Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix another typo #985

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2018
Merged

Fix another typo #985

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2018

Conversation

yujinqiu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #985 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #985   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.59%   75.59%           
=======================================
  Files         206      206           
  Lines        9462     9462           
=======================================
  Hits         7153     7153           
+ Misses       1646     1645    -1     
- Partials      663      664    +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
common/buf/buffer.go 86.2% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
proxy/context.go 83.33% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
common/buf/copy.go 68.62% <0%> (-7.85%) ⬇️
app/proxyman/mux/mux.go 56.76% <0%> (-2.63%) ⬇️
proxy/vmess/outbound/outbound.go 78.65% <0%> (-1.13%) ⬇️
proxy/shadowsocks/client.go 69.47% <0%> (-1.06%) ⬇️
transport/internet/kcp/connection.go 73.4% <0%> (+0.55%) ⬆️
transport/ray/direct.go 84.87% <0%> (+1.68%) ⬆️
transport/internet/kcp/listener.go 89% <0%> (+2%) ⬆️
common/buf/writer.go 72.52% <0%> (+2.19%) ⬆️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 30e99f7...eb38f48. Read the comment docs.

@DarienRaymond DarienRaymond merged commit 1dadd54 into v2ray:master Mar 24, 2018
xiocode pushed a commit to going/v2ray-core that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2022
* Fix some tests to PickPort correctly

* Add retry logic for two socks tests

Two socks tests listen for both TCP and UDP with same port number, in some cases the port is not available
Add retry logic for server core, start server core and client core separately
Extract a common method

* Add retry logic for two dokodemo tests

Two dokodemo tests listen for 5 ports, in some cases they are not available
Add retry logic for client core, start server and client separately
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants