Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update FITSImageData.ipynb #1908

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Prateekgidolia
Copy link
Contributor

Set width in FITSProjection.

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Code passes flake8 checker
  • New features are documented, with docstrings and narrative docs
  • Adds a test for any bugs fixed. Adds tests for new features.

Set width in FITSProjection.
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"which took the same parameters as `ProjectionPlot` except the width, because `FITSProjection` and `FITSSlice` always make slices and projections of the width of the domain size, at the finest resolution available in the simulation, in a unit determined to be appropriate for the physical size of the dataset."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the text you deleted is fine here, but I also think that you could maybe add a quick example to this file of making the same projection with a different width, which would be clearer.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I added a quick example, set a new pull request.

@ngoldbaum
Copy link
Member

Closing this in favor of #1913, @jzuhone can you take a look at that one?

@Prateekgidolia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Prateekgidolia commented Jul 23, 2018 via email

@jzuhone jzuhone closed this Jul 26, 2018
@jzuhone
Copy link
Contributor

jzuhone commented Jul 26, 2018

Closed this in favor of PR #1913

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants