Emotional
interdependence—here defined as partners’ emotions being linked to each other
across time—is often considered a key characteristic of healthy romantic
relationships. But is this actually the case? We conducted an
experience-sampling study with 50 couples indicating their feelings 10 times a
day for 7 days and modeled emotional interdependence for each couple separately
taking a dyadographic approach.
The majority of couples (64%) did not
demonstrate strong signs of emotional interdependence, and couples that did,
showed great inter-dyad differences in their specific patterns. Individuals
from emotionally more interdependent couples reported higher individual
well-being than individuals from more independent couples in terms of life
satisfaction but not depression. Relational well-being was not (relationship
satisfaction) or even negatively (empathic concern) related to the degree of
emotional interdependence. Especially driving the emotions of the partner
(i.e., sender effects) accounted for these associations, opposed to following
the emotions of the partner (i.e., receiver effects).
Additionally, assessing
emotional interdependence for positive and negative emotions separately
elucidated that primarily emotional interdependence for positive emotions
predicted more self-reported life satisfaction and less empathic concern.
These
findings highlight the existence of large inter-dyad differences, explore
relationships between emotional interdependence and key well-being variables,
and demonstrate differential correlates for sending and receiving emotions.
Below: Interpersonal emotion dynamics
presented as a network. The
four nodes represent positive (PE) and negative emotions (NE) of both partners.
The arrows represent slopes, and thus the effects of emotions at time t-1 on
emotions at time t. Solid
arrows correspond to slopes for cross-partner connections, and thus partner
effects, and dashed arrows to within-partner connections or actor effects.
Below: Percentages of interdependent couples that evidenced specific cross-partner connections
Faculty of
Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Faculty of Psychology and Educational
Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Edited by: Vivian Zayas, Cornell University,
USA
Reviewed by: Jiyoung Park, University of
Massachusetts Amherst, USA; Emre Selcuk, Middle East Technical University,
Turkey