CN105759782A - Criticality-based vehicle fault diagnosis strategy construction method - Google Patents

Criticality-based vehicle fault diagnosis strategy construction method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105759782A
CN105759782A CN201610052967.3A CN201610052967A CN105759782A CN 105759782 A CN105759782 A CN 105759782A CN 201610052967 A CN201610052967 A CN 201610052967A CN 105759782 A CN105759782 A CN 105759782A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
test
fault
node
density
correlation matrix
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201610052967.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN105759782B (en
Inventor
刘远宏
刘建敏
韩立军
乔新勇
张小明
刘艳斌
谷广宇
董意
顾程
何盼攀
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Academy of Armored Forces Engineering of PLA
Original Assignee
Academy of Armored Forces Engineering of PLA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Academy of Armored Forces Engineering of PLA filed Critical Academy of Armored Forces Engineering of PLA
Priority to CN201610052967.3A priority Critical patent/CN105759782B/en
Publication of CN105759782A publication Critical patent/CN105759782A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN105759782B publication Critical patent/CN105759782B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0243Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/24Pc safety
    • G05B2219/24065Real time diagnostics

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a criticality-based vehicle fault diagnosis strategy construction method. The method is characterized by comprising the following steps: 1, a heuristic function containing criticality factors is used, a test with single step optimization is selected, the optimization test starting position serves as a test starting node, corresponding test is carried out on the vehicle, and a sensor measurement result is acquired; 2, according to the output value of the sensor measurement result, a fault test correlation matrix is used for decomposing a state set node corresponding to the test output value to serve as the current branch node correlated with the node; and 3, if the branch node is a leaf node, the branch node is marked as an already-solved node, and a fault result is outputted, and if the branch node is a node not solved, the first step is carried out. The corrected relative criticality serves as a weight, an optimization objective function for average test cost is brought forward, and the total number of final intermediate nodes in the diagnosis strategy is reduced.

Description

A kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection
Technical field
The present invention relates to car fault diagnosis technical field, particularly to a kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection.
Background technology
Existing diagnosis policy developing algorithm is substantially made up of heuristic function and search strategy, and heuristic function determines the scope of application of algorithm, and search strategy determines the good and bad degree of the diagnosis policy obtained.Existing algorithm solve the many-valued test tested in reliable situation, multiple faults, multiloop, multi-mode, multistage maintenance, towards correction maintenance with towards the diagnosis policy optimization problem of life cycle management.Existing algorithm is disadvantageous in that: the optimization object function of algorithm only considered test spent time and cost element, to being likely to damage that equipment is caused in diagnosis process and the factor such as negative effect that cycle tests causes lacks and considers;When building diagnosis policy, it is based primarily upon the probability of malfunction attribute of fault mode, and in practical application, when abnormal alarm occurs in system test, during according to the optimal diagnosis strategy reasoning location fault obtained, often requiring that the fault mode to harm to the system is higher can quickly be detected and isolate, namely should consider the hazardness of fault mode when diagnosis policy builds, the intermediate node sum making the diagnosis policy of structure again is more few more good;Probability is worked as weight by the optimization object function of existing algorithm, in practical application, the normal probability of system accounts for major part, weight difference is big, when test execution expense is identical, the minimum diagnostic tree of average test expense selected is isolated to specify the intermediate node sum of level experience to be not necessarily minimum, and owing to comentropy function is ∩ type convex function, when system probability differs greatly, adopt the single step optimum test test that simply comentropy is maximum that the heuristic function optimizing based on probability obtains, compartment system state is not necessarily maximum, it is unfavorable for reducing the intermediate node sum of diagnosis policy.
Summary of the invention
The present invention has designed and developed a kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection, solves the defect that in existing method for diagnosing faults, diagnosis node is too much, decreases intermediate node sum final in diagnosis policy, is diagnosed to be fault fast and accurately.
Technical scheme provided by the invention is:
A kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection, comprises the following steps:
Step one, use and include the heuristic function of the density of infection factor, select the test that single step is optimum, and using optimum test original position as with test start node, vehicle is tested accordingly, obtains sensor measurement;
Step 2, output valve according to described sensor measurement, operational failure test correlation matrix decomposites the state set node corresponding to this test output valve as the relevant minor matters point of current and described node;
If step 3 minor matters point is leaf node, then this minor matters point of labelling is for solving node, exports fail result;If minor matters point is not for solving node, return step one.
Preferably, the heuristic function including the density of infection factor described in is expressed as:
k * = arg m a x j { I G ( X h , t j ) / C ( t j ) }
IG(Xh;tj)=Hj1(Xj1)+Hj2(Xj2)+…+Hjn(Xjn)
H j i ( X j i ) = - S ( X j i ) ‾ S ( X ) l o g S ( X j i ) ‾ S ( X )
Wherein, k*Represent next step the best test when given system failure collection;N is test tjOutput valve number;C(tj) for performing test tjExpense;Hji(Xji) in fault test correlation matrix with test tjThe fault set X that i-th output result is relevantjiAmount of diagnostic information;For fault set XjiCorrection relative risk degree.
Preferably, described correction relative risk degree is:
S i ‾ = 1 + S i ′ Σ i = 1 m ( 1 + S i ′ )
S i ′ = S i Σ i = 1 m S i
Wherein, SiFor fault mode fiDensity of infection in unit interval, m is the quantity of fault mode.
Preferably, described fault test correlation matrix is fault-two-value test correlation matrix.
Preferably, described fault test correlation matrix is fault-many-valued test correlation matrix.
Preferably, described fault test correlation matrix is replaceable units-test correlation matrix.
Preferably, fault test carries out under 16 kinds of selected mode of operations.
Preferably, under selected mode of operation, described fault test can be derived that test result.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows: revised relative risk degree is worked as weight by the present invention, it is proposed to the optimization object function of average test expense combine testing expense, time and fault mode and be likely to factors such as the damages that equipment causes.By object function it can be seen that when test execution expense is identical, when selecting the minimum diagnostic tree of average test expense, revised relative risk degree less than probability difference (normal condition probability is bigger), the intermediate node sum in diagnostic tree is also less.What the present invention proposed is local optimization searching strategy based on what adopt in the diagnosis policy developing algorithm of density of infection, result of calculation shows, with compared with the greedy search algorithm of probability, based in the searching algorithm of density of infection when test execution expense is identical, owing to revised density of infection difference is less, algorithm obtains the maximum test of topical diagnosis quantity of information and is often also to discriminate between the test that number of faults is maximum, advantageously reduces intermediate node sum final in diagnosis policy.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the diagnosis policy schematic diagram based on fault-two-value test correlation matrix of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is the diagnosis policy schematic diagram based on fault-many-valued test correlation matrix of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is the diagnosis policy schematic diagram based on replaceable units-test correlation matrix of the present invention.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the present invention is described in further detail, to make those skilled in the art can implement according to this with reference to description word.
The invention provides a kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection, it is necessary first to set up car fault diagnosis model, use F={f0,f1,…,fmRepresent all fault mode f in modeliSet;Use T={t1,t2,…,tlRepresent all test t in modeljSet;Total m+1 of fault mode, total l of test, and 0≤i≤m, 1≤j≤l.
The object function of existing diagnosis policy optimization problem is improved, and integration test expense, time and fault mode are likely to factors such as the test damages that causes of object, it is proposed to the optimization object function of average test expense, it may be assumed that
J = m i n { Σ i = 0 m { Σ j = 1 | p i | c p i | j | } S ‾ ( f i ) }
The relative risk degree of system mode is used as the weight calculation average test expense of state, wherein p by above formulaiFor diagnosis policy is isolated to fault mode fiPerformed cycle tests, | pi| for testing quantity,For jth test execution cost,For fault mode fiDensity of infection weight.
Assuming that fault mode collection F={f0,f1,…,fmIn fault mode fiDensity of infection in unit interval is Si, then the relative risk degree of fault mode is Si':
S i ′ = S i Σ i = 1 m S i
In practical application, for avoiding working as SiWhen=0, Si' weight is 0, when namely system is normal, weight is 0, to Si' it is modified:
S i ‾ = 1 + S i ′ Σ i = 1 m ( 1 + S i ′ )
The heuristic function adopted under assigned work pattern is IG (Xh;tj)/C(tj), represent and perform test tjThe diagnosis obtained
k * = arg m a x j { I G ( X h , t j ) / C ( t j ) }
IG(Xh;tj)=Hj1(Xj1)+Hj2(Xj2)+…+Hjn(Xjn)
H j i ( X j i ) = - S ( X j i ) ‾ S ( X ) l o g S ( X j i ) ‾ S ( X )
In formula, n is test tjOutput valve number, is two-value test during n=2, is many-valued test during n=3, C (tj) for performing test tjExpense;Hji(Xji) in fault-test correlation matrix with test tjThe state set X that i-th output result is relevantjiAmount of diagnostic information.When being isolated to replaceable units, Hji(Xji) represent test tjI-th output result correlation unit XjiAmount of diagnostic information.Owing to entropy is ∩ type convex function, and revised relative risk degree diversity ratio probability is less, when test execution expense is identical, tests tjOutput result is more many, Hji(Xji) more big, obtainable diagnostic message is more big, and the system mode number of differentiation is also more many.
Analyzed it can be seen that diagnosis policy developing algorithm is mainly made up of heuristic function and search strategy by present Research, diagnosis policy developing algorithm can have multiple optimizing strategy, as optimum in single step or multistep, global optimum's search strategy.The heuristic function based on density of infection proposed, the optimizing strategy under a certain pattern adopts single step optimum search, tests optimizing strategy and is:
1) it is F={f by initialization failure fuzzy set0,f1,…,fmIt is defined as root node, namely do not solve node;
2) application heuristic function calculates the test that single step is optimum, will test as with node, then the state set node corresponding with this test output valve is decomposited as current and node minor matters point according to correlation matrix, and labelling minor matters point and node, judge whether current all minor matters points are leaf nodes, and namely state set need not decompose again;
3) if minor matters point is leaf node, then this minor matters point of labelling is for solving node.If all minor matters points are solves node, then, when tracing back to root node, algorithm terminates;If current all minor matters points still having and not solving node, jump to step 2).
It is configured to example with two-value diagnosis policy, first obtains fault-two-value test correlation matrix
D = d 01 d 02 ... d 0 n d 11 d 12 ... d 1 n . . . . . ... . . . . d m 1 d m 2 ... d m n
In above-mentioned correlation matrix, different row represents different fault mode fi, different test t is shown in different listsj, and
The fault derived-two-value test correlation matrix is as shown in table 1.
Table 1
According to the density of infection data in table 1, the correction relative risk degree that calculated system mode set pair is answered is:
S ‾ = { 0.0909 , 0.1050 , 0.1065 , 0.0931 , 0.1067 , 0.1018 , 0.0926 , 0.0957 , 0.1003 , 0.1074 }
According to heuristic function formula, obtain each test heuristic function value as follows:
H={0.8862,0.7212,0.9603,0.9807,0.8648}
Wherein maximum max (IG (Xh;tj)/C(tj))=0.9807, corresponding test is t4, namely select test t6As with node, according to test output result, state set is divided into by crossing two fringe collection { f with difference0,f3,f5,f6,f7,f9And { f1,f2,f4,f8, i.e. minor matters point.Minor matters point is not for solve node, to minor matters point { f0,f3,f5,f6,f7,f9Application heuristic function, obtain max (IG (Xh;tj)/C(tj)) corresponding test is t3.The like the diagnosis policy based on density of infection obtained, as shown in Figure 1.After obtaining diagnosis policy, according to the testing sequence in diagnosis policy, vehicle can be tested, fault set is isolated, to find final fault.
In another embodiment, carry out the structure of many-valued diagnosis policy, obtain fault-many-valued test correlation matrix, as shown in table 2.
Table 2
When adopting above-mentioned analysis method to be isolated to concrete fault mode, obtain the diagnosis policy based on density of infection, as shown in Figure 2.
In another embodiment, carry out the structure of unit diagnosis strategy, obtain fault-test correlation matrix, as shown in table 3.
Table 3
When adopting above-mentioned analysis method to be isolated to concrete LRU, Hji(Xji) represent test tjThe amount of diagnostic information of i-th output result correspondence LRU, obtains the diagnosis policy based on density of infection as shown in Figure 3.
When carrying out have selected a certain test, it should carry out this test under specific pattern.The invention provides pattern in 16, as shown in table 4.
Table 4
By above-mentioned setting, make the diagnosis policy of vehicle trouble, when carrying out car fault diagnosis, according to the testing sequence of diagnosis policy, vehicle is tested, isolate partial fault pattern, until finding final fault mode.
Although embodiment of the present invention are disclosed as above, but listed utilization that it is not restricted in description and embodiment, it can be applied to various applicable the field of the invention completely, for those skilled in the art, it is easily achieved other amendment, therefore, under the general concept limited without departing substantially from claim and equivalency range, the present invention is not limited to specific details and shown here as the legend with description.

