene glycol methyl ether i, Ν, Ν-dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, 1,4 dioxane, dipropylene glycol, dipropylene glycol methyl ether, dipropylene glycol dibenzoate, diproxitol, alkylpyrrolidone, ethyl acetate, 2-ethylhexanol, ethylene carbonate, 1,1,1-2-alkane-triheptane b-limonene, ethyl lactate, ethylene glycol, ethylene glycol butyl ether, ethylene glycol methyl ether, gamma butyrolactone, glycerol, glycerol acetate, glycerol diacetate, glycerol triacetate, hexadecane, iso-isoanyl acetate, iso-isoanyl acetate he, isopropylbenzene, isopropyl myristate, lactic acid, laurylamine, mesityl oxide, methoxypropanol, methyl isoamyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl laurate, methyl octanoate, methyl oleate, methylene chloride, meta-xylene, n-octylamine, octylamine, octylamine, octylamine, octylamine, octylamine, octylamine, octylamine, ortho-xylene, phenol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), propionic acid, propillactate, propylene carbonate, propylene glycol, propylene glycol methyl ether, para-xylene, toluene, triethyl phosphate, triethylene glycol, xylene sulfonic acid, steam athena, mineral oil, trichlorethylene, perchlorethylene, ethyl acetate, amyl acetate, butyl acetate, propylene glycol methyl ether, diethylene glycol methyl ether, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and high molecular weight alcohols, such as amyl alcohol, tetrahydrofurficolganol, ethanol, ethylene glycol, ethanol, ethylene glycol, alcohol glycerol, Y-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, and the like. Water is a conventional carrier for diluting concentrates. Solid carriers are, for example, talc, titanium dioxide, pyrophyllite clay, silica, attapulgite clay, kieselguhr, limestone, calcium carbonate, bentonite, montmorillonite potassium, husk of cotton seeds, wheat flour, soy flour, pumice, wood grain nuts, lignin and similar substances described, for example, in SRV 180.1001, (c) and (b).

In preparative forms, it is advisable to use a large number of surfactants, especially in preparative forms to be diluted with a carrier before use. Surfactants can be anionic, cationic, nonionic or polymeric and can be used as emulsifiers, wetting agents or suspending agents or for other purposes. Typical surfactants are, for example, salts of alkyl sulfates, such as diethanolammonium lauryl sulfate; salts of alkylaryl sulfonates such as calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate; alkyl phenol / alkylene oxide adducts such as nonyl phenol ethoxylate; alcohol / alkylene oxide adducts such as tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate; soaps such as sodium stearate; salts of alkylnaphthalenesulfonates such as sodium dibutylnaphthalenesulfonate; dialkyl esters of sulfosuccinates, such as di (2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate; esters of sorbitol, sorbitol; quaternary amines, such as lauryltrimethylammonium chloride, esters of polyethylene glycol and fatty acids, such as polyethylene glycol stearate; block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide; and salts of esters of mono- and dialkyl phosphates; as well as other compounds described, for example, in MsSi1syeoi'8 Es1sgdsp15 apb YeshikShsga Appia1, publishing house of MS Ryyyppd Sogr., Ktbds ^ oo 1sg5su.

1981.

Other standard adjuvants for formulations that can generally be used according to the invention are crystallization inhibitors, viscosity modifiers, suspending agents, colorants, antioxidants, foaming agents, weak absorbents, mixing aids, antifoaming agents, complexing agents, substances, pH neutralizing or changing buffers, corrosion inhibitors, flavoring agents, wetting agents, absorption enhancers, trace elements, plasticizers, substances improving

- 3 018318 glide, lubricants, dispersants, thickeners, antifreezes, microbicides, as well as liquid and solid fertilizers.

The formulations of the invention may also include additives of vegetable or animal oil, mineral oil, alkyl esters of said oils, or mixtures of oils and derivatives of oils. The amount of oil additive in the composition proposed in the invention, as a rule, is from 0.01 to 10% in terms of the mixture for spraying. For example, an oil additive may be added to the sprayer tank at the desired concentration after preparing the spray mixture. Preferred oil additives contain mineral oils or oils of vegetable origin, for example, rapeseed oil, olive oil or sunflower oil, emulsified vegetable oil such as AM1OO® (Köye-Roiéeis Saiaia 1ps.), Alkyl esters of vegetable oils, for example methyl derivatives , or animal oil, such as fish oil or liquid beef tallow. Preferred oil additives contain, for example, practically 80 wt.% Fish oil alkyl esters and 15 wt.% Methyl rapeseed oil, as well as conventional emulsifiers and pH modifiers, 5 wt.%, As active components. Particularly preferred oil additives contain alkyl esters of C ₈ -C ₂ fatty acids, especially methyl derivatives of C ₁₂ -C ₁₈ fatty acids, for example, methyl esters of lauric acid, palmitic acid and oleic acid are most important. These esters are known as methyl laurate (CA8-111-82-0), methyl palmitate (CA8-112-39-0) and methyl oleate (CA8-112-62-9). A preferred derivative of a fatty acid methyl ester is Etegu® 2230 and 2231 (Sodi18 OTH). These and other derivatives of oils are also described in Sotreijst o! Unshielded AfschgapK 5th ed., Published by 8oy1yegi ΙΙΙίηοίδ Ishuegayu, 2000. Another preferred adjuvant is AFdot® (8UpDesha AO), which is an adjuvant based on methylated rapeseed oil.

The scope and effect of oil additives can be further enhanced by combining them with surfactants, such as nonionic, anionic or cationic surfactants. Examples of acceptable anionic, nonionic and cationic surfactants are given on ss. 7-8 \ UO 97/34485. Preferred surfactants are anionic surfactants such as dodecylbenzyl sulfonate, especially calcium salts thereof, and nonionic surfactants are compounds such as fatty alcohol ethoxylates. Most preferred is ethoxylated fatty C; ₂ -C ₂₂ alcohols having a degree of ethoxylation from 5 to 40. Examples of surfactants that are commercially available are products such as genapol (Oeiaro1) (C1apaSh AO). Silicone surfactants are also preferred, in particular polyalkyl oxide-modified heptamethyltriloxanes, which are commercially available, for example, in the form of 811Tee1 L-77®, as well as perforated surfactants. The concentration of surfactants in terms of the total content of additives is generally from 1 to 30 wt.%. Examples of oil additives containing mixtures of oil or mineral oils or their derivatives with surfactants are Eyeyog ME 8I®, Tygosyatde® (company 8yuidea AO, Switzerland) or AsyrtoyS (company BP Oy Ytiyey, UK).

If necessary, in the formulations proposed in the invention, it is also possible to use the above surfactants individually, i.e. without oil additives.

In addition, the addition of an organic solvent to the oil additive / surfactant mixture may further increase activity. Suitable solvents are, for example, 8o1ge55o® (company or E88O) or Atotays 8o1uei1® (company Ehhoi Sotrotayoi). The concentration of such solvents can be from 10 to 80 wt.% In terms of the total weight. Oil additives that are present in a mixture with solvents are described, for example, in I8-A-4834908. Commercially available oil additives are known as MEXE® (BA8E Sotrotayoi). Another oil additive that is preferred according to the invention is 8COKE® (8widei! A Sgor Ptolessioi Saiaya).

In addition to the oil additives listed above, spray formulations of alkyl pyrrolidones (e.g. Adptah®) can also be added to the spray mixture. You can also use synthetic compositions having a crystalline lattice of compounds, for example, polyacrylamide, polyvinyl derivatives or poly-1-para-menthene (for example, Voil®, Sostet® or Etetai®). Solutions that contain propionic acid, for example, Eigodket Rei-e-yOe®, as an activity enhancing agent, can also be added to the spray mixture.

As noted above, the component representing diafentyuron and the component representing the antidote for crops can be prepared and / or included individually in the formulation and then combined before spraying (for example, when diluted as a mixture prepared in one tank (tank mix ), as described below in the examples).

In the latter case, each of these components (preferably diafentyuron in the form of a preparation

- 4 018318 form) can be packaged as a combination. Thus, another object of the invention is a combined package containing an insecticide and an antidote for crops, where the package includes a first container containing diafentyuron and a second container containing an antidote for crops.

The insecticidal compositions and formulations of the invention can be used to control insects, phytopathogenic spider mites and / or ticks in crops of cultivated plants. Thus, the next object of the invention is a method of controlling insects in crops of cultivated plants, which consists in treating insects or crops, or the location of insects or crops, with the insecticidal composition or insecticidal formulation described herein.

Insects, phytopathogenic spider mites, and mites that can be combated are, for example, representatives of the orders Berloridae, Coloridae, and Noshor. 01p1ega, Leapia, Tyu8aior1ega, Og11yur1sga. Liorgiga, 81 ryopar1ega, Ma11or1ada, Tyukaiiga, Sorporega, Pgosor1ega and Nuteiorgia, which live in crops of cultivated plants. In particular, the compositions and formulations can be used to control sucking insects, spider mites and whiteflies, and most preferably with members of the family Teeiusius dae (especially Teiiusius igisae), aphids (primarily Lyre doku) and whiteflies (especially Vetsa 1aaac1 )

Cultivated crops on which the compositions and formulations of the invention can be used to control insects and / or phytotoxicity, which can be reduced or prevented, include cotton and vegetable crops. Preferably, the crop is cotton.

It should be understood that the concept of crops also includes those crops that are given tolerance to herbicides or to certain classes of herbicides (for example, inhibitors of LB8 (acetolactate synthase), C8 (glutamate synthetase), EP8P8 (5enolpyruvyl chikimate-3-phosphate synthsinta ) and ΗΡΡΌ (parahydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase)) using conventional selection methods or genetic engineering, as well as those cultures that are given resistance to harmful insects using methods genetic engineering, for example, cotton line B1 (resistant to box worm of cotton, for example, NICOT1N33B® (cotton), Vo11dagD® (cotton).

Any suitable processing method can be used to treat cultivated plants, insects or insect / cultivated plants with the compositions or formulations of the invention. These include large and small volume spraying methods (e.g., spraying with a boom sprayer, spraying with a one / triple nozzle backpack sprayer, etc.) that are known to those skilled in the art.

As a rule, diafentyuron can be used at a rate of consumption from 250 g of active ingredient per hectare (g a.a. / ha) to 800 g a.a. / ha, for example 250, 300, 400 or 800 g ai / ha using a spray volume of 150 to 500 l / ha (e.g. 150, 200, 250, 300 l / ha). The antidote for crops should be included in such an amount as to obtain a concentration of from 0.02 to 2 vol.%. Preferably, the antidote for crops should be used in the following concentrations of 0.07, 0.1, 0.25 or 1 vol.%.

Various objects and embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in more detail below by way of examples. It should be understood that the invention can make changes to the details without deviating from the scope of the invention.

For the avoidance of doubt, literature references, patent applications, or patents cited in the text of the present description are fully incorporated by reference.

Examples

Example 1. The effect of AEox 8et1E-135 on the detected phytotoxicity of diafentyuron against non-transgenic cotton.

The field experiment was repeated three times in plots of 50 m ² each to assess the effect of the polymeric chemical compound LEo.x 8etokoe E-135 and the atomized volume on diapentiuron-mediated phytotoxicity to cotton.

