Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Print parameters used in auto_levels_opt = 2 #2015

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

weiwangncar
Copy link
Collaborator

@weiwangncar weiwangncar commented Feb 26, 2024

TYPE: enhancement

KEYWORDS: auto_levels_opt, dzbot, dzstretch

SOURCE: internal

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:
Problem:
Lack of information in the standard output when running real.exe using auto_levels_opt = 2.

Solution:
Adds print for parameters used to define vertical levels.

LIST OF MODIFIED FILES:
M dyn_em/module_initialize_real.F

TESTS CONDUCTED:

  1. Now print like the following is added to output from running real.exe:
    p_top = 1000. Pa, dzbot = 30.0 m, dzstretch_s/u = 1.20 1.02
  2. The Jenkins tests are all passing.

RELEASE NOTE: This PR adds a print for parameters used when running real.exe using auto_levels_opt = 2 option, which is the default.

@weiwangncar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The regression test results:

Test Type              | Expected  | Received |  Failed
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = =
Number of Tests        : 23           24
Number of Builds       : 60           57
Number of Simulations  : 158           150        0
Number of Comparisons  : 95           86        0

Failed Simulations are: 
None
Which comparisons are not bit-for-bit: 
None

@weiwangncar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dudhia @kkeene44 Can you review this PR?

@weiwangncar weiwangncar merged commit 95eb02c into wrf-model:develop Feb 28, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants