Julia Rhyder
I am Assistant Professor of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at Harvard University. My first book, "Centralizing the Cult: The Holiness Legislation in Leviticus 17–26" (FAT 134; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019) was the joint winner of the 2021 Manfred Lautenschlaeger Award for Theological Promise. Presenting my doctoral research (2018, Université de Lausanne), "Centralizing the Cult" shows how Leviticus 17–26 use ritual legislation to make a new, and distinctive, case as to why the Israelites must defer to a central sanctuary, standardized ritual processes, and a hegemonic priesthood. It further argues that this discourse of centralization reflects historical challenges that faced the priests in Jerusalem during the Persian period: notably, the loss of a royal sponsor, the need to mobilize socioeconomic resources and to negotiate with the sanctuary at Mount Gerizim and with a growing diaspora.
I have since co-edited several books, including Text and Ritual in the Pentateuch: A Systematic and Comparative Approach (Penn State University Press, 2021), Authorship and the Hebrew Bible (Mohr Siebeck, 2022), and Collective Violence and Memory in the Ancient Mediterranean (Brill 2023). In 2021, I was honored with the David Noel Freedman Award for Excellence and Creativity in Hebrew Bible Scholarship for my work on the pig prohibition in ancient Judaism.
I am currently completing a monograph entitled Celebrating War: Festivals and War Commemoration in the Hebrew Bible, in which I present a new history of how war shaped Israelite religion from the oldest biblical traditions to the Second Temple era. I am also writing a commentary on Leviticus for the Hermeneia series (Fortress Press).
Address: Harvard University
6 Divinity Avenue
Cambridge MA 02138
I have since co-edited several books, including Text and Ritual in the Pentateuch: A Systematic and Comparative Approach (Penn State University Press, 2021), Authorship and the Hebrew Bible (Mohr Siebeck, 2022), and Collective Violence and Memory in the Ancient Mediterranean (Brill 2023). In 2021, I was honored with the David Noel Freedman Award for Excellence and Creativity in Hebrew Bible Scholarship for my work on the pig prohibition in ancient Judaism.
I am currently completing a monograph entitled Celebrating War: Festivals and War Commemoration in the Hebrew Bible, in which I present a new history of how war shaped Israelite religion from the oldest biblical traditions to the Second Temple era. I am also writing a commentary on Leviticus for the Hermeneia series (Fortress Press).
Address: Harvard University
6 Divinity Avenue
Cambridge MA 02138
less
InterestsView All (15)
Uploads
Monographs by Julia Rhyder
Vetus Testamentum, 72, no. 2 (2022): 348–350.
https://brill.com/view/journals/vt/72/2/article-p348_13.xml
Review of Biblical Literature (05/2022):
https://www.sblcentral.org/API/Reviews/13524_72038.pdf
Review of Biblical Literature (03/2022):
https://www.sblcentral.org/home/bookDetails/13524
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 45, no. 5 (Book List 2021) :
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1177/030908922110017
Rivista Biblica Italiana 69, no. 2 (2021), 277–82
https://www.academia.edu/77359238/Recensioni_03_Bianchi_J_Rhyder_Centralizing_the_Cult_The_Holiness_Legislation_in_Leviticus_17_26_FAT_134_Mohr_Siebeck_T%C3%BCbingen_2019_
Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 83, no. 1 (2021): 131–33.
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/781558
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 133, no. 2 (2021): 288–89.
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1515/zaw-2021-2007
AJS Review, 44, no. 2 (2020): 414–16.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0364009420000148
Old Testament Abstracts, 43 (2020): 885–86.
Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtgeschichte 26 (2020): 321–24.
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.13173/zeitaltobiblrech.26.2020.0321
This work provides new insights into the relationship between the Holiness legislation in Leviticus 17–26 and processes of cultic centralization in the Persian period. The author departs from the classical theory that Leviticus 17–26 merely presume, with minor modifications, a concept of centralization articulated in Deuteronomy. She shows how Leviticus 17–26 use ritual legislation to make a new, and distinctive case as to why the Israelites must defer to a central sanctuary, standardized ritual processes, and a hegemonic priesthood. This discourse of centralization reflects the historical challenges that faced priests in Jerusalem during the Persian era: in particular, the need to compensate for the loss of a royal sponsor, to pool communal resources in order to meet socio-economic pressures, and to find new means of negotiating with the sanctuary at Mount Gerizim and with a growing diaspora.
https://books.google.ch/books?id=h_u1DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Edited Volumes by Julia Rhyder
This special issue explores the two edicts issued by the Seleucid king Antiochus III for Jerusalem that are preserved in Josephus’s Antiquities book 12 (§§ 138–46), and reassesses their significance for understanding Jewish history in the time of Seleucid hegemony. Across its five articles, the volume aims to map the main topics arising from the edicts that require attention, with a particular focus on the benefit, importance, and ongoing challenges of a comparative approach to this distinctive dossier of evidence. Such an approach, we argue, is essential for contextualizing Josephus’s dossier within Seleucid administrative practices toward local communities, which in turn advances our understanding of the place of Jerusalem, the Jews, and Judaism in the broader Hellenistic world.
The special issue originated at a conference held at Harvard University on April 20–21, 2023, which was sponsored by the Center for Jewish Studies and Ancient Studies at Harvard. Particular thanks are due to Osnat Aharoni, Maura Gould, and Rachel Rockenmacher, who helped organize the event, and to Sylvie Honigman, who participated in the conference and contributed to the discussion. Finally, we are grateful to the editors of the Journal of Ancient Judaism, Angela Kim Harkins and Jonathan Klawans, for their dedication in bringing this issue to fruition.
Reviewed in:
Catholic Biblical Quarterly 86 (2024): 400–3.
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1353/cbq.2024.a924388
Review of Biblical Literature (03/2024)
https://www.sblcentral.org/home/bookDetails/1002218?search=Rhyder&type=0
Svensk exegetisk årsbok, 88, no. 1 (2023): 225–77.
https://publicera.kb.se/sea/article/view/12895
Theologische Literaturzeitung, 148 (2023): 818–19
https://www.thlz.com/artikel/23769/?recherche=%26o%3Da%26autor%3Drhyder%26s%3D1%23r2
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 135, no. 1 (2023): 130–31
https://www-degruyter-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/document/doi/10.1515/zaw-2023-1007/html
Reviewed in:
Review of Biblical Literature, (05/2024)
https://www.sblcentral.org/home/bookDetails/1000888
Vetus Testamentum 72, no. 1 (2022): 168–70
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-00001147-03
Themelios 42, no 2 (2022): 391–92
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/review/text-and-ritual-in-the-pentateuch-a-systematic-and-comparative-approach/
Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS) 59, no. 2 (2022): 313–19,
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/auss/vol59/iss2/21
Journal Articles by Julia Rhyder
This article provides an introduction to the special issue of the Journal of Ancient Judaism entitled "Antiochus III’s Decrees for Jerusalem: Between Imperial Stress and Local Agency." After introducing the decrees, the introduction identifies the main focus of the special issue as the comparative study of these distinctive documents--an approach that was spearheaded by Elias J. Bickerman, but which must now reckon with various recent discoveries that expand the potential pool of comparison. After summarizing the five articles and the comparative approaches they each adopt, the article concludes by identifying the main results of the volume and future directions of study.
This article analyzes the proclamation of Antiochus III concerning the temple and city of Jerusalem, quoted in Ant. 12.145–46, in light of three sets of evidence: Greek comparative materials from the broader Mediterranean world; biblical and Second Temple writings; and archaeological remains from Hellenistic Jerusalem, especially those that attest to the presence of non-sacrificial animals in the city. The evidence suggests that Ant. 12.145–46 preserves traces of an authentic proclamation, written in the style of a Greek ritual norm and probably with royal backing. We should not conclude from this, however, that the proclamation reflects the reality of how all Jews in Jerusalem conceptualized the purity of the temple and their obligations when butchering and tanning their animals within the city. I rather argue for a more complex interpretive approach that views royal edicts as fueling local debates surrounding temple purity, the sacred economy, and priestly prerogatives in Hellenistic Jerusalem.
Highly Commended – 2023 Sophie Coe Prize in Food History.
Please email me for a full PDF ([email protected]).
Pig avoidance is among the most famous and well studied of the customs described in the Hebrew Bible. Commonly the ban on consuming pork has been considered evidence of the importance of dietary prohibitions in establishing boundaries between Israel and neighboring groups. I argue, however, that differentiation from other ethnicities by means of diet was not the only function that the pig prohibition served in ancient Israel. In fact, the relevant biblical texts are as much, if not more, concerned with employing the pig prohibition as a device by which cultic norms as well as dietary customs within the Israelite community were standardized. With the accounts of the Maccabean rebellion in the second century BCE, the pig assumes a greater signi cance in identity formation, but even in these traditions, the relationship between pig avoidance and ethnic boundaries is more complex than is o en assumed. Detailed analysis of the references to the pig in Lev 11, Deut 14, Isa 56-66, and 1 and 2 Maccabees, along with the study of archaeological evidence and comparative materials from the ancient Near East and ancient Mediterranean more broadly, reveals the multiplicity of factors that shaped the emergence of pig avoidance as a central custom in ancient Judaism.
The temple vision of Ezek 40-48 devotes considerable attention to measuring and describing the various gates and entrances of the temple compound. Previous studies have tended to focus on the defensive function of the gates. However, these structures not only bar entry but also facilitate access to the temple under certain ritualized conditions. Offering a close reading of the references to the gates in Ezek 40-48, in which particular roles and activities are associated with specific entrances, this article shows how these architectural features of the temple map a differential system in which social hierarchies are organized according to the level, direction, and timing of access ascribed to different groups and individuals within the temple compound. The article concludes by exploring the significance of the gates for how we understand the literary genre of the temple vision of Ezek 40-48, and in particular its nature as a social utopia.
Full text available at https://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685179-12341425
Vetus Testamentum, 72, no. 2 (2022): 348–350.
https://brill.com/view/journals/vt/72/2/article-p348_13.xml
Review of Biblical Literature (05/2022):
https://www.sblcentral.org/API/Reviews/13524_72038.pdf
Review of Biblical Literature (03/2022):
https://www.sblcentral.org/home/bookDetails/13524
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 45, no. 5 (Book List 2021) :
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1177/030908922110017
Rivista Biblica Italiana 69, no. 2 (2021), 277–82
https://www.academia.edu/77359238/Recensioni_03_Bianchi_J_Rhyder_Centralizing_the_Cult_The_Holiness_Legislation_in_Leviticus_17_26_FAT_134_Mohr_Siebeck_T%C3%BCbingen_2019_
Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 83, no. 1 (2021): 131–33.
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/781558
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 133, no. 2 (2021): 288–89.
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1515/zaw-2021-2007
AJS Review, 44, no. 2 (2020): 414–16.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0364009420000148
Old Testament Abstracts, 43 (2020): 885–86.
Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtgeschichte 26 (2020): 321–24.
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.13173/zeitaltobiblrech.26.2020.0321
This work provides new insights into the relationship between the Holiness legislation in Leviticus 17–26 and processes of cultic centralization in the Persian period. The author departs from the classical theory that Leviticus 17–26 merely presume, with minor modifications, a concept of centralization articulated in Deuteronomy. She shows how Leviticus 17–26 use ritual legislation to make a new, and distinctive case as to why the Israelites must defer to a central sanctuary, standardized ritual processes, and a hegemonic priesthood. This discourse of centralization reflects the historical challenges that faced priests in Jerusalem during the Persian era: in particular, the need to compensate for the loss of a royal sponsor, to pool communal resources in order to meet socio-economic pressures, and to find new means of negotiating with the sanctuary at Mount Gerizim and with a growing diaspora.
https://books.google.ch/books?id=h_u1DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
This special issue explores the two edicts issued by the Seleucid king Antiochus III for Jerusalem that are preserved in Josephus’s Antiquities book 12 (§§ 138–46), and reassesses their significance for understanding Jewish history in the time of Seleucid hegemony. Across its five articles, the volume aims to map the main topics arising from the edicts that require attention, with a particular focus on the benefit, importance, and ongoing challenges of a comparative approach to this distinctive dossier of evidence. Such an approach, we argue, is essential for contextualizing Josephus’s dossier within Seleucid administrative practices toward local communities, which in turn advances our understanding of the place of Jerusalem, the Jews, and Judaism in the broader Hellenistic world.
The special issue originated at a conference held at Harvard University on April 20–21, 2023, which was sponsored by the Center for Jewish Studies and Ancient Studies at Harvard. Particular thanks are due to Osnat Aharoni, Maura Gould, and Rachel Rockenmacher, who helped organize the event, and to Sylvie Honigman, who participated in the conference and contributed to the discussion. Finally, we are grateful to the editors of the Journal of Ancient Judaism, Angela Kim Harkins and Jonathan Klawans, for their dedication in bringing this issue to fruition.
Reviewed in:
Catholic Biblical Quarterly 86 (2024): 400–3.
https://doi-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1353/cbq.2024.a924388
Review of Biblical Literature (03/2024)
https://www.sblcentral.org/home/bookDetails/1002218?search=Rhyder&type=0
Svensk exegetisk årsbok, 88, no. 1 (2023): 225–77.
https://publicera.kb.se/sea/article/view/12895
Theologische Literaturzeitung, 148 (2023): 818–19
https://www.thlz.com/artikel/23769/?recherche=%26o%3Da%26autor%3Drhyder%26s%3D1%23r2
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 135, no. 1 (2023): 130–31
https://www-degruyter-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/document/doi/10.1515/zaw-2023-1007/html
Reviewed in:
Review of Biblical Literature, (05/2024)
https://www.sblcentral.org/home/bookDetails/1000888
Vetus Testamentum 72, no. 1 (2022): 168–70
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-00001147-03
Themelios 42, no 2 (2022): 391–92
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/review/text-and-ritual-in-the-pentateuch-a-systematic-and-comparative-approach/
Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS) 59, no. 2 (2022): 313–19,
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/auss/vol59/iss2/21
This article provides an introduction to the special issue of the Journal of Ancient Judaism entitled "Antiochus III’s Decrees for Jerusalem: Between Imperial Stress and Local Agency." After introducing the decrees, the introduction identifies the main focus of the special issue as the comparative study of these distinctive documents--an approach that was spearheaded by Elias J. Bickerman, but which must now reckon with various recent discoveries that expand the potential pool of comparison. After summarizing the five articles and the comparative approaches they each adopt, the article concludes by identifying the main results of the volume and future directions of study.
This article analyzes the proclamation of Antiochus III concerning the temple and city of Jerusalem, quoted in Ant. 12.145–46, in light of three sets of evidence: Greek comparative materials from the broader Mediterranean world; biblical and Second Temple writings; and archaeological remains from Hellenistic Jerusalem, especially those that attest to the presence of non-sacrificial animals in the city. The evidence suggests that Ant. 12.145–46 preserves traces of an authentic proclamation, written in the style of a Greek ritual norm and probably with royal backing. We should not conclude from this, however, that the proclamation reflects the reality of how all Jews in Jerusalem conceptualized the purity of the temple and their obligations when butchering and tanning their animals within the city. I rather argue for a more complex interpretive approach that views royal edicts as fueling local debates surrounding temple purity, the sacred economy, and priestly prerogatives in Hellenistic Jerusalem.
Highly Commended – 2023 Sophie Coe Prize in Food History.
Please email me for a full PDF ([email protected]).
Pig avoidance is among the most famous and well studied of the customs described in the Hebrew Bible. Commonly the ban on consuming pork has been considered evidence of the importance of dietary prohibitions in establishing boundaries between Israel and neighboring groups. I argue, however, that differentiation from other ethnicities by means of diet was not the only function that the pig prohibition served in ancient Israel. In fact, the relevant biblical texts are as much, if not more, concerned with employing the pig prohibition as a device by which cultic norms as well as dietary customs within the Israelite community were standardized. With the accounts of the Maccabean rebellion in the second century BCE, the pig assumes a greater signi cance in identity formation, but even in these traditions, the relationship between pig avoidance and ethnic boundaries is more complex than is o en assumed. Detailed analysis of the references to the pig in Lev 11, Deut 14, Isa 56-66, and 1 and 2 Maccabees, along with the study of archaeological evidence and comparative materials from the ancient Near East and ancient Mediterranean more broadly, reveals the multiplicity of factors that shaped the emergence of pig avoidance as a central custom in ancient Judaism.
