Books by Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi
Epoca Bronzului de-o parte și de alta a Carpaților. Studii în onoarea lui Tudor Soroceanu, 2024
Volumul de față reunește contribuțiile a 38 de specialiști preocupați de problematica epocii bron... more Volumul de față reunește contribuțiile a 38 de specialiști preocupați de problematica epocii bronzului de-o parte și de alta a Carpaților. El este dedicat lui Tudor Soroceanu, cu ocazia împlinirii vârstei de 80 de ani, ca un modest omagiu pentru moștenirea științifică și sufletească pe care ne-a lăsat-o.
This volume brings together the contributions of 38 scholars concerned with Bronze Age topics on both sides of the Carpathians. It is dedicated to Tudor Soroceanu, on the occasion of his 80th birthday, as a modest homage to the scientific and spiritual legacy he left us.
LIVING WITH THE DEAD.
BURIALS IN EIA SETTLEMENTS BETWEEN THE BALKANS, TISZA AND DNESTR
- ABSTRA... more LIVING WITH THE DEAD.
BURIALS IN EIA SETTLEMENTS BETWEEN THE BALKANS, TISZA AND DNESTR
- ABSTRACT -
PROBLEMATICS
Burials in settlements are a particular funerary phenomenon, documented worldwide, in different eras and contexts. Archaeologically speaking, burials consist of skeletons or parts of human skeletons, in or not anatomical position, deposited in disused habitat structures (pits, dwellings). Often labelled as “macabre” findings, “atypical” or “irregular” burials, this is undoubtedly a type of treatment of the human body after death.
As this practice is often documented at the same time with the existence of actual cemeteries, the hypotheses regarding the status of the individuals deposited in the settlements are numerous. Setting aside some of the exceptional findings – such as A and B grave circles from Mycenae, which prove the special social position of the buried individuals – the human bones found in domestic context were most of the times considered to be the result of human sacrifices or burials of persons of special status: slaves, war prisoners, heretics, pariahs, convicts, etc. On the other hand, we need to take into account the ethnographic sources indicating that human societies practised numerous and complex funerary rituals, some of them involving manipulations and treatments of the body starting from the time of death until final deposition.
In this context, we can ponder upon the nature of the social and ritual mechanisms that led to the separation or dissolution of the usual limits between the living and the dead.
Within this problematic, our project sets out to draw up a list of the cases of burials in early Hallstattan settlements spread between the Balkans, Dnestr and Tisza Rivers, to analyze the respective inventory and the identified ritual gestures, compare them with similar situations from other areas and eras and confront them, in the end, with historical documentation.
SPACE AND AGE
Early Iron Age (ca. 1200/1100 – 800/700 BC) is characterized by the emergence and dissemination of iron metallurgy. This technology that was born in eastern Anatolia and neighbouring areas (Armenia and Cilicia) spread rapidly from the end of 2nd millennium BC, but especially during the so-called Dark Ages in Greece. This period was much tormented in the Aegean-Anatolian area, as the Sea People rose while the Hittite Empire and the Mycenaean civilization fell.
In the northern Balkans, at the end of the 2nd millennium and beginning of the 1st millennium BC, classic cultural manifestations of the Middle and Late Bronze Age (Monteoru, Noua, Coslogeni, Suciu de Sus, Žuto-Brdo–Gârla Mare, Cruceni-Belegiš, Zimnicea-Plovdiv etc.) come to an end and new ones take shape. Despite the emergence of the first iron artefacts, this is the peak of bronze metallurgy and of the deposition of bronze artefacts in ritual contexts.
The area we’ve selected for the study of this category of findings corresponds to the dissemination of several early Hallstattan archaeological cultures with grooved pottery (Bistreţ-Işalniţa, Gáva-Holidrady, Chişinău-Corlăteni etc.), but also with stamped and incised pottery (Pšeničevo, Babadag, Insula Banului, Gornea-Kalakača, Belozerka, Cozia, Saharna-Solonceni), which are a variation of the funerary ritual . Nevertheles, in the entire area, in various proportions, probably due to the level of the investigations in the settlements, intramuros graves were also found.
STATE OF RESEARCH
Though the first such finds were uncovered since the 50’s, an analysis thereof is rather new archaeological endeavour in southern and Eastern Europe. The known publications so far mostly approach individual finds (e.g. Gomolava, Babadag, Niculiţel, Jurilovca–Orgame, Svilengrad, Saharna, Pusztataskony etc.). Syntheses on this topic are scarce and incomplete regarding the number of finds, area and method of investigation . Therefore an interdisciplinary approach over an extended area of various contemporaneous cultural manifestations may lead to the formation of a solid documentary base for an objective interpretation of this funerary practice.
CATALOGUE OF THE FINDS
We have catalogued the finds in the area between the Balkans, Dnestr and Tisza from 53 EIA sites (broadly 12th c.-8th c. BC) with 226 contexts for human bones from at least 512 individuals.
From the 53 catalogued sites, most of them (cat. no. 1, 3-6, 10, 14, 19, 21-22, 28-30, 33-35, 37, 45-46, 51-53) were ascribed to Gáva culture, most of the information concerning burials in settlements coming from rather recent finds in the intra-Carpathian region, up to Tisza River. Other such finds are concentrated at the Lower Danube, mostly ascribed to Babadag culture (cat. no. 2, 7-9, 11-12, 16-17, 24, 27, 31, 36, 38, 41, 43); in our opinion, the site at Tămăoani can be ascribed to Belozerka culture (cat. no. 48). The finds from Upper and Middle Dnestr were ascribed both to Saharna-Solonceni culture (cat. no. 15, 39-40) and Černoles culture (cat. no. 20, 23, 50); the finds at Ostrovul Corbului, Gomolava and Novi Sad were included in the areal of Kalakača culture, and the finds from Sava, Karanovo and Svilengrad are probably part of Pšeničevo culture. A special place among these finds is held by the settlement from Tărtăria, characterized by Basarabi-style decorated pottery.
Most human bones contexts in settlements were found in the area of Saharna-Solonceni culture, where the site at Hligeni alone provides 86 such contexts. However, this site can now be deemed an exception. More homogenous distribution is encountered at the Lower Danube in the sites ascribed to Babadag culture and in the intra-Carpathian region (Graphic 2).
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Arheologie 8, 2013
Cristina AILINCĂI
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Patrimonium 3, 2007
Coperta 1 şi 4: Morminte tumulare din judeţul Tulcea, foto -Valeriu Leonov Acest volum a fost tip... more Coperta 1 şi 4: Morminte tumulare din judeţul Tulcea, foto -Valeriu Leonov Acest volum a fost tipărit cu sprijinul financiar al DJCCPCN Tulcea, director executiv prof. Axenia Hogea DTP&Layout: ing. Carmen Simionescu Tipărit la SC INFCON SA -Constanţa -0241 580 527 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României TOPOLEANU FLORIN INVENTARIEREA SITURILOR ARHEOLOGICE DIN JUDEŢUL TULCEA STUDIU DE CAZ: MORMINTELE TUMULARE / Florin Topoleanu, Gabriel Jugănaru, Cristian Micu -Constanţa: Ex Ponto, 2007 ISBN: 978-973-644-735-8 I. JUGĂNARU, GABRIEL II. MICU, CRISTIAN 94(498 Mormintele Tumulare) ISBN: 978-973-644-735-8 Corespondenţa, schimburile de carte şi comenzile se vor trimite la: The correspondence, the book exchange and the orders could be sent to: La correspondance, les échanges et toutes commandes seront envoyés au:
Edited volumes by Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Patrimonium 11, 2023
Ukraine. The publication was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. Its co... more Ukraine. The publication was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsabiblity of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Arheologie 21, 2021
Nu știu și nici nu pot să fac efortul de a înțelege clar de ce în Dobrogea excepționalitatea arhe... more Nu știu și nici nu pot să fac efortul de a înțelege clar de ce în Dobrogea excepționalitatea arheologică a fost și este mai frecventă decât în alte provincii ale României. Nu că n-aș avea la îndemână explicații de natură istorică și exemple numeroase care arată și-n alte zone descoperiri deosebite, cercetări de amploare, creșteri spectaculoase de colecții și conduc la elogii meritate pe seama calităților comunităților arheologice. Dar parcă, nu aidoma Dobrogei! Și mai ales, cazului Tulcea. În alte locuri, tradiții și instituții de tezaur cu vechime explică rezultatele merituoasechiar și în vecinătate, la Constanța, pe când la Tulcea, acestea s-au împlinit și se măsoară doar în câteva decenii. Explicații ar putea deriva din chiar ocazia fastă și onorantă de a-l elogia pe distinsul nostru coleg, Victor Baumann la împlinirea a 80 de ani. Parafrazând spusele unui mare învățat, vecin deal tulcenilor, Victor și micul grup profesional al ICEM aparțin oamenilor excepționali, el reprezentând o personalitate fondatoare 1. Adică acelor semeni rari de întâlnit și puțini ca număr, dăruiți cu viziune, cu capacitatea de anticipare, înțelegere și explicitare, dar și de interpretare, reconstituire credibilă și convingătoare. O fi contat, și în cazul său, calitatea confreriei coagulată de Gavrilă Simion-unul și unul, una și una!-dar mai ales calitățile personale. Nu ne îndoim de acestea! S-or fi adăugat, nevăzute energii creatoare, tradiția reieșită din căutările și prezentările avântate ale predecesorilor: Constantin Moisil, Raymund Netzhammer, ca și genialele deschideri făcute de Vasile Pârvan. Nici aici nu rămâne vreo îndoială! Evaluate, însă toate acestea întăresc afirmația pe seama excepționalității. În seria universitară (1964) de la Facultatea de Istorie a Universității bucureștene-când Victor și-a încheiat studiile-s-au regăsit mai mulți tineri, care ulterior au dovedit calități profesionale spectaculoase: Paul Rezeanu, Ofelia Văduva, Florin Costinescu, Florian Tănăsescu, Cornel Almășan, Ion Calafeteanu, Marcel Popa și alți câțiva. Dintre toți, doar doi au onorat domeniul arheologiei: Mircea Babeș și Victor Baumann. Fiecare a urcat în ierarhia profesiei, remarcându-se prin lucrări științifice de referință și descoperiri excepționale. Dacă primul, strălucit cercetător și săpător, a beneficiat de la începutul carierei de un climat academic și de mijloace documentare-confirmând rapid valoarea sa profesională, celălalt a evoluat într-un loc lipsit de asemenea avantaje; la Tulcea, în modestul Muzeu al Deltei Dunării unde toate au trebuit să fie făcute: grup de lucru, program și metode, documentare și bibliotecă, patrimoniu și expoziție de bază, relații profesionale ... De la început! Norocul l-a favorizat pe Victor Baumann, oferindu-i ocazia de a-și afirma calitățile prin contribuții directe la săpături complexe, la constituirea colecțiilor, la periegheze și 1 Băncilă 1997. 10 Ioan OPRIȘ repertoriere, editarea și publicarea rezultatelor (la timp și nu în concurență cu confrați titrați), dar mai ales la muzeologizarea descoperirilor. Spirit ordonat și organizat, cu o voință de afirmare superioară, echilibrată, colegul și prietenul nostru a beneficiat de un spațiu arheologic generos, în cea mai mare parte doar semnalat și nu săpat sistematic, cu un mare potențial științific și cultural. Mijloacele financiare destinate săpăturilor și valorificării rezultatelor acestora n-au lipsit, Cancelarul Gavrilă Simion fiind garant sigur. Garant și ascultat de autorități înțelegătoare pe seama serviciilor benefice și sigure pe care le asigurau cei din muzeu, autorităților. Dacă în Occidentul european tradiția arheologică a debutat prin măsurile de protecție stabilite prin Proclamația regală suedeză (1666)-incluzând vestigii și inscripții-, în cazul României, acestea au întârziat, abia sub domnia lui Alexandru Ioan Cuza înfiripându-se un început de inventariere și, prin lege, formându-se instituția responsabilă: Muzeul Național de Antichități (1864). Acestea au fost lărgite și sistematizate, la inițiativa lui Grigore Tocilescu (1892-1893) și cu sprijinul direct al regelui Carol I. Consolidate treptat, cu tendințe de modernizare prin aportul lui Vasile Pârvan, și a unei pleiade de învățați, începând cu 1919 domeniile arheologiei și conservării-restaurării au intrat în atenția autorităților, menținânduse însă numeroase restanțe și decalaje față de nivelul practicii occidentale 2. Pentru România, o reală politică de cercetare și valorificare plenară a patrimoniului istoric construit-implicit a celui arheologic-s-a impus abia începând din anii '50 ai veacului XX. Grupul minuscul organizat de Gavrilă Simion-de muzeografi și conservatori-l-a inclus și pe Victor Baumann, atras irezistibil de arheologie, domeniu căruia-i rămăsese fidel încă din anii studenției. Modelele de atunci: Constantin Daicoviciu și învățații clujeni (I.
Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie, Band 350, 2020
For more than 150 years, the prehistoric civilizations of the East Mediterranean have fascinated... more For more than 150 years, the prehistoric civilizations of the East Mediterranean have fascinated and attracted numerous scholars interested both in the various manifestations of the respective social order within this geographical zone, and by the role and impact these civilizations may have had on the neighbouring regions.
As one would expect, our knowledge is growing continuously, triggered by new archaeological research, the progress of interdisciplinary investigations of archaeological science, and the diversification of theoretical approaches interpreting material culture from an anthropological perspective. The speed of these accumulations is increasing rapidly, while the number of studies and the variety and complexity of the themes is also continuously growing. That is why the periodic organization of conferences on welldefined themes and the publication of the respective volumes are absolutely necessary, not only in order to be able to integrate the new data into the broader picture, but also for the redefinition of the state of research within certain working areas and to show the experimental investigation of new research directions.
The present volume is the outcome of a conference with the same title organized at Tulcea, Romania, between the 10th and the 13th of November 2017, dedicated to the memory of Professor Alexandru Vulpe. Four prestigious institutions, two from Romania (the Gavrilă Simion Eco-Museum Research Institute, Tulcea and the Vasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest) and two from Germany (the Institut für und Frühgeschichte und Vorderasiatische Archäologie, Heidelberg and the Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Eurasien Abteilung, Berlin), with the generous support of the Mayor’s Office in Tulcea, managed to bring together over 50 scholars, most of them friends, colleagues, collaborators, students or simply acquaintances of Professor Vulpe. The intention of the organizers was to provide a suitable environment for sharing opinions and experience, and for an open and positive discussion, to recognize the current state of research on the topic, and to establish stronger connections for future collaboration in this field.
Contacts among human communities from various cultural areas, the circulation of people, ideas and objects, or the identification of the main communication routes as well as their role in shaping prehistoric societies are likely to remain forever topics of intense discussion within archaeology. The relations between the Carpathian-Balkan area and the Aegean during the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age was one of the main themes of study for Alexandru Vulpe. As a supporter of the idea of Ex oriente lux, Vulpe always argued for the major role played by the Helladic civilization in the cultural development of the Carpathian Balkan area. The lectures delivered at the Tulcea conference and the papers published in the present volume highlight once again the complexity of these connections and the multitude of perspectives revealed when approaching such a theme.
Although the title of the volume indicates the main geographic areas in question, contributions from other cultural areas (i.e. Central Europe, the Middle Danube, Northern Pontic area, etc.), whose societies were in close contact with those of the Balkans, were also welcome. The four sections grouping the studies in the volume had not been established from the very beginning; they are the result of the subjects approached by the authors. Reading the papers attentively, one notices the diversity of the subjects and approaches and, in most cases, the novelty of the ideas expressed. We hope that the publication will provide research with a reference volume, opening new perspectives on the matters discussed. The present work is the result of the common effort of all authors, spanning a period of over three years. We wish to thank all contributors for their promptness and seriousness in answering our invitation to the volume, as well as for the openness and patience showed during the entire editing process. We are very much indebted to the Mayor’s Office of the community of Tulcea for the financial help and for the hospitality provided to the participants of the conference. Special thanks go to Douglas Fear (Heidelberg) for the careful language editing of the contributions to this volume.
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Arheologie 18, 2019
Structuri arheologice din aşezările epocii fierului în spaţiul tiso-nistrean Archeological struct... more Structuri arheologice din aşezările epocii fierului în spaţiul tiso-nistrean Archeological structures from the Iron Age settlements in the Tisza-Dniester region Materialele colloquium-ului de vară de la Saharna 12-15 iulie 2018
Biblioteca Istro Pontica. Seria Arheologie 17, 2018
Cercetări interdisciplinare în siturile de epoca fierului din spaţiul tiso-nistrean Interdiscipli... more Cercetări interdisciplinare în siturile de epoca fierului din spaţiul tiso-nistrean Interdisciplinary research in Iron Age sites from the Tisa-Dniester area Materialele colloquium-ului de vară de la Saharna 13-16 iulie 2017 Cercetări interdisciplinare în siturile de epoca fierului din spaţiul tiso-nistrean Interdisciplinary research in Iron Age sites from the Tisa-Dniester area Materialele colloquium-ului de vară de la Saharna 13-16 iulie 2017 Cercetări interdisciplinare în siturile de epoca fierului din spaţiul tiso-nistrean Interdisciplinary research in Iron Age sites from the Tisa-Dniester area Materialele colloquium-ului de vară de la Saharna 13-16 iulie 2017
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Arheologie 13, 2017
Omul, fluviul şi marea : studii de arheologie şi istorie în onoarea lui Florin Topoleanu la a 65-... more Omul, fluviul şi marea : studii de arheologie şi istorie în onoarea lui Florin Topoleanu la a 65-a aniversare / ed.: George Nuţu, Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi, Cristian Micu. -Cluj-Napoca : Mega, 2017 Conţine bibliografie ISBN 978-606-543-894-1 I. Nuţu, George (ed.) II. Ailincăi, Sorin Cristian (ed.) III. Micu, Cristian (ed.) 902 94 TABULA GRATULATORIA Adrian ADAMESCU (Galaţi) Sorin-Cristian AILINCĂI (Tulcea) Nicolae ALEXANDRU (Mangalia) Cristina-Georgeta ALEXANDRESCU (Bucureşti) Mircea ANGELESCU (Bucureşti) Dan APARASCHIVEI (Iași) Adrian ARDEȚ (Caransebeș) Radu ARDEVAN (Cluj-Napoca) Margareta ARSENESCU (Bucureşti) Martin AUER (Innsbruck) Alexandru AVRAM (Le Mans) Alexandru BARNEA (Bucureşti) Dan BASARAB-NANU (Galaţi) Dan BĂCUEȚ-CRIȘAN (Zalău) Sanda BĂCUEȚ-CRIȘAN (Zalău) Alexandru BĂDESCU (Bucureşti) Constantin BĂJENARU (Constanța) Maria BĂRBULESCU (Constanța) Mihai BĂRBULESCU (Cluj-Napoca) Iulian BÂRZESCU (Bucureşti) Ioan BEJINARIU (Zalău) Doina BENEA (Timișoara) George BILAVSCHI (Iași) Alexandra BIVOLARU (Paris) Ionuț BOCAN (București) Doru BOGDAN (Alba Iulia) Dorel BONDOC (Craiova) Valentin BOTTEZ (București) George BOUNEGRU (Alba Iulia) Octavian BOUNEGRU (Iași) Maurizio BUORA (Udine) Livia BUZOIANU (Constanța) Constantin CALOTOIU (Tg. Jiu) Cristian CĂLDĂRARU (Galaţi) Constantin CHERA (Constanța) Laurent CHRZANOVSKI (Geneva) Radu CIOBANU (Alba Iulia) Florin CIULAVU (Tulcea) Traian CLEANTE (Constanța) Sorin COCIŞ (Cluj-Napoca) Robert CONSTANTIN (Mangalia) Costin CROITORU (Brăila) Florin CURTA (Gainesvile) Gabriel CUSTUREA (Constanţa) Oana DAMIAN (București) Paul DAMIAN (București) Dan DEAC (Zalău) Adrian DOBOȘ (București) Traian DVORSKI (Bucarest) Piotr DYCZEK (Warsaw) Dan ELEFTERESCU (Călărași) Max FIEDERLING (Munich) Robert FRECER (Praga) Ştefan-Emilian GAMUREAC (București) Ştefan Viorel GEORGESCU (Hunedoara) Robert GHINDELE (Satu Mare) Petre GHERGHE (Craiova) Mihai GORGOI (București) Nicolae GUDEA (Cluj-Napoca) Ana HAMAT (Reșița) Puiu HAȘOTTI (Constanța) Ştefan HONCU (Iași) Constantin ICONOMU (Iași) Claudiu ILAȘ (Timișoara) Costel ILIE (Galați) Dan IONESCU (Constanța) Mihai IONESCU (Mangalia) Adrian IONIȚĂ (București) Ionel IONIȚĂ (București) Lăcrămioara-Elena ISTINA (Bacău) Gabriel JUGĂNARU (Tulcea) Stoica LASCU (Constanța) Martin LEMKE (Warsaw) Sabin Adrian LUCA (Sibiu) Vasilica LUNGU (București) Virgil LUNGU (Constanța) Alexandru MADGEARU (București) Tudor MANDACHE (Galați) Gheorghe MĂNUCU-ADAMEŞTEANU (București) Mihaela MĂNUCU-ADAMEȘTEANU (București) Monica MĂRGINEANU-CÂRSTOIU (București) Liviu MARTA (Satu Mare) Dana MIHAI (București) Alexander MINCHEV (Varna) Cristian MICU (Tulcea) Lucreţiu MIHĂILESCU-BÎRLIBA (Iași) Virgil MIHĂILESCU-BÎRLIBA (Iași) Elina MIRCHEVA (Varna) Ioana MUREȘAN (Tulcea) Lucian-Mircea MUREȘAN (Tulcea) Crişan MUŞEŢEANU (București) Marian NEAGU (Călărași) Decebal NEDU (Galați) Virgil Ștefan NIȚULESCU (București) George NUŢU (Tulcea) Ernest OBERLANDER-TÂRNOVEANU (București) Andrei OPAIȚ (Iaşi) Ioan OPRIȘ (București) Ioan Carol OPRIȘ (București) Radu OTA (Alba Iulia) Ghiorghe PAPUC (Constanța) Valentin PARNIC (Călărași) Adriana PANAITE (București) Bernd PÄFFGEN (Munich) Doina PĂULEANU (Constanța) Radu PETCU (Constanța) Tobias PFLEDERER (Kempten/Munich) Zeno PINTER (Sibiu) Ioan PISO (Cluj-Napoca) Adriana PESCARU (Deva) Dinu POP (Cluj-Napoca) Horea POP (Zalău) Simina RAFAILĂ-STANC (Iaşi) Simona REGEP (Timișoara) Elena RENŢA (Slobozia) Cristian ROMAN (Cluj-Napoca) Gheorghe ROMANESCU (Iaşi) Florin ROTARU (Paris) Viorica RUSU-BOLINDEȚ (Cluj-Napoca) Cristian SCHUSTER (București) Valeriu SÎRBU (Brăila) Irina SODOLEANU (Constanța) Aurel-Daniel STĂNICĂ (Tulcea) Gabriel TALMAȚCHI (Constanța) Karolina TRUSZ (Warsaw) Dumitru ȚEICU (Reșița) Dan VASILESCU (Constanța) Cristian VIRAG (Satu Mare) Iulian VIZAUER (Tulcea) Florin VLAD (Slobozia) Valerii YOTOV (Varna) Mihail ZAHARIADE (București)
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Arheologie 2016, 2016
The volume contains over 30 scientific studies dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the professor... more The volume contains over 30 scientific studies dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the professor Gavrila Simion.
Biblioteca Istro-Pontica. Seria Arheologie 9, 2013
Editori / Editors: Sorin-Cristian AILINCĂI, Alexandra-Clara ȚÂRLEA, Cristian MICU Tehnoredactare ... more Editori / Editors: Sorin-Cristian AILINCĂI, Alexandra-Clara ȚÂRLEA, Cristian MICU Tehnoredactare / Computer graphics: Camelia KAIM Toate lucrările publicate au fost recenzate de specialişti în domeniu This is a peer-reviewed volume Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naționale a României DIN PREISTORIA DUNĂRII DE JOS -50 DE ANI DE LA ÎNCEPUTUL CERCETĂRILOR ARHEOLOGICE LA BABADAG (1962-2012). Conferință națională (2012; Tulcea) Din Preistoria Dunării de Jos : 50 de ani de la începutul cercetărilor arheologice la Babadag (1962-2012) : conferință națională : Tulcea, 20-22 septembrie 2012 / ed: Sorin Cristian Ailincăi, Alexandra Țârlea, Cristian Micu : Editura Istros a Muzeului Brăilei, 2013 Bibliogr.
Descrirea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României OMAGIU. SIMON, Mihai Studii privind preistoria s... more Descrirea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României OMAGIU. SIMON, Mihai Studii privind preistoria sud-estului Europei: volum dedicat memoriei lui Mihai Simon / ed. Cristian-Eduard Ştefan, Mihai Florea, Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi, Cristian Micu. -Brăila : Editura Istros a Muzeului Brăilei, 2014 ISBN 978-606-654-110-7 I. Ştefan, Cristian-Eduard (ed.) II. Florea, Mihai (ed.) III. Ailincăi, Sorin-Cristian (ed.) IV. Micu, Cristian (ed.)
Papers by Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi
Sava, V., Gogâltan, F. (eds), Epoca Bronzului de-o parte și de alta a Carpaților. Studii în onoarea lui Tudor Soroceanu / The Bronze Age on both sides of the Carpathians. Studies in Honor of Tudor Soroceanu at 80 Years, 2024
During the archaeological excavations conducted on the site from Vânători in 2019, among other fi... more During the archaeological excavations conducted on the site from Vânători in 2019, among other finds, there was also a small dagger, characterised by a blade with parallel cutting edges and midrib. The item presents good analogies, especially in contexts attributed to the Bilozerka culture, spread in the Budjak steppe and on the Lower Dniepr, where not only finished objects but also moulds are to be found. In general, such daggers, included by Valentin Dergačev in the Kardašinka variant of the Lobojkovka type, have a length between 10 and 14 cm and a maximum width of 1.5-2.5 cm, being made of copper or alloys with a high percentage of copper (over 90%).
These daggers are considered a creation of the Bilozerka culture, being dated loosely to the entire evolution of this culture (12th – 10thcenturies BC). The14C dating from the context excavated at Vânători (RoAMS-2130.46: 2791±33), as well as the association of the mould from the Lower Dniepr with late items, attributed by Vadim Bočkarev especially to the Zavadovka cultural group, could indicate for the Kardašinka type daggers a chronological framework situated during the late phase of the Bilozerka culture.
Peuce, serie nouă 21, 2023
The paper presents the Roman era pottery discovered during the 1988 and 2000 rescue archaeologica... more The paper presents the Roman era pottery discovered during the 1988 and 2000 rescue archaeological excavations at Niculiţel-Cornet, Tulcea County, Romania, prior to the construction of the methane gas pipe in the area. The assemblage consists of pottery of Pontic, Oriental and Western origins, while the functional categories represented are kitckenware, tableware, amphorae. Handmade pottery of local tradition is also present. The fine ware is represented by terra sigillata, barbotine decorated vessels, Pontic sigillata and imitations. The majority of the pottery can be dated to the 2 nd-3 rd c. AD, with some fragments characteristic of a slightly earlier period, and other types dated up to the 5 th c. AD. The present catalogue represents a part of the discovered Roman pottery, the rest of material being scheduled for future analysis and publication. Rezumat: Articolul prezintă ceramica de epocă romană descoperită în timpul campaniilor de cercetări arheologice de la Niculiţel-Cornet, judeţul Tulcea, România din anii 1988 şi 2000. Construirea unei conducte de gaz metan a prilejuit cercetări arheologice preventive, rezultând categorii de vase de origine pontică, orientală şi occidentală, grupate în diferite tipuri de veselă de servit masa, de băut şi de bucătărie, împreună cu amfore şi vase lucrate la mână. Vasele din pastă fină sunt de asemenea prezente, inclusiv terra sigillata, vasele decorate în tehnica barbotinei, sigilate pontice şi imitaţii. Majoritatea ceramicii poate fi datată în perioada sec. II-III p.Chr., dar unele fragmente ceramice sunt caracteristice pentru o perioadă puţin mai timpurie, în timp ce alte tipuri pot fi datate în sec. V p.Chr. Prezentul catalog nu reprezintă întregul lot al ceramicii descoperite, urmând ca restul materialului să fie publicat ulterior.
HERiPRENEURSHIP Sustainable Tourism, Heritage Management and the Cultural and Creative Industries: Creating New Investment Opportunities at Places of Cultural Significance Proceedings of an International Conference Tulcea June 8th-9th 2023, 2023
In the beginning of the 1st millennium BC, the territory between the Danube and the Black Sea wit... more In the beginning of the 1st millennium BC, the territory between the Danube and the Black Sea witnessed a new period of intensive human inhabitation, coming to Dobruja after a sparse presence of archaeological remains belonging to the end of the Bronze Age. The new settlements were assigned to the Babadag culture, a cultural manifestation corresponding to the beginning of the Early Iron Age in South-Eastern Romania. These communities had a marked preference for settling close to important rivers, such as the Danube and its tributaries, but also on the lakeshores in the vicinity of the Black Sea.
The area around Babadag Lake undoubtedly offered a favourable environment to human communities from the beginning of the first millennium BC. On a surface of approximately 200 km2, no fewer than nine settlements characterised by Babadag type pottery were identified. From a chronological point of view, these sites cover the 10th-9th centuries BC. The only site with an existence covering this entire period is the settlement from Babadag–Cetăţuie. A complex stratigraphy with over 2 m of archaeological depositions was identified here, as well as the only ample fortification works. Such investments necessitated, without doubt, coordination as well as an important mobilisation of the entire community. The unique character of the site from Babadag proves its importance in the studied area, situation indicating the probability of its functioning as a centre around which the other settlements were founded and to which the exploitation of this territory can be connected for approximately two centuries.
PEUCE, 2023
The paper analyses several archaeological features discovered during an excavation performed on t... more The paper analyses several archaeological features discovered during an excavation performed on the outskirts of Isaccea, during the summer of 2018, in the easternmost part of the Noviodunum archaeological site. Of the three documented features, two are funerary structures: one is a pit in which cremation remains and grave goods were deposited, while the other is either a 'deviant' burial, or a secondary burial of a part of the skeleton. The last feature offered inconclusive results. The grave goods discovered are numerous and diverse: different types of pottery, as well as metal artefacts. Thus, the following information completes the repertoire of funerary discoveries from Noviodunum and the northern part of the Roman province of Moesia Inferior.
Uploads
Books by Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi
This volume brings together the contributions of 38 scholars concerned with Bronze Age topics on both sides of the Carpathians. It is dedicated to Tudor Soroceanu, on the occasion of his 80th birthday, as a modest homage to the scientific and spiritual legacy he left us.
BURIALS IN EIA SETTLEMENTS BETWEEN THE BALKANS, TISZA AND DNESTR
- ABSTRACT -
PROBLEMATICS
Burials in settlements are a particular funerary phenomenon, documented worldwide, in different eras and contexts. Archaeologically speaking, burials consist of skeletons or parts of human skeletons, in or not anatomical position, deposited in disused habitat structures (pits, dwellings). Often labelled as “macabre” findings, “atypical” or “irregular” burials, this is undoubtedly a type of treatment of the human body after death.
As this practice is often documented at the same time with the existence of actual cemeteries, the hypotheses regarding the status of the individuals deposited in the settlements are numerous. Setting aside some of the exceptional findings – such as A and B grave circles from Mycenae, which prove the special social position of the buried individuals – the human bones found in domestic context were most of the times considered to be the result of human sacrifices or burials of persons of special status: slaves, war prisoners, heretics, pariahs, convicts, etc. On the other hand, we need to take into account the ethnographic sources indicating that human societies practised numerous and complex funerary rituals, some of them involving manipulations and treatments of the body starting from the time of death until final deposition.
In this context, we can ponder upon the nature of the social and ritual mechanisms that led to the separation or dissolution of the usual limits between the living and the dead.
Within this problematic, our project sets out to draw up a list of the cases of burials in early Hallstattan settlements spread between the Balkans, Dnestr and Tisza Rivers, to analyze the respective inventory and the identified ritual gestures, compare them with similar situations from other areas and eras and confront them, in the end, with historical documentation.
SPACE AND AGE
Early Iron Age (ca. 1200/1100 – 800/700 BC) is characterized by the emergence and dissemination of iron metallurgy. This technology that was born in eastern Anatolia and neighbouring areas (Armenia and Cilicia) spread rapidly from the end of 2nd millennium BC, but especially during the so-called Dark Ages in Greece. This period was much tormented in the Aegean-Anatolian area, as the Sea People rose while the Hittite Empire and the Mycenaean civilization fell.
In the northern Balkans, at the end of the 2nd millennium and beginning of the 1st millennium BC, classic cultural manifestations of the Middle and Late Bronze Age (Monteoru, Noua, Coslogeni, Suciu de Sus, Žuto-Brdo–Gârla Mare, Cruceni-Belegiš, Zimnicea-Plovdiv etc.) come to an end and new ones take shape. Despite the emergence of the first iron artefacts, this is the peak of bronze metallurgy and of the deposition of bronze artefacts in ritual contexts.
The area we’ve selected for the study of this category of findings corresponds to the dissemination of several early Hallstattan archaeological cultures with grooved pottery (Bistreţ-Işalniţa, Gáva-Holidrady, Chişinău-Corlăteni etc.), but also with stamped and incised pottery (Pšeničevo, Babadag, Insula Banului, Gornea-Kalakača, Belozerka, Cozia, Saharna-Solonceni), which are a variation of the funerary ritual . Nevertheles, in the entire area, in various proportions, probably due to the level of the investigations in the settlements, intramuros graves were also found.
STATE OF RESEARCH
Though the first such finds were uncovered since the 50’s, an analysis thereof is rather new archaeological endeavour in southern and Eastern Europe. The known publications so far mostly approach individual finds (e.g. Gomolava, Babadag, Niculiţel, Jurilovca–Orgame, Svilengrad, Saharna, Pusztataskony etc.). Syntheses on this topic are scarce and incomplete regarding the number of finds, area and method of investigation . Therefore an interdisciplinary approach over an extended area of various contemporaneous cultural manifestations may lead to the formation of a solid documentary base for an objective interpretation of this funerary practice.
CATALOGUE OF THE FINDS
We have catalogued the finds in the area between the Balkans, Dnestr and Tisza from 53 EIA sites (broadly 12th c.-8th c. BC) with 226 contexts for human bones from at least 512 individuals.
From the 53 catalogued sites, most of them (cat. no. 1, 3-6, 10, 14, 19, 21-22, 28-30, 33-35, 37, 45-46, 51-53) were ascribed to Gáva culture, most of the information concerning burials in settlements coming from rather recent finds in the intra-Carpathian region, up to Tisza River. Other such finds are concentrated at the Lower Danube, mostly ascribed to Babadag culture (cat. no. 2, 7-9, 11-12, 16-17, 24, 27, 31, 36, 38, 41, 43); in our opinion, the site at Tămăoani can be ascribed to Belozerka culture (cat. no. 48). The finds from Upper and Middle Dnestr were ascribed both to Saharna-Solonceni culture (cat. no. 15, 39-40) and Černoles culture (cat. no. 20, 23, 50); the finds at Ostrovul Corbului, Gomolava and Novi Sad were included in the areal of Kalakača culture, and the finds from Sava, Karanovo and Svilengrad are probably part of Pšeničevo culture. A special place among these finds is held by the settlement from Tărtăria, characterized by Basarabi-style decorated pottery.
Most human bones contexts in settlements were found in the area of Saharna-Solonceni culture, where the site at Hligeni alone provides 86 such contexts. However, this site can now be deemed an exception. More homogenous distribution is encountered at the Lower Danube in the sites ascribed to Babadag culture and in the intra-Carpathian region (Graphic 2).
Edited volumes by Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi
As one would expect, our knowledge is growing continuously, triggered by new archaeological research, the progress of interdisciplinary investigations of archaeological science, and the diversification of theoretical approaches interpreting material culture from an anthropological perspective. The speed of these accumulations is increasing rapidly, while the number of studies and the variety and complexity of the themes is also continuously growing. That is why the periodic organization of conferences on welldefined themes and the publication of the respective volumes are absolutely necessary, not only in order to be able to integrate the new data into the broader picture, but also for the redefinition of the state of research within certain working areas and to show the experimental investigation of new research directions.
The present volume is the outcome of a conference with the same title organized at Tulcea, Romania, between the 10th and the 13th of November 2017, dedicated to the memory of Professor Alexandru Vulpe. Four prestigious institutions, two from Romania (the Gavrilă Simion Eco-Museum Research Institute, Tulcea and the Vasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest) and two from Germany (the Institut für und Frühgeschichte und Vorderasiatische Archäologie, Heidelberg and the Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Eurasien Abteilung, Berlin), with the generous support of the Mayor’s Office in Tulcea, managed to bring together over 50 scholars, most of them friends, colleagues, collaborators, students or simply acquaintances of Professor Vulpe. The intention of the organizers was to provide a suitable environment for sharing opinions and experience, and for an open and positive discussion, to recognize the current state of research on the topic, and to establish stronger connections for future collaboration in this field.
Contacts among human communities from various cultural areas, the circulation of people, ideas and objects, or the identification of the main communication routes as well as their role in shaping prehistoric societies are likely to remain forever topics of intense discussion within archaeology. The relations between the Carpathian-Balkan area and the Aegean during the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age was one of the main themes of study for Alexandru Vulpe. As a supporter of the idea of Ex oriente lux, Vulpe always argued for the major role played by the Helladic civilization in the cultural development of the Carpathian Balkan area. The lectures delivered at the Tulcea conference and the papers published in the present volume highlight once again the complexity of these connections and the multitude of perspectives revealed when approaching such a theme.
Although the title of the volume indicates the main geographic areas in question, contributions from other cultural areas (i.e. Central Europe, the Middle Danube, Northern Pontic area, etc.), whose societies were in close contact with those of the Balkans, were also welcome. The four sections grouping the studies in the volume had not been established from the very beginning; they are the result of the subjects approached by the authors. Reading the papers attentively, one notices the diversity of the subjects and approaches and, in most cases, the novelty of the ideas expressed. We hope that the publication will provide research with a reference volume, opening new perspectives on the matters discussed. The present work is the result of the common effort of all authors, spanning a period of over three years. We wish to thank all contributors for their promptness and seriousness in answering our invitation to the volume, as well as for the openness and patience showed during the entire editing process. We are very much indebted to the Mayor’s Office of the community of Tulcea for the financial help and for the hospitality provided to the participants of the conference. Special thanks go to Douglas Fear (Heidelberg) for the careful language editing of the contributions to this volume.
Papers by Sorin-Cristian Ailincăi
These daggers are considered a creation of the Bilozerka culture, being dated loosely to the entire evolution of this culture (12th – 10thcenturies BC). The14C dating from the context excavated at Vânători (RoAMS-2130.46: 2791±33), as well as the association of the mould from the Lower Dniepr with late items, attributed by Vadim Bočkarev especially to the Zavadovka cultural group, could indicate for the Kardašinka type daggers a chronological framework situated during the late phase of the Bilozerka culture.
The area around Babadag Lake undoubtedly offered a favourable environment to human communities from the beginning of the first millennium BC. On a surface of approximately 200 km2, no fewer than nine settlements characterised by Babadag type pottery were identified. From a chronological point of view, these sites cover the 10th-9th centuries BC. The only site with an existence covering this entire period is the settlement from Babadag–Cetăţuie. A complex stratigraphy with over 2 m of archaeological depositions was identified here, as well as the only ample fortification works. Such investments necessitated, without doubt, coordination as well as an important mobilisation of the entire community. The unique character of the site from Babadag proves its importance in the studied area, situation indicating the probability of its functioning as a centre around which the other settlements were founded and to which the exploitation of this territory can be connected for approximately two centuries.
This volume brings together the contributions of 38 scholars concerned with Bronze Age topics on both sides of the Carpathians. It is dedicated to Tudor Soroceanu, on the occasion of his 80th birthday, as a modest homage to the scientific and spiritual legacy he left us.
BURIALS IN EIA SETTLEMENTS BETWEEN THE BALKANS, TISZA AND DNESTR
- ABSTRACT -
PROBLEMATICS
Burials in settlements are a particular funerary phenomenon, documented worldwide, in different eras and contexts. Archaeologically speaking, burials consist of skeletons or parts of human skeletons, in or not anatomical position, deposited in disused habitat structures (pits, dwellings). Often labelled as “macabre” findings, “atypical” or “irregular” burials, this is undoubtedly a type of treatment of the human body after death.
As this practice is often documented at the same time with the existence of actual cemeteries, the hypotheses regarding the status of the individuals deposited in the settlements are numerous. Setting aside some of the exceptional findings – such as A and B grave circles from Mycenae, which prove the special social position of the buried individuals – the human bones found in domestic context were most of the times considered to be the result of human sacrifices or burials of persons of special status: slaves, war prisoners, heretics, pariahs, convicts, etc. On the other hand, we need to take into account the ethnographic sources indicating that human societies practised numerous and complex funerary rituals, some of them involving manipulations and treatments of the body starting from the time of death until final deposition.
In this context, we can ponder upon the nature of the social and ritual mechanisms that led to the separation or dissolution of the usual limits between the living and the dead.
Within this problematic, our project sets out to draw up a list of the cases of burials in early Hallstattan settlements spread between the Balkans, Dnestr and Tisza Rivers, to analyze the respective inventory and the identified ritual gestures, compare them with similar situations from other areas and eras and confront them, in the end, with historical documentation.
SPACE AND AGE
Early Iron Age (ca. 1200/1100 – 800/700 BC) is characterized by the emergence and dissemination of iron metallurgy. This technology that was born in eastern Anatolia and neighbouring areas (Armenia and Cilicia) spread rapidly from the end of 2nd millennium BC, but especially during the so-called Dark Ages in Greece. This period was much tormented in the Aegean-Anatolian area, as the Sea People rose while the Hittite Empire and the Mycenaean civilization fell.
In the northern Balkans, at the end of the 2nd millennium and beginning of the 1st millennium BC, classic cultural manifestations of the Middle and Late Bronze Age (Monteoru, Noua, Coslogeni, Suciu de Sus, Žuto-Brdo–Gârla Mare, Cruceni-Belegiš, Zimnicea-Plovdiv etc.) come to an end and new ones take shape. Despite the emergence of the first iron artefacts, this is the peak of bronze metallurgy and of the deposition of bronze artefacts in ritual contexts.
The area we’ve selected for the study of this category of findings corresponds to the dissemination of several early Hallstattan archaeological cultures with grooved pottery (Bistreţ-Işalniţa, Gáva-Holidrady, Chişinău-Corlăteni etc.), but also with stamped and incised pottery (Pšeničevo, Babadag, Insula Banului, Gornea-Kalakača, Belozerka, Cozia, Saharna-Solonceni), which are a variation of the funerary ritual . Nevertheles, in the entire area, in various proportions, probably due to the level of the investigations in the settlements, intramuros graves were also found.
STATE OF RESEARCH
Though the first such finds were uncovered since the 50’s, an analysis thereof is rather new archaeological endeavour in southern and Eastern Europe. The known publications so far mostly approach individual finds (e.g. Gomolava, Babadag, Niculiţel, Jurilovca–Orgame, Svilengrad, Saharna, Pusztataskony etc.). Syntheses on this topic are scarce and incomplete regarding the number of finds, area and method of investigation . Therefore an interdisciplinary approach over an extended area of various contemporaneous cultural manifestations may lead to the formation of a solid documentary base for an objective interpretation of this funerary practice.
CATALOGUE OF THE FINDS
We have catalogued the finds in the area between the Balkans, Dnestr and Tisza from 53 EIA sites (broadly 12th c.-8th c. BC) with 226 contexts for human bones from at least 512 individuals.
From the 53 catalogued sites, most of them (cat. no. 1, 3-6, 10, 14, 19, 21-22, 28-30, 33-35, 37, 45-46, 51-53) were ascribed to Gáva culture, most of the information concerning burials in settlements coming from rather recent finds in the intra-Carpathian region, up to Tisza River. Other such finds are concentrated at the Lower Danube, mostly ascribed to Babadag culture (cat. no. 2, 7-9, 11-12, 16-17, 24, 27, 31, 36, 38, 41, 43); in our opinion, the site at Tămăoani can be ascribed to Belozerka culture (cat. no. 48). The finds from Upper and Middle Dnestr were ascribed both to Saharna-Solonceni culture (cat. no. 15, 39-40) and Černoles culture (cat. no. 20, 23, 50); the finds at Ostrovul Corbului, Gomolava and Novi Sad were included in the areal of Kalakača culture, and the finds from Sava, Karanovo and Svilengrad are probably part of Pšeničevo culture. A special place among these finds is held by the settlement from Tărtăria, characterized by Basarabi-style decorated pottery.
Most human bones contexts in settlements were found in the area of Saharna-Solonceni culture, where the site at Hligeni alone provides 86 such contexts. However, this site can now be deemed an exception. More homogenous distribution is encountered at the Lower Danube in the sites ascribed to Babadag culture and in the intra-Carpathian region (Graphic 2).
As one would expect, our knowledge is growing continuously, triggered by new archaeological research, the progress of interdisciplinary investigations of archaeological science, and the diversification of theoretical approaches interpreting material culture from an anthropological perspective. The speed of these accumulations is increasing rapidly, while the number of studies and the variety and complexity of the themes is also continuously growing. That is why the periodic organization of conferences on welldefined themes and the publication of the respective volumes are absolutely necessary, not only in order to be able to integrate the new data into the broader picture, but also for the redefinition of the state of research within certain working areas and to show the experimental investigation of new research directions.
The present volume is the outcome of a conference with the same title organized at Tulcea, Romania, between the 10th and the 13th of November 2017, dedicated to the memory of Professor Alexandru Vulpe. Four prestigious institutions, two from Romania (the Gavrilă Simion Eco-Museum Research Institute, Tulcea and the Vasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest) and two from Germany (the Institut für und Frühgeschichte und Vorderasiatische Archäologie, Heidelberg and the Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Eurasien Abteilung, Berlin), with the generous support of the Mayor’s Office in Tulcea, managed to bring together over 50 scholars, most of them friends, colleagues, collaborators, students or simply acquaintances of Professor Vulpe. The intention of the organizers was to provide a suitable environment for sharing opinions and experience, and for an open and positive discussion, to recognize the current state of research on the topic, and to establish stronger connections for future collaboration in this field.
Contacts among human communities from various cultural areas, the circulation of people, ideas and objects, or the identification of the main communication routes as well as their role in shaping prehistoric societies are likely to remain forever topics of intense discussion within archaeology. The relations between the Carpathian-Balkan area and the Aegean during the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age was one of the main themes of study for Alexandru Vulpe. As a supporter of the idea of Ex oriente lux, Vulpe always argued for the major role played by the Helladic civilization in the cultural development of the Carpathian Balkan area. The lectures delivered at the Tulcea conference and the papers published in the present volume highlight once again the complexity of these connections and the multitude of perspectives revealed when approaching such a theme.
Although the title of the volume indicates the main geographic areas in question, contributions from other cultural areas (i.e. Central Europe, the Middle Danube, Northern Pontic area, etc.), whose societies were in close contact with those of the Balkans, were also welcome. The four sections grouping the studies in the volume had not been established from the very beginning; they are the result of the subjects approached by the authors. Reading the papers attentively, one notices the diversity of the subjects and approaches and, in most cases, the novelty of the ideas expressed. We hope that the publication will provide research with a reference volume, opening new perspectives on the matters discussed. The present work is the result of the common effort of all authors, spanning a period of over three years. We wish to thank all contributors for their promptness and seriousness in answering our invitation to the volume, as well as for the openness and patience showed during the entire editing process. We are very much indebted to the Mayor’s Office of the community of Tulcea for the financial help and for the hospitality provided to the participants of the conference. Special thanks go to Douglas Fear (Heidelberg) for the careful language editing of the contributions to this volume.
These daggers are considered a creation of the Bilozerka culture, being dated loosely to the entire evolution of this culture (12th – 10thcenturies BC). The14C dating from the context excavated at Vânători (RoAMS-2130.46: 2791±33), as well as the association of the mould from the Lower Dniepr with late items, attributed by Vadim Bočkarev especially to the Zavadovka cultural group, could indicate for the Kardašinka type daggers a chronological framework situated during the late phase of the Bilozerka culture.
The area around Babadag Lake undoubtedly offered a favourable environment to human communities from the beginning of the first millennium BC. On a surface of approximately 200 km2, no fewer than nine settlements characterised by Babadag type pottery were identified. From a chronological point of view, these sites cover the 10th-9th centuries BC. The only site with an existence covering this entire period is the settlement from Babadag–Cetăţuie. A complex stratigraphy with over 2 m of archaeological depositions was identified here, as well as the only ample fortification works. Such investments necessitated, without doubt, coordination as well as an important mobilisation of the entire community. The unique character of the site from Babadag proves its importance in the studied area, situation indicating the probability of its functioning as a centre around which the other settlements were founded and to which the exploitation of this territory can be connected for approximately two centuries.
This paper analyzes the artifacts made of stone (knapped and polished) and hard animal materials discovered at Garvăn–Mlăjitul Florilor site , aiming to improve our understanding of the artifacts’ operational process, from raw material block to discarded item: raw material, typology, technological and functional observations.
The fortification walls are of irregular shape, almost trapezoidal. The northern and western sectors were protected by two vallums / wooden walls with adjacent ditches, while the southern and western sectors coincide with the steep slope of the promontory and were probably consolidated with a simple palisade or a wooden wall. The land and air view distinguish at least three access areas – one in the north, one in the north-east corner and one on the western side.
The two research campaigns aimed to obtain stratigraphic data from the defensive system and the enclosed are. Unfortunately, the data was only succinctly published, on various occasions. The researchers considered that the earliest inhabitation dated to the end of the Bronze Age (Coslogeni culture) and Early Iron Age (Babadag culture), when Vallum I was thought to have been erected. The second inhabitation layer consists of numerous pits and dwellings with hand-made pottery and a large number of Greek pottery that could be dated to the 6th-5th centuries B.C.
After processing the entire inventory preserved from the archaeological campaign at the site, and after studying the research documentation, we were able to provide a new interpretation of the finds at Beidaud. This paper refers strictly to the finds from the early inhabitation period. Though published on several occasions, the research undergone so far at Beidaud-Calebair still raises several questions regarding the early inhabitation at the site. Research notes are rather succint and part of the layouts have been either lost or never drawn. Such deficiencies render difficult the reconstituion of the contexts and, implicitly, the establishment of a clear inhabitation timeline. Under these circumstancs, we could only use the typological method.
Thus, in our opinion, it is rather uncertain that inhabitation at the site began at the end of the Bronze Age, in a chronological horizon contemporaneous with Noua-Coslogeni cultures. As mentioned above, the pottery ascribed to this level (though some analogies can be identified in the Babadag culture) was found in uncertain contexts, often mixed with pottery specific to the Iron Age. The same enygma floats around the context of the bronze dagger, which, in our opinion, is an isolated find.
Most likely, inhabitation at the site started the Babadag culture, in the 10th-9th centuries B.C. Despite the insufficient documentation, the inhabitation seems to be specific to the Babadag culture, as the research unearthed mainly pits and dwellings dug in the ground. As the investigated area is rather small, we cannot estimate the inhabited surface. However, considering the data on Babadag culture sites, inhabited areas are usually large. Therefore it probably expanded beyond the fortified enclosure, which, in our opinion, dates to a later period.
The existence of such ceramic styles is not unique; on the contrary, there is a situation frequently found in the European archaeology and beyond. In the Carpathian-Danube area this horizon with stamped pottery partially coexists with a horizon characterised by channelled pottery (of Belegiš II-Lăpuş II-Gáva tradition), spread mainly in the intra-Carpathian area, but also found outside this area, both being replaced by the Basarabi style (Hänsel 1976; Gumă 1993; László 1994; Leviţki 1994a). In our opinion, the existence of these pottery styles on vast areas during the same chronological framework could represent a proof of networks on long distances, through which were transmitted the pottery-making tradition as well as other aspects of material and spiritual life.
while the secondary burials most likely belong to the middle period of the Bronze Age, some can probably be attributed to the Mnogovalikovaja culture (end of the 3rd mill.-early 2nd mill. BC).