Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Channels should be sorted #369

Closed
dsuch opened this issue Feb 17, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Channels should be sorted #369

dsuch opened this issue Feb 17, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@dsuch
Copy link
Collaborator

dsuch commented Feb 17, 2015

As reported on the mailing list, channels are not sorted in any way and there can exist conflicts when matching pattern-based paths.

https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/zato-discuss/2015-February/000884.html

They should be sorted by their names so that users were able to influence the order by changing names without modifying paths.

@dsuch dsuch self-assigned this Feb 17, 2015
dsuch added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2015
dsuch added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2015
@dsuch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dsuch commented Feb 17, 2015

Done in 60c7780.

@dsuch dsuch closed this as completed Feb 17, 2015
dsuch added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2015
dsuch added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2015
dsuch added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2015
dsuch added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant