Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Add TPM as a method for calculating coverage #22

Closed
apcamargo opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[Suggestion] Add TPM as a method for calculating coverage #22

apcamargo opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@apcamargo
Copy link

Currently, CoverM offers the user to output contig and genome coverage in RPKM. This metric is cool because it corrects for both library size and contig/genome length.

TPM (transcripts per million) is another metric with the same positive aspects and has the advantage that the sum of all contigs/genomes must add to 1.000.000. More on this here. Nowadays, most RNA-Seq quantification software use TPM instead of RPKM.

A the advantage of TPM becomes clear when comparing the coverage between two libraries. If a contig/genome has a higher TPM in library A than in library B, you can infer that this contig/genome is more abundant in library A. If you observed the same with RPKM values, you wouldn't be able to reach the same conclusion, as the total RPKM varies between different libraries.

@wwood wwood closed this as completed in adb854f Sep 23, 2020
@wwood
Copy link
Owner

wwood commented Sep 23, 2020

I got there in the end.. thanks for the suggestion and useful link.

@apcamargo
Copy link
Author

That's awesome! Thanks, Ben

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants