CA2544448A1 - Fusion proteins and detergent compositions comprising them - Google Patents

Abstract

There is provided a fusion protein comprising a Carbohydrate Binding Domain and a domain having a high binding affinity for a melamine-type polymer. Also provided is a detergent composition comprising one or more surfactants and a fusion protein according to the invention and micro-particles comprising a melamine-type polymer, which contain a benefit agent selected from the group consisting of a fabric softening agents, fragrances, perfumes, polymeric lubricants, photoprotective agents, dye fixative agents, antioxidants, insecticides, soil repelling agents or a soil release agents. The fusion protein is advantageously used in a detergent composition to deliver benefit agents to a fabric.

Description

FUSION PROTEINS AND DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THEM
TECHNICAL FIEhD
The present invention generally relates fusion proteins and detergent compositions comprising them. More in particular, it relates to detergent compositions comprising fusion proteins which are useful for delivering a benefit agent to a fabric.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART
In a laundry cleaning process it is sometimes desirable to deliver benefit agents onto the fabric. Such a benefit agent may for example be a fabric softening agent, a perfume, a polymeric lubricant, a photoprotective agent, a latex, a resin, a dye fixative agent, an encapsulated material, an antioxidant, an insecticide, a soil repelling agent or a soil release agent.
From WO-A-98/00500 (Unilever) it is known to deliver a benefit agent onto fabric by means of peptide or protein Deposition Aid having a high affinity for fabric. The benefit agent is attached or adsorbed to a peptide or protein Deposition Aid having a high affinity for fabric.
Preferably, the deposition aid is the cellulose binding domain of a cellulase enzyme. The compositions are said to effectively deposit the benefit agent onto the fabric during the wash cycle.
In order to overcome certain drawbacks and limitations of WO-A-98/00500, it has been further proposed in WO-A-01/46357 (Unilever) to use fusion proteins to deposit the benefit agents onto the fabric. The fusion proteins comprise a cellulose binding domain for binding to the fabric and a domain having a high binding affinity for the benefit agent.

However, the stability of detergent compositions disclosed in WO-A-01/46357, may under certain circumstances, leave to be desired. It was found that many of the available technologies to encapsulat a the payload of benefit agent may not give sufficiently stable encapsulates when they are formulated into a detergent composition. Subsequently, the benefit agent may leak out of the capsule during processing of the formulation or upon storage.
It is an object of the pre sent invention to provide an alternative or improved detergent composition, which is capable of delivering a benefit agent to a fabric during a washing or rinsing proces s.
Importantly, the use of chemically defined capsules is key to maintain the integrity of capsules during the formulation and storage stages of a detergent formulation. However, because these chemical species are very simple in structure, the ability to obtain a protein-binding molecule to specifically recognise the se cross-linked repeating haptens cannot be readily envisage d.
Surprisingly, we have now found that these and other objects of the invention may be achieved by the fusion protein of the present invention, which is characterised in that it comprises a Carbohydrate Blinding Domain, preferably a Cellulose Binding domain, and a domain having a high binding affinity for a melamine-type polymer. We have found that, by means of such fusion prote ins, it is possible to enhance the delivery and retention of perfume encapsulated in melamine /
formaldehyde based polymer capsules to fabric in a main wash formulation.
This fusion molecule is bi -functional in its binding ability, whereby the Carbohydrate Binding Domain region binds to carbohydrate such as ce11u1osic fabric materials and the second domain binds to a melamine-type polymer. In this way, melamine capsules containing benefit,agents may be targeted to the fabric to deliver the benefit agent onto the fabric.
Furthermore, the same cap sine form can be used to deliver a whole range of benefit agents, therefore the same protein binding molecules may be used to delivery a whole range of benefit agents utilising a generic capsule approach.
DEFINITION OF THE INVENTZ ON
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a fusion protein comprising a Carbohydrate Binding Domain and a domain havin g a high binding affinity for a melamine-type polymer.
According to a second asp ect, there is provided a detergent composition comprising such fusion protein and micro-particles containing a benefit agent.
According to a third aspect, there is provided a process for delivering a benefit agent to a fabric by treating said fabric with a composition comprising said fusion protein and a micro-particles contain ing a benefit agent.
DETAINED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
1.1 The Carbohydrate Binding Domain In its first aspect, the invention relates to a fusion protein comprising a Carbohydrate Binding Domain (CBD) and a domain having a high binding affinity for a melamine-type polymer. A Carbohydrate Binding Domain is a polypeptide that has a high affinity for or binds to water-soluble or water-insoluble forms of carbohydrate polymers such as cellulose and chitin, including thei r crystalline forms. CBDs are sometimes als o referred to as polysaccharide binding domains (PBDs).
Preferred examples of Carbohydrate Binding Domains are Cellulose Binding Domains. The term Carbohydrate Binding Domain is broader and also includes protein sequences such as starch binding domains, mannose binding domains, xylan binding domains and chitin binding domains. Henrissat B. and Davies G.J. (Plant Physiology (2000) 124(4):1515-1519) describe many examples of such Carbohydrate Binding Domains.
The term Carbohydrate Binding Domain (or CBD) will be collectively used hereinafter for any of such binding domains which can be used as part of the fusion protein according to the present invention, unless indicated otherwise.
A preferred Carbohydrate Binding Domain is the Cellulose Binding Domain, which will be used hereinafter as a typical example of the Carbohydrate Binding Domain part of the ~0 fusion protein according to the present invention. Thus, the abbreviation CBD is used hereinafter to indicate Carbohydrate Binding Domains in general, whereas a Cellulose Binding Domain is a typical and preferred example of the broader defin.i tion of Carbohydrate Binding Domains.
Carbohydrate Binding Domains are found as integral parts of large protein complexes consisting of two or more different polypeptides, for example in hydrolytic enzymes (hydrolases) which typicall y are composed of a catalytic domain containing the active site for substrate hydrolysis, and a Carbohydrate Blinding Domain such as a Cellulose Binding Domain for binding to the insoluble matrix. Such enzymes may comprise more than one catalytic domain and one, two or three CBDs and optionally one or more polypeptide regions linking the CB D(s) with the catalytic domain(s), the latter regions usually being denoted a "linker". Examples of hydrolytic enzymes comprising a CBD are cellulases, xy1 anases, mannanases, arabinofuranosidases, acetyl est erases and chitinases. CBDs have also been found in algae, e.g. the red alga Porphyra purpurea as a non-5 hydrolytic polysaccharide binding protein, see Peter Tomme et al., "Cellulose Binding Domains: Classification and Properties" in "Enzymatic Degradation o.f Insoluble Carbohydrates", John N. Saddler and Michael H. Penner (Eds.), ACS Symposium Series, No. 618, 1996. However, most of the known CBDs are from cellulases and xylanases.
In this context, the term "Cellulose Binding Domain" is intended to be understood as defined by Tomme et al., op.
cit_ This definition classifies more than 120 Cellulose Binding Domains into 10 families (I-X) which may have different functions or roles in connection with the meth anism of substrate binding. However, it is anticipated that new family representatives and additional CBD families will appear in the future.
A Carbohydrate Binding Domain may be exemplified by a binding domain recognising cellulose. Such a Cellulose Bindd.ng Domain is a part of many cellulolytic enzymes and can be obtained therefrom. Cellulose Binding Domains are also obtainable from xylanase and other hemicellulase degrading enzymes. Preferably, the Cellulose Binding Domain is obtainable from a fungal enzyme origin such as Humicola, Trick oderma, Thermomonospora, Phanerochaete, Aspergillus, Meripilus or from a bacterial enzyme origin such as Baci1 lus, Clostridium, Streptomyces, Ce11u1omonas and Pseudomonas, In th a fusion protein according to the invention, the Carbohydrate Binding Domain is fused, using conventional rDNA techniques, to a second domain having a high binding affinity for a melamine-type polymer. Preferably, the Carbohydrate Binding Domain is connected to the domain having a high binding affinity for the melamine-type polymer by means of a linker consisting of about 0-20, preferably about 2-15, more preferably of 2-5 amino acid residues.
The second domain having a high binding affinity for the melamine-type polymer may, for instance, be an antibody or an antibody fragment. Especially preferred are heavy chain antibodies such as found in Camelidae.
Llama antibodies have been shown to be able to bind to both proteins and dye haptens. Published work on their structure and functionality states that raising single chain antibodies against haptens turned out to be difficult if not impossible, especially with hydrophobic ones (Journal of Molecular Biology 2001 311, 123-129). It was shown that it was possible to generate binders to a variety of dye h aptens. These characteristically contained a number of benzene rings and sulphonated side chains.
The present inventors have now is~lated 3 antibody binding domains from a library size of 1011 that are capable of blinding to melamine particles. It was surprising that binders to melamine were found, considering that melamine represents a repeating unit of C3N6H6 [1,3,5 triazine 2,4,6 triamine] .
The fusion protein according to the invention may comprise more than two recognition domains. It is for example possible to produce a CBD fusion protein with more than one antibody domain, in which the antibody domains may bind to the same or bind to different antigens. Conversely, it is a1 so possible in the CBD antibody fusion format to produce a molecule with one antibody domain with more than one CBD, whereby the CBD's incorporated may be identical sequences or from more than one source, or modified varieties thereof.

Generally speaking, the degree of binding of a molecule A to another molecule B can be generally expressed by the chemical equilibrium constant Kd resulting from the following reaction:
(AJ+ (BJ t~ (A = BJ
The chemical equilibrium constant Kd is then given by:
Kd= (AJx(BJ
(A--_- BJ
Whether the binding of a molecule to the fabric / ligand is specific or not can be judged from the difference between the binding (Kd value) of the molecule to one type of fabric / ligand, versus the binding to another type of fabric /
ligand material. For applications in laundry, said ligand material will form part of or be associated with a benefit agent. In this aspect of the invention, the CBD region of the fusion protein binds to the fabric and the high affinity domain region binds to the melamine-type polymer agent.
Alternatively, this approach can be reversed whereby the fabric material, or a ligand bound to the fabric is targeted by the high affinity domain of the fusion protein and the cellulose binding domain region binds to a cellulosic based or cellulosic containing benefit agent.
However, it will usually be more convenient to measure Kd values and differences in Kd values on other materials such as a polystyrene microtitre plate or a specialised surface in an analytical biosensor. The difference between the two binding constants should be minimally 10, preferably more than 100, and more preferably, more that 1000. Typically, the reagent should bind to the ligand / fabric, with a Kd lower than 10-4 M, preferably lower than 10-6 M and could be 10-1° M or even less. Higher binding affinities (Kd of less than 10-5 M) and/or a larger difference between the one type of ligand / fabric and another type of ligand / fabric (or background) binding would increase the deposition of the melamine-type polymer in the micro-particles containing the benefit agent. Also, the weight efficiency of the reagent in the total rinse composition would be increased and smaller amounts of the reagent would be required.
Several classes of reagent or molecules can be envisaged which deliver the capability of specific binding to fabrics / ligands, to which one would like to deliver the benefit agent. In the following we will give a number of examples of molecules having such capabilities, without pretending to be exhaustive.
1.2.1. Antibodies.
Antibodies are specific binding proteins. Their function in nature is to protect against disease by recognising (and binding) foreign bodies, such as viruses or bacteria, but not self-cells. Furthermore, methods are well-known in the art to generate antibodies that are specific for almost any protein, organic molecule, or cell surface, that is likely to be encountered. This binding specificity has been exploited in the Biotechnology industry, principally for medical diagnostics. For example, many home-based pregnancy test kits comprise an antibody that specifically binds to the pregnancy marker hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), but not to other hormones present in urine.
More recently, the use of antibodies in laundry products has been described. In particular, Unilever has described the use of stain-specific antibodies to target bleaching enzymes exclusively to stains but not to dyes - thus achieving efficient stain removal without damaging surrounding fabric (WO-A-98/56885).

Antibodies are well known examples of molecules that are capable of binding specifically to compounds against which they were raised. Antibodies can be derived from several sources. From mice, monoclonal antibodies can be obtained which possess very high binding affinities. From such antibodies, Fab, Fv or scFv fragments, can be prepared which have retained their binding properties. Such antibodies or fragments can be produced through recombinant DNA technology by microbial fermentation. Well known production hosts for antibodies and their fragments are yeast, moulds or bacteria.
A class of antibodies of particular interest is formed by the Heavy Chain antibodies as found in Camelidae, like the camel or the llama. The binding domains of these antibodies consist of a single polypeptide fragment, namely the variable region of the heavy chain polypeptide (HC-V). In contrast, in the classic antibodies (murine, human, etc.), the binding domain consists of two polypeptide chains (the variable regions of the heavy chain (Vh~ and the light chain (V1)). Procedures to obtain heavy chain immunoglobulins from Camelidae, or (functionalized) fragments thereof, have been described in WO-A-94/04678 (Casterman and Hamers) and WO-A-94/25591 (Unilever and Free University of Brussels).
Alternatively, binding domains can be obtained from the Vh fragments of classical antibodies by a procedure termed "camelization". Hereby the classical Vh fragment is transformed, by substitution of a number of amino acids, into a HC-V-like fragment, whereby its binding properties are retained. This procedure has been described by Riechmann et al. in a number of publications (J. Mol. Biol. (1996) 259, 957-969 Protein. Eng. (1996) 9, 531-537, Bio/Technology (1995) 13, 475-479). Also HC-V fragments can be produced through recombinant DNA technology in a number of microbial hosts (bacterial, yeast, mould), as described in WO-A-94/29457 (Unilever).
Met hods for producing fusion proteins that comprise an 5 enzyme and an antibody or that comprise an enzyme and an ant ibody fragment are already known in the art. One approach is described by Neuberger and Rabbits (EP-A-194 276). A
method for producing a fusion protein comprising an enzyme and an antibody fragment that was derived from an antibody 10 on ginating in Camelidae is described in WO-A-94/25591. A
met hod for producing bispecific antibody fragments is de scribed by Holliger et al. (1993) PNAS 90, 6444-6448.
A particularly attractive feature of antibody binding behaviour is their reported ability to bind to a "family" of structurally related molecules. For example, in Gani et al.
(J_ Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol. 48, 277-282) an antibody is described that was raised against progesterone but also binds to the structurally-related steroids, pregnanedione, pregnanolone and 6-hydroxy-progesterone. Therefore, using the same approach, antibodies could be isolated that bind to a whole "family" of stain chromophores (such as the po lyphenols, porphyrins, or caretenoids as described below).
A broad action antibody such as this could be used to treat several different stains when coupled to a bleaching enzyme.
1. 2 . 2 . Peptides .
Peptides usually have lower binding affinities to the sub stances of interest than antibodies. Nevertheless, the binding properties of carefully selected or designed peptides can be sufficient to deliver the desired se 1 ectivity in an oxidation process. A peptide which is capable of binding selectively to a fabric / ligand to which on a would like to deliver a benefit agent, can for instance be obtained from a protein which is known to bind to that specific fabric / ligand. An example of such a peptide would be a binding region extracted from an antibody raised against that fabric / ligand. A suitable peptide could be analogous to the active centre of a protein analogous to a non-catalytic binding domain of a protein, e.g. a receptor.
Alternatively, peptides that bind to such substance can be obtained by the use of peptide combinatorial libraries. Such a library may contain up to 101° peptides, from which the peptide with the desired binding properties can be isolated.
(R. A. Houghten, Trends in Genetics, Vol 9, no &, 235-239).
Several embodiments have been described for this procedure (J. Scott et al., Science (1990) 249, 386-390; Fodor et al., Science (1991) 251, 767-773; K. Lam et al., Nature (1991) 354, 82-84~ R.A. Houghten et al., Nature (1991) 354, 84-86).
Suitable peptides can be produced by organic synthesis, using for example the Merrifield procedure (Merrifield (1963) J.Am.Chem.Soc. 85, 2149-2154). Alternatively, the peptides can be produced by recombinant DNA technology in microbial hosts (yeast, moulds, bacteria)(K.N. Faber et al.
(1996) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45, 72-79).
1.2.3. Peptidomimics.
In order to improve the stability and/or binding properties of a peptide, the molecule can be modified by the incorporation of non-natural amino acids and/or non-natural chemical linkages between the amino acids. Such molecules are called peptidomimics (H. U. Saragovi et al. (1991) Bio/Technology 10, 773-778; S. Chen et al. (1992) Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5872-5876). The production of such compounds is restricted to chemical synthesis.
1.2.4. Other organic molecules.
It can be readily envisaged that other molecular structures, which need not be related to proteins, peptides or derivatives thereof, can be found which bind selectively to fabrics / ligands to which one would like to deliver a benefit agent. For example, certain polymeric RNA molecules which have been shown to bind small synthetic dye molecules (A. Ellington et al. (1990) Nature 346, 818-822). Such binding compounds can be obtained by the combinatorial approach, as described for peptides (L.B. McGown et al.
(1995), Analytical Chemistry, 663A-668A).
This approach can also be applied for purely organic compounds which are not polymeric. Combinatorial procedures for synthesis and selection for the desired binding properties have been described for such compounds (Weber et al. (1995) Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.Engl. 34, 2280-2282; G. Lowe (1995), Chemical Society Reviews 24, 309-317; L.A. Thompson et al. (1996) Chem. Rev. 96, 550-600). Once suitable binding compounds have been identified, they can be produced on a larger scale by means of organic synthesis.
A further embodiment of the present invention would be for the domain with a high binding affinity to the melamine-type polymer to be a bi-specific reagent. Such a reagent could fulfil the requirement of accumulating the benefit agent on the fabric either by supplying said reagent together with the benefit agent as a pre-formed non-covalent complex or by supplying the two separately and allowing them to self-assemble either in the wash liquor or on the fabric.
2. The melamine-type polymer The fusion proteins according to the invention comprises a part having a high binding affinity for melamine-based polymers, such that they can bind to micro-capsules made of or containing such chemicals and polymers. Utilising and producing melamine capsules is well known in the art, see for instance WO-A-01/51197, WO-A-01/49817, US-A-6 248 703.
They contain and are characterised by the repeating unit of C3N6H6 [1,3,5 triazine 2,4,6 triamine~.