Claims (8)

1. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
Step one, use and include the heuristic function of the density of infection factor, select the test that single step is optimum, and using optimum test original position as with test start node, vehicle is tested accordingly, obtains measurement result by sensor;
Step 2, output valve according to described sensor measurement, operational failure test correlation matrix decomposites the state set node corresponding to this test output valve as the relevant minor matters point of current and described node;
If step 3 minor matters point is leaf node, then this minor matters point of labelling is for solving node, exports fail result;If minor matters point is not for solving node, return step one.
2. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described in include the heuristic function of the density of infection factor and be expressed as:
k * = arg max j { IG ( X h , t j ) / C ( t j ) }
IG(Xh;tj)=Hj1(Xj1)+Hj2(Xj2)+…+Hjn(Xjn)
H j i ( X j i ) = - S ( X j i ) ‾ S ( X ) ‾ l o g S ( X j i ) ‾ S ( X ) ‾
Wherein, k*Represent next step the best test when given system failure collection;N is test tjOutput valve number;C(tj) for performing test tjExpense;Hji(Xji) in fault test correlation matrix with test tjThe fault set X that i-th output result is relevantjiAmount of diagnostic information;For fault set XjiCorrection relative risk degree.
3. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 2, it is characterised in that described correction relative risk degree is:
S i ‾ = 1 + S i ′ Σ i = 1 m ( 1 + S i ′ )
S i ′ = S i Σ i = 1 m S i
Wherein, SiFor fault mode fiDensity of infection in unit interval, m is the quantity of fault mode.
4. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 3, it is characterised in that described fault test correlation matrix is fault-two-value test correlation matrix.
5. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 3, it is characterised in that described fault test correlation matrix is fault-many-valued test correlation matrix.
6. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 3, it is characterised in that described fault test correlation matrix is replaceable units-test correlation matrix.
7. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 3, it is characterised in that fault test carries out under 16 kinds of selected mode of operations.
8. the car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection according to claim 7, it is characterised in that described fault test can be derived that test result under selected mode of operation.
CN201610052967.3A 2016-01-26 2016-01-26 A kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection Expired - Fee Related CN105759782B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610052967.3A CN105759782B (en) 2016-01-26 2016-01-26 A kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610052967.3A CN105759782B (en) 2016-01-26 2016-01-26 A kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105759782A true CN105759782A (en) 2016-07-13
CN105759782B CN105759782B (en) 2018-06-08

Family

ID=56342613

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610052967.3A Expired - Fee Related CN105759782B (en) 2016-01-26 2016-01-26 A kind of car fault diagnosis construction of strategy method based on density of infection

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105759782B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111061246A (en) * 2019-12-06 2020-04-24 北京航空航天大学 Method for analyzing failure mode, influence and hazard in mechanical product assembly process
CN111886552A (en) * 2017-06-08 2020-11-03 康明斯公司 Diagnostic system and method for isolating failure modes of a vehicle