The temple vision of Ezek 40-48 devotes considerable attention to measuring and describing the various gates and entrances of the temple compound. Previous studies have tended to focus on the defensive function of the gates. However, these structures not only bar entry but also facilitate access to the temple under certain ritualized conditions. Offering a close reading of the references to the gates in Ezek 40-48, in which particular roles and activities are associated with specific entrances, this article shows how these architectural features of the temple map a differential system in which social hierarchies are organized according to the level, direction, and timing of access ascribed to different groups and individuals within the temple compound. The article concludes by exploring the significance of the gates for how we understand the literary genre of the temple vision of Ezek 40-48, and in particular its nature as a social utopia.
Full text available at https://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685179-12341425
The sanctification of all Israel in Leviticus 17–26—expanding the obligation to be holy from the priests to a collective requirement for all Israelites—further elevates the priesthood to a hegemonic social position.
https://www.ancientjewreview.com/read/2022/8/9/creating-a-commentary
https://www.bibleodyssey.org/passages/related-articles/commemoration-of-war-in-early-jewish-festivals
Speakers include Sylvie Honigman (Tel Aviv University), Benedikt Eckhardt (University of Edinburgh), Paul Kosmin (Harvard University), Julia Rhyder (Harvard University), Rotem Avneri Meir (University of Helsinki/Harvard University), and Anathea Portier-Young (Duke Divinity School).
This event is co-sponsored by Ancient Studies at Harvard and the Center for Jewish Studies. Its results will be published in a special issue of the Journal of Ancient Judaism.
All are welcome to join us online! Please register at: https://unibas.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJIkf-CupjsiH9BMZGLfRLlS0u3zzwxGAmTb
Pig avoidance is among the most famous and well-studied of the customs described in the Hebrew Bible. Commonly this prohibition on consuming pig has been considered evidence of the importance of dietary prohibitions in establishing boundaries between Israel and neighbouring groups. However, this paper argues that differentiation from other ethnicities by means of diet was not the only function that the pig taboo served in ancient Israel. In fact, the relevant biblical texts are as much, if not more, concerned with employing the pig prohibition as a device by which cultic norms as well as dietary customs within the Israelite community were standardized. Within the accounts of the Maccabean rebellion in the second century BCE, the pig assumes a greater significance in identity formation, but even in these traditions, the relationship between pig avoidance and ethnic boundaries is more complex than is often assumed. Combining detailed analysis of the references to the pig in Lev 11, Deut 14, Isa 56–66, and 1 and 2 Maccabees with the study of material evidence and comparative materials from the ancient Mediterranean, this paper advances Hebrew Bible scholarship by revealing the multiplicity of factors that shaped the emergence of pig non-consumption as a central custom in ancient Judaism. Moreover, it underscores the benefits of scholars’ differentiating between the origins of biblical customs involving unclean animals and the uses of dietary norms in later periods. Their significance and meaning at each stage of Jewish history can thereby be appreciated more fully and subtly.
Course Description:
How did ancient people decide what to eat, and what not to eat? And why do the ancient texts of the Bible continue to shape the way many people think about diet and identity today? This course will explore the importance of diet in establishing social bonds and ethnic boundaries in the ancient Near East, as well as the role food played in mediating relationships with God, animals, and the environment, according to the Hebrew Bible (Jewish Tanakh/Christian Old Testament).
This course is highly interactive. We will visit the Boston Museum of Fine Arts to see how food featured as part of burial rituals in ancient Egypt; we will explore the archaeology of food and everyday life at the Harvard Museum of the Ancient Near East; and we will even try cooking some ancient recipes together. Students will also be introduced to anthropological approaches to food, diets, and commensality, and learn to reflect critically on how such theoretical lenses might be applied to the study of ancient dietary patterns, biblical interpretation, and contemporary dietary practice.
No prior knowledge of the Bible or ancient history required.
Course Description:
The Israelite deity, with an unpronounceable name, may seem to have no history, having simply existed from the beginning of time. Yet, closer examination of the biblical evidence reveals a complex story of how a deity associated with storms and warfare gradually emerged as the one God of Israel. This course analyzes key texts of the book of Psalms that, in extolling the qualities of the Israelite deity, reveal different aspects of his character: his nature as a storm god and warrior; his eventual preference for the city of Jerusalem; his adoption of the traits of a sun god, connected to the domains of law and justice; and his emergence as the head of the heavenly council and creator of the world.
The course presumes basic proficiency with Biblical Hebrew.