These melamine polymers are advantageously used in the manufacture of micro-capsules, preferably having a particle size o f between 0.1 and 100 micrometer, more preferably of between 50 And 10 micrometer. Such micro-capsules are well known and have been described in US-A-2003078043, JP-A-101398 17, WO-A-03/035245, US-A-6 080 418. These melamine-polymer containing micro-capsules contain the benefit agents which is to be deposited onto the fabric. Many processes for micro encapsulation are known. These include methods for capsul a formation such as described in US-A-2 730 456, US-A-2 800 457 and US-A-2 800 458. Other useful methods for micro capsule manufacture are described in: US-A-4 001 140, US-A- 4 081 376 and US-A-4 089 802 describing a reaction betwe en urea and formaldehyde; US-A-4 100 103 describing react ion between melamine and formaldehyde; GB-A-2 062 570 descr~.bing a process for producing microcapsules having walls produced by polymerization of melamine and forma ldehyde in the presence of a styrenesulfonic acid.
Micro -encapsulation is also taught in US-A-2 730 457 and US-A-4 1 97 346. Processes for forming microcapsules from urea-forma ldehyde resin and/or melamine formaldehyde resin are disclosed in US-A-4 001 140, US-A-4 081 376, US-A-4 089 802, US-A- 4 100 103, US-A-4 105 823, US-A-4 444 699. Alkyl acryl ate/acrylic acid copolymer capsules are taught in US-A-4 552 811.
3. The detergent composition In th a detergent composition according to the invention, the fusio n protein can be used to deposit a benefit agent onto the fabric by means of the Carbohydrate Binding Domain.
In a further embodiment, the detergent compositions of the invention comprise micro-particles comprising melamine-type polymers, sensitised with CBD-antibody fusions, and confi guyed such that the micro-particles are loaded with the benefit agent and the antibody domain of the fusion protein has a high affinity or specificity for a substance (or " marker molecule") typically found on some regions of fabrics but not on others. Examples of such marker molecules include bleach-damaged dyes and microbes known to be associated with malodour. The antibody domain targets the benefit agent to its intended site of action and binds it there. For example, Microbe-specific antibody based fusions may target fragrance-containing particles to the regions of malodour. Thus, a more efficient use of expensive ingredients is achieved. Alternatively, antibody based fusions specific for bleach-damaged dyes can target dyed particles to faded regions, thus replenishing the colour lost in the main wash cycle.
The CBD antibody fusion protein binds to the fabric via the CBD region, thereby allowing the antibody domain to bind to corresponding antigens / ligands that comprise or form part of the benefit agent. The fusion protein can be dosed in conjunction with the benefit agent or can be added to the fabric prior to the said fabric coming into contact with the benefit agent.
A further aspect of the invention is a process for delivering a benefit agent to a fabric by treating said fabric with a composition comprising a fusion protein according to the invention and micro-capsules comprising a benefit agent selected from the group consisting of softening agents, finishing agents/ protective agents, fragrances (perfumes) and bleaches.
Examples of softening agents are clays, cationic surfactants or silicon compounds. Examples of finishing agents/
protective agents are polymeric lubricants, soil repelling agents, soil release agents, photo-protective agents (sunscreens), anti-static agents, dye-fixing agents, anti-bacteri al agents and anti-fungal agents. The fragrances or perfume s inside the micro-capsules may be further encapsulated, e.g. in latex micro-capsules or the may be gelatin a based coacervates.