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5412802A (en) * 1990-05-11 1995-05-02 Hitachi, Ltd. Reasoning method and fault diagnosis method and system implementing the same
CN102662831A (en) * 2012-03-20 2012-09-12 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 Method of diagnosis strategy optimization for fault tolerant system
CN102662389A (en) * 2012-03-21 2012-09-12 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 Monitoring parameter selection method based on failure characteristic analysis
US20120233112A1 (en) * 2011-03-10 2012-09-13 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Developing fault model from unstructured text documents
CN102902623A (en) * 2012-09-27 2013-01-30 华北电力大学 Implementation method for test optimization of complex system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5412802A (en) * 1990-05-11 1995-05-02 Hitachi, Ltd. Reasoning method and fault diagnosis method and system implementing the same
US20120233112A1 (en) * 2011-03-10 2012-09-13 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Developing fault model from unstructured text documents
CN102662831A (en) * 2012-03-20 2012-09-12 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 Method of diagnosis strategy optimization for fault tolerant system
CN102662389A (en) * 2012-03-21 2012-09-12 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 Monitoring parameter selection method based on failure characteristic analysis
CN102902623A (en) * 2012-09-27 2013-01-30 华北电力大学 Implementation method for test optimization of complex system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
刘远宏等: "基于Rollout信息启发式算法的故障诊断策略", 《计算机工程》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111886552A (en) * 2017-06-08 2020-11-03 康明斯公司 Diagnostic system and method for isolating failure modes of a vehicle
CN111886552B (en) * 2017-06-08 2024-03-26 康明斯公司 Diagnostic system and method for isolating failure modes of a vehicle
CN111061246A (en) * 2019-12-06 2020-04-24 北京航空航天大学 Method for analyzing failure mode, influence and hazard in mechanical product assembly process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN105759782B (en) 2018-06-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111459700B (en) Equipment fault diagnosis method, diagnosis device, diagnosis equipment and storage medium
US8370108B2 (en) Diagnostic device
DE102012102770B9 (en) System and method for error isolation and error mitigation based on network modeling
CN111553590A (en) Radar embedded health management system
EP3809592A1 (en) Methods and systems for fault detection, diagnosis and localization in solar panel network
US20070226540A1 (en) Knowledge-Based Diagnostic System for a Complex Technical System, Comprising Two Separate Knowledge Bases for Processing Technical System Data and Customer Complaints
CN111208445A (en) Power battery abnormal monomer identification method and system
CN108414896B (en) Power grid fault diagnosis method
EP1556764A2 (en) Fault diagnosis system
Do Coutto Filho et al. Quantifying observability in state estimation
CN109739904A (en) A kind of labeling method of time series, device, equipment and storage medium
CN104268375A (en) Ship electric power station fault diagnosing method based on knowledge petri network
CN107391515A (en) Power system index analysis method based on Association Rule Analysis
CN106154180A (en) Energy-storage battery charge/discharge anomaly detection method and detecting system
CN105759782A (en) Criticality-based vehicle fault diagnosis strategy construction method
CN111025153A (en) Electric vehicle battery fault diagnosis method and device
CN114418138B (en) Multi-equipment combined self-checking intelligent power grid operation and maintenance method and system
CN115455746A (en) Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method
CN110489852A (en) Improve the method and device of the wind power system quality of data
CN114154305A (en) Sensor optimal arrangement multi-criterion decision analysis method for detecting and identifying leakage of water supply pipe network
CN115114124A (en) Host risk assessment method and device
CN113887452B (en) Fault diagnosis optimization method based on correlation matrix
CN117114248A (en) Health evaluation method for water quality monitoring system, computer equipment and medium
CN114444933A (en) Danger source analysis method, equipment and medium based on constructional engineering
CN102033194A (en) Comprehensive simulation evaluation method for circuit diagnosis policy and test configuration information

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20180608

Termination date: 20200126