Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update scala-java-time-tzdb to 2.6.0 #1124

Merged

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates io.github.cquiroz:scala-java-time-tzdb from 2.5.0 to 2.6.0

πŸ“œ GitHub Release Notes - Changelog - Version Diff

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

πŸ” Files still referring to the old version number

The following files still refer to the old version number (2.5.0).
You might want to review and update them manually.

build.sbt
project/plugins.sbt
βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "io.github.cquiroz", artifactId = "scala-java-time-tzdb" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "io.github.cquiroz", artifactId = "scala-java-time-tzdb" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, version-scheme:always, old-version-remains, commit-count:1

@scala-steward scala-steward requested a review from a team as a code owner June 8, 2024 22:03
@fsvehla fsvehla merged commit df9c147 into zio:series/2.x Jun 13, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants