IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-10688-2_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Efficiency Wages Reconsidered: Theory and Evidence

In: Advances in the Theory and Measurement of Unemployment

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin M. Murphy
  • Robert H. Topel

Abstract

Differences in wages for observationally similar persons have interested economists at least since Smith, who devoted a chapter (I.X) to the problem. Smith identified five sources of wage inequality, of which the fourth is the ‘small or great trust which must be reposed in the workmen’. He argued that workers in jobs requiring greater trust (goldsmiths and jewellers were his examples) receive higher wages than ‘those of other workmen, not only of equal, but of much superior ingenuity’. Smith clearly envisioned that a type of agency problem was solved by paying higher wages, for he notes that this source of wage inequality is internalized ‘when a person employs his own stock in trade’.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin M. Murphy & Robert H. Topel, 1990. "Efficiency Wages Reconsidered: Theory and Evidence," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Yoram Weiss & Gideon Fishelson (ed.), Advances in the Theory and Measurement of Unemployment, chapter 8, pages 204-240, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-10688-2_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-10688-2_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-10688-2_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.