Cotton (cultivar C1M-496) VVSN72 (stage 72 of the development of the culture according to the Zadoks scale) was treated with compositions containing diafentiuron in the form of ROBO® 500 8C at a rate of consumption of 250 g / ha, either individually or in combination with L11okh 8etk1e E-135. The cultivated plant was treated twice, the interval between treatments was 1 week. The treatment was carried out using either a large (H) spray volume (700 l / ha) or a small (B) spray volume (200 l / ha) using a knapsack sprayer with one nozzle. In compositions containing Л11ох 8етко1е E-135, this component was included in a concentration of 0.03 vol.%. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of redness of cotton leaves 4 and 7 days after treatment (note: assessment in

- 5 018318 day 7 after the first spraying was carried out before the second spraying) compared with untreated cotton. The results are presented below in table. one.

Table 1

Composition ROYO 5S500 (g / ha) ΑιΙοχ 8knot1e E-135 (vol.%) % redness of cotton leaves 7 ϋβΑ2 The sprayed volume (l / ha) 4 ϋΑΑΙ (ani after processing 1) 7 ϋϋΑΙ 4 EOA2 (days after treatment 2) the control - - 0 0 0 0 one 700 250 - 2 6 4 5 2 200 250 - 3 twenty 5 fifteen 3 200 250 0,03 one 25 2 10

It was found that when using a smaller spray volume, a greater degree of phytotoxicity mediated by diapheniuron was found. The inclusion of Sulfur 8e1 E-135 at a concentration of 0.03% reduced the detected phytotoxicity.

Example 2. The effect of Scooter E-135 and Ushati 16180 on the detected phytotoxicity of diafentyuron against transgenic cotton at the stage of BBCH73.

We conducted two field experiments, which were repeated once in a single plot (200 m ² ), to assess the effect of polymeric chemical compounds Αίίοχ 8eshkoe Е-135 (Αίίοχ, firm Sgoia) and U1iati1 16180 (Ushati1, firm Ce1eiege) on phytotoxicity mediated by diaphentiuron regarding transgenic cotton. The first field experiment was carried out using a large spray volume, and the second experiment was carried out using a small spray volume.

2.1. Experience 1 - sprayed volume of 700 l / ha

Cotton (YY1a1-11) was grown to the stage of BBCH73 and treated with diafentyuron (in the form of a formulation, which was either \ ¥ Р (wettable powder) or 8С (water suspension concentrate), and was used in the indicated application rates) either individually or in combination with tested chemical compounds at the indicated concentrations. One crop treatment was carried out using a backpack with a triple conical nozzle and using a spray volume of 700 l / ha. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of redness (% redness) of cotton leaves on days 4, 7, and 10 after treatment compared to untreated cotton. The presence of necrosis was also noted (if it took place). The results are presented below in table 2.

table 2

Diafentnuron type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha) Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity after treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4OAA 7ϋΑΑ ΙΟϋΑΑ one be) processing without treatment 0 0 0 2 \ νΡ5ϋ (300) - fifteen 25 35 3 ΑΥΡ50 (300) Αίίοχ (1) 0 0 0 4 \ νΡ50 (300) UTATI! (one) 5 5 4 5 8С500 (250) - 5 ΐ twenty 6 8С500 (250) Αίίοχ (1) 0 0 0 7 5С500 (250) UtagtpN (ί) 3 3 I

2.2 Experience 2 - sprayed volume of 300 l / ha

Cotton (YY1a1-11) was grown to the stage of BBCHH73 and treated with diaphentiuron (in the form of a formulation that was either ^ P or 8C, which was used at the indicated flow rates) either individually or in combination with the tested chemical compounds at the indicated concentrations. Two treatments of the crop were carried out, the interval between which was 1 week, using a backpack with a single nozzle and a spray volume of 300 l / ha. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of reddening of cotton leaves compared with untreated cotton. The evaluation was carried out on days 4 and 7 after treatment 1 (note: the assessment on day 7 after the first spraying was carried out before the second spraying) and on days 4, 7 and 10 after treatment 2. The results are presented below in table. 3.

- 6 018318

Table 3

Dnafentyuron, type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha) Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity after the first treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4ϋΑΑ 7OAA one without treatment without treatment 0 0 2 \ νР50 (300) - fifty 75 3 \ νР50 (300) Anokh (1} 0 0 4 »P50 (300) UTATI! (one) 35 27 5 5С500 (250) twenty fifty 6 5С500 (250} Anoch (1) 0 0 7 8С500 (250) UTATI! (one) fifteen fifteen Phthotoxicity after the second treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4CAA 7OAA 10CAA 8 ν / Ρ50 (300) 75 80 80 nine \ UR50 (300) ΑίΙοχ (I) 0 0 2 Dnafentunuron, type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha) Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity after the first treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4OAA 7CAA 10 \ νΡ50 (300) UTATI! (one) thirty thirty 25 N 8С500 (250) - 40 fifty fifty 12 8С500 (250) Anoch (1) " * thirteen 8С500 (250) UTATI! (one) fifteen 12 10

* data not received, processing defect

Example 3. The impact of 8οχ 8shk1s E-135, 8αηάονί (and Ιηάίτοη on the detected phytotoxicity of diapheniuron against transgenic cotton.

We conducted two field experiments, which were repeated once in one plot (200 m ² ), to assess the effect of polymer chemical compounds Αίΐοχ 8eshk1e Е-135 (Αίΐοχ, Sgoba firm), 8αηάονί ((8ппеппаа Ιηάίο firm) and Ιηάίτοη (firm ΙηсаοΓίΐ . trap) on diapentyuron-mediated phytotoxicity against transgenic cotton.

3.1 Experience 1.

Cotton (U18LaSh) was grown to the stage of BBCH 72 and treated with diaphentiuron (in the form of a formulation that is either AP or 8C, which was used in the indicated consumption rates) either individually or in combination with the tested chemical compounds at the indicated concentrations. Two crop treatments were carried out, the interval between which was 1 week, using a backpack with a single nozzle and a spray volume of 300 l / ha. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of reddening of cotton leaves compared with untreated cotton. The evaluation was carried out on days 4 and 7 after each treatment (note: the evaluation on day 7 after the first spraying was carried out before the second spraying). The results are presented below in table. 4.

Table 4

Diafsntiuron, type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha Polymer compound (vol%) Phthotoxicity after the first treatment (% redness of the leaf ") 4ϋΑΑ 7ϋΑΑ one without treatment without treatment 0 0 2 ννΡ50 (300) - 25 thirty 3 3ΥΡ5Ο (300) Αΐΐοχ (1) 0 0 4 3 ¥ P5O (300) Apoh (0.2) 0 one 5 \ UR50 (300) Atsokh (0,)) 3 5 6 3ΥΡ5Ο (300) Anoch (0.03) 3 7 7 ΧΥΡ50 (300) 5appbow | 1 (0.2) 4 5 8 \ ν₽50 (300) ΙηϋίΓοη (0.2) 5 7

- 7 018318

Dmafentyuron, type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity after the first treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4βΑΑ 7ϋΑΑ nine 8С500 (250) 2 2 10 5С500 (250) ΑΙΙοχ (!) 0 0 II 8С500 (250) ΑίΙοχ (0.2) 0 0 12 8С500 (250) ΑΙΙοχ (0,1) 0 0 thirteen 8С500 (250) ΑΙΙοχ (0.03) 0 one phytotoxicity after the second treatment {% leaf redness) 4ϋΑΑ 7ϋΑΑ 14 9 / P50 (300) - 40 fifty fifteen SAM50 (300) ΑΙΙοχ (1) 0 one sixteen ZUR5O (300) ΑίΙοχ (0.2) 10 fifteen 17 ν / Ρ50 (300) ΑΙΙοχ (0,1) fifteen 25 eighteen ZUR5O (300) ΑΙΙοχ (0.03) thirty 40 nineteen ΨΡ50 (300) Kapyouts ¢ 0.2) thirty 35 twenty ZUR5O (300) ΙπάίΓΟη (0.2) fifteen twenty 21 8С500 (250) - fifteen thirty 22 8С500 (250) ΑίΙοχ (1) 0 0 23 8С500 (250) ΑΙΙοχ (0.2) 7 twenty 24 8С500 (250) ΑΙΙοχ (0,1) 7 25 25 8С500 (250) ΑΙΙοχ (0.03) £ thirty

3.2 Experience 2.

Cotton (U18Ya1-11) was grown to the stage of BBCH 72 and treated with diafentyuron in the form \ νΡ5 () at a flow rate of 300 g / ha, either individually or in combination with the tested chemical compounds at the indicated concentrations. Two treatments of the crop were carried out, the interval between which was 1 week, using a backpack with a single nozzle and a spray volume of 300 l / ha. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of reddening of cotton leaves compared with untreated cotton (control). The evaluation was carried out on days 4 and 7 after each treatment (note: the evaluation on day 7 after the first spraying was carried out before the second spraying). The results are presented below in table. 5.

Table 5

Polymer compound (vol.%) Phytotoxicity after the first treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4ϋΑΑ 7OAA one the control 0 0 2 - 23 fifteen 3 ΑίΙοχ (1) 0 0 4 ΑίΙοχ (0.2) 5 3 5 A (1ox (0,1) 5 one 6 ΑΙΙοχ (0.03) fifteen 7 7 Zapbone (0.2) 8 3 8 ΙηάΙτοη (0.2) fifteen 7 Phytotoxicity after the second treatment (% redness of the leaves) 4ϋΑΑ 7 PAA 14 - 12 twenty fifteen ΑίΙοχ (1) 0 2 sixteen ΑΙΙοχ (0.2) 4 5 17 ΑίΙοχ (0,1) 5 5 eighteen ΑΙΙοχ (0.03) 5 10 nineteen 8aps1ou (0.2) 2 5 twenty Ιηάίτοη (0.2) 5 10

Example 4. The effect of various polymer chemical compounds on the detected phytotoxicity of diafentyuron against transgenic cotton.

A field experiment was carried out, which was repeated once on a single plot (100 m ² ), to assess the effect of polymer chemical compounds: Άίΐοχ 8eshk1e E-135 (AIokh, firm Sgoba), No.Stu1 A2099 2099 (firm Ό8Μ No.Ke8Sh8) and No.Stu1 A -1120 1120 (firm Ό8Μ No.ОКе8Ш8) for diapheniuron-mediated phytotoxicity against transgenic cotton.

Cotton line B ((U18Ya1-11) was grown for 90 days to the stage of BBCH 72 and treated with diaphentiuron (in the form of a formulation, which was either νΡ or 8C, which

- 8 018318 was used in the indicated consumption rates) either individually or in combination with the tested chemical compounds in the indicated concentrations. One crop treatment was carried out using a backpack with a single nozzle and a spray volume of 300 l / ha. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of redness (% red) of cotton leaves on days 6, 8 and 12 after treatment. The presence of necrosis was also noted (if it took place). The results are presented below in table. 6.

Table 6

Diafentnuron, type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity 6OAA 8OAA 12RAA % red ♦ Necrosis % red •Necrosis % red •Necrosis one without treatment without treatment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8С500 (250) 5 (+) 5 0 5 0 3 8С500 (300) 10 0 10 0 8 0 4 39P50 (250) 10 0 eighteen 0 fifteen 0 5 5UR5O (300) twenty ++ 40 ++ 35 ++ 6 \ UR50 ¢ 300) 3 0 3 0 2 0 7 8С500 (300) Anoch (0.5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5С500 (300) Αιΐοχ (0.5) 3 0 3 0 3 0 nine ννΡ50 (300) 1120 (0.13) 10 0 eighteen 0 twenty 0 10 \ ΥΡ50 (300) 1,120 (0.25) 5 0 fifteen 0 fifteen 0 Diafentyuron, type of formulation and rate of application (g / ha Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity 6ϋΑΑ 8OAA 12OAA % red •Necrosis % red •Necrosis % red ♦ Necrosis eleven U / P50 (300) 2099 (0.07) 8 0 10 0 10 0 12 \ νΡ50 (300) 2099 (0.13) 2 0 2 0 2 0 thirteen \ νΡ50 (300) 2099 (0.25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3νΡ5Ο (300) 2099 (0.5) 2 0 2 0 one 0 fifteen \ νΡ50 (300) 2099 (0.25) 0 0 0 0 0 0

* necrosis: (+) = <5%, ++> 10%

From the data presented it follows that all three polymer chemical compounds can be used to reduce the phytotoxic effect of diapentyuron.

Example 5. The effect of various polymer chemical compounds on the detected phytotoxicity of diafentyuron against non-transgenic cotton.

Two field experiments were carried out, which were repeated once in a single plot (60 m ² ), in order to evaluate the effect of various polymer chemical compounds on phytotoxicity mediated by diapheniuron against non-transgenic cotton.

The first experiment was carried out to assess the effects of the 8th E1 135 AIoh (Sgoba firm), Μο \ νί1йy ΌΗΕ 578 578 (Ce1aieze firm), ΜονιΙιΐΚ LIM 2418 2418 (Ce1aieze firm) and A-2099 2099 (Ό8Ό еоеёев. The second experiment was carried out to assess the impact of Αίΐοχ 8eshkoye Е-135 Αΐΐοχ (Sgoba firm), GeoSgu1 A-1120 1120 (Ό8Μ GeoKevtv company), No. Sgu1 A-615 615 (Ό8Μ GeoKevtv company) and TEXUUE 17-0422 17-0422 (8еой Wabeg).

Cotton (cultivar Ie11a Ora1) was grown to the stage of BBCH67 and then sprayed with diapheniuron (in the form of a formulation that was either ^ P or 8C, which was used at a rate of 800 g ai / ha), either individually or in combination with test chemical compounds at indicated concentrations. Sheet processing of crops was carried out using a belt sprayer with 6 conical nozzles (3 nozzles per row) using a spray volume of 150 l / ha. The results are presented below in tables 7 and 8. The degree of phytotoxicity was evaluated depending on the percentage of redness (% redness) of cotton leaves on 6, 8 and 11 days after treatment (experiment 1, table 7) or on 6, 8 and 12 days after processing (experiment 2, table. 8). Necrosis was evaluated qualitatively on a scale where + denotes the presence of mild necrosis, ++ denotes a more pronounced degree of necrosis, and +++ denotes significant necrosis.

Table 7

Diafentyuron, type of formulation Polymer compound (vol%) Fitotoksnch whining 6ϋΑΑ 8ϋΑΑ 1 AAA % red Necrosis % red Necrosis % red Necrosis one without treatment without treatment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8С500 - 25 ++ 45 +++ 35 +++ 3 8С500 Αΐΐοχ (1,0) 2 0 6 0 5 0 4 8С500 578 (1.0) twenty 0 35 +++ thirty + 4 5 8С500 241 8 (1) 10 0 35 Ί- + 25 4- 6 5С500 2099 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0

- 9 018318

From the presented data, it follows that all four of the studied polymer chemical compounds reduced the phytotoxic effect of diapheniuron, while Αίΐοχ ет 81коко Е 135 Е---и и and еоСССгу11 A-2099 were the most effective.

Table 8

Diafentyuron. type of formulation Polymer compound (vol%) Phytotoxicity 6OAA 8ϋΑΑ 12OAA % red Necrosis % red Necrosis % red Necrosis one without treatment without treatment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ννΡ50 - eighteen + 40 ++ ++ 35 ++ + 3 8S5OO - 25 4- + 45 + 4- + 40 ++ + 4 8С500 Apoh (1.0) 5 0 5 0 8 0 5 8С500 1120 (1,0} one 0 one 0 3 0 6 8С500 615 (1.0) 12 + thirty + 25 ++ 7 8С500 17-0422 (1 0) fifteen 35 +++ thirty +++

From the presented data, it follows that all four of the studied polymer chemical compounds reduced the phytotoxic effect of diapheniuron, while Αίίοχ 8shche1e E-135 and LeoCu1 A-1120 proved to be the most effective.

Claims (15)

CLAIM 1. An insecticidal composition containing diapentyuron and an antidote for crops, where the antidote for crops is a polymeric material. 2. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, in which the antidote for crops has a minimum film-forming temperature of 30 ° C or lower and a solubility in water of 1% or less. 3. The insecticidal composition according to claim 2, in which the antidote for crops has a minimum film-forming temperature of 20 ° C or lower. 4. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, in which the polymeric material is a vinyl acetate polymer or copolymer. 5. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, in which the polymeric material is an acrylic polymer or copolymer. 6. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, in which the polymeric material is a simple polyester. 7. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, in which the antidote for crops is selected from the group of compounds consisting of a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate, an acryl styrene copolymer, an acrylic copolymer, a copolymer of vinyl acetate and a vinyl ester of versate acid, a vinyl acetate homopolymer, a vinyl acetate polymer, an alkylaryl polyglycol ether and alkylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol. 8. An insecticidal composition containing (I) diafentyuron, (II) an antidote for crops, selected from the group consisting of a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate, an acryl styrene copolymer, an acrylic copolymer, a vinyl acetate copolymer and a vinyl ester of versatic acid, a vinyl acetate homopolymer, a vinyl acetate polymer, alkylaryl polyglycol ether and alkyl phenoxy polyethoxyethanol; and (III) a standard adjuvant for the formulation. 9. A combination package comprising an insecticide and an antidote for crops, comprising a first container containing diaphentiuron and a second container containing an antidote for crops, where the antidote for crops is a polymeric material. 10. The combined package of claim 9, wherein the crop antidote is selected from an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, an acryl styrene copolymer, an acrylic copolymer, a vinyl acetate copolymer of versate acid vinyl ester, a vinyl acetate homopolymer, a vinyl acetate polymer, an alkyl aryl polyglycol ether and an alkyl ethanol ethylene. 11. A method of controlling insects in crops of cultivated plants, comprising treating said insects or said crop or localization of said insects or said crop with an insecticidal composition according to one of claims 1 to 8. 12. A method of reducing or preventing phytotoxicity in crops of cultivated plants, where phytotoxicity is due to the treatment of crops of cultivated plants with diafentyuron, comprising treating crops of cultivated plants with diafentyuron in combination with an antidote for crops selected from the group of polymer material comprising an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, acryl styrene copolymer, acrylic copolymer, copolymer of vinyl acetate and vinyl ester of versatic acid, vinyl acetate homopolymer, vinyl acetate polymers, alkylarylpolyglycol ether and alkylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol. 13. The use of an adjuvant to reduce the phytotoxicity of diafentiuron, where the specified adjuvant is selected from the group of polymeric material, including a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate, acrylic - 10 018318 styrene copolymer, acrylic copolymer, copolymer of vinyl acetate and vinyl ester of versato acid, vinyl acetate homopolymer, vinyl acetate polymer, alkylaryl polyglycol ether and alkylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol. 14. The use of a compound selected from the group of polymeric material, including ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, acryl styrene copolymer, acrylic copolymer, vinyl acetate-vinyl ester copolymer of versate acid, vinyl acetate homopolymer, vinyl acetate polymer, agricultural aryl polyglycol ether and agricultural phenyl-ethoxy ethanol ethylene ether, . 15. The use of a compound selected from the group of polymeric material, including acryl styrene copolymer, acrylic copolymer, copolymer of vinyl acetate and vinyl ester of versatic acid, vinyl acetate homopolymer, in an agrochemical formulation to reduce the phytotoxicity of diaphentiuron or as an antidote to diafentyuron for crops. Eurasian Patent Organization, EAPO Russia, 109012, Moscow, Maly Cherkassky per., 2