SuitabL a examples of bleaches are photobleaches. Examples of photobL caches are given in EP-A-379 312 (British Petroleum), which discloses a water-insoluble photobleach derived from anionically substituted porphine, and in EP-A-035 470 (Ciba 10 Geigy), which discloses a textile treatment composition comprising a photobleaching component.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it is possibl a to target some benefit molecules to particular 15 regions of fabric. For example, dyes can be targeted to colour-bleached regions to replenish dye lost in the main wash or fragrance can be targeted to regions where it is most needed, in particular to those regions where microbes associated with malodour are present, such as the "underarm"
regions .
4. The fabrics For laundry detergent applications, several classes of natural or man-made fabrics can be envisaged, in particular cotton_ In the embodiment of the invention whereby the antibody region of the fusion protein targets the fabric, such macromolecular compounds have the advantage that they can have a more immunogenic nature, i.e. that it is easier to rail a antibodies against them. Furthermore, they are more accessible at the surface of the fabric than for instance colour ed substances in stains, which generally have a low molecu tar weight.
An imp ortant embodiment of the invention is to use binding domain s (as described above) that bind to several different types of fabrics. This would have the advantage of enabling a benefit agent to be deposited to several different types of fabric using the CBD-antibody fusion molecule.
5. The Detergent Composition.
The fusion proteins of the invention can be used in a detergent composition that is specifically suited for the purpose, and this constitutes a second aspect of the invention. When formulating a detergent composition, it is important to ensure that the other ingredients of the product are compatible with the activity of the fusion protein. WO-A-98/07820 (P&G) discloses inter alia rinse treatment compositions containing antibodies directed at cellulase and standard softener actives such as DEQA. The detergent product according to the present invention preferably contains no softener or low levels of softener active (e. g. HEQ).
To that extent, the detergent composition comprises one or more benefit agents and optionally other conventional detergent ingredients. The invention in its second aspect provides a detergent composition which comprises from 0.1 -50 o by weight, based on the total composition, of one or more surfactants. This surfactant system may in turn comprise 0 - 95 o by weight of one or more anionic surfactants and 5 - 100 o by weight of one or more nonionic surfactants. The surfactant system may additionally contain amphoteric or zwitterionic detergent compounds, but this in not normally desired owing to their relatively high cost. It may be advantageous to also include cationic surfactants into the composition. Examples of suitable cationic surfactants are given in WO-A-97/03160 and WO-A-98/17767 (Procter&Gamble).
In general, the nonionic and anionic surfactants of the surfactant system may be chosen from the surfactants described "Surface Active Agents" Vol. 1, by Schwartz &

Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, I nterscience 1958, in the current edition of "McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents" published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in "Tenside-Taschenbuch", H.
Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981.
Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include, in particular, the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Specific nonionic detergent compounds are C6-C22 alkyl phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, generally 5 to 25 E0, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic C$-C1$ primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 40 EO.
Suitable anionic detergent compounds which may be used are usually water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphates and sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals.
Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl sulphates, especially those obtained by sulphating higher Ca-C18 alcohols, produced for example from tallow or coconut oil, sodium and potassium alkyl C9-C2o benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl Clo-C15 benzene sulphonates; and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum. The preferred anionic detergent compounds are sodium C11-C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates and sodium C1~-Ci$ alkyl sulphates. Also applicable are surfactants such as those described in EP-A-328 177 (Unilever), which show resistance to salting-out, the alkyl polyglycoside surfactants described in EP-A-070 074, and alkyl monoglycosides.
Preferred surfactant systems are mixtures of anionic with nonionic detergent active materials, in particular the groups and examples of anionic and nonionic surfactants pointed out in EP-A-346 995 (Unilever). Especially preferred is surfactant system which is a mixture of an alkali metal salt of a C16-C1$ primary alcohol sulphate together with a C12-Cis primary alcohol 3-7 EO ethoxylate .
The nonionic detergent is preferably present in amounts greater than 100, e.g. 25-90o by weight of the surfactant system. Anionic surfactants can be present for example in amounts in the range from about 5o to about 40o by weight of the surfactant system.
The detergent composition may take any suitable physical form, such as a powder, a tablet, an aqueous or non aqueous liquid, a paste or a gel. The fusion protein according to the invention will generally be used as a dilution in water of about 0.05 to 20.
The detergent composition in accordance with the invention comprising the fusion protein can have any suitable form, i.e. the form of a granular composition, a liquid or a slurry of the enzyme, or with carrier material (e.g. as in EP-A-258 068 and the Savinase (TM) and Zipolase (TM) products of Novo Nordisk). A good way of adding the fusion protein to a liquid detergent product is in the form of a slurry containing from 0.005 to 50 o by weight of the complex in an ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant.
The detergent compositions of the invention comprise about 0.001 to 50 mg, preferably from 0.01 to 10 mg of fusion protein per liter of the rinse liquor in use. A concentrated detergent composition before use will comprise about 1 to 1000 mg/l, preferably from 10 mg to 100 mg per liter of the detergent product.
The invention will now be further illustrated in the following, non-limiting Examples. In the accompanying drawings:
Figure 1 illustrates the ability of two isolated clones to bind to melamine and a variety of other antigens, Figure ~ illustrates the dilution factors used to demonstrate the antibody / antigen binding event of four chosen antibody proteins, Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the ability of the fusion protein to enhance the delivery of melamine based micro-capsules (containing fragrance notes) to cotton fabric both in a water rinse formulation (Figure 3) or in a formulated OMO
washing powder rinse (Figure 4), Figure 5 gives the gene sequences of three melamine-binding proteins VhhM-1E7, VhhM-1C8, VhhM-16711 which were isolated out of the antibody library.
Example 1 Identification of melamine capsule binders Figure 1 illustrates the ability of isolated clones to bind to melamine and a variety of other antigens. With such a small repeating epitope in the melamine particle structure, the very fact that we have isolated binders is surprising.
Interestingly the binders also cross-react with gelatin cross-linked microspheres, suggesting that the binding epitope may also be present in these particles in the form of an amine side chain or a common cross-linked motif whereby formaldehyde or urea cross-linking is common with amine containing micro-particles. Figure 2 illustrates the dilution factors used to demonstrate the antibody / antigen binding event of the chosen antibody proteins. Figure 5 gives the gene sequences of the 3 melamine binding proteins isolated out of the antibody library.
Example 2 5 Binding perfumed melamine particles to cotton.
Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the ability of the fusion protein to enhance the delivery of melamine based microcapsules (containing fragrance notes) to cotton fabric both in a water rinse formulation (figure 3) or in a formulated OMO
10 washing powder rinse (figure 4). OMO is a commercially available laundry detergent powder.

Claims (13)

1. Fusion protein comprising a Carbohydrate Binding Domain and a domain having a high binding affinity for a microcapsule comprised of, or containing, a melamine based chemical component.

2. Fusion protein according to claim 1, wherein the Carbohydrate Binding Domain is a Cellulose Binding Domain.

3. Fusion protein according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the Carbohydrate Binding Domain is a Cellulose Binding Domain obtainable from a fungal enzyme origin such as Humicola, Trichoderma, Thermomonospora, Phanerochaete, Aspergillus, Meripilus or from a bacterial enzyme origin such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Streptomyces, Cellulomonas and Pseudomonas.

4. Fusion protein according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the Cellulose Binding Domain is obtainable from Trichoderma, Meripilus or Humicola.

5. Fusion protein according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the domain having a high binding affinity is an antibody or antibody fragment.

6. Fusion protein according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the domain having a high binding affinity is a Heavy Chain antibody as found in Camelidae.

7. Fusion protein according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the domain having a high binding affinity is a peptide.

8. Fusion protein according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the Cellulose Binding Domain is connected to the domain having a high binding affinity for the melamine-type polymer by means of a linker consisting of 2-15, preferably 2-5 amino acids.

9. DNA sequence coding for melamine-binding proteins VhhM-1E7, VhhM-1C8 or VhhM-1G711.

10. Detergent composition comprising one or more surfactants and a fusion protein according to any one of claims 1-8 and micro-particles capsule comprising a melamine-type polymer.

11. Detergent composition according to claim 10, wherein the micro-particles comprise a benefit agent selected from the group consisting of a fabric softening agents, fragrances, perfumes, polymeric lubricants, photoprotective agents, dye fixative agents, antioxidants, insecticides, soil repelling agents or a soil release agents.

12. Detergent composition according to claim 11, wherein the benefit agent is a perfume.

13. Process for delivering a benefit agent to a fabric by treating said fabric with a composition comprising a fusion protein according to any one of claims 1-8 and micro-capsules comprising a benefit agent selected from the group consisting of softening agents, finishing agents/ protective agents, fragrances and bleaching